The The Impacts of Preservice English Teachers’ Self-efficacy of Using AI Towards Their Intentions of Teaching Writing Skills Using AI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jpbi.v12i1.80827Keywords:
self-efficacy, TAM, behavioral intention, simple linear regressionAbstract
The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the classroom is growing, particularly when it comes to writing instruction. However, because of their low self-efficacy, a lot of pre-service English teachers are reluctant to apply AI. This study aims to analyze how pre-service English teachers' intentions to teach writing with AI are influenced by their level of self-efficacy in the field. In this quantitative study, 303 aspiring English instructors at an public institution were surveyed. Researchers created two questionnaires to gauge behavioral intentions and self-efficacy. Simple Linear Regression was used to evaluate the results. Based on the research findings, self-efficacy significantly influences the intention to employ AI to teach writing skills. Teachers are more likely to use AI if they feel confident in using it. This study concludes that increasing self-efficacy in AI among pre-service teachers has a positive impact on their intention to integrate AI into teaching practice. These findings underscore the need for teacher training programs and educational institutions to focus on building confidence in using AI, which can improve teaching practices.
References
Al Darayseh, A. (2023). Acceptance of artificial intelligence in teaching science: Science teachers’ perspective. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4(February), 100132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100132.
Albert Bandura. (1994). Self‐efficacy. The Wiley Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences, 1994, 387–391. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118970843.ch243.
Aljohani, R. A. (2021). Teachers and students’ perceptions on the impact of artificial intelligence on English Language Learning in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 8(1), 36–47. http://jallr.com/index.php/JALLR/article/view/1156.
Alkash, K. A. M., & Al-Dersi, Z. E. M. (2013). Advantages of Using PowerPoint Presentation in EFL Classroom & the Status of its Use in Sebha University. IJ-ELTS: International Journal of English Language & Translation Studies, 1(1), 3–16. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf.
Amri, Z., & Alasmari, N. (2021). Self-efficacy of Saudi English Majors after the Emergent Transition to Online Learning and Online Assessment during the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Higher Education, 10(3), 127. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v10n3p127.
An, X., Chai, C. S., Li, Y., Zhou, Y., Shen, X., Zheng, C., & Chen, M. (2023). Modeling English teachers’ behavioral intention to use artificial intelligence in middle schools. Education and Information Technologies, 28(5), 5187–5208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11286-z.
Baaijen, V. M., & Galbraith, D. (2018). Discovery Through Writing: Relationships with Writing Processes and Text Quality. Cognition and Instruction, 36(3), 199–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2018.1456431.
Caner, M., & Aydin, S. (2021). Self Efficacy Beliefs of Pre-service Teachers on Technology Integration. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 22(3), 76–96. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.961820.
Cardon, P., Fleischmann, C., Aritz, J., Logemann, M., & Heidewald, J. (2023). The Challenges and Opportunities of AI-Assisted Writing: Developing AI Literacy for the AI Age. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 86(3), 257–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294906231176517.
Chen, S.-C., Li, S.-H., & Li, C.-Y. (2012). Recent Related Research In Technology Acceptance Model: A Literature Review. Australian Journal of Business and Management Research, 01(09), 124–127. https://doi.org/10.52283/NSWRCA.AJBMR.20110109A14.
Chung, J. E., Park, N., Wang, H., Fulk, J., & McLaughlin, M. (2010). Age differences in perceptions of online community participation among non-users: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1674–1684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.016.
Coppin, B. (2004). Artificial Intelligence Illuminated (1st ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. In SAGE Publication, Incs (5th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Czaja, S. J., Charness, N., Fisk, A. D., Hertzog, C., Nair, S. N., Rogers, W. A., & Sharit, J. (2006). Factors predicting the use of technology: Findings from the center for research and education on aging and technology enhancement (create). Psychology and Aging, 21(2), 333–352. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.21.2.333.
Etikan, I., Musa, S. A. M., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11.
Falck, O., Mang, C., & Woessmann, L. (2018). Virtually no effect? Different uses of classroom computers and their effect on student achievement. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 80(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/obes.12192.
Farhadiba, D., & Nunuk Wulyani, A. (2020). Investigating Preservice Teachers’ Efficacy Level and Factors Influencing It. KnE Social Sciences, 2020, 40–49. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v4i4.6464.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research (Addison-Wesley (ed.)). Psychology Press.
Fitria, Tiara Nur. (2021). Artificial Intelligence (AI) In Education: Using AI Tools For Teaching And Learning Process. Prosiding Seminar Nasional & Call for Paper STIE AAS, September. https://prosiding.stie-aas.ac.id/index.php/prosenas/article/view/106.
Fitria, Tira Nur. (2021). Grammarly as AI-powered English Writing Assistant: Students’ Alternative for Writing English. Metathesis: Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching, 5(1), 65. https://doi.org/10.31002/metathesis.v5i1.3519.
Fırat, E. E., & Laramee, R. S. (2018). Towards a survey of interactive visualization for education. Computer Graphics and Visual Computing, CGVC 2018, 91–101. https://doi.org/10.2312/cgvc.20181211.
Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Hadi, M. S., Izzah, L., & Paulia, Q. (2021). Teaching writing through Canva application to enchance students’ writing performance. JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 9(2), 228–235. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v%vi%i.3533.
Harlan, J. (2018). Analisis regresi linear. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 1–119. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169743999000180.
Hismanoglu, M., & Hismanoglu, S. (2011). Attitudes of English Teacher Candidates Toward ICT. E-International Journal of Educational Research, 2(2), 17–29. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2012.654495.
Holden, H., & Rada, R. (2011). Understanding the influence of perceived usability and technology self-efficacy on teachers’ technology acceptance. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(4), 343–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2011.10782576.
Hong, J. W. (2022). I Was Born to Love AI: The Influence of Social Status on AI Self-Efficacy and Intentions to Use AI. International Journal of Communication, 16, 172–191. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/17728.
Huerta, M., Goodson, P., Beigi, M., & Chlup, D. (2018). Graduate Students as Academic Writers: Writing Anxiety, Self-Efficacy, and Emotional Intelligence. Tourism Recreation Research, 36(4), 19. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1238881.
Jawas, U. (2019). Writing anxiety among Indonesian EFL students: Factors and strategies. International Journal of Instruction, 12(4), 733–746. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12447a.
Joo, Y. J., Park, S., & Lim, E. (2018). Factors Influencing Preservice Teachers’ Intention to Use Technology. Educational Technology & Society, 21(3), 48–59. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26458506.
Kalaw, M. T. B. (2017). Trend of De La Salle Lipa Education Graduates’ Performance in the Licensure Examination for Teachers (LET) from 2011 to 2015. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 6(2), 138. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v6i2.7592.
Kangasharju, A., Ilomäki, L., Lakkala, M., & Toom, A. (2022). Lower secondary students’ poetry writing with the AI-based Poetry Machine. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3(May 2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100048.
Kateryna, A., Oleksandr, R., Mariia, T., Iryna, S., Evgen, K., & Anastasiia, L. (2020). Digital literacy development trends in the professional environment. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(7), 55–79. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.7.4.
Kibirige, I., & Teffo, W. L. (2014). Actual and Ideal Assessment Practices in South African Natural Sciences Classrooms. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 6(3), 509–519. https://doi.org/10.31901/24566322.2014/06.03.1.
Koltay, T. (2011). The media and the literacies: Media literacy, information literacy, digital literacy. Media, Culture & Society, 33(2), 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443710393382.
Kukul, V. (2023). Modelling the Spectrum of Technology Integration from Teacher Training to Usage Intention: Findings from a Two-Phase Study. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-023-09658-6.
Lai, C.-S., Au, K.-M., & Low, C.-S. (2021). Beyond Conventional Classroom Learning: Linking Emotions and Self-Efficacy to Academic Achievement and Satisfaction with Online Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.509.2021.84.367.374.
Maidiana, M. (2021). Penelitian Survey. ALACRITY : Journal of Education, 1(2), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.52121/alacrity.v1i2.23.
Martin, A., & Grudziecki, J. (2006). DigEuLit: Concepts and tools for digital literacy development. Innovation in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Sciences, 5(4), 249–267. https://doi.org/10.11120/ital.2006.05040249.
Masrom, M. (2007). Technology acceptance model and E-learning. 12th International Conference on Education, May, 21–24.
McDonald, T., & Siegall, M. (1992). The Effects of Technological Self-Efficacy and Job Focus on Job Performance, Attitudes, and Withdrawal Behaviors. The Journal of Psychology, 126(5), 465–475. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1992.10543380.
Mediyawati, N., Young, J. C., & Nusantara, S. B. (2021). U-Tapis: Automatic Spelling Filter As An Effort To Improve Indonesian Language Competencies Of Journalistic Students. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 40(2), 402–412. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v40i2.34546.
Mijwel, M. M. (2015). History of Artificial Intelligence Yapay Zekânın T arihi. Computer Science, April 2015, 3–4. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.16418.15046.
Musliha, & Revita, R. (2021). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Ditinjau dari Self Regulated Learning Siswa. JRPM (Jurnal Review Pembelajaran Matematika), 6(1), 68–82. https://doi.org/10.15642/jrpm.2021.6.1.68-82.
Niehaus, K., Rudasill, K. M., & Adelson, J. L. (2012). Self-Efficacy, Intrinsic Motivation, and Academic Outcomes Among Latino Middle School Students Participating in an After-School Program. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 34(1), 118–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739986311424275.
Ozdamli, F., & Ozdal, H. (2018). Developing an instructional design for the design of infographics and the evaluation of infographic usage in teaching based on teacher and student opinions. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(4), 1197–1219. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/81868.
Özdemir, V., & Hekim, N. (2018). Birth of Industry 5.0: Making Sense of Big Data with Artificial Intelligence, “the Internet of Things” and Next-Generation Technology Policy. OMICS A Journal of Integrative Biology, 22(1), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1089/omi.2017.0194.
Peng, R., Razak, R. A., & Halili, S. H. (2023). Factors influencing in-service teachers’ technology integration model: Innovative strategies for educational technology. PLoS ONE, 18(8 August), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286112.
Qekaj-Thaqi, A., & Thaqi, L. (2021). The Importance of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) during the COVID-19—Pandemic in Case of Kosovo (Analytical Approach of Students Perspective). OALib, 08(07), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1106996.
Radovanović, D., Hogan, B., & Lalić, D. (2015). Overcoming digital divides in higher education: Digital literacy beyond Facebook. New Media and Society, 17(10), 1733–1749. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815588323.
Saeid, N., & Eslaminejad, T. (2016). Relationship between Student’s Self-Directed-Learning Readiness and Academic Self-Efficacy and Achievement Motivation in Students. International Education Studies, 10(1), 225. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v10n1p225.
Samerkhanova, E. K., & Imzharova, Z. U. (2018). Organizational and pedagogical conditions for forming the readiness of future teachers for project activities in the context of Digitalization of education. Vestnik of Minin University, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.26795/2307-1281-2018-6-2-2.
Setlight, K. C. M. S., Betaubun, M., & Kartika, V. (2023). Involving Problem-Based Learning as an Alternative for EFL Students’ Writing Improvement: A Method for Teaching Writing. Journal of English Culture, Language, Literature and Education, 11(2), 210–235. https://doi.org/10.53682/eclue.v11i2.6625.
Sharif Abbasi, M., Hussain Chandio, F., Fatah Soomro, A., & Shah, F. (2011). Social influence, voluntariness, experience and the internet acceptance. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 24(1), 30–52. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410391111097410.
Sharma, C., & Puri, S. R. (2020). The importance of four skills in English education. The Genesis, 7(4), 33–36. https://doi.org/10.47211/tg.2020.v07i04.007.
Sintiani, G. A., Sulindawati, N. L. G. E., & Herawati, N. T. (2018). Analisis Pengaruh Academic Self Efficacy Dan Fraud Triangle Terhadap Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik (Academic Fraud) (Studi Kasus Pada Mahasiswa Penerima Beasiswa Jurusan Akuntansi Program S1 Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha). JIMAT (Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Akuntansi S1), 9(1), 201–211. https://doi.org/10.23887/jimat.v9i1.20504.
Spante, M., Hashemi, S. S., Lundin, M., & Algers, A. (2018). Digital competence and digital literacy in higher education research: Systematic review of concept use. Cogent Education, 5(1), 1519143. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1519143.
Sumakul, D. T. Y. G., Hamied, F. A., & Sukyadi, D. (2022). Artificial Intelligence in EFL Classrooms: Friend or Foe? LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 15(1), 232–256. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1336138.
Sumandal, A. H. (2023). T eachers’ Self -Efficacy with Artificial Intelligence (AI) Based Educational Tools Allan H. Sumandal School of Graduate Studies, Saint Mary’s University , Bayombong, Nueva Vizcaya, Philippines DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.10002206. Ignatian International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 1(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10002206.
Surendran, P. (2012). Technology acceptance model: A survey of literature. International Journal of Business and Social Research, 2(4), 175–178. https://ideas.repec.org/a/mir/mirbus/v2y2012i4p175-178.html.
Syahnaz, M., & Fithriani, R. (2023). Utilizing Artificial Intelligence-based Paraphrasing Tool in EFL Writing Class: A Focus on Indonesian University Students’ Perceptions. Scope : Journal of English Language Teaching, 7(2), 210. https://doi.org/10.30998/scope.v7i2.14882.
Utami, S. P. T., Andayani, A., Winarni, R., & Sumarwati, S. (2023). Utilization of artificial intelligence technology in an academic writing class: How do Indonesian students perceive? Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(4), ep450. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13419.
Valizadeh, S., & Sahmaniasl, R. (2023). The impact of using Grammarly in teaching writing skills of Iranian advanced EFL students. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Comprehensive Research, 2(5), 24–26. http://dspace.univ-ghardaia.edu.dz/xmlui/handle/123456789/6772.
Zheng, Y., & Xie, Y. (2016). Metamodel for evaluating the performance of ICT in education. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 9757). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41165-1_19.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Suardewa Putu Maha Surya Suardewa, I Putu Indra Kusuma, Kadek Sintya Dewi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Undiksha agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)