THE QUALITATIVE EVIDENCES THAT UNITE TAMBAKAN AND PELAGA DIALECTS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jpbi.v1i1.3374Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan persamaan fonologis dan leksikal antara dialek Tambakan (DT) dengan dialek Pelaga (DP). Objek dari penenlitian ini adalah dialek Tambakan dan Pelaga. Tiga orang penutur dari masing-maasing dialek dipilih sebagai informan dalam penelitian ini. Penelitian ini membandingkan dua dialek, yaitu dialek Tambakan dan dIalek Pelaga. Data yang didapatkan dalam bentuk leksikon yang diidentifikasi menggunakan Daftar Kata Swadesh, Daftar Kata Budasi, dan Daftar Kata Holle yang dikumpulkan menggunakan teknik merekam, mendengarkan, dan mencatat. Dalam penelitian ini, sistem fonologi dari kedua dialek dideskripsikan terlebih dahulu. Hasil dari penelitian menunjukkan bahwa DT dan DP memiliki persamaan fonologis dan leksikon yang relatif banyak. Terdapat 38 fonem yang sama di posisi awal, tengah, dan akhir pada leksikon kedua dialek tersebut. Fonem yang sama tersebut meliputi: a) enam vokal yang sama: //, /i/, /u/, /e/, // dan /o/; b) lima diftong yang sama: /i/, /u/, //, //, dan /u/; c) dua vokal rangkap yang sama: // and //; d) sembilan belas konsonan yang sama: /b/, /t/, /d/, /g/, /ʔ/, /h/, //, /k/, /l/, /m/, /n/, /p/, /r/, /s/, /t/, /w/, /y, /ŋ/, dan /ñ/; e) enam konsonan kluster yang sama: /kl/, /bl/, /pl/, /tl/, /ml/, dan /kr/. Dari tiga Daftar Kata yang terdiri dari 1.716 leksikon, ditemukan bahwa terdapat 946 leksikon yang sama dan 495 leksikon yang serupa sebagai bukti-bukti kualitatif yang menyatukan kedua dialek tersebut.Kata Kunci : metode perbandingan, aspek fonologis, leksikon, dialek Tambakan, dialek Pelaga
This study aimed at describing the phonological and lexical similarities between Tambakan dialect (TD) and Pelaga dialect (PD). The objects of this study were Tambakan and Pelaga dialects. Three speakers from each dialect were chosen as the informants in this study. This study compared two dialects: Tambakan dialect and Pelaga dialect. The obtained data in the form of lexicons identified using Swadesh Wordlists, Budasi Wordlists, and Holle Wordlists were collected through recording, listening, and noting techniques. In this study, the phonological systems of both dialects were firstly described. The results of the study show that TD and PD actually have relatively many phonological and lexical similarities. The study has found that there are 38 same phonemes in the initial, middle and final positions of the words. Those phonemes were: a) six the same vowels phonemes: //, /i/, /u/, /e/, // and /o/; b) five the same diphthongs: /i/, /u/, //, //, and /u/; c) two the same geminate vowels: // and //; d) nineteen the same consonants: /b/, /t/, /d/, /g/, /ʔ/, /h/, //, /k/, /l/, /m/, /n/, /p/, /r/, /s/, /t/, /w/, /y, /ŋ/, and /ñ/; and e) six same consonant clusters: /kl/, /bl/, /pl/, /tl/, /ml/, and /kr/. From the three wordlists containing 1,716 lexicons, it has been found that there are 760 exactly the same lexicons and 546 similar lexicons as the qualitative evidences that unite those two dialects.
keyword : comparative method, phonological aspect, lexicon, Tambakan dialect, Pelaga dialect
Published
2014-07-14
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Authors who publish with the Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Undiksha agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)
