Is it True That My Students don't Understand the Static Fluid Concepts? Rasch Modeling Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jpp.v57i1.57883Kata Kunci:
Classical Test Theory, Conceptual understanding, Person diagnostic map, Rasch modelingAbstrak
Analisis pemahaman konsep siswa dapat dilakukan dengan menggunakan pendekatan Classical Test Theory (CTT) dan Item Response Theory (IRT). CTT hanya dapat menjelaskan pemahaman konsep siswa pada tingkat kelompok, sedangkan IRT dapat menjelaskan sampai pada tingkat individu. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi pemahaman konsep siswa dengan menggunakan model Rasch. Penelitian ini menggunakan jenis penelitian survei dan dilaksanakan di kelas XI SMA Negeri di Yogyakarta. Pemahaman konsep siswa dikumpulkan menggunakan 10 soal pilihan ganda pada materi fluida statis. Tingkat pemahaman konsep dianalisis secara bertahap menggunakan pemodelan Rasch. Analisis pemahaman dimulai dengan menganalisis tingkat kesulitan soal, kemudian dilanjutkan dengan analisis deskriptif. Peta Wright digunakan untuk melihat hirarki antara pemahaman konsep siswa dengan tingkat kesulitan soal yang digunakan. Terakhir, menggunakan peta person diagnostic untuk melihat pemahaman konsep siswa secara detail. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa pemahaman konsep siswa secara umum berada pada kategori tinggi dan sedang. Peta person diagnostic telah mengidentifikasi pola jawaban benar dan salah dari siswa yang tidak menunjukkan kemampuan sebenarnya. Maka, perlu dianalisis letak yang tepat dari kelemahan dan kelebihan pemahaman konsep siswa. Hal ini berimplikasi pada kesesuaian rencana pembelajaran yang akan digunakan guru.
Referensi
Adams, D., Chuah, K. M., Sumintono, B., & Mohamed, A. (2021). Students’ readiness for e-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic in a South-East Asian university: a Rasch analysis. Asian Education and Development Studies, ahead-of-p(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-05-2020-0100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-05-2020-0100
Adams, D., Joo, M. T. H., Sumintono, B., & Pei, O. S. (2020). Blended Learning Engagement in Public and Private Higher Education Institutions: A Differential Item Functioning Analysis of Students’ Backgrounds. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 17(1), 133–158. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2020.17.1.6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2020.17.1.6
Atasoy, V., & Kaya, G. (2022). Formative assessment practices in science education: A meta-synthesis study. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 75, 101186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101186
Ayanwale, M. A., Chere-Masopha, J., & Morena, M. C. (2022). The Classical Test or Item Response Measurement Theory: The Status of the Framework at the Examination Council of Lesotho. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(8), 384–406. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.8.22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.8.22
Baghaei, P. (2013). Development and psychometric evaluation of a multidimensional scale of willingness to communicate in a foreign language. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28(3), 1087–1103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-012-0157-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-012-0157-y
Boone, W. J., Staver, J. R., & Yale, M. S. (2014). Rasch Analysis in the Human Sciences. Springer Netherlands. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6857-4
Chen, L.-H. (2011). Enhancement of student learning performance using personalized diagnosis and remedial learning system. Computers & Education, 56(1), 289–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.015
Cizek, G. J., & Lim, S. N. (2023). Formative assessment: an overview of history, theory and application. In International Encyclopedia of Education(Fourth Edition) (pp. 1–9). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818630-5.09002-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818630-5.09002-3
Diani, R., Alfin, J., Anggraeni, Y. M., Mustari, M., & Fujiani, D. (2019). Four-Tier Diagnostic Test With Certainty of Response Index on The Concepts of Fluid. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1155, 012078. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1155/1/012078. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1155/1/012078
English, N., Robertson, P., Gillis, S., & Graham, L. (2022). Rubrics and formative assessment in K-12 education: A scoping review of literature. International Journal of Educational Research, 113, 101964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.101964. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.101964
Fenditasari, K., Jumadi, Istiyono, E., & Hendra. (2020). Identification of misconceptions on heat and temperature among physics education students using four-tier diagnostic test. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1470(1), 012055. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1470/1/012055. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1470/1/012055
Gorter, R., Fox, J.-P., Riet, G. Ter, Heymans, M. W., & Twisk, J. W. R. (2020). Latent growth modeling of IRT versus CTT measured longitudinal latent variables. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 29(4), 962–986. https://doi.org/10.1177/0962280219856375. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0962280219856375
He, P., Zheng, C., & Li, T. (2022). Upper Secondary School Students’ Conceptions of Chemical Equilibrium In Aqueous Solutions: Development and Validation of a Two-Tier Diagnostic Instrument. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 21(3), 428–444. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/22.21.428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/22.21.428
Hikmah, F. N., Sukarelawan, M. I., Nurjannah, T., & Djumati, J. (2021). Elaboration of high school student’s metacognition awareness on heat and temperature material: Wright map in Rasch model. Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4(2), 172–182. https://doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v4i2.9488. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v4i2.9488
Irwansyah, Sukarmin, & Harjana. (2018). Analysis Profile of Student Misconceptions on The Concept of Fluid Based Instrument Three-Tier Test. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1097, 012020. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012020
Ivanjek, L., Morris, L., Schubatzky, T., Hopf, M., Burde, J.-P., Haagen-Schützenhöfer, C., Dopatka, L., Spatz, V., & Wilhelm, T. (2021). Development of a two-tier instrument on simple electric circuits. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 17(2), 020123. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.020123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.020123
Jabrayilov, R., Emons, W. H. M., & Sijtsma, K. (2016). Comparison of Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory in Individual Change Assessment. Applied Psychological Measurement, 40(8), 559–572. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621616664046. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621616664046
Karini, R. A., Fikroh, R. A., & Cahyani, V. P. (2022). Identification of Students’ Misconceptions on Hydrocarbon Material Using a Four-Tier Multiple Choice Diagnostic Test. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Indonesia, 6(2), 79–87. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpki.v6i2.39022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jpki.v6i2.39022
Koto, I., & Ilhami, D. (2023). High-School Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Fluid Dynamics Following Online Learning During the Coronavirus Pandemics. Atlantis Press SARL. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-012-1_16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-012-1_16
Linacre, J. M. (2021). Winsteps® (Version 4.6.1) [Computer Software].
Linacre, J. M., & Wright, B. D. (2012). A User’s Guide to WINSTEPS Ministeps Rasch Model Computer Programs. Mesa Press.
Liu, F., Zhang, Z., Lin, B., Ping, Z., & Mei, Y. (2022). Assessing the psychometric properties of the Chinese return-to-work self-efficacy questionnaire using Rasch model analysis. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 20(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-022-01929-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-022-01929-7
Magno, C. (2009). Demonstrating the Difference between Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory Using Derived Test Data. The International Journal of Educational and Psychological Assessment, 1(1), 1–11.
McInerney, I., & Kerrigan, E. C. (2022). Teaching Predictive Control Using Specification-based Summative Assessments. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 55(17), 236–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.09.285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.09.285
Mohamadi, Z. (2018). Comparative effect of online summative and formative assessment on EFL student writing ability. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 59, 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.02.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.02.003
Nursulistyo, E., Indratno, T. K., Dwiastuti, E., Arifiyanti, F., Puspitasari, A. D., Abdullah, N. S. Y. binti, & Sukarelawan, M. I. (2022). Perception Scale of Online Learning in the Indonesian Context During the Covid-19 Pandemic: Psychometric Properties Based on the Rasch Model. Indonesian Review of Physics, 5(2), 49–56. https://doi.org/10.12928/irip.v5i2.6544. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12928/irip.v5i2.6544
Pandey, P., & Pandey, M. M. (2015). Research Methodology: Tools and Techniques. Bridge Center.
Pranata, E. (2016). Implementasi Model Pembelajaran Group Investigation (GI) Berbantuan Alat Peraga Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Matematika. JPMI (Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Indonesia), 1(1), 34–38. https://doi.org/10.26737/jpmi.v1i1.80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26737/jpmi.v1i1.80
Puspitasari, A. D., Sukarelawan, M. I., Damayanti, E. N., Syifa, A., & Fitri, F. (2022). Model pembelajaran predict observe explain dalam edmodo untuk meningkatkan pemahaman konsep fisika di SMP: Analisis stacking. Berkala Fisika Indonesia : Jurnal Ilmiah Fisika, Pembelajaran Dan Aplikasinya, 13(1), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.12928/bfi-jifpa.v13i1.23204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12928/bfi-jifpa.v13i1.23204
Rasmitadila, Aliyyah, R. R., Rachmadtullah, R., Samsudin, A., Syaodih, E., Nurtanto, M., & Tambunan, A. R. S. (2020). The perceptions of primary school teachers of online learning during the covid-19 pandemic period: A case study in Indonesia. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 7(2), 90–109. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/388. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/388
Riwanto, D., Azis, A., & Arafah, K. (2019). Analisis Pemahaman Konsep Peserta Didik dalam Menyelesaikan Soal-Soal Fisika Kelas X Mia SMA Negeri 3 Soppeng. Jurnal Sains Dan Pendidikan Fisika (JSPF), 15(2), 23–31. https://doi.org/10.35580/jspf.v15i2.11033. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35580/jspf.v15i2.11033
Saputro, D. E., Sarwanto, S., Sukarmin, S., & Ratnasari, D. (2019). Pre-services science teachers’ conceptual understanding level on several electricity concepts. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157, 032018. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/3/032018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/3/032018
Shidik, M. A. (2020). Hubungan antara Motivasi Belajar dengan Pemahaman Konsep Fisika Peserta Didik MAN Baraka. Jurnal Kumparan Fisika, 3(2), 91–98. https://doi.org/10.33369/jkf.3.2.91-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33369/jkf.3.2.91-98
Sukarelawan, M. I., Gustina, E., Ayu, S. M., Sofiana, L., & Sriyanto, S. (2021). Workshop penelitian alternatif di masa pandemik covid-19 bagi guru-guru SMA/SMK. Peran Perguruan Tinggi (PT) Dalam Meningkatkan Kapastias Masyarakat Di Era Pandemi, 1538–1544.
Sukarelawan, M. I., Jumadi, J., Kuswanto, H., Soeharto, S., & Hikmah, F. N. (2021). Rasch Analysis to Evaluate the Psychometric Properties of Junior Metacognitive Awareness Inventory in the Indonesian Context. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 10(4), 486–495. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v10i4.27114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v10i4.27114
Sukarelawan, M. I., Jumadi, J., & Rahman, N. A. (2019). An Analysis of Graduate Students’ Conceptual Understanding in Heat and Temperature (H&T) Using Three-Tier Diagnostic Test. Indonesian Review of Physics, 2(1), 9–14. https://doi.org/10.12928/irip.v2i1.910. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12928/irip.v2i1.910
Sukarelawan, M. I., Puspitasari, A. D., Rahmatika, Z. ’Amalia, Dennis, D., Ishafit, I., Hikmah, F. N., Indratno, T. K., & Sulistyo, E. N. (2022). Online Learning Using Google Incorporated for Student High School: Mapping Motivation Using Rasch Model in Physics Learning. Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 10(2), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.20527/bipf.v10i2.12209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20527/bipf.v10i2.12209
Sukarelawan, M. I., Puspitasari, A. D., Sulisworo, D., Kuswanto, H., & Jumadi, J. (2022). A Shift in the Conceptual Understanding of Physics Students Through the Wright Map. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 55(1), 127–141. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpp.v55i1.38342.
Sukarelawan, M. I., Sriyanto, S., Puspitasari, A. D., Sulisworo, D., & Hikmah, U. N. (2021). Four-Tier Heat and Temperature Diagnostic Test (4T-HTDT) to Identify Student Misconceptions. JIPFRI (Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika Dan Riset Ilmiah), 5(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.30599/jipfri.v5i1.856. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30599/jipfri.v5i1.856
Suma, K., Sadia, I. W., & Pujani, N. M. (2018). The identification of the 11 th grade students’ prior knowledge of electricity concepts. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1040, 012038. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1040/1/012038. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1040/1/012038
Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2014). Aplikasi model rasch untuk penelitian ilmu-ilmu sosial [Rasch model application for social sciences research]. Trim Komunikata Publishing House.
Tabatabaee-Yazdi, M., Motallebzadeh, K., Ashraf, H., & Baghaei, P. (2018). Development and Validation of a Teacher Success Questionnaire Using the Rasch Model. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11210a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11210a
Umam, A., Suparmi, & Sukarmin. (2020). Using two tier based concept test to analysis profile of student understanding on the concept of simple harmonic motion. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1567(3), 032076. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1567/3/032076. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1567/3/032076
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2023 Moh. Irma Sukarelawan, Sriyanto Sriyanto, Miftakhatun Sa’adah, Jimmy Jupri, Fitri Nur Hikmah
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)
