Sharing and Knowing Learning Model: Is it Effective in Increasing Student Learning Activities and Understanding?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jpp.v56i2.59938Kata Kunci:
Student learning activities, students understanding, Musca Moston’s teaching style, sharing and knowing modelAbstrak
Learning design should ideally support increased learning activities and student understanding, but in fact there are still various problems in its implementation, for example students lack concentration, are less active in asking questions, and are low motivated in seeking information. This study aims to analyze the improvement of the Sharing and Knowing (SHARK) learning model on student learning activities and understanding of the material "Musca Moston’s teaching style in Physical Education learning". This study used a quantitative experimental method using a post-test only control group design involving 41 participants. The research instrument uses guidelines for six learning activity behaviours to measure learning activities and five essay questions to measure student understanding levels. Assessment results data were analyzed descriptively and independent sample test using Microsoft excel and SPSS tool pack analysis. The results of the study proved that there was a significant increase in student learning activity and understanding from the SHARK learning model experimental group. Thus, the SHARK learning model is effective for lecturers to use in increasing student learning activities and understanding. The implication is that student-centered learning activities help them to be more enthusiastic, interactive, and responsible for group assignments, as well as increase students' knowledge and understanding in higher-order thinking processes.
Referensi
Ahmad, M. (2021). Optimization of learning effectiveness through the learning environment and learning motivation for students. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 13(3), 1546–1555. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v13i3.617. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v13i3.617
Arnitasari, N. H., & Gaudiawan, A. V. E. (2020). Keaktifan mahasiswa STKIP Widya Yuwana dalam mengikuti perkuliahan. Credendum: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama, 1(2), 17–25. https://doi.org/10.34150/credendum.v1i2.262.
Blegur, J., Wasak, M. R. P., & Manu, L. (2021). Penilaian formatif peserta didik atas kompetensi pendidik dalam proses pembelajaran. Satya Widya, 33(2), 117–127. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.sw.2017.v33.i2.p117-127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24246/j.sw.2017.v33.i2.p117-127
Burke, A. (2011). Group work: How to use groups effectively. The Journal of Effective Teaching, 11(2), 87–95. https://uncw.edu/jet/articles/vol11_2/burke.pdf.
Chiriac, E. H. (2014). Group work as an incentive for learning - students’ experiences of group work. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 558. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00558. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00558
Chivatá, Y. P., & Oviedo, R. C. (2018). EFL students’ perceptions of activeness during the implementation of flipped learning approach at a Colombian university. Gist Education and Learning Research Journal, 17, 81–105. https://doi.org/10.26817/16925777.436. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26817/16925777.436
Clarindo, C. B. d. S., Miller, S., & Kohle, É. C. (2020). Learning activity as a means of developing theoretical thinking capacities. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 603753. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.603753. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.603753
Closs, L., Mahat, M., & Imms, W. (2022). Learning environments’ influence on students’ learning experience in an Australian Faculty of Business and Economics. Learning Environments Research, 25(1), 271–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-021-09361-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-021-09361-2
Concina, E. (2022). The relationship between self- and peer assessment in higher education: A systematic review. Trends in Higher Education, 1(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.3390/higheredu1010004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/higheredu1010004
Evcim, H., & İpek, Ö. F. (2013). Effects of Jigsaw II on academic achievement in English prep classes. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 1651–1659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.236
Falchikov, N., & Goldfinch, J. (2000). Student peer assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks. Review of Educational Research, 70(3), 287–322. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543070003287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543070003287
Fitriani, F., Nurhuda, N., & Ina, A. I. (2021). Improving students’ activeness and critical thinking skills through problem based learning. Journal of Science and Education (JSE, 2(1), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.56003/jse.v2i1.60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56003/jse.v2i1.60
Fook, C. Y., & Sidhu, G. K. (2015). Investigating Learning Challenges Faced by Students in Higher Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 186, 604–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.001
Friskawati, G. F., & Supriadi, D. (2020). Video analysis with youtube platform for physical education, health, and recreation students’s higher order thinking skills (HOTs. Journal Sport Area, 7(1), 96–103. https://doi.org/10.25299/sportarea.2022.vol7(1).7737. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25299/sportarea.2022.vol7(1).7737
Giang, T. T., Khanh, M. Q., Hong, N. T. T., & Hoa, V. L. (2022). Life skills education capacity structure of teacher in the context of current education innovation. International Journal of Social Sciences, 5(2), 105–109. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijss.v5n2.1893. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21744/ijss.v5n2.1893
Gozalo-Delgado, M., León-Del-Barco, B., & Mendo-Lázaro, S. (2020). Good practices and learning strategies of undergraduate university students. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(6), 1849. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17061849. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17061849
Green, Z. A., Noor, U., & Hashemi, M. N. (2020). Furthering proactivity and career adaptability among university students: Test of intervention. Journal of Career Assessment, 28(3), 402–424. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072719870739. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072719870739
Halim, S. W. (2021). Peer assessment in university level: A preliminary study on the reliability. CaLLs: Journal of Culture, Arts, Literature, and Linguistics, 7(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.30872/calls.v6i2.3804. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30872/calls.v6i2.3804
Hanik, N. R., & Harsono, S. (2016). Peningkatan aktivitas dan hasil belajar mahasiswa pada mata kuliah anatomi tumbuhan melalui model pembelajaran komparasi yang berbasis lesson study. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan IPA, 7(2), 25–31. https://doi.org/10.26418/jpmipa.v7i2.17687. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26418/jpmipa.v7i2.17687
Harmono, S. (2017). Pengaruh model pembelajaran quantum dan gaya belajar terhadap pemahaman konseptual dan ketrampilan gerak pada mata pelajaran pendidikan jasmani olahraga dan kesehatan siswa SMA kota Kediri. Jurnal SPORTIF: Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran, 3(1), 103–114. https://doi.org/10.29407/js_unpgri.v3i1.745. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29407/js_unpgri.v3i1.745
Iglesias Pérez, M. C., Vidal-Puga, J., & Pino Juste, M. R. (2022). The role of self and peer assessment in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 47(3), 683–692. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1783526. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1783526
Irsyad, T., Wuryandini, E., Yunus, M., & Hadi, D. P. (2020). Analisis keaktifan mahasiswa dalam proses pembelajaran statistika multivariat. Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi Undiksha, 12(1), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.23887/jjpe.v12i1.24294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jjpe.v12i1.24294
Karo Karo, R., Perangin-Angin, R. B. B., & Murad, A. (2020). The effect of STAD cooperative learning model and critical thinking ability on learning outcomes PPKn grade V students of SD Negeri 060934 Medan Johor. Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal, 3(2), 871–878. https://doi.org/10.33258/birle.v3i2.959. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birle.v3i2.959
Khasanah, U., & Fitriyani, H. (2016). Peningkatan aktivitas belajar mahasiswa melalui pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD dikolaborasikan dengan gallery work. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Berkemajuan Dan Menggembirakan, Ke-1, 150–157. https://doi.org/http://hdl.handle.net/11617/7640.
Kragten, M., Admiraal, W., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2015). Students’ learning activities while studying biological process diagrams. International Journal of Science Education, 37(12), 1915–1937. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1057775. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1057775
Lee, J., Song, H. D., & Hong, A. J. (2019). Exploring factors, and indicators for measuring students’ sustainable engagement in e-learning. Sustainability, 11(4), 985. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11040985. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11040985
Lin, H. C., Hwang, G. J., Chang, S. C., & Hsu, Y. D. (2021). Facilitating critical thinking in decision making-based professional training: An online interactive peer-review approach in a flipped learning context. Computers and Education, 173, 104266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104266
Mahmoud Raba, A. A. A. (2017). The impact of effective teaching strategies on producing fast and good learning outcomes. International Journal of Research - Granthaalayah, 5(1), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v5.i1.2017.1691 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v5.i1.2017.1691
Mawardi. (2015). Peningkatan aktivitas belajar mahasiswa dengan metode jigsaw. PIONIR: Jurnal Pendidikan, 13(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.22373/pjp.v4i2.177.
Melovitz-Vasan, C., Gentile, M., Huff, S., & Vasan, N. (2018). Student perception of active learning group in a problem-based learning curricular environment. Medical Science Educator, 28(1), 195–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-018-0541-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-018-0541-6
Mendoza, G. L. L., Caranto, L. C., & David, J. J. (2015). Effectiveness of video presentation to students’ learning. International Journal of Nursing Science, 5(2), 81–86. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.nursing.20150502.07.
Motaei, B. (2014). On the effect of cooperative learning on general English achievement of Kermanshah Islamic Azad University students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1249–1254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.540. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.540
Mulyadi. (2018). Analisis faktor rendahnya keaktifan belajar mahasiswa pendidikan matematika STKIP PGRI Pacitan pada mata kuliah persamaan differensial. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 10(1), 1–7. https://repository.stkippacitan.ac.id/id/eprint/1120/
Ningsih, S., E., B., & Sumarmi. (2017). Improving the students’ activity and learning outcomes on social sciences subject using round table and rally coach of cooperative learning model. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(11), 30–37. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1139772.pdf.
Paolini, A. (2015). Enhancing teaching effectiveness and student learning outcome. The Journal of Effective Teaching, 15(1), 20–33. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1060429.pdf.
Payne, B. K., Monk-Turner, E., Smith, D., & Sumter, M. (2006). Improving group work: Voices of students repository citation original publication citation. Education, 126(3), 441–448. https://doi.org/https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/sociology_criminaljustice_fac_pubs/22.
Pham, H. H., & Tran, L. T. (2013). Developing graduate knowledge and skills for the world of work: The case of the translation curriculum in Vietnam. The Internet Journal Language, Culture and Society, 36, 7–17. http://aaref.com.au/en/publications/journal/
Robertson, B., & Flowers, M. J. (2020). Determining the impact of lecture videos on student outcomes. Learning and Teaching, 13(2), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.3167/latiss.2020.130203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3167/latiss.2020.130203
Serrano-Aguilera, J. J., Tocino, A., Fortes, S., Martín, C., Mercadé-Melé, P., Moreno-Sáez, R., Muñoz, A., Palomo-Hierro, S., & Torres, A. (2021). Using peer review for student performance enhancement: Experiences in a multidisciplinary higher education setting. Education Sciences, 11(2), 71. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11020071. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11020071
Silva, H., Lopes, J., Dominguez, C., Payan-Carreira, R., Morais, E., Nascimento, M., & Morais, F. (2016). Fostering critical thinking through peer review between cooperative learning groups. Revista Lusófona de Educação, 32, 31–45. https://doi.org/https://revistas.ulusofona.pt/index.php/rleducacao/article/view/5511.
Södervik, I., Vilppu, H., Boshuizen, H., & Murtonen, M. (2022). Development of university teachers’ professional vision of students’ prior knowledge during a short pedagogical training. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 34(1), 7–24. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1363721.pdf.
Sriklaub, K., & Wongwanich, S. (2014). Learning activities aimed at promoting students’ interest: Synthesis of master teachers’ activity organizing methods via TV media. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 3375–3380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.767. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.767
Stenberg, M., Mangrio, E., Bengtsson, M., & Carlson, E. (2021). Formative peer assessment in higher healthcare education programmes: A scoping review. BMJ Open, 11(2), 45345. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045345
Sumiwa, I. G. (2015). Penerapan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe jigsaw untuk meningkatkan aktivitas dan hasil belajar mata kuliah teori dan praktik renang II. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 4(2), 666–674. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v4i2.6063. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v4i2.6063
Susanti, D., & Nastuti, R. (2021). Pengaruh disiplin dan aktivitas belajar terhadap hasil belajar nahasiswa pendidikan guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah FAI UM Sumatera Barat. Jurnal Kajian Dan Pengembangan Umat, 14(1), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.31869/jkpu.v4i1.2640. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31869/jkpu.v4i1.2640
Suyono, & Hariyanto. (2016). Belajar dan pembelajaran: Teori dan konsep dasar. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Tri Juniar, D., Rohyana, A., & Rahmat, A. A. (2019). Pengembangan model pembelajaran diskusi kelompok dalam meningkatkan pemahaman dan aktivitas belajar mahasiswa. JUARA: Jurnal Olahraga, 4(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.33222/juara.v4i1.381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33222/juara.v4i1.381
Triyanto. (2019). Understanding student participation within a group learning. South African Journal of Education, 39(2), 1629. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v39n2a1629. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v39n2a1629
Umar, H. (2018). Peningkatan keaktifan dan prestasi belajar mahasiswa melalui penerapan metode pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD (student teams achievement division. JURNAL TEPAT: Teknologi Terapan Untuk Pengabdian Masyarakat, 1(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.25042/jurnal_tepat.v1i1.17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25042/jurnal_tepat.v1i1.17
Veine, S., Anderson, M. K., Andersen, N. H., Espenes, T. C., Søyland, T. B., Wallin, P., & Reams, J. (2020). Reflection as a core student learning activity in higher education - Insights from nearly two decades of academic development. International Journal for Academic Development, 25(2), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2019.1659797. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2019.1659797
Widayana, G., & Balsono, K. (2023). Jigsaw learning model improves student learning outcomes in mechanical engineering basic knowledge. Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 6(1), 101–108. https://doi.org/10.23887/jlls.v6i1.61166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jlls.v6i1.61166
Widyani, G. P., & Sukirno. (2019). Improving student learning activities through student team achievement division learning model. Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi Indonesia, 17(1), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpai.v17i1.26335. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jpai.v17i1.26335
Zhao, X., Ismail, I. S., & Narasuman, S. (2023). Measurement indicators of student engagement and investigation on student engagement in blended learning. 3rd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Education (IC-ICAIE, 823–829. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-040-4_125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-040-4_125
Zhu, J., Yuan, H., Zhang, Q., Huang, P. H., Wang, Y., Duan, S., Lei, M., Lim, E. G., & Song, P. (2022). The impact of short videos on student performance in an online-flipped college engineering course. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9(1), 327. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01355-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01355-6
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2023 Aang Rohyana, Dicky Tri Juniar, Jusuf Blegur
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)
