Stoichiometry E-Book Based on Creative Problem Solving (CPS) to Solve Conceptual Problems

Penulis

  • Rahmat Rasmawan Universitas Tanjungpura

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23887/jpk.v6i1.43441

Kata Kunci:

E-Book, Creative Problem Solving, Stoikiometri, Permasalahan Konseptual

Abstrak

Kurangnya bahan ajar yang dapat memunculkan ide penyelesaian masalah dapat menghambat kemampuan mahasiswa dalam menyelesaikan permasalahan konseptual. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menghasilkan e-book berbasis Creative Problem-Solving yang valid dan layak digunakan serta dapat menumbuhkan kemampuan mahasiswa dalam menyelesaikan permasalahan konseptual. Bentuk penelitian yang digunakan adalah Research and Developmet (R&D) yang mengacu pada model pengembangan ADDIE, dimulai dari tahap analyze, design. develop, implement and evaluate. Hasil yang diperoleh menunjukkan bahwa e-book yang dikembangkan valid secara content validity dan face validity dalam aspek kesesuaian capaian pembelajaran dengan konsep atau isi materi, kebahasaaan, panduan, kemudahan penggunaan, kemenarikan tampilan, kejelasan petunjuk penggunaan, kejelasan materi, kejelasan gambar, kejelasana video, kemenarikan analogi, kejelasan contoh dan soal latihan, kejelasan langkah Creative Problem Solving serta terbukti dalam membantu mahasiswa dalam menyelesaikan permasalahan konseptual setelah diterapkannya e-book dalam pembelajaran. Berdasarkan hasil yang diperoleh dapat disimpulkan bahwa e-book yang dikembangkan layak digunakan.

Referensi

Asmawat, E. S., Rosidin, U., & Abdurrahman. (2018). The Development Of Assessment Instrument Towards The Students’ Critical Thinking Ability On The High School Physics Lesson With The Creative Problem Solving Model. International Journal of Advanced Research (IJAR), 6(6), 90–99. https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/7191 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/7191

Bobek, E., & Tversky, B. (2016). Creating Visual Explanations Improves Learning. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 1(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-016-0031-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-016-0031-6

Broman, K., & Parchmann, I. (2014). Students’ Application Of Chemical Concepts When Solving Chemistry Problems In Different Contexts. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15(4), 516–529. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RP00051J DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RP00051J

Chandrasegaran, A. L., Treagust, D. F., Waldrip, B. G., & Chandrasegaran, A. (2009). Students’ Dilemmas In Reaction Stoichiometry Problem Solving: Deducing The Limiting Reagent In Chemical Reactions. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 10(1), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1039/B901456J DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/B901456J

Cracolice, M. S., Deming, J. C., & Ehlert, B. (2008). Concept Learning versus Problem Solving: A Cognitive Difference. Journal of Chemical Education, 85(6), 873. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed085p873 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ed085p873

Danjuma, I. M. (2011). Methods Used By Pre-Service Nigeria Certificate In Education Teachers In Solving Quantitative Problems In Chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 12(4), 427–433. https://doi.org/10.1039/C0RP90012E DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/C0RP90012E

Dewi, M. R. L., & Putra, D. K. N. S. (2021). Creative Problem-Solving Learning Model Assisted with Multimedia to the Competency of Science. International Journal of Elementary Education, 4(4), 587–595. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijee.v4i4.32791

Fauziah, M., Marmoah, S., Murwaningsih, T., & Saddhono, K. (2019). The Effect of Thinking Actively in a Social Context and Creative Problem-Solving Learning Models on Divergent-Thinking Skills Viewed from Adversity Quotien. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(2), 537–568. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.2.537 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.2.537

Febriyanti, F., Wiji, W., & Widhiyanti, T. (2019). Thermochemistry Multiple Representation Analysis For Developing Intertextual Learning Strategy Based On Predict Observe Explain (POE). Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157, 042042. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042042 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042042

Ferreira, J. E. V., & Lawrie, G. A. (2019). Profiling The Combinations Of Multiple Representations Used In Large-Class Teaching: Pathways To Inclusive Practices. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 20(4), 902–923. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RP00001A DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RP00001A

Franck, K., Khan, T., & Walsh, J. (2016). The Importance of Cognitive Interviews as a Face Validity Method for Nutrition Education Surveys for Limited-Resource Audiences. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 48(7), S92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2016.04.245 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2016.04.245

Gauchon, L., & Méheut, M. (2007). Learning About Stoichiometry: From Students’ Preconceptions To The Concept Of Limiting Reactant. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8(4), 362–375. https://doi.org/10.1039/B7RP90012K DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/B7RP90012K

Giunta, C. J. (2016). What’s in a Name? Amount of Substance, Chemical Amount, and Stoichiometric Amount. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(4), 583–586. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00690 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00690

Gulacar, O., Overton, T. L., Bowman, C. R., & Fynewever, H. (2013). A Novel Code System For Revealing Sources Of Students’ Difficulties With Stoichiometry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14(4), 507–515. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3RP00029J DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/C3RP00029J

Hanson, R. (2016). Ghanaian Teacher Trainees’ Conceptual Understanding of Stoichiometry. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 3(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.509/2016.3.1/509.1.1.8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.509/2016.3.1/509.1.1.8

Heliawati, L., Afakillah, I. I., & Pursitasari, I. D. (2021). Creative Problem-Solving Learning through Open-Ended Experiment for Students’ Understanding and Scientific Work Using Online Learning. International Journal of Instruction, 14(4), 321–336. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14419a DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14419a

Hobri, Ummah, I. K., Yuliati, N., & Dafik. (2020). The Effect of Jumping Task Based on Creative Problem Solving on Students’ Problem Solving Ability. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 387–406. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13126a DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13126a

Kartal, T., & Kartal, B. (2019). Examining Strategies Used by Pre-service Science Teachers in Stoichiometry Problems in Terms of Proportional Reasoning. Cukurova University Faculty of Education Journal, 48(1), 910–944. https://doi.org/10.14812/cuefd.491826

Lau, X. C., Wong, Y. L., Wong, J. E., Koh, D., Sedek, R., Jamil, A. T., Ng, A. L. O., Hazizi, A. S., Ruzita, A. T., & Poh, B. K. (2019). Development and Validation of a Physical Activity Educational Module for Overweight and Obese Adolescents: CERGAS Programme. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(9), 1506. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16091506 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16091506

Makhechane, M., & Qhobela, M. (2019). Understanding How Chemistry Teachers Transform Stoichiometry Concepts at Secondary Level in Lesotho. South African Journal of Chemistry, 72, 59–66. https://doi.org/10.17159/0379-4350/2019/v72a9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17159/0379-4350/2019/v72a9

Mehadi, R. (2019). 21st Century Skill “Problem Solving”: Defining the Concept. Asian Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 2(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.34256/ajir1917 DOI: https://doi.org/10.34256/ajir1917

Niaz, M., & Montes, L. A. (2012). Understanding Stoichiometry: Towards A History And Philosophy Of Chemistry. Educación Química, 23, 290–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0187-893X(17)30156-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0187-893X(17)30156-8

Rahayu, R., & Sutrisno, H. (2019). The Analysis of Analogy use in Chemistry Teaching. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1233, 012022. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1233/1/012022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1233/1/012022

Randles, C. A., & Overton, T. L. (2015). Expert Vs. Novice: Approaches Used By Chemists When Solving Open-Ended Problems. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(4), 811–823. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RP00114E DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RP00114E

Sangguro, S. B. A., Surif, J. B., & Ibrahim, N. H. B. (2019). Conceptual Knowledge in Stoichiometry’s Problem Solving. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE), 8(2), 405–441. https://www.ijrte.org/wp-content/uploads/papers/v8i2S/B10590782S19.pdf

Stamovlasis, D., Tsaparlis, G., Kamilatos, C., Papaoikonomou, D., & Zarotiadou, E. (2005). Conceptual Understanding Versus Algorithmic Problem Solving: Further Evidence From A National Chemistry Examination. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 6(2), 104–118. https://doi.org/10.1039/B2RP90001G DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/B2RP90001G

Subamia, I. D. P., Wahyuni, I. G. A. N. S., & Widiasih, N. N. (2021). Efektivitas Video Panduan Menggunakan Bahan Kimia untuk Meningkatkan Kesehatan dan Keselamatan Kerja di Laboratorium. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Indonesia, 5(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpk.v5i1.29535 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jpk.v5i1.29535

Surif, J., Ibrahim, N. H., & Dalim, S. F. (2014). Problem Solving: Algorithms and Conceptual and Open-ended Problems in Chemistry. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 4955–4963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1055 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1055

Taha, H., Hashim, R., Ismail, Z., Jusoff, K., & Khoo, Y. Y. (2014). The Influence Of Students’ Concept Of Mole, Problem Representation Ability And Mathematical Ability On Stoichiometry Problem Solving. Scottish Journal of Arts, Social Sciences and Scientific Studies, 21(1), 3–21. http://irep.iium.edu.my/42187/1/Hafsa_Taha_SJASS_Vol.21_No.1.pdf

Triyono, T., Senam, S., Jumadi, J., & Wilujeng, I. (2017). The Effects Of Creative Problem Solving-Based Learning Towards Students’ Creativities. Jurnal Kependidikan: Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran, 1(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v1i2.9429 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v1i2.9429

Vernon, D., Hocking, I., & Tyler, T. C. (2016). An Evidence-Based Review of Creative Problem Solving Tools: A Practitioner’s Resource. Human Resource Development Review, 15(2), 230–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484316641512 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484316641512

Vidal, R. V. V. (2010). Creative Problem Solving: An Applied University Course. Pesquisa Operacional, 30(2), 405–426. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-74382010000200009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-74382010000200009

Wood, C. (2006). The Development Of Creative Problem Solving In Chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 7(2), 96–113. https://doi.org/10.1039/B6RP90003H DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/B6RP90003H

Yuriev, E., Naidu, S., Schembri, L. S., & Short, J. L. (2017). Scaffolding The Development Of Problem-Solving Skills In Chemistry: Guiding Novice Students Out Of Dead Ends And False Starts. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18(3), 486–504. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RP00009J DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RP00009J

Yusoff, M. S. B. (2019). ABC of Content Validation and Content Validity Index Calculation. Education in Medicine Journal, 11(2), 49–54. https://doi.org/10.21315/EIMJ2019.11.2.6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21315/eimj2019.11.2.6

Zechariah, S., Waller, J. L., De Leo, G., Stallings, J., Gess, A. J., & Lehman, L. (2021). Content and Face Validation of a Novel, Interactive Nutrition Specific Physical Exam Competency Tool (INSPECT) to Evaluate Registered Dietitians’ Competence: A Delphi Consensus from the United States. Healthcare, 9(9), 1225. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9091225 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9091225

Unduhan

Diterbitkan

2022-05-26

Cara Mengutip

Rasmawan, R. (2022). Stoichiometry E-Book Based on Creative Problem Solving (CPS) to Solve Conceptual Problems. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Indonesia, 6(1), 70–78. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpk.v6i1.43441

Terbitan

Vol 6 No 1 (2022)

Bagian

Articles

Lisensi

Hak Cipta (c) 2022 Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Indonesia

Creative Commons License

Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with the Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Indonesia agree to the following terms: 

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)