Implementation English Teacher’s Creativity in Transition Period at Junior High School
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jpbi.v11i1.60733Keywords:
English Teachers, Creativity, Transitional PeriodAbstract
Implementation of face-to-face learning during the transition period makes students confused and tends to be passive when carrying out learning in class. That was because previous learning was carried out online and tended not to run effectively so it was necessary to apply teacher creativity in the classroom to increase student understanding and activity. This study aimed to analyze how teachers implement their creativity towards face-to-face learning during the post-pandemic transitional period. Embedded mixed methods were used as a research design where qualitative data became the main data while quantitative data were used as supporting data. The English teacher in junior high school is choosen as the research subject. Data collection are using self-rated questionnaire, classroom observation, and in-depth interview. For the data analyze technique the researcher assess by assigning a point to each statement on the sheet of observations. The results of the study show that 1) Teachers tend not to meet the criteria of being creative teachers in implementing learning during the transition period where teachers fall into the unlikely creativity category in implementing creativity. Teachers who tend to be uncreative can make students more passive and difficult to understand learning in class, especially during the transition period where students who previously learned less effectively through online platforms are now switching to face-to-face learning which requires them to understand the subject matter well.
References
Andarwati, M. (2019). Pembelajaran Sejarah Kontekstual, Kreatif, Menyenangkan di Kelas Dengan “Power Director” bagi Generasi Z. Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah Indonesia, 2(1), 64–81. https://doi.org/10.17977/um033v2i12019p064.
Antika, R. R. (2014). Proses Pembelajaran Berbasis Student Centered Learning (Studi Deskriptif di Sekolah Menengah Pertama Islam Baitul “Izzah, Nganjuk.” BioKultur, 3(1), 251. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=5164642271972738619&as_sdt=2005&sciodt=0,5&hl=id.
Arianti, Y. S., & Waluyati, L. R. (2019). Analisis nilai tambah dan strategi pengembangan agroindustri gula merah di Kabupaten Madiun. Jurnal Ekonomi Pertanian Dan Agribisnis, 3(2), 256–266. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jepa.2019.003.02.4.
Çetin, E. (2018). Digital storytelling in teacher education and its effect on the digital literacy of pre-service teachers. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 39, 100760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100760.
Chasanah, A. N. (2019). Cognitive Growth Learning Model to Improve the Students’ Critical Thinking Skills. JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education), 4(2), 112–123. https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v4i2.8127.
Cresswell, J. W., & Cresswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design; Fifth Edition.
Erdem, A. R., & Cag Adıguzel, D. (2019). The Opinions of Primary School Teachers on their Creative Thinking Skills. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 19(80), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2019.80.2.
Festiyed, Djamas, D., & Ramli, R. (2019). Learning model based on discovery learning equipped with interactive multimedia teaching materials assisted by games to improve critical thinking skills of high school students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1185(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1185/1/012054.
Gunadi, G., Haryono, H., Purwanti, E., Raya, B. R., Pinoh Barat Melawi, T., & Kalimantan, W. (2022). The Analysis of 21 st Century Learning Implementation and Competency Achievement of Junior High School Students in 3T Regions. Innovative Journal of Curriculum and Educational Technology, 11(1), 10–18. https://doi.org/10.15294/IJCET.V11I1.44847.
Hart, C., Costa, C., D’Souza, D., Kimpton, A., & Ljbusic, J. (2021). Exploring higher education students’ critical thinking skills through content analysis. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41(May), 100877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100877.
Hau, N. H., Cuong, T. V., & Tinh, T. T. (2020). Students and Teachers’ Perspective Of The Importance Of Arts In STEAM Education In Vietnam. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(11), 666–671. https://doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.11.121.
Hoth, J., Kaiser, G., Busse, A., Döhrmann, M., König, J., & Blömeke, S. (2017). Professional competences of teachers for fostering creativity and supporting high-achieving students. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 49(1), 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0817-5.
Jeon, E. Y. (2018). The effect of learner-centered EFL writing instruction on Korean university students’ writing anxiety and perception. TESOL International Journal, 13(3), 100–112. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1247310.
Komalasari, K., & Rahmat. (2019). Living values based interactive multimedia in Civic Education learning. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.1218a.
Kurniawati, L., Miftah, R., & Indriani, R. (2021). Improving students’ mathematical inductive reasoning ability through reflective learning Model. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1836(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1836/1/012071.
Lapitan, L. D., Tiangco, C. E., Sumalinog, D. A. G., Sabarillo, N. S., & Diaz, J. M. (2021). An effective blended online teaching and learning strategy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Education for Chemical Engineers, 35, 116–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2021.01.012.
Lastari, D. S., & Silvana, R. (2020). the Effects of Summarizing Using Infographics on Efl Learners’ Reading Comprehension. Globish: An English-Indonesian Journal for English, Education, and Culture, 9(2), 128. https://doi.org/10.31000/globish.v9i2.2707.
Lee, A. Y. L. (2016). Media education in the School 2.0 era: Teaching media literacy through laptop computers and iPads. Global Media and China, 1(4), 435–449. https://doi.org/10.1177/2059436416667129.
Lestiyanawati, R. (2020). The strategies and problems faced by Indonesian teachers in conducting e-learning during COVID-19 outbreak. CLLiENT (Culture, Literature, Linguistics, and English Teaching), 2(1), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.32699/cllient.v2i1.1271.
Mc Pherson-Geyser, G., de Villiers, R., & Kavai, P. (2020). The use of experiential learning as a teaching strategy in life sciences. International Journal of Instruction, 13(3), 877–894. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13358a.
Muhali, M. (2019). Pembelajaran Inovatif Abad Ke-21. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: E-Saintika, 3(2), 25–50. https://doi.org/10.36312/e-saintika.v3i2.126.
Ningsih, W., Asmidaryani, & Emirawati. (2022). Tantangan Dan Kesulitan Guru, Orang Tua Dan Siswa Dalam Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran Tatap Muka pada Era New Normal Pandemi Covid-19. Al-Mafahim: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 5(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.53398/jm.v5i1.116.
Pelikan, E. R., Korlat, S., Reiter, J., Holzer, J., Mayerhofer, M., & Schober, B. (2021). Distance learning in higher education during COVID-19: The role of basic psychological needs and intrinsic motivation for persistence and procrastination–a multi-country study. PLoS ONE, 16(10 October), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257346.
Rahman, M. M. (2019). 21st Century Skill “Problem Solving”: Defining the Concept. Asian Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 2(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.34256/ajir1917.
Rahmatullah, A. S., Mulyasa, E., Syahrani, S., Pongpalilu, F., & Putri, R. E. (2022). Digital era 4.0. Linguistics and Culture Review, 6, 89–107. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v6nS3.2064.
Rusdin, N. M. (2018). Teachers’ Readiness in Implementing 21st Century Learning. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v8-i4/4270.
Saha, S. M., Pranty, S. A., Rana, M. J., Islam, M. J., & Hossain, M. E. (2022). Teaching during a pandemic: do university teachers prefer online teaching? Heliyon, 8(1), e08663. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08663.
Tee, Y. H., & Amran, M. S. (2021). Tinjauan Sistematik Pembelajaran Koperatif Menggunakan Kaedah Jigsaw Dalam Penulisan Bahasa. Sains Insani, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.33102/sainsinsani.vol6no2.280.
Thuneberg, H. M., Salmi, H. S., & Bogner, F. X. (2018). How creativity, autonomy and visual reasoning contribute to cognitive learning in a STEAM hands-on inquiry-based math module. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 29(July), 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.07.003.
Trimahesri, I., & Hardini, A. T. A. (2019). Peningkatan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Hasil Belajar Pada Mata Pelajaran Matematika Menggunakan Model Realistic Mathematics Education. Thinking Skills and Creativity Journal, 2(2), 111–120. https://doi.org/10.23887/tscj.v2i2.22272.
Whale, K., Cramer, H., & Joinson, C. (2018). Left behind and left out: The impact of the school environment on young people with continence problems. British Journal of Health Psychology, 23(2), 253–277. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12284.
Yue, X. (2019). Exploring Effective Methods of Teacher Professional Development in University for 21st Century Education. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 7(5), 248–257. https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol7.iss5.1506.
Zhou, X., Chen, L.-H., & Chen, C.-L. (2019). Collaborative Learning by Teaching: A Pedagogy between Learner-Centered and Learner-Driven. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041174.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Kadek Wahyu Tresna
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Undiksha agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)