Development of assistive technology e-books basic concepts of art for children with learning disabilities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jpp.v55i2.42327Kata Kunci:
assistive technology, e-book, learning disabilitiesAbstrak
This study examines the development of teaching materials in the form of e-books as learning aids for children with learning disabilities. Development is carried out on the basis of the needs and learning styles of students. Therefore, the research and development (R&D) approach was used in this study. The model developed using ADDIE, first analyzes, designs, develops, implements, and evaluates the results of the development. The expert validation stage is carried out on curriculum experts, media, and education practitioners. The trial was carried out on students at various levels, (1, 3, 5, and 7) with a total of 25 respondents. The data collection technique used a questionnaire with a Likert scale, after being given an e-book the respondents were then asked to fill out a questionnaire. The results showed that the development of assistive technology for e-books with the basic concept of art received a good response, was understandable, looked attractive, and was effective or feasible to use. In conclusion, students through the use of the basic concept art e-book managed to achieve not only a better level of socialization, but also managed to achieve most of the objectives of the lesson plan program for the development of motor, speech, language, reading, writing and memory skills.
Referensi
Anastasiou, D., Kauffman, J. M., & Di Nuovo, S. (2015). Inclusive education in Italy: description and reflections on full inclusion. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 30(4), 429–443. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2015.1060075.
Andersson, U., & Östergren, R. (2012). Number magnitude processing and basic cognitive functions in children with mathematical learning disabilities. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(6), 701–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.05.004.
Barletta, F., Yoguel, G., Pereira, M., & Rodríguez, S. (2017). Exploring scientific productivity and transfer activities: Evidence from Argentinean ICT research groups. Research Policy, 46(8), 1361–1369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.05.007.
Barnes, M. A., & Fuchs, L. S. (2008). Learning disabilities. In Developmental-Behavioral Pediatrics (pp. 445–466). Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-04025-9.50015-5.
Benmarrakchi, F., El Kafi, J., & Elhore, A. (2017). Communication technology for users with specific learning disabilities. Procedia Computer Science, 110, 258–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.06.093.
Bjekić, D., Obradović, S., Vučetić, M., & Bojović, M. (2014). E-teacher in inclusive e-education for students with specific learning disabilities. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 128, 128–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.131.
Bose, B., & Heymann, J. (2020). Do inclusive education laws improve primary schooling among children with disabilities? International Journal of Educational Development, 77, 102208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102208.
Cha, Y. K., Wong, S. Y., & Meyer, J. W. (1988). Values education in the curriculum: Some comparative empirical data. In The Revival of Values Education in Asia & the West (pp. 11–28). Pergamon. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-035853-6.50007-2.
Dardzińska-Głębocka, A., & Zdrodowska, M. (2021). Analysis children with disabilities self-care problems based on selected data mining techniques. Procedia Computer Science, 192, 2854–2862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.09.056.
Fayomi, O. S. I., Okokpujie, I. P., & Fayomi, G. U. (2019). An innovation concept towards bridging the gaps between teaching and research. Procedia Manufacturing, 35, 775–781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.06.022.
Fidan, T., & Oztürk, I. (2015). The relationship of the creativity of public and private school teachers to their intrinsic motivation and the school climate for innovation. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 905–914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.370.
Florez, D., García-Duque, C. E., & Osorio, J. C. (2019). Is technology (still) applied science?. Technology in Society, 59, 101193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101193.
Gucyeter, S., & Erdogan, S. C. (2020). Creative children in a robust learning environment: Perceptions of special education teacher candidates. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37, 100675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100675.
Guille, M., Arias, B., Vicente, E., Verdugo, M. A., & Badia, M. (2016). Research in Developmental Disabilities Confirmatory factor analysis of the supports intensity scale for children. 50, 140–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2015.11.022.
Hanik, E. U. (2020). Self Directed Learning Berbasis Literasi Digital Pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19 di Madrasah Ibtidaiyah. Elementary: Islamic Teacher Journal, 8(1), 183–208. https://doi.org/10.21043/elementary.v8i1.7417.
Hansen, L. A., & Wass, S. (2022). Enactive methods towards situational learning-engaging people with intellectual and developmental disability in design. Procedia Computer Science, 196, 598–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.12.054.
Herman, M. S., & Shantz, C. U. (1983). Social problem solving and mother-child interactions of educable mentally retarded children. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 4(3), 217–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/0193-3973(83)90019-9.
Huijsmans, M. D., Kleemans, T., van der Ven, S. H., & Kroesbergen, E. H. (2020). The relevance of subtyping children with mathematical learning disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 104, 103704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2020.103704.
Hukkelberg, S., Tømmerås, T., & Ogden, T. (2019). Parent training: Effects beyond conduct problems. Children and Youth Services Review, 100, 405–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.03.009.
Isaila, N., & Nicolau, I. (2010). Promoting computer assisted learning for persons with disabilities. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 4497–4501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.719.
Karpagavalli, S., Gripsy, J. V., & Nandhini, K. (2021). Speech assistive Tamil learning mobile applications for learning disability children. Materials Today: Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.01.050.
Kincaid, D. L., Doris, M., Shannon, C., & Mulholland, C. (2017). What is the prevalence of autism spectrum disorder and ASD traits in psychosis? A systematic review. Psychiatry Research, 250, 99–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2017.01.017.
Kulkarni, M. (2018). Discursive work within weak field mandate events: The case of a conference on assistive technologies for persons with disabilities. IIMB Management Review, 30(4), 291–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iimb.2018.08.001.
Laabidi, M., Jemni, M., Ayed, L. J. B., Brahim, H. B., & Jemaa, A. B. (2014). Learning technologies for people with disabilities. Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences, 26(1), 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2013.10.005.
Lersilp, T. (2016). Assistive technology and educational services for undergraduate students with disabilities at universities in the Northern Thailand. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 36, 61–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2016.09.012.
Lewandowski, L., Wood, W., & Miller, L. A. (2016). Technological applications for individuals with learning disabilities and ADHD. In Computer-assisted and web-based innovations in psychology, special education, and health (pp. 61–93). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802075-3.00003-6.
Lindström, E. R., & Lemons, C. J. (2021). Teaching reading to students with intellectual and developmental disabilities: An observation study. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 115, 103990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2021.103990.
Nees, M. A., & Berry, L. F. (2013). Audio assistive technology and accommodations for students with visual impairments: Potentials and problems for delivering curricula and educational assessments. Performance Enhancement & Health, 2(3), 101–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peh.2013.08.016.
Olokundun, M., Ogbari, M., Peter, F., Borishade, T., Falola, H., Salau, O., & Kehinde, O. (2018). Survey data on teaching strategies and product innovation: A focus on selected university students in Nigeria. Data in Brief, 18, 248–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2018.03.027.
Parr, M. (2012). The Future of Text-to-Speech Technology: How Long before it’s Just One More Thing we do When Teaching Reading? Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69, 1420–1429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.081.
Perelmutter, B., McGregor, K. K., & Gordon, K. R. (2017). Assistive technology interventions for adolescents and adults with learning disabilities: An evidence-based systematic review and meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 114, 139–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.06.005.
Pheeraphan, N. (2013). Enhancement of the 21st century skills for Thai higher education by integration of ICT in classroom. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 103, 365–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.346.
Rapp, A., Cena, F., Castaldo, R., Keller, R., & Tirassa, M. (2018). Designing technology for spatial needs: Routines, control and social competences of people with autism. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 120, 49–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.07.005.
Sahin, M. C. (2009). Instructional design principles for 21st century learning skills. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 1464–1468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.258.
Sharar, T., & Nawab, A. (2020). Teachers’ perceived teacher leadership practices: A case of private secondary schools in Lahore, Pakistan. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 2(1), 100049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100049.
Stein, A., Dalton, L., Rapa, E., Bluebond-Langner, M., Hanington, L., Stein, K. F., & Yousafzai, A. (2019). Communication with children and adolescents about the diagnosis of their own life-threatening condition. The Lancet, 393(10176), 1150–1163. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)33201-X.
Steruska, J., Simkova, N., & Pitner, T. (2019). Do science and technology parks improve technology transfer? Technology in Society, 59, 101127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.04.003.
Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Torgesen, J. K. (1991). Learning Disabilities: Historical and Conceptual Issues. In Learning About Learning Disabilities (pp. 3–37). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-762530-0.50007-2.
Turculeţ, A. (2015). Teachers for the 21st century. Will emotional intelligence make the difference? Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 180, 990–995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.188.
Valtonen, T., Hoang, N., Sointu, E., Näykki, P., Virtanen, A., Pöysä-Tarhonen, J., & Kukkonen, J. (2021). How pre-service teachers perceive their 21st-century skills and dispositions: A longitudinal perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 116, 106643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106643.
Valverde-Berrocoso, J., Fernández-Sánchez, M. R., Dominguez, F. I. R., & Sosa-Díaz, M. J. (2021). The educational integration of digital technologies preCovid-19: Lessons for teacher education. PLoS ONE, 16(8 August), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256283.
Voinea, M., & Pălăşan, T. (2014). Teachers’ professional identity in the 21st century Romania. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 128, 361–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.172.
Wang, H., Peng, A., & Patterson, M. M. (2021). The roles of class social climate, language mindset, and emotions in predicting willingness to communicate in a foreign language. System, 99, 102529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102529.
Whiting, D., Lichtenstein, P., & Fazel, S. (2021). Violence and mental disorders: a structured review of associations by individual diagnoses, risk factors, and risk assessment. The Lancet Psychiatry, 8(2), 150–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30262-5.
Wu, T. F., Chen, M. C., Yeh, Y. M., Wang, H. P., & Chang, S. C. H. (2014). Is digital divide an issue for students with learning disabilities? Computers in Human Behavior, 39, 112–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.06.024.
Zhu, Q., & Mitcham, C. (2020). Liu Zeyuan’s philosophy of engineering and technology: An introduction to his Marxist socioeconomic theory. Technology in Society, 63, 101351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101351.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Authors who publish with Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)
