Marzano Taxonomy-Based Assessment Instrument to Measure Analytical and Creative Thinking Skills
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jpk.v6i1.40117Kata Kunci:
Analytical thinking, Creative thinking, Assessment Instrument, Taxonomy MarzanoAbstrak
Penilaian merupakan salah satu aspek penting dalam proses pembelajaran. Penilaian yang didesain dengan baik akan dapat mengukur kemampuan siswa sesuai tujuan pembelajaran yang telah ditetapkan. Kemampuan berpikir analitis dan kreatif merupakan kemampuan esensial yang harus dikuasai oleh siswa. Instrumen tes yang digunakan oleh guru dalam penilaian hasil belajar siswa pada pembelajaran jarak jauh masih mengukur kemampuan berpikir rendah Tujuan penelitian ini yaitu mengembangkan instrumen penilaian berbasis Taksonomi Marzano untuk mengukur kemampuan berpikir analitis dan kreatif. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian pengembangan. Model yang digunakan adalah 4D sampai tahap development. Instrumen yang telah didesain kemudian divalidasi oleh 3 pakar dan dinyatakan valid. Instrumen kemudian diuji cobakan kepada 450 siswa kelas XI. Data hasil ujicoba kemudian dianalisis menggunakan SPSS. Berdasarkan hasil analisi data diketahui bahwa 17 butir soal yang dikembangkan valid, reliabel, memiliki tingkat kesukaran dan daya pembeda yang memadai. Instrumen penilaian ini dapat membantu guru mengukur kemampuan berpikir analitis dan kreatif dibarengi dengan proses pembelajaran di kelas menggunakan metode pembelajaran yang merangsang siswa berpikir tingkat tinggi.
Referensi
Al-khatib, B. A. (2012). The Effect of Using Brainstorming Strategy in Developing Creative Problem Solving Skills among Female Students in Princess Alia University College Department of Psychology and Special Education. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 2(10), 29–38.
Alghafri, A. S. R., & Ismail, H. N. Bin. (2014). The Effects of Integrating Creative and Critical Thinking on Schools Students’ Thinking. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 4(6), 518–525. https://doi.org/10.7763/ijssh.2014.v4.410 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7763/IJSSH.2014.V4.410
Areesophonpichet, S. (2013). A Development of Analytical Thinking Skills of Graduate Students by using Concept Mapping. The Asian Conference on Education 2013 Official Conference Proceedings, 1–16. Retrieved from www.iafor.org
Bagiyono. (2017). Analisis Tingkat Kesukaran dan Daya Pembeda Butir Soal Ujian Pelatihan Radiografi Tingkat 1. Jurnal Widyanuklida, 16(1), 1–12.
Chonkaew, P., Sukhummek, B., & Faikhamta, C. (2016). Development of analytical thinking ability and attitudes towards science learning of grade-11 students through science technology engineering and mathematics (STEM education) in the study of stoichiometry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17(4), 842–861. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6rp00074f DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RP00074F
Diawati, C., Liliasari, L., Setiabudi, A., & Buchari, B. (2017). Development and validation of creative thinking skills test in the project of laboratory apparatus modification. In Ideas for 21st Century Education (1st Editio, pp. 185–188). https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315166575-46 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315166575-37
Facione, P. a. (2011). Critical Thinking : What It Is and Why It Counts. Insight Assessment, (ISBN 13: 978-1-891557-07-1.), 1–28. Retrieved from https://www.insightassessment.com/CT-Resources/Teaching-For-and-About-Critical-Thinking/Critical-Thinking-What-It-Is-and-Why-It-Counts/Critical-Thinking-What-It-Is-and-Why-It-Counts-PDF
Hendryadi. (2017). Validitas Isi: Tahap Awal Pengembangan Kuesioner. Jurnal Riset Manajemen Dan Bisnis (JRMB) Fakultas Ekonomi UNIAT, 2(2), 169–178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36226/jrmb.v2i2.47
Imam Farisi, M. (2016). Developing the 21 St-Century Social Studies Skills Through Technology Integration. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, (January), 16–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.47374
Irwanto, Rohaeti, E., Lfx, E. W., & Suyanta. (2017). Development of an Integrated Assessment Instrument for Measuring Analytical Thinking and Science Process Skills. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1847(050005), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4983907 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4983907
Kearns, L. (2012). Student Assessment in Online Learning: Challenges and Effective Practices. Jolt.Merlot.Org, 8(3), 198–208. Retrieved from http://jolt.merlot.org/vol8no3/kearns_0912.htm
Khoiriah, Jalmo, T., & Abdurrahman. (2018). Development of Assessment Instruments Higher Order Thinking Skills on Science Subjects for Student Grade Eight Junior High School. He Online Journal of New Horizons in Education -, 8(2), 19–29.
Kusaeri, & Suprananto. (2012). Pengukuran dan Penilaian Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Laura, G. (2021). Assessing 21st Century Skills: A Guide to Evaluating Mastery and Authentic Learning. Corwin: A SAGE Publications Company.
Lince, R. (2016). Creative Thinking Ability to Increase Student Mathematical of Junior High School by Applying Models Numbered Heads Together. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(6), 206–212.
Mardapi, Djemari, & Andayani, S. (2012). Performance Assessment dalam Perspektif Multiple Criteria Decision Making. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Penelitian, Pendidikan Dan Penerapan MIPA UNY, 136–145.
Marzano, R. J., & Kendall, J. S. (2007). Praise for the Second Edition of The New Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (Second Edi). United Statet of America: Corwin Press A Sage Publications Company.
Nofiana, M., & Puguh, S. (2016). Pengembangan Instrumen Evaluasi Higher Order Thinking Skills Pada Materi Kingdom Plantae. Jurnal Pedagogi Hayati, 01(01), 46–53.
Nunez, J. R., & Leeuwner, J. (2020). Changing Courses in Midstream: COVID-19 and the Transition to Online Delivery in Two Undergraduate Chemistry Courses ́ ̃. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), 2819–2824. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00781 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00781
OCED. (2019). PISA 2021 Creative Thinking Framework (Third Draft).
Petrovska, S., & Veselinovska, S. S. (2013). Contemporary Pedagogical Approaches for Developing Higher Level Thinking on Science Classes. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 92(April), 702–710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.742 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.742
Pratama, G. S., & Retnawati, H. (2018). Urgency of Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Content Analysis in Mathematics Textbook . Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1097, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012147 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012147
Putria, H., Maula, L. H., & Uswatun, D. A. (2020). Analisis Proses Pembelajaran Dalam Jaringan (DARING) Masa Pandemi COVID-19 pada Guru Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 4(4), 861–872. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v4i4.460 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v4i4.460
Ramachandran, R., & Rodriguez, M. C. (2020). Student Perspectives on Remote Learning in a Large Organic Chemistry Lecture Course. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), 2565–2572. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00572 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00572
Rigianti, H. A. (2020). Kendala Pembelajaran Daring Guru Sekolah Dasar di Kabupaten Banjarnegara. Elementary School, 7(2), 297–302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31316/esjurnal.v7i2.768
Ritter, S. M., Id, X. G., Crijns, M., & Biekens, P. (2020). Fostering students ’ creative thinking skills by means of a one-year creativity training program. PLoS ONE, 15(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229773 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229773
Rofiah, E., Aminah, N. S., & Ekawati, E. Y. (2013). Penyusunan Instrumen Tes Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Fisika pada Siswa SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 1(2), 17–22.
Sitthipon, A.-I. (2012). Development of Teachers’ Learning Management Emphasizing on Analytical Thinking in Thailand. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46(December 2012), 3339–3344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.063 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.063
Sumarni, W., Supardi, K. I., & Widiarti, N. (2018). Development of assessment instruments to measure critical thinking skills. IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 349(1–11). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/349/1/012066 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/349/1/012066
Taleb, H., & Chadwick, C. (2016). Enhancing Student Critical and Analytical Thinking Skills At a Higher Education Level in Developing Countries : Case Study of the British University in Dubai. Journal of Educational and Instructional Studies in the World, 6(February), 67–77.
Thiagarajan, S., Semmel, D. S., & Semmel, M. I. (1974). Instructional development for training teachers of exceptional children A sourcebook. Indiana: Eric.
Toledo, S., & Dubas, J. M. (2016). Encouraging Higher-Order Thinking in General Chemistry by Scaffolding Student Learning Using Marzano’s Taxonomy. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(1), 64–69. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00184 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00184
Wardany, K., Sajidah, & Ramli, M. (2015). Penyusunan Instrumen Tes Higher Order Thinking Skill Pada Materi Ekosistem SMA Kelas X. Proceeding Biology Education Conference, 12(1), 538–543.
Yuni, E., Dwi, W. ;, Sudjimat, A., & Nyoto, A. (2016). Transformasi Pendidikan Abad 21 sebagai Tuntutan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia di Era Global. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika 2016, 263–278.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2022 Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Indonesia
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Indonesia agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)
