Blended Learning in Integrated Science Learning by a WISE Approach in Homeschooling

Agus Tryanto; Moch Sukardjo; Eveline Siregar

doi:10.23887/jet.v5i4.38365

Authors

Agus Tryanto State University of Jakarta
Moch Sukardjo State University of Jakarta
Eveline Siregar State University of Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v5i4.38365

Keywords:

blended learning, science, WISE approach

Abstract

The lack of variety of learning is carried out by Homeschooling, while Homeschooling is required to be more creative, independent, and innovative. Blended learning will be an innovative learning option and according to the character of Homeschooling. This study aims to develop blended learning in science subjects with the WISE approach in Homeschooling. The research is entitled development research (R&D). The development method uses a flipped learning model with a web-based design model with data collection using data triangulation. The instrument used to collect data is a questionnaire. The product will go through an evaluation process from experts and evaluate its feasibility and effectiveness. Expert reviews consist of reviews of media experts and learning design experts and reviews of material and language experts. The feasibility stage is carried out by one-to-one test, small group test, and field test. In comparison, the effectiveness test is carried out to summative evaluation by calculating the N-Gain score. The final result states that blended learning is feasible with an average of 3.5 on expert reviews, which is very good and effective with the calculation results of the average N-Gain 0.61 in the excellent category. So with Blended Learning, learning in Homeschooling becomes creative, innovative, and independent. The research implication is that the application of blended learning in Homeschooling will increase a pleasant learning atmosphere.

Author Biographies

Agus Tryanto, State University of Jakarta

Postgraduate Educational Technology

Moch Sukardjo, State University of Jakarta

Postgraduate Educational Technology

Eveline Siregar, State University of Jakarta

Postgraduate Educational Technology

References

Abramovitz, B., Berezina, M., Berman, A., & Shvartsman, L. (2012). A Blended Learning Approach in Mathematics. Teaching Mathematics Online: Emergent Technologies and Methodologies, 21. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60960-875-0.ch002.

Akhmalia, N. L., Suana, W., & Maharta, N. (2018). Efektivitas Blended Learning Berbasis LMS dengan Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri pada Materi Fluida Statis terhadap Penguasaan Konsep Siswa. JIPFRI (Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika Dan Riset Ilmiah), 2(2), 56–64. https://doi.org/10.30599/jipfri.v2i2.299.

Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2011). Understanding cognitive presence in an online and blended community of inquiry: Assessing outcomes and processes for deep approaches to learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(2), 233–250. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01029.x.

Balan, S., Katenga, J. E., & Simon, A. (2019). “Reading Habits and their Influence on Academic Achievement among Students at Asia Pacific International University, Thailand.” Abstract Proceedings International Scholars Conference, 7(1), 1469–1495. https://doi.org/10.35974/isc.v7i1.928.

Barnes, S. J., Pressey, A. D., & Scornavacca, E. (2019). Mobile ubiquity: Understanding the relationship between cognitive absorption, smartphone addiction and social network services. In Computers in Human Behavior (Vol. 90). Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.09.013.

Bervell, B., & Arkorful, V. (2020). LMS-enabled blended learning utilization in distance tertiary education: establishing the relationships among facilitating conditions, voluntariness of use and use behaviour. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-0183-9.

Bilik, Ö., Kankaya, E. A., & Deveci, Z. (2020). Effects of web-based concept mapping education on students’ concept mapping and critical thinking skills: A double blind, randomized, controlled study. Nurse Education Today, 86, 104312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2019.104312.

Bock, A., Modabber, A., Kniha, K., Lemos, M., Rafai, N., & Hölzle, F. (2018). Blended learning modules for lectures on oral and maxillofacial surgery. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 56(10), 956–961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2018.10.281.

Boyadzhieva, E. (2016). Learner-centered Teaching and Learner Autonomy. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 232, 35–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.008.

Choi, J. J., Robb, C. A., Mifli, M., & Zainuddin, Z. (2021). University students’ perception to online class delivery methods during the COVID-19 pandemic: A focus on hospitality education in Korea and Malaysia. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, 29(August), 100336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2021.100336.

Cooper, V. A., Forino, G., Kanjanabootra, S., & Meding, J. von. (2020). Leveraging the community of inquiry framework to support web-based simulations in disaster studies. The Internet and Higher Education, 47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100757.

Dashtestani, R. (2013). Implementing mobile-assisted language learning (MALL) in an EFL context: Iranian EFL teachers’ perspectives on challenges and affordances. The JALT CALL Journal, 9(2), 149–168. https://doi.org/10.29140/jaltcall.v9n2.153.

Ghavifekr, S., & Rosdy, W. A. W. (2015). Teaching and learning with technology: Effectiveness of ICT integration in schools. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 1(2). https://ijres.net/index.php/ijres/article/view/79.

Gil-Flores, J., Rodríguez-Santero, J., & Torres-Gordillo, J. J. (2017). Factors that explain the use of ICT in secondary-education classrooms: The role of teacher characteristics and school infrastructure. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 441–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.057.

Hamzah, I., & Mentari, S. (2017). Development of Accounting E-Module to Support the Scientific Approach of Students Grade X Vocational High School. Journal of Accounting and Business Education, 1(1), 78. https://doi.org/10.26675/jabe.v1i1.9751.

Herfinaly, R., & Aryani, L. (2013). Interaksi Sosial Remaja Yang Bersekolah di Homeschooling Dengan Menggunakan Metode Distance Learning. Jurnal Psikologi, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.24014/jp.v9i1.147.

Hogan, R., & Devi, M. (2019). A synchronous pedagogy to improve online student success. International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design, 9(3), 61–77. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJOPCD.2019070105.

Hong, J.-C., Hsiao, H.-S., Chen, P.-H., Lu, C.-C., & Tai, K.-H. (2021). Critical attitude and ability associated with students’ self-confidence and attitude toward “predict-observe-explain” online science inquiry learning. Computers & Education, 166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104172.

Hrastinski, S. (2019). What Do We Mean by Blended Learning? TechTrends. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00375-5.

Khalil, Z. M. (2018). EFL Students’ Perceptions towards Using Google Docs and Google Classroom as Online Collaborative Tools in Learning Grammar. Applied Linguistics Research Journal, 2(2), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.14744/alrj.2018.47955.

Khamparia, A., & Pandey, B. (2017). Impact of interactive multimedia in E-learning technologies: Role of multimedia in E-learning. Enhancing Academic Research With Knowledge Management Principles, April, 199–227. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-2489-2.ch007.

Kurniawati, M., Santanapurba, H., & Kusumawati, E. (2019). Penerapan Blended Learning Menggunakan Model Flipped Classroom Berbantuan Google Classroom Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Smp. EDU-MAT: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(1), 8–19. https://doi.org/10.20527/edumat.v7i1.6827.

Lapitan, L. D., Tiangco, C. E., Sumalinog, D. A. G., Sabarillo, N. S., & Diaz, J. M. (2021). An effective blended online teaching and learning strategy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Education for Chemical Engineers, 35(May 2020), 116–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2021.01.012.

Li, J., Zhang, X., & Hu, Z. (2018). The design and application of flip classroom teaching based on computer technology. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 13(10), 95–107. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v13i10.9453.

Lian, B., Kristiawan, M., Ammelia, D., Primasari, G., Anggung, M., & Prasetyo, M. (2020). Teachers’ Model in Building Students’ Character. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(14), 927–932. https://doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.14.165.

Linn, M. C., Slotta, J. D., Terashima, H., Stone, E., & Madhok, K. (2010). Designing Science Instruction using the Web-based. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 11(2). https://www.eduhk.hk/apfslt/download/v11_issue2_files/foreword.pdf.

Lukitasari, Purnamasari, Utami, & Sukri. (2019). Blended-Problem-Based Learning: How its impact on students’ critical thingking skills? Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia, 5(3), 425–434. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v5i3.10048.

Maarop, A. H., & Embi, M. A. (2016). Implementation of Blended Learning in Higher Learning Institutions: A Review of Literature. ResearchGate, 9(3), 41. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n3p4.

Mali, D., & Lim, H. (2021). How do students perceive face-to-face/blended learning as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic? International Journal of Management Education, 19(3), 100552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100552.

Malik, R. S. (2018). Educational Challenges in 21st Century and Sutainable Development. Journal of Sustainable Development Education and Research, 2(1), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsder.v2i1.12266.

Matuk, C., Wanjing Anya, M., Sharma, G., & Linn, M. C. (2019). The lifespan and impact of students’ ideas shared during classroom science inquiry. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference, 1. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/41n1w9d4.

Muhametjanova, G., & Akmatbekova, A. (2019). The web-based learning environment in general physics course in a public university in Kyrgyzstan. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/100409.

Müller, A. M., Goh, C., Lim, L. Z., & Gao, X. (2021). COVID-19 Emergency eLearning and Beyond: Experiences and Perspectives of University Educators. Education Sciences, 11(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11010019.

Neuman, A. (2020). The meaning of learning: homeschooled compared with schooled children. Educational Studies, 46(6). https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2019.1668258.

Outhwaite, L. A., Faulder, M., Gulliford, A., & Pitchford, N. J. (2019). Raising early achievement in math with interactive apps: A randomized control trial. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(2), 284–298. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000286.

Pöntinen, S., & Räty-Záborszky, S. (2020). Pedagogical aspects to support students’ evolving digital competence at school. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 28(2), 182–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2020.1735736.

Purwaningsih, N., & Fauziah, P. Y. (2019). Homeschooling As an Alternative Education in Indonesia: Case Study on Homeschoolers with Mothers’ Professional Difference. KnE Social Sciences, 1(5). https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i17.4617.

Ran, W., & Jinglu, L. (2020). The Design and Development of Digital Books for E-learning. 2020 4th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Virtual Reality, 51–55. https://doi.org/10.1145/3439133.3439140.

Seibert, S. A. (2020). Problem-based learning: A strategy to foster generation Z’s critical thinking and perseverance. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 000, 2–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2020.09.002.

Shamsuddin, N., & Kaur, J. (2020). Students’ learning style and its effect on blended learning, does it matter? International. Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i1.20422.

Siregar, A. D., Yusuf, M., & Silaban, R. (2018). Analysis of Feasibility Teaching Material on Molecular Shape Topic Based on Criteria Board of National Education Standards in Indonesia. Atlantis Press, 200. https://doi.org/10.2991/aisteel-18.2018.11.

Spector, J. M. (2016). Educational Technology Program and Project Evaluation. In Educational Technology Program and Project Evaluation, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315724140.

Sudiarta, I. G. P., & Sandra, I. (2016). Pengaruh Model Blended Learning berbantuan Video Animasi Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah dan Pemahaman Konsep Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 49(2). https://doi.org/10.23887/jppundiksha.v49i2.9009.

Taimur, S., & Sattar, H. (2018). Education for Sustainable Development and Critical Thinking Competency. Springer Nature Switzerland AG, September, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69902-8_64-1.

Tobing, R. L., & Pranowo. (2020). Blended learning in French intermediate grammar learning: Is it effective? Cakrawala Pendidikan, 39(3). https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v39i3.32035.

Widana, I. N. S., Sumaryani, N. P., Ayuning, N. L. W., & Pradnyawati. (2018). Memicu Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Hasil Belajar Biologi melalui Model Blended Learning Berbantuan Komik Digital. Emasains, 7(1), 38–48. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1407735.

Wu, W. H., Kao, H. Y., Wu, S. H., & Wei, C. W. (2019). Development and evaluation of affective domain using student’s feedback in entrepreneurial Massive Open Online Courses. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(MAY). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01109.

Yigzaw, M., Tebekaw, Y., Kim, Y.-M., Kols, A., & Ayalew, F. (2019). Comparing the effectiveness of a blended learning approach with a conventional learning approach for basic emergency obstetric and newborn care training in Ethiopia. Midwifery, 78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2019.07.014.

Yusoff, S., Yusoff, R., & Noh, N. . (2017). Blended Learning Approach for Less Proficient Students. SAGE Open, 7(3), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F2158244017723051.