The Perception of Primary School English Teacher with Non-English Educational Background towards Pedagogical Content Knowledge
-
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jpbi.v11i3.65437Keywords:
Pedagogical content knowledgeAbstract
Basic skills and knowledge that must be owned by a teacher is pedagogical content knowledge. Pedagogical content knowledge is all aspects related to teaching and learning activities in class, for example lesson planning, learning design, understanding of the curriculum, assessment, and mastery of knowledge of the subject matter being taught. This study aims to analyze non-educational English teachers perceive of pedagogical content knowledge, and determine the consistency between perception and implementation. This research involved three non-educational English teachers who teach in elementary schools. The method used is embedded mix-method where qualitative data is primary data and qualitative data is secondary data. There are three instruments used in the study, including questionnaires, observation sheets, and interview guides. Based on the results of the questionnaire obtained teachers' perceptions of pedagogical content knowledge is high. Then the results of the observations show very low data. To ensure the data obtained, interviews were conducted with teachers and the results showed that there was no consistency between perception and implementation. The inconsistency between perception and implementation is caused by the teacher's limitations in developing learning designs, the various characteristics and needs of students, and the general use of English by teachers and students because English is a content subject. Therefore, the implication of this research is that teachers can use technology to access learning resources, examples of lesson plans and designs, as well as take advantage of the environment around students.
References
Akdamar, N., S., Sutcu, S., & S. (2021). Effects of digital stories on the development of EFL learners’ listening skill. The Asian Institute of Research Education Quarterly Reviews, 4(4), 271–279. https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1993.04.04.391.
Alrwele, D. N. S. (2017). Effects of Infographics on Student Achievement and Students’ Perceptions of the Impacts of Infographics. Journal of Education and Human Development, 6(3), 104–117. https://doi.org/10.15640/jehd.v6n3a12.
Baburajan, P. K., Noushad, S., & Shaikh, A. A. (2019). Users Perceptions and Experience on Blackboard Learn Functionalities. 2019 Advances in Science and Engineering Technology International Conferences (ASET, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASET.2019.8714473.
Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59, 389–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554.
Büyükkarci, K. (2014). Assessment Beliefs and Practices of Language Teachers in Primary Education. International Journal of Instruction, 7(1), 107–120. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/eiji/issue/5136/69989.
Camović, D. (2019). Some aspects of developmentally (non-) stimulating interactions of parents with preschool children – implications of basic determinants of parental behaviour. Sodobna Pedagogika/Journal of Contemporary Educational Studies, 70(4), 170–191. https://search.proquest.com/openview/6ab5bfcc821b4f33b65190d83a20dbf7/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=436389.
Cole, J., & Feng, J. (2015). Effective strategies for improving writing skills of elementary English language learners. Chinese American Educational Research and Development Association Annual Conference, 1–25. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED556123.
Creswell, J. W. (2021). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. SAGE publications.
Das, K. (2019). The Role and Impact of ICT in Improving the Quality of Education : An Overview. 4931, 97–103. https://ijissh.org/storage/Volume4/Issue6/IJISSH-040611.pdf.
Demirbaş, İ., & Şahin, A. (2022). The effect of digital stories on primary school students’ listening comprehension skills. Participatory Educational Research (PER), 9(6), 380–397. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.144.9.6.
Dewi, N. K. S. (2021). EFL Pre-Service Teachers’ Perception of Their Readiness in Teaching Online during Covid-19 Pandemic. The Art of Teaching English as a Foreign Language, 2(2), 163–168. https://doi.org/10.36663/tatefl.v2i1.172.
Fatimah, A. S., & Santiana, S. (2017). Teaching in 21St Century: Students-Teachers’ Perceptions of Technology Use in the Classroom. Script Journal: Journal of Linguistic and English Teaching, 2(2), 125. https://doi.org/10.24903/sj.v2i2.132.
Hudson, P., & Nguyen, T. M. H. (2009). What Do EFL Preservice Teachers Expect from Their Mentors? In P. Jeffery (Ed.), Changing Climates: Education for Sustainable Futures: Proceedings of the Australian Association for Research in Education (AARE) International Education Research Conference 2008 (pp. 1–10). Australian Association for Research in Education. https://metprogram.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Mentees-expectations-of-mentors.pdf.
Ibrahem, U. M., & Alamro, A. R. (2020). Effects of Infographics on Developing Computer Knowledge, Skills and Achievement Motivation among Hail University Students. International Journal of Instruction, 14(1), 907–926. https://doi.org/10.29333/IJI.2021.14154A.
Irving, K. E. (2006). The impact of technology on the 21st century. Teaching Science in the 21st Century, March 1981, 3–19. https://cmapsconverted.ihmc.us/rid=1JVHR9TKT-1VMCFZP-SHW/21st century.pdf.
Ituma, A. (2011). An evaluation of students’ perceptions and engagement with e-learning components in a campus-based university. Active Learning in Higher Education, 12(1), 57–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787410387722.
Jawas, U. (2019). Writing anxiety among Indonesian EFL students: Factors and strategies. International Journal of Instruction, 12(4), 733–746. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12447a.
Le, H., Janssen, J., & Wubbels, T. (2018). Collaborative learning practices: teacher and student perceived obstacles to effective student collaboration. Cambridge Journal of Education, 48(1), 103–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2016.1259389.
Lyublinskaya, I., & Kaplon-Schilis, A. (2022). Analysis of Differences in the Levels of TPACK: Unpacking Performance Indicators in the TPACK Levels Rubric. Education Sciences, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12020079.
Muslimin, A. I., Mukminatien, N., & Ivone, F. M. (2023). TPACK-SAMR digital literacy competence, technostress, and teaching performance: Correlational study among EFL lecturers. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(2), ep409. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/12921.
Nagro, S. A., Fraser, D. W., & Hooks, S. D. (2019). Lesson Planning With Engagement in Mind: Proactive Classroom Management Strategies for Curriculum Instruction. Intervention in School and Clinic, 54(3), 131–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451218767905.
Öz, H. (2014). Pre-service English Teachers’ Perceptions of Web-based Assessment in a Pedagogical Content Knowledge Course. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 45–58. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.010.
Rahmadi, I. F. (2019). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK): Kerangka Pengetahuan Guru Abad 21. Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan, 6(1). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.32493/jpkn.v6i1.y2019.p65-74.
Safitri, D., Sujarwo, & Putra, Z. F. F. (2019). Pemberdayaan Kelompok Guru Dalam Membuat Media Pembelajaran Quizizz. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 1(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.21009/DSD.XXX.
Schmidt, D. A., Thompson, A. D., Koehler, M. J., & Shin, T. S. (2014). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK): The Development and Validation of an Assessment Instrument for Preservice Teachers. CIE 2014 - 44th International Conference on Computers and Industrial Engineering and IMSS 2014 - 9th International Symposium on Intelligent Manufacturing and Service Systems, Joint International Symposium on "The Social Impacts of Developments in Informat, 42(2), 2531. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2009.10782544.
Sharma, C., & Puri, S. R. (2020). The importance of four skills in English education. The Genesis, 7(4), 33–36. https://doi.org/10.47211/tg.2020.v07i04.007.
Sintawati, M., & Abdurrahman, G. (2020). The effectiveness of blended learning to improve pre-service teacher TPaCK in developing multimedia learning mathematics at elementary school. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/3/032014.
Tondeur, J., Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Baran, E. (2020). Enhancing pre-service teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): A mixed-method study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 319–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09692-1.
Udayani, N. K. R. T. K., Wibawa, I. M. C., & Rati, N. W. (2022). Development Of E-Comic Learning Media On The Topic Of The Human Digestive System. Journal of Education Technology, 5(3), 472–481. https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v5i3.34732.
Yusuf, H. O. (2022). Impact Of Teachers Use Of Folktales On The Performance Of Pupils In Reading Comprehension. European Journal of Education Studies, 4, 107–120. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.353.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Dewa Ayu Ratna Lily Pastika I Dewa Made Pastika
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Undiksha agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)