Profile of Thematic Learning Viewed from STEAM in the 2013 Curriculum for Grade IV Elementary School

Kurniati - Fadhilah; Fenny Roshayanti; Veryliana Purnamasari

doi:10.23887/jisd.v5i2.26830

Authors

Kurniati - Fadhilah Universitas PGRI Semarang http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2790-6983
Fenny Roshayanti Universitas PGRI Semarang
Veryliana Purnamasari Universitas PGRI Semarang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v5i2.26830

Keywords:

Pembelajaran, tematik, STEAM, buku guru, buku siswa

Abstract

Education in Indonesia is still relatively low, because students have not been able to face the challenges of the industrial revolution 4.0. There needs to be an educational concept that is able to answer the challenges of the industrial revolution 4.0, one of which is STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Art, Mathematics). This study aims to analyze the potential of STEAM contained in the Teacher's Book and Student's Book Theme 1-9 Revised 2017 grade IV Elementary School. This research is a qualitative descriptive study with the object of research directed to find out the potential of STEAM contained in the 2017 Revised Teacher's Book and Student's Book for Grade IV Elementary School. Data obtained from secondary data in the form of Teacher's Books and Revised 2017 Student Books for Class IV Elementary Schools that have been analyzed. The data collection method used the documentation analysis method so that the researchers analyzed the Theme Books 1-9 Class IV Elementary School. The data analysis method used is the Miles and Huberman model starting with data collection, data presentation, data reduction, and drawing conclusions and verification. The results show that there are facts that have STEAM potential and facts that have STEAM potential with an average of 80% of STEAM potential from the number of lessons in Themes 1-9. So, the results of the analysis of the 2017 Revised Teacher's Book and Theme Book for Grade IV Elementary School have the potential for STEAM. However, there are some learnings that do not have STEAM facts, so the learning does not have STEAM potential.

Author Biography

Kurniati - Fadhilah, Universitas PGRI Semarang

Nama: Kurniati Fadhilah Pendidikan: Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas PGRI Semarang

References

Alaloul, W. S., Liew, M. S., Zawawi, N. A. W. A., & Kennedy, I. B. (2020). Industrial Revolution 4.0 in the construction industry: Challenges and opportunities for stakeholders. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 11(1), 225–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2019.08.010.

Alismail, H. A., & McGuire, P. (2015). 21 St Century Standards and Curriculum: Current Research and Practice. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(6), 150–155. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1083656.pdf.

Allina, B. (2018). The development of STEAM educational policy to promote student creativity and social empowerment. Arts Education Policy Review, 119(2), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2017.1296392.

Anisimova, T. I., Sabirova, F. M., & Shatunova, O. V. (2020). Formation of design and research competencies in future teachers in the framework of STEAM education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(2), 204–217. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i02.11537.

Apriliana, M. R., Ridwan, A., Hadinugrahaningsih, T., & Rahmawati, Y. (2018). Pengembangan Soft Skills Peserta Didik melalui Integrasi Pendekatan Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics (STEAM) dalam Pembelajaran Asam Basa. JRPK: Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Kimia, 8(2), 42–51. https://doi.org/10.21009/jrpk.082.05.

Arifin, Z. (2020). Transformasi Pendidikan di Negara Maju: Inisiatif Filosofis Pengembangan Mutu Pendidikan di Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Studies, 16 (1), 38–56. https://doi.org/10.47466/hikmah.v16i1.166.

Bahrum, S., & Ibrahim, M. N. (2018). Kebolehgunaan Modul “ steAm ” dalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Pendidikan Seni Visual Sekolah Rendah Usability of " steAm " Module in Teaching and Learning of Visual Arts Education in Primary School. Jurnal Seni Dan Pendidikan Seni, 6, 65–79. https://ejournal.upsi.edu.my/index.php/JSPS/article/download/2282/1603/.

Budiyono. (2020). Inovasi Pemanfaatan Teknologi Sebagai Media Pembelajaran di Era Revolusi 4.0 Budiyono. Jurnal Kependidikan, 6(2), 300–309. https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v6i2.2475.

Costantino, T. (2018). STEAM by another name: Transdisciplinary practice in art and design education. Arts Education Policy Review, 119(2), 100–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2017.1292973.

Darise, G. N. (2019). Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 Revisi Sebagai Solusi Alternatif Pendidikan Di Indonesia Dalam Menghadapi Revolusi Industri. Ilmu Iqra’, 13(2), 41–53. http://journal.iain-manado.ac.id/index.php/JII/article/view/967.

Fatkhuri, F. (2019). Desentralisasi Pendidikan di Indonesia : Korupsi dan Problem Politik Kekuasaan. KEMUDI : Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 3(2), 278–297. https://doi.org/10.31629/kemudi.v3i2.874.

Gettings, M. (2016). Putting It All Together: STEAM, PBL, Scientific Method, and the Studio Habits of Mind. Art Education, 69(4), 10–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2016.1176472.

Harahap, N. J. (2019). Mahasiswa Dan Revolusi Industri 4.0. Ecobisma (Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis Dan Manajemen), 6(1), 70–78. https://doi.org/10.36987/ecobi.v6i1.38.

How, M., Loong, W., & Hung, D. (2019). Educing AI-Thinking in Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics (STEAM) Education. Education Sciences, 9(3), 1–41. https://doi.org/https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/9/3/184#.

Jeong, S., & Kim, H. (2015). The effect of a climate change monitoring program on students’ knowledge and perceptions of STEAM education in Korea. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(6), 1321–1338. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1390a.

Moleong, L. (2012). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Munawar, M., Roshayanti, F., & Sugiyanti, S. (2019). Implementation of Steam (Science Technology Engineering Art Mathematics) - Based Early Childhood Education Learning In Semarang City. Ceria (Cerdas Energik Responsif Inovatif Adaptif), 2(5), 276. https://doi.org/10.22460/ceria.v2i5.p276-285.

Muttaqin, Z., & Rais, M. (2018). Menelusuri Pendidikan Kecakapan Hidup (Life Skill) Pada Mata Pelajaran Ppkn Siswa Kelas Iv Di Sdn 1 Terong Tawah Kec.Labuapi Kabupaten Lombok Barat Tahun Pelajaran 2014/2015. CIVICUS : Pendidikan-Penelitian-Pengabdian Pendidikan Pancasila Dan Kewarganegaraan, 4(2), 87. https://doi.org/10.31764/civicus.v4i2.345.

Ningsih, Y. E., & Rohman, A. (2018). Pendidikan Multikultural: Penguatan Identitas Nasional Di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. UNWAHA Jombang, 1(September), 44–50.

Novianto, A. & Mustadi, A. (2015). Analisis Buku Teks Muatan Tematik Integratif, Scientific Approach, Dan Authentic Assessment Sekolah Dasar. Analisis Buku Teks Muatan Tematik Integratif, Scientific Approach, Dan Authentic Assessment Sekolah Dasar, 45(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v45i1.7181.

Nurhikmayati, I. (2019). Implementasi STEAM Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Didactical Mathematics, 1(2), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.31949/dmj.v1i2.1508.

Perignat, E., & Katz-Buonincontro, J. (2019). STEAM in practice and research: An integrative literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31, 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.10.002.

Prastyo, H. (2020). Pengembangan Soal Matematika Model PISA Menggunakan Konteks Kalimantan Timur. Jurnal Padegogik, 3(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.35974/jpd.v3i1.2230.

Quigley, C. F., Herro, D., & Jamil, F. M. (2017). Developing a Conceptual Model of STEAM Teaching Practices. School Science and Mathematics, 117(1–2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12201.

Ramadani, E. (2020). Pengembangan Handout Matematika Berbasis Pendekatan STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics) Pada Materi Bangun Ruang Sisi Datar Untuk Siswa Kelas VIII SMP. Universitas Jambi.

Şadoğlu, G. P. (2018). Engineering students’ opinions on science literacy. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6(8), 1819–1830. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2018.060827.

Sari, R. M. M., & Priatna, N. (2020). Model-Model Pembelajaran di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0 (E-Learning, M-Learning, AR-Learning dan VR-Learning). Jurnal Ilmiah Fakultas Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan, 6(1), 107–115. http://ejournal.unsub.ac.id/index.php/FKIP/article/view/699/591.

Simamora, R. E., Saragih, S., & Hasratuddin, H. (2019). Improving Students’ Mathematical Problem Solving Ability and Self-Efficacy through Guided Discovery Learning in Local Culture Context. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(1), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/3966.

Siswanto, J. (2018). Keefektifan Pembelajaran Fisika dengan Pendekatan STEM untuk Meningkatkan Kreativitas Mahasiswa. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika, 9(2), 133–137. https://doi.org/10.26877/jp2f.v9i2.3183.

Syahmani, S., Hafizah, E., Sauqina, S., Adnan, M. Bin, & Ibrahim, M. H. (2021). STEAM Approach to Improve Environmental Education Innovation and Literacy in Waste Management: Bibliometric Research. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE), 3(2), 130–141. https://doi.org/10.23917/ijolae.v3i2.12782.

Syahputri, N. R., Yanzi, H., & Halim, A. (2019). Peran Program Bosda Dalam Perluasan Akses Pendidikan Di SMKN 1 Bandar Lampung. Jurnal Kultur Demokrasi, vol v, 1–15. http://jurnal.fkip.unila.ac.id/index.php/JKD/article/view/18355.

Thien, L. M., Darmawan, I. G. N., & Ong, M. Y. (2015). Affective characteristics and mathematics performance in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand: what can PISA 2012 data tell us? Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-015-0013-z.

Tohir, M. (2019). Hasil PISA Indonesia Tahun 2018 Turun Dibanding Tahun 2015. 2018–2019. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/pcjvx.

W, R. W. A., Poluakan, M. V., Dikayuana, D., Wibowo, H., & Raharjo, S. T. (2020). Potret Generasi Milenial Pada Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Focus : Jurnal Pekerjaan Sosial, 2(2), 187. https://doi.org/10.24198/focus.v2i2.26241.

Zharylgassovaa, P., Assilbayeva, F., Saidakhmetova, L., & Arenova, A. (2021). Psychological and pedagogical foundations of practice-oriented learning of future STEAM teachers. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100886.