THE EFFECT OF MAKE A MATCH TECHNIQUE WITH FLASHCARD ON SPEAKING ACHIEVEMENT OF GRADE EIGHT STUDENTS OF SMP NEGERI 2 SERIRIT IN ACADEMIC YEAR OF 2015/2016
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jpbi.v1i1.6003Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menyelidiki apakah ada atau tidak ada perbedaan yang signifikan dalam prestasi dalam berbicara antara siswa yang diajarkan dengan menggunakan tehnik make a match dengan flashcard dan mereka yang diajarkan dengan menggunakan tehnik menghafal dialog. Desain penelitian yang digunakan adalah Post-test Only Control Group Design. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas delapan SMP Negeri 2 Seririt. Kelas VIIIF digunakan sebagai kelas ekperimen dimana menggunakan tehnik make a match dengan flashcard dan kelas VIIID digunakan sebagai kelas kontrol dimana menggunakan tehnik memorization dialogue. Hasil dari analisa data menunjukan siswa di grup ekperimen medapatkan hasil yang lebih baik daripda siswa grup control. Hasil analisis data menunjukkan bahwa siswa di kelompok eksperimen mencapai hasil yang lebih baik daripada siswa di kelompok kontrol. Hal ini dibuktikan oleh hasil statistik deskriptif yang menunjukkan mean skor kelompok eksperimen adalah 74,46 sedangkan nilai rata-rata dari kelompok kontrol adalah 74,35. Hasil dari uji test juga menunjukkan bahwa nilai tob lebih rendah dari tcv tersebut. Nilai tob itu 0,092, sedangkan nilai Tcv adalah 1,999. Ini berarti bahwa tidak ada perbedaan yang signifikan terhadap prestasi berbicara antara siswa yang diajarkan dengan menggunakan tehnik make a match dengan flashcard dan mereka yang diajarkan dengan menggunakan tehnik menghafal dialogKata Kunci : Tehnik make a match dengan flashcard, Tehnik menghafal dialog, Prestasi dalam berbicara.
This study aimed at investigating whether or not there was significant difference in speaking achievement between students taught by using makes a match technique with flashcard and those taught by using memorization dialogue technique. The research design used was Post-test Only Control Group Design. The population was eighth grade students of SMP Negeri 2 Seririt. Cluster Random Sampling was assigned to select the sample of the study. Class VIII F was assigned as the experimental group which was taught by using “make a match technique with flashcard” and class VIII D as the control group which was taught by using “memorization dialogue technique”. The result of the data analysis showed that students in experimental group achieved better result than students in control group. It was proven by the result of descriptive statistics that showed the mean score the experimental group was 74.46 while the mean score of control group was 74.35. The result of the t-test also showed that the value of the tob was lower than the tcv. The value of the tob was 0.092, while the value of the tcv was 1.999. It means that there is no significant difference on speaking achievement between students who were taught using memorization dialogue technique with students who were taught using memorization dialogue technique.
keyword : Make a match technique with flashcard, Memorization dialogue technique, Speaking achievement.
Published
2015-10-01
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Authors who publish with the Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Undiksha agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)