An Analysis of Grammatical Errors Committed by Students in Writing Argumentative Paragraph

Authors

  • Ni Putu Candra Widiya Lestari Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
  • Dewa Putu Ramendra Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
  • Ida Ayu Made Istri Utami Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23887/jpbi.v11i3.46341

Keywords:

Grammatical Errors, Argumentative Paragraph, Sources of Errors

Abstract

Writing skills are very important for students to master to help them prepare for their future. However, grammar is one of the obstacles for students in writing English. This research aims to analyze grammatical errors made by students in writing argumentative paragraphs and to analyze the sources of these errors. Second semester English Language Education students were chosen as the subjects of this research. Furthermore, in analyzing the data, this research applies a combination of descriptive qualitative and descriptive quantitative methods. Apart from that, data was collected through collecting documents from the end-of-semester tests. The data analysis procedure consists of three specific steps, namely data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions/verification. The results of the research found that students made 11 types of errors with a total of 165 errors. Most of them made omission of article errors with 39 (23.63%) errors, then simple addition 33 (20%) errors, alternating form 27 (16.36%) errors, omission of to be 21 (12.72%) errors, then omission of preposition 17 (10.30%) errors, omission of plural –s with 15 (9.09%) errors, misordering 6 (3.63%) errors, regularization 3 (1.81%) errors, and finally double marking and archi-form each 1 ( 0.60%) error. In addition, sources of errors were found in four types: interlingual transfer, intralingual transfer, context of learning, and communication strategy. The majority of students made mistakes due to intralingual transfer, 119 (72.12%) errors were found, followed by interlingual transfer 41 (24.84%) errors, communication strategy 3 (1.81%), and context of learning 2 (1.21%) errors.

References

Amalia, H., Abdullah, F., & Fatimah, A. S. (2021). Teaching writing to junior high school students: A focus on challenges and solutions. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(2), 794–810. https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.904066.

Atmaca, Ÿ. (2016). Error Analysis of Turkish EFL Learners: A Case Study. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 232, 234–241. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.007.

Bakoko, R., & Pratiwi, D. I. (2021). The application of cooperative principle in learning spoken English. International Journal of Education and Language, 1(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.5349/ijel.v1i01.

Baran-Łucarz, M. (2019). Formative assessment in the English as a foreign language classroom in secondary schools in Poland. Report on a mixed-method study. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 10(2), 309–327. https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs20192.309.327.

Bungsu, O. P., Daud, A., & Masyhur. (2021). An Analysis on Students’ Grammatical Errors in Writing Degrees of Comparison. Indonesian Journal of Economics, Socal, and Humanities, 3(1), 55–63. https://doi.org/10.31258/ijesh.3.1.55-63.

Cahyono, B. Y., & Rahayu, T. (2020). Efl students’ motivation in writing, writing proficiency, and gender. Teflin Journal, 31(2), 162–180. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v31i2/162-180.

Castillo-Cuesta, L. (2022). Using Genially Games for Enhancing EFL Reading and Writing Skills in Online Education. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(1), 340–354. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.1.19.

Creswell, J. H., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (Fifth Edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

Debata, P. K. (2013). The importance of grammar in English language teaching-A reassessment. Language in India, 13(5), 482–486. https://5y1.org/download/98f96188eebdddcec8e41f75f2dc0c87.pdf.

Dewi, F. S., & Huda, M. C. (2020). An Analysis of Students ’ Errors in Writing Descriptive Text at Tenth Grade of SMAN 1 Tulungagung in Academic Year 2018 / 2019. A Journal of English Language Teaching, Linguistics, and Literature, 3(1), 11–20. https://www.academia.edu/download/87227928/1544-3105-2-PB.pdf.

Fatimah, A. S., & Santiana, S. (2017). Teaching in 21St Century: Students-Teachers’ Perceptions of Technology Use in the Classroom. Script Journal: Journal of Linguistic and English Teaching, 2(2), 125. https://doi.org/10.24903/sj.v2i2.132.

Gilakjani, A. P., Sabouri, N. B., Pourhosein, A., & Branch, L. (2016). Learners’ Listening Comprehension Difficulties in English Language Learning: A Literature Review. English Language Teaching, 9(6), 123–133. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n6p123.

Gottardo, A., Mirza, A., Koh, P. W., Ferreira, A., & Javier, C. (2018). Unpacking listening comprehension: the role of vocabulary, morphological awareness, and syntactic knowledge in reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 31(8), 1741–1764. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9736-2.

Grabe, W. (2014). Key Issues in L2 Reading Development. 4th CELC Symposium Proceedings, 8–18. https://blog.nus.edu.sg/celcblog/files/2021/12.

Herder, A., Berenst, J., de Glopper, K., & Koole, T. (2018). Reflective practices in collaborative writing of primary school students. International Journal of Educational Research, 90(February), 160–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2018.06.004.

Ibrahim, R., Leng, N. S., Yusoff, R. C. M., Samy, G. N., Masrom, S., & Rizman, Z. I. (2018). E-learning acceptance based on technology acceptance model (TAM). Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences, 9(4S), 871. https://doi.org/10.4314/jfas.v9i4s.50.

Islamiyah, M., & Fajri, M. S. Al. (2019). Error Analysis and Its Implications for the English Classroom : A Case Study of an Advanced English Learner. Indonesian EFL Journal: Journal of ELT, Linguistics, and Literature, 5(2), 1–13. http://ejournal.kopertais4.or.id/mataraman/index.php/efi/article/view/3736.

Kharmilah, P., & Narius, D. (2019). Error Analysis in Writing Discussion Text Made by Students at English Department of Universitas Negeri Padang. Journal of English Language Teaching, 8(3), 327–335. https://doi.org/10.24036/jelt.v8i3.105228.

Kumala, B. P., Aimah, S., & Ifadah, M. (2018). An analysis of grammatical errors on students’ writing. 2nd English Language and Literature International Conference (ELLiC), 2, 144–149. https://jurnal.unimus.ac.id/index.php/ELLIC/article/view/3513.

Lee, G. L. (2022). Best practices of teaching traditional beliefs using Korean folk literature. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 417–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.114.

Linda, L., & Dardjito, H. (2020). Grammatical Errors Analysis Of The Third Semester Studentsâ€Tm Recount Essays. JELLT (Journal of English Language and Language Teaching), 4(2), 44–51. https://doi.org/10.36597/jellt.v4i2.9460.

Maba, W. (2017). Teacher’s perception on the implementation of the assessment process in 2013 curriculum. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.29332/ijssh.v1n2.26.

Manik, N. I., & Suwastini, N. A. (2020). Analyzing Grammatical Error in Students’ Recount Text Writing in Junior High School. Humanis: Journal of Arts and Humanities, 4(3), 238–246. https://doi.org/10.24843/JH.2020.v24.i03.p02.

Manik, N. P. I. M. C., & Suwastini, N. K. A. (2020). Analyzing grammatical error in students’ recount text writing in junior high school. Humanis, 24(3), 238–246. https://doi.org/10.24843/jh.2020.v24.i03.p02.

Meiranti, R. (2012). Improving Students’ Writing Skills Through Field Trip Method. English Review: Journal of English Education, 1(1), 1–8. http://journal.uniku.ac.id/index.php/ERJEE/article/view/73.

Miles, M. B., A, M. H., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis; A Methode Sourcebook (Third Edit). Arizona State University.

Muhsin, M. A. (2016). Analysing the students errors in using simple present (A case study at Junior High School in Makassar). Pacific Science Review B: Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(3), 81–87. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psrb.2016.09.006.

Ngoc Tu, T. P., & Thao, T. Q. (2019). the Use of Phrasal Verbs in English Language Research Proposals By Vietnamese M.a. Students. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 35(4). https://doi.org/10.25073/2525-2445/vnufs.4399.

Rao, P. S. (2019). The Importance of Speaking Skills in English Classrooms. Alford Council of International English & Literature Journal(ACIELJ), 2(2), 18. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Parupalli-rao/publication/334283040.

Robinson, L., & Feng, J. (2016). Effect of Direct Grammar Instruction on Student Writing Skills. Eastern Educational Research Association Annual Conference, 1–16. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED564336.

Rojabi, A. R. (2020). Exploring EFL Students’ Perception of Online Learning via Microsoft Teams: University Level in Indonesia. English Language Teaching Educational Journal, 3(2), 163. https://doi.org/10.12928/eltej.v3i2.2349.

Seixas, B. V., Smith, N., & Mitton, C. (2018). The qualitative descriptive approach in international comparative studies: Using online qualitative surveys. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 7(9), 778–781. https://doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2017.142.

Wu, T. T., & Huang, Y. M. (2017). A mobile game-based English vocabulary practice system based on portfolio analysis. Educational Technology and Society, 20(2), 265–277. https://www.jstor.org/stable/90002180.

Downloads

Published

2024-05-24

Issue

Section

Articles