WRITTEN CORRECTIVE FEEDBACKS USED BY ENGLISH TEACHERS OF THE STATE SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS IN EFL WRITING CLASSES: A STUDY ON TEACHERS AND STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS ON THE MOST EFFECTIVE FEEDBACKS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jpbi.v1i1.3950Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk (1) mengidentifikasi jenis umpan balik korektif tertulis digunakan oleh guru-guru di tiga SMA Negeri di Singaraja di kelas menulis, (2) mencari tahu apa yang guru pikir sebagai umpan balik yang paling efektif di antara jenis umpan balik korektif tertulis, dan (3) mencari tahu apa yang siswa pikir sebagai umpan balik korektif tertulis yang paling menguntungkan untuk peningkatan tulisan mereka. Penelitian ini melibatkan enam guru bahasa Inggris dan tiga belas anak kelas sebelas dari tiga SMA Negeri di Singaraja. Data penelitian ini berupa data pengamatan dan data wawancara. Data pengamatan dikumpulkan melalui pengamatan kelas dan tulisan-tulisan mahasiswa yang telah diperbaiki namun belum dikembalikan oleh guru, sedangkan data wawancara dikumpulkan melalui wawancara guru dan siswa. Semua data dianalisa secara deskriptif. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa umpan balik terintegrasi tampak mendominasi penggunaan. Para guru dan siswa memiliki persepsi yang beraneka mengenai masukan yang paling efektif dan menguntungkan, yang mencerminkan beberapa korespondensi dan perbedaan. Umpan balik secara lisan yang ditemukan dalam penggunaannya adalah jenis umpan balik formatif. Saran-saran diberikan terutama untuk guru bahasa Inggris dan Lembaga Kurikulum Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Guru.Kata Kunci : Umpan balik korektif, tulisan EFL, umpan balik efektif
This study aimed at (1) identifying the types of written corrective feedback employed by the teachers in three state senior high schools in Singaraja in writing classes, (2) finding out what the teachers think as the most effective feedback among the types of written corrective feedback, and (3) finding out what the students think as the most beneficial written corrective feedback for their writing improvement. The study involved six English teachers and thirteen eleven graders from three state senior high schools in Singaraja. The data were in the forms of observation data and interview data. The observation data were collected through classroom observations and student writings which had been corrected but not returned yet by the teachers, while the interview data were collected through teacher and student interviews. The data were all analyzed descriptively. The results indicated that the integrated feedbacks seemed dominated the uses of written corrective feedback. The teachers and the students had varied perceptions on the most effective and beneficial feedbacks, which reflect some correspondences and discrepancies. Oral feedback found in use was the formative feedback. Suggestions were mainly provided for English teachers and the Curriculum of Teacher Training and Education Institution.
keyword : Corrective feedback, EFL writing, effective feedback
Published
2014-08-07
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Authors who publish with the Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Undiksha agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)