Development of assistive technology e-books basic concepts of art for children with learning disabilities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jpp.v55i2.42327Kata Kunci:
assistive technology, e-book, learning disabilitiesAbstrak
This study examines the development of teaching materials in the form of e-books as learning aids for children with learning disabilities. Development is carried out on the basis of the needs and learning styles of students. Therefore, the research and development (R&D) approach was used in this study. The model developed using ADDIE, first analyzes, designs, develops, implements, and evaluates the results of the development. The expert validation stage is carried out on curriculum experts, media, and education practitioners. The trial was carried out on students at various levels, (1, 3, 5, and 7) with a total of 25 respondents. The data collection technique used a questionnaire with a Likert scale, after being given an e-book the respondents were then asked to fill out a questionnaire. The results showed that the development of assistive technology for e-books with the basic concept of art received a good response, was understandable, looked attractive, and was effective or feasible to use. In conclusion, students through the use of the basic concept art e-book managed to achieve not only a better level of socialization, but also managed to achieve most of the objectives of the lesson plan program for the development of motor, speech, language, reading, writing and memory skills.
Referensi
Anastasiou, D., Kauffman, J. M., & Di Nuovo, S. (2015). Inclusive education in Italy: description and reflections on full inclusion. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 30(4), 429–443. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2015.1060075. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2015.1060075
Andersson, U., & Östergren, R. (2012). Number magnitude processing and basic cognitive functions in children with mathematical learning disabilities. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(6), 701–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.05.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.05.004
Barletta, F., Yoguel, G., Pereira, M., & Rodríguez, S. (2017). Exploring scientific productivity and transfer activities: Evidence from Argentinean ICT research groups. Research Policy, 46(8), 1361–1369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.05.007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.05.007
Barnes, M. A., & Fuchs, L. S. (2008). Learning disabilities. In Developmental-Behavioral Pediatrics (pp. 445–466). Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-04025-9.50015-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-04025-9.50015-5
Benmarrakchi, F., El Kafi, J., & Elhore, A. (2017). Communication technology for users with specific learning disabilities. Procedia Computer Science, 110, 258–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.06.093. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.06.093
Bjekić, D., Obradović, S., Vučetić, M., & Bojović, M. (2014). E-teacher in inclusive e-education for students with specific learning disabilities. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 128, 128–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.131
Bose, B., & Heymann, J. (2020). Do inclusive education laws improve primary schooling among children with disabilities? International Journal of Educational Development, 77, 102208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102208
Cha, Y. K., Wong, S. Y., & Meyer, J. W. (1988). Values education in the curriculum: Some comparative empirical data. In The Revival of Values Education in Asia & the West (pp. 11–28). Pergamon. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-035853-6.50007-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-035853-6.50007-2
Dardzińska-Głębocka, A., & Zdrodowska, M. (2021). Analysis children with disabilities self-care problems based on selected data mining techniques. Procedia Computer Science, 192, 2854–2862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.09.056. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.09.056
Fayomi, O. S. I., Okokpujie, I. P., & Fayomi, G. U. (2019). An innovation concept towards bridging the gaps between teaching and research. Procedia Manufacturing, 35, 775–781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.06.022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.06.022
Fidan, T., & Oztürk, I. (2015). The relationship of the creativity of public and private school teachers to their intrinsic motivation and the school climate for innovation. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 905–914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.370
Florez, D., García-Duque, C. E., & Osorio, J. C. (2019). Is technology (still) applied science?. Technology in Society, 59, 101193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101193
Gucyeter, S., & Erdogan, S. C. (2020). Creative children in a robust learning environment: Perceptions of special education teacher candidates. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37, 100675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100675. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100675
Guille, M., Arias, B., Vicente, E., Verdugo, M. A., & Badia, M. (2016). Research in Developmental Disabilities Confirmatory factor analysis of the supports intensity scale for children. 50, 140–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2015.11.022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2015.11.022
Hanik, E. U. (2020). Self Directed Learning Berbasis Literasi Digital Pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19 di Madrasah Ibtidaiyah. Elementary: Islamic Teacher Journal, 8(1), 183–208. https://doi.org/10.21043/elementary.v8i1.7417. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21043/elementary.v8i1.7417
Hansen, L. A., & Wass, S. (2022). Enactive methods towards situational learning-engaging people with intellectual and developmental disability in design. Procedia Computer Science, 196, 598–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.12.054. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.12.054
Herman, M. S., & Shantz, C. U. (1983). Social problem solving and mother-child interactions of educable mentally retarded children. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 4(3), 217–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/0193-3973(83)90019-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0193-3973(83)90019-9
Huijsmans, M. D., Kleemans, T., van der Ven, S. H., & Kroesbergen, E. H. (2020). The relevance of subtyping children with mathematical learning disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 104, 103704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2020.103704. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2020.103704
Hukkelberg, S., Tømmerås, T., & Ogden, T. (2019). Parent training: Effects beyond conduct problems. Children and Youth Services Review, 100, 405–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.03.009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.03.009
Isaila, N., & Nicolau, I. (2010). Promoting computer assisted learning for persons with disabilities. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 4497–4501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.719. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.719
Karpagavalli, S., Gripsy, J. V., & Nandhini, K. (2021). Speech assistive Tamil learning mobile applications for learning disability children. Materials Today: Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.01.050. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.01.050
Kincaid, D. L., Doris, M., Shannon, C., & Mulholland, C. (2017). What is the prevalence of autism spectrum disorder and ASD traits in psychosis? A systematic review. Psychiatry Research, 250, 99–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2017.01.017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2017.01.017
Kulkarni, M. (2018). Discursive work within weak field mandate events: The case of a conference on assistive technologies for persons with disabilities. IIMB Management Review, 30(4), 291–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iimb.2018.08.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iimb.2018.08.001
Laabidi, M., Jemni, M., Ayed, L. J. B., Brahim, H. B., & Jemaa, A. B. (2014). Learning technologies for people with disabilities. Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences, 26(1), 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2013.10.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2013.10.005
Lersilp, T. (2016). Assistive technology and educational services for undergraduate students with disabilities at universities in the Northern Thailand. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 36, 61–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2016.09.012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2016.09.012
Lewandowski, L., Wood, W., & Miller, L. A. (2016). Technological applications for individuals with learning disabilities and ADHD. In Computer-assisted and web-based innovations in psychology, special education, and health (pp. 61–93). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802075-3.00003-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802075-3.00003-6
Lindström, E. R., & Lemons, C. J. (2021). Teaching reading to students with intellectual and developmental disabilities: An observation study. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 115, 103990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2021.103990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2021.103990
Nees, M. A., & Berry, L. F. (2013). Audio assistive technology and accommodations for students with visual impairments: Potentials and problems for delivering curricula and educational assessments. Performance Enhancement & Health, 2(3), 101–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peh.2013.08.016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peh.2013.08.016
Olokundun, M., Ogbari, M., Peter, F., Borishade, T., Falola, H., Salau, O., & Kehinde, O. (2018). Survey data on teaching strategies and product innovation: A focus on selected university students in Nigeria. Data in Brief, 18, 248–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2018.03.027. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2018.03.027
Parr, M. (2012). The Future of Text-to-Speech Technology: How Long before it’s Just One More Thing we do When Teaching Reading? Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69, 1420–1429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.081. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.081
Perelmutter, B., McGregor, K. K., & Gordon, K. R. (2017). Assistive technology interventions for adolescents and adults with learning disabilities: An evidence-based systematic review and meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 114, 139–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.06.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.06.005
Pheeraphan, N. (2013). Enhancement of the 21st century skills for Thai higher education by integration of ICT in classroom. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 103, 365–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.346. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.346
Rapp, A., Cena, F., Castaldo, R., Keller, R., & Tirassa, M. (2018). Designing technology for spatial needs: Routines, control and social competences of people with autism. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 120, 49–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.07.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.07.005
Sahin, M. C. (2009). Instructional design principles for 21st century learning skills. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 1464–1468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.258
Sharar, T., & Nawab, A. (2020). Teachers’ perceived teacher leadership practices: A case of private secondary schools in Lahore, Pakistan. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 2(1), 100049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100049. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100049
Stein, A., Dalton, L., Rapa, E., Bluebond-Langner, M., Hanington, L., Stein, K. F., & Yousafzai, A. (2019). Communication with children and adolescents about the diagnosis of their own life-threatening condition. The Lancet, 393(10176), 1150–1163. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)33201-X. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)33201-X
Steruska, J., Simkova, N., & Pitner, T. (2019). Do science and technology parks improve technology transfer? Technology in Society, 59, 101127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.04.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.04.003
Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Torgesen, J. K. (1991). Learning Disabilities: Historical and Conceptual Issues. In Learning About Learning Disabilities (pp. 3–37). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-762530-0.50007-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-762530-0.50007-2
Turculeţ, A. (2015). Teachers for the 21st century. Will emotional intelligence make the difference? Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 180, 990–995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.188
Valtonen, T., Hoang, N., Sointu, E., Näykki, P., Virtanen, A., Pöysä-Tarhonen, J., & Kukkonen, J. (2021). How pre-service teachers perceive their 21st-century skills and dispositions: A longitudinal perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 116, 106643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106643. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106643
Valverde-Berrocoso, J., Fernández-Sánchez, M. R., Dominguez, F. I. R., & Sosa-Díaz, M. J. (2021). The educational integration of digital technologies preCovid-19: Lessons for teacher education. PLoS ONE, 16(8 August), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256283
Voinea, M., & Pălăşan, T. (2014). Teachers’ professional identity in the 21st century Romania. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 128, 361–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.172
Wang, H., Peng, A., & Patterson, M. M. (2021). The roles of class social climate, language mindset, and emotions in predicting willingness to communicate in a foreign language. System, 99, 102529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102529. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102529
Whiting, D., Lichtenstein, P., & Fazel, S. (2021). Violence and mental disorders: a structured review of associations by individual diagnoses, risk factors, and risk assessment. The Lancet Psychiatry, 8(2), 150–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30262-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30262-5
Wu, T. F., Chen, M. C., Yeh, Y. M., Wang, H. P., & Chang, S. C. H. (2014). Is digital divide an issue for students with learning disabilities? Computers in Human Behavior, 39, 112–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.06.024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.06.024
Zhu, Q., & Mitcham, C. (2020). Liu Zeyuan’s philosophy of engineering and technology: An introduction to his Marxist socioeconomic theory. Technology in Society, 63, 101351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101351. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101351
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Authors who publish with Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)