*) Jurnal Pedagogi dan Pembelajaran is Accredited by The Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education of the Republic of Indonesia, which is ranked SINTA 2.
Peer Review Process
Jurnal Pedagogi dan Pembelajaran (JP2) operates under a conventional single-blind peer review policy, in which the identity of the reviewer is always concealed from the submitting author. Authors are expected to present their manuscripts honestly, without fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, or inappropriate data manipulation. Submitted manuscripts are evaluated by anonymous referees for their contribution, originality, relevance, and presentation.
Jurnal Pedagogi dan Pembelajaran (JP2) follows a stringent and transparent review process to ensure the quality and credibility of the published articles. The journal adopts a single-blind peer-review model, where the identity of the reviewers is kept confidential during the review process.
Submission and Initial Evaluation
All manuscripts submitted to Jurnal Edutech Undiksha (JEU) undergo an initial evaluation by the editorial team to assess their relevance and compliance with the journal’s scope and guidelines. Papers are then sent for anonymous review by at least two reviewers, who are members of the Editorial Board or individuals holding equivalent positions in the field. Manuscripts that pass the initial evaluation are processed further.
Peer Review
Each eligible manuscript is subsequently sent for review by at least two independent expert reviewers in the relevant field. Reviewers are selected based on their expertise, experience, and previous contributions to the field.
Review Criteria
Reviewers are asked to assess the submitted manuscript based on scientific quality, originality, relevance to the journal’s scope, clarity of presentation, and adherence to ethical guidelines. Constructive feedback and suggestions for improvement are encouraged to assist authors in enhancing the quality of their manuscripts.
Review Duration
Jurnal Edutech Undiksha (JEU) strives to provide timely and efficient peer reviews. Editors will inform authors of the review results as soon as possible, typically within 4 to 12 weeks. The decision of the Editor is final, and no correspondence will be entertained regarding manuscripts deemed unsuitable for publication in this journal. All correspondence, including notifications about editorial decisions and requests for revisions, will be sent via email.
