Thinking Trajectory of Students with Thinking and Feeling Personality Types in Solving Algebra Problems
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jp2.v6i1.53957Keywords:
Learning Trajectory, Thinking Personality, Feeling Personality, Problem SolvingAbstract
The strategies students use in solving mathematical problems are quite diverse, so they affect students' personality types. This research focuses on analyzing the trajectory of students' thinking in solving algebraic problems in terms of thinking and feeling personality types. This research is qualitative research with a descriptive method. The population is 34 students; the sampling is done by purposive sampling—data collection techniques through personality questionnaire sheets, algebraic test questions, and interviews. Qualitative data analysis was done through data reduction, display, and conclusion/verification stages. The results showed that the students' thinking path in solving algebraic problems in terms of thinking and feeling personality types is that in the problem analysis cycle, thinking students can correctly show what is known from the problem. The problem-solving process is made sequentially up to the simplification cycle. In the completion cycle, students think until they get the final answer by completing the steps properly and correctly. Based on these results, students need help solving algebra problems properly compared to students with the thinking personality type. It is because students feel that the steps could be more sequential in solving problems with algebraic forms, and it is difficult to consider based on right or wrong (objective). Therefore, sometimes he needs to be more wishy-washy or even needs clarification in taking a stand.
References
Afnanda, M. (2023). Menelaah kembali teori belajar dan gaya belajar. Qualitative Research In Educational Psychology, 1(1). https://journal.nubaninstitute.org/index.php/qrep/article/view/6/2.
Ardiansyah, K., Kurniati, D., Trapsilasiwi, D., & Osman, S. (2022). Truth-Seekers Students’ Critical Thinking Process in Solving Mathematics Problems with Contradiction Information. Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 13(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v13i1.33286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v13i1.33286
Delima, N., Rahmah, M. A., & Noto, M. S. (2019). Students’ mathematical thinking and their learning style. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1280(4), 042046. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1280/4/042046. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1280/4/042046
Fauzi, A. M., & Abidin, Z. (2019). Analisis Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Tipe Kepribadian Thinking-Feeling Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal PISA. Suska Journal of Mathematics Education, 5(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.24014/sjme.v5i1.6769. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24014/sjme.v5i1.6769
Felder, R. M., Felder, G. N., & Dietz, E. J. (2002). The effects of personality type on engineering student performance and attitudes. Journal of Engineering Education, 91(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2002.tb00667.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2002.tb00667.x
Filahanasari, E. (2019). Kemampuan Strategis Matematis Siswa Kepribadian Tipe Thinking Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika Materi Program Linear Kelas XI SMA. Journal of Residu, 3(21), 1–23. https://garuda.kemdikbud.go.id/documents/detail/1093946.
Gunawan, D., Sutrisno, S., & Muslim, M. (2020). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Matematika Berdasarkan TPACK untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(2), 249. https://doi.org/10.36709/jpm.v11i2.11518. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36709/jpm.v11i2.11518
Hajidin, H., Wulandari, S., & Duskri, M. (2020). Pengembangan Soal Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) pada Materi Aljabar di Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Jurnal Didaktik Matematika, 7(2), 200–220. https://doi.org/10.24815/jdm.v7i2.17774. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/jdm.v7i2.17774
Hidayat, W., & Riyana, E. (2021). Desain Lintasan Belajar Trigonometri Materi Aturan Sinus dengan Strategi Relating, Experiencing, Applying, Cooperating, Transferring (REACT). JNPM (Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika), 5(2), 296. https://doi.org/10.33603/jnpm.v5i2.5427. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33603/jnpm.v5i2.5427
Homa, A. I. R. (2020). Engineering Students’ Algebra Difficulties: An Experiment with Computer-Aided Diagnostic Assessment. Acta Scientiae, 22(5), 254–272. https://doi.org/10.17648/acta. scientiae.5714. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17648/acta.scientiae.5714
Jinkerson, J., Masilla, A., & Hawkins, R. C. (2017). Can MBTI Dimensions Predict Therapy Outcome: Differences in the Thinking-Feeling Function Pair in CBT. Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.4081/ripppo.2015.167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/ripppo.2015.167
Juniar, A., Silalahi, A., & Suyanti, R. D. (2021). The Effect of Guided Inquiry-based Learning with Creative Thingking Ability towards Students’ Scientific Process Skill in Analytical Chemistry Courses. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1819(1), 012009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1819/ 1/012009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1819/1/012009
Kamal, A., & Radhakrishnan, S. (2019). Individual learning preferences based on personality traits in an E-learning scenario. Education and Information Technologies, 24(1), 407–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9777-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9777-4
Lazarević, L. B., Purić, D., Teovanović, P., Lukić, P., Zupan, Z., & Knežević, G. (2021). What drives us to be (ir)responsible for our health during the Covid-19 pandemic? The role of personality, thinking styles, and conspiracy mentality. Personality and Individual Differences, 176, 110771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110771. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110771
Legarde, M. A. (2022). Students’ Common Errors in Solving Routine & Non-Routine Problems: A Mixed Method Analysis. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis, 05(05). https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmra/v5-i2-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmra/v5-i2-42
Li, Y., & Schoenfeld, A. H. (2019). Problematizing teaching and learning mathematics as “given” in STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0197-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0197-9
Maryati, I., Suzana, Y., Harefa, D., & Maulana, I. T. (2022). Analisis Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis dalam Materi Aljabar Linier. PRISMA, 11(1), 210. https://doi.org/10.35194/jp.v11i1.2044. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35194/jp.v11i1.2044
Murphy, L., Eduljee, N. B., Croteau, K., & Parkman, S. (2020). Relationship between personality type and preferred teaching methods for undergraduate college students. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 6(1), 100–109. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.v6i1.690. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.v6i1.690
Mutawah, M. A. Al, Thomas, R., Eid, A., Mahmoud, E. Y., & Fateel, M. J. (2019). Conceptual Understanding, Procedural Knowledge and Problem-Solving Skills in Mathematics: High School Graduates Work Analysis and Standpoints. International Journal of Education and Practice, 7(3), 258–273. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61.2019.73.258.273. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61.2019.73.258.273
Nagahi, M., Ibne Hossain, N. U., El Amrani, S., Jaradat, R., Khademibami, L., Goerger, S., & Buchanan, R. (2022). Investigating the Influence of Demographics and Personality Types on Practitioners’ Level of Systems Thinking Skills. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 69(6), 3923–3937. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2021.3075414. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2021.3075414
Pane, A., & Dasopang, M. D. (2017). Belajar Dan Pembelajaran. Fitrah:Jurnal Kajian Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman, 3(2), 333. https://doi.org/10.24952/fitrah.v3i2.945. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24952/fitrah.v3i2.945
Rangkuti, A. N., & Siregar, A. I. (2020). Lintasan Belajar Teorema Pythagoras dengan Pendekatan Pendidikan Matematika Realistik. Logaritma : Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Sains, 7(02), 149–162. https://doi.org/10.24952/logaritma.v7i02.2112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24952/logaritma.v7i02.2112
Rini, D. S., Adisyahputra, A., & Sigit, D. V. (2020). Boosting Student Critical Thinking Ability through Project Based Learning, Motivation and Visual, Auditory, Kinesthetic Learning Style: A study on Ecosystem Topic. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(4A), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081806. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081806
Saifulloh, A. M., & Darwis, M. (2020). Manajemen Pembelajaran dalam Meningkatkan Efektivitas Proses Belajar Mengajar di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Bidayatuna: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Mandrasah Ibtidaiyah, 3(2), 285. https://doi.org/10.36835/bidayatuna.v3i2.638. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36835/bidayatuna.v3i2.638
Sakiah, N. A., & Effendi, K. N. S. (2021). Analisis Kebutuhan Multimedia Interaktif Berbasis PowerPoint Materi Aljabar Pada Pembelajaran Matematika SMP. JP3M (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran Matematika), 7(1), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.37058/jp3m.v7i1.2623. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37058/jp3m.v7i1.2623
Saraswati, P. M. S., & Agustika, G. N. S. (2020). Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal HOTS Mata Pelajaran Matematika. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 4(2), 257. https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v4i2.25336. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v4i2.25336
Sari, H. I., Munawaroh, M., & Raharjo, H. (2020). Analysis of Student’s Creative Thinking Ability in Mathematical Problem Solving in Terms of Extrovert and Introvert Personality Types. Eduma : Mathematics Education Learning and Teaching, 9(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.24235 /eduma.v9i1.6153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24235/eduma.v9i1.6153
Sasmita, R. S. (2020). Pemanfaatan Internet Sebagai Sumber Belajar. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling (JPDK), 2(1). https://doi.org/10.31004/jpdk.v2i1.603. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/jpdk.v1i2.603
Setyaedhi, H. S. (2020). Gambaran Kepribadian Pengurus OSIS Berdasarkan Myers Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI). Indonesian Psychological Research, 2(1), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.29080/ipr.v2i1.196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29080/ipr.v2i1.196
Sujana, I. W. C. (2019). Fungsi Dan Tujuan Pendidikan Indonesia. Adi Widya: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 4(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.25078/aw.v4i1.927. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25078/aw.v4i1.927
Susilo, B. (2020). Profile of Mathematical Creative Thinking in Students Type Sensing and Intuiting Personality in Resolving Mathematical Problems. Journal of Instructional Development Research, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.30998/jidr.v1i1.239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30998/jidr.v1i1.239
Tuankotta, L. N., Jana, P., Susetyawati, M. E., & Saptatiningsih, R. I. (2021). Respon guru matematika terhadap penghapusan ujian nasional. Wahana Matematika Dan Sains: Jurnal Matematika, Sains, Dan Pembelajarannya, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.23887/wms.v15i3.34124.
Umami, A. N., Kurniati, D., Murtikusuma, R. P., Setiawan, B., Dwi, D., Jatmiko, H., Studi, P., Matematika, P., & Jalan, U. J. (2023). Berpikir Kritis Siswa Berkepribadian Sensing , Intuition , Thinking Dan Feeling Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Dengan Informasi Kontradiksi. Jurnal Edukasi Dan Sains Matematika, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.25134/jes-mat.v9i1.7341i.
Utami, G., & Bahtiar, N. (2020). Aplikasi Pengenalan Kepribadian Tipe Myers Briggs Menggunakan Metode Fuzzy Saw Berbasis Android. Jurnal Masyarakat Informatika, 11(1), 59–67. https://doi.org/10.14710/jmasif.11.1.31460. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jmasif.11.1.31460
Widayanti, R., & Nur’aini, K. (2020). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning untuk Meningkatkan Prestasi Belajar Matematika dan Aktivitas Siswa. Mathema: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.33365/jm.v2i1.480. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33365/jm.v2i1.480
Widodo, S. A., Irfan, M., Trisniawati, T., Hidayat, W., Perbowo, K. S., Noto, M. S., & Prahmana, R. C. I. (2020). Process of algebra problem-solving in formal student. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1657(1), 012092. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1657/1/012092. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1657/1/012092
Wulandari, R., Astuti, I., & Afandi, A. (2023). Pengembangan Desain Multimedia Interaktif Website untuk Memberdayakan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis pada Materi Perbandingan Trigonometri. Journal on Education, 5(4), 14625–14635. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v5i4.2519. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v5i4.2519
Yielder, J., Dungey, G., & Patten, B. (2021). Personality preferences for radiation therapy students in New Zealand. Radiography, 27(1), 156–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2020.07.010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2020.07.010
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Rhomiy Handican
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Pedagogi dan Pembelajaran agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)
