EFL Pre-Service Teacher’s Perception During Kampus Mengajar: A Case Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jpbi.v12i2.82473Keywords:
EFL pre-services teacher, EFL pre-service teacher’s perception, Kampus MengajarAbstract
Classroom management skills of prospective English as a second language (EFL) teachers are inseparable. Professionalism requires a balance between theoretical education in the classroom and real-world experience. This article aims to analyze the perceptions of pre-service EFL teachers during the Kampus Mengajar program. Three alumni of the 7th batch of pre-service EFL teachers who teach in Junior High Schools were purposively selected as the subjects of this study. This study used a descriptive qualitative design. To collect data, semi-structured interviews were used. The data analysis of this study used the interactive model of Miles and Huberman. The results of the study showed that pre-service EFL teachers had positive perceptions during the Kampus Mengajar program. However, there were also many challenges faced by the participants during Kampus Mengajar, namely (1) Difficulty in instructional materials, (2) student motivation, (3) technology integration, and (4) busy teacher schedules. In addition, there were also several strategies used by the participants to overcome these obstacles, such as maximizing preparation before teaching, using appropriate teaching strategies and technology integration, and having good teaching aids. Despite all that, the Kampus Mengajar program is recommended to be implemented as one way to improve faculty accreditation scores, an evaluation tool for the Independent Curriculum and an authentic experience for pre-service EFL teachers in the reality of school life.
References
Al-Ahdal, A. A. M. H., & Abduh, M. Y. M. (2021). English Writing Proficiency and Apprehensions Among Saudi College Students: Facts and remedies. TESOL International Journal, 16(1), 34–56. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mariam-Abduh/publication/348327244.
Al Mamun, M. A., Lawrie, G., & Wright, T. (2022). Exploration of learner-content interactions and learning approaches: The role of guided inquiry in the self-directed online environments. Computers & Education, 178, 104398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104398.
Alsadi, S. M. A., & Silman, F. (2023). Difficulties Encountered by Pre-Service Teachers in Classrooms: The Study of Public High School in Zintan City, Libya. The Online Journal of New Horizons in Education, 13(02), 98–104. https://tojdel.net/journals/tojned/volumes/tojned-volume13-i02.pdf#page=39.
Amalia Solikhah, N. (2023). Impact of Technology in Teaching and Learning English as Foreign Language : TESOL Context. Journal Corner of Education, Linguistics, and Literature, 3(1), 83–91. https://doi.org/10.54012/jcell.v3i1.194.
Aristawati, F. A., & Budiyanto, C. (2017). Penerapan Robotika Dalam Pembelajaran STEM:Kajian Pustaka. Prosiding Seminar Nasional UNS Vocational Day, 2, 440–446. https://doi.org/10.20961/uvd.v1i0.1585.
Arroba, J., & Acosta, H. (2021). Authentic digital storytelling as alternative teaching strategy to develop speaking skills in efl classes. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 14(1), 317–343. https://doi.org/https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/LEARN/index.
Cabrera-Solano, P. (2020). The Use of Digital Portfolios to Enhance English as a Foreign Language Speaking Skills in Higher Education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(24), 159–175. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i24.15103.
Cheng, M. M. H., Cheng, A. Y. N., & Tang, S. Y. F. (2010). Closing the gap between the theory and practice of teaching: Implications for teacher education programmes in Hong Kong. Journal of Education for Teaching, 36(1), 91–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607470903462222.
Cohen, J., Wong, V., Krishnamachari, A., & Berlin, R. (2020). Teacher coaching in a simulated environment. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 42(2), 208–231. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373720.
Crossley, S. A., & McNamara, D. S. (2016). Adaptive educational technologies for literacy instruction. Adaptive Educational Technologies for Literacy Instruction, 1–310. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315647500.
Deed, C., Cox, P., & Prain, V. (2011). Enablers and constraints in achieving integration in a teacher preparation program. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36(8). https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2011v36n4.5.
Girsang, S. E. E., & Chadijah, S. (2022). The Strategies Of The Teacher In Motivating The Students In Learning English At Eleventh Class Study Of MA AL Hasyimiyah Academic Year 2020/2021. Bilingual : Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, 4(1), 69–74. https://doi.org/10.36985/jbl.v4i1.383.
Hazzan, O., & Lapidot, T. (2004). Construction of a professional perception in the “methods of teaching computer science” course. SIGCSE Bulletin (Association for Computing Machinery, Special Interest Group on Computer Science Education), 36(2), 57–61. https://doi.org/10.1145/1024338.1024372.
Husein La Ede, M. A., Maulina, M., & Faridawati, F. (2022). Efl Pre-Service Teachers’ Perception in Managing the Learning Process During Kampus Mengajar Program. Klasikal : Journal of Education, Language Teaching and Science, 4(1), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.52208/klasikal.v4i1.133.
Isnawati, I. (2017). Students’ Views On The Use Of Book And Web-Based Materials For Their Elt Classes: A Study On Ict-Based Education In Indonesian Context. KnE Social Sciences, 1(3), 112. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v1i3.730.
Jawas, U. (2019). Writing anxiety among Indonesian EFL students: Factors and strategies. International Journal of Instruction, 12(4), 733–746. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12447a.
Kennedy-Clark, S., Eddles-Hirsch, K., Francis, T., Cummins, G., Ferantino, L., Tichelaar, M., & Ruz, L. (2018). Developing pre-service teacher professional capabilities through action research. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 43(9), 38–58. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2018v43n9.3.
Kusmana, S., & Nurzaman, B. (2022). Bahan Ajar Cerita Rakyat sebagai Perancah Pendidikan Karakter (Folklore Teaching Materials as a Character Education Scaffold. Indonesian Language Education and Literature, 6(2), 351. https://doi.org/10.24235/ileal.v6i2.8778.
Lasagabaster, D. (2020). The Impact of Type of Approach (CLIL Versus EFL) and Methodology (Book-Based Versus Project Work) on Motivation. Porta Linguarum Revista Interuniversitaria de Didáctica de Las Lenguas Extranjeras, 41–57. https://doi.org/10.30827/digibug.53737.
Lestari, S., Fatonahr, K., Halim, A., Aurra, L. M., & Rahmawati, S. (2022). Initiatives and Challenges of The Kampus Mengajar Program to Pursue Freedom to Learn. Pedagonal : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 6(2), 203–210. https://doi.org/10.55215/pedagonal.v6i2.5620.
Loo, D. B., Maidom, R., & Kitjaroonchai, N. (2019). Non-native English speaking pre-service teachers in an EFL context: examining experiences through borderland discourse. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 47(4), 414–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2019.1607252.
Lutfi, M. M., Wulandari, S., & Entusiastik, E. (2023). Efl Teachers’Perception on the Implementation of Kurikulum Merdeka: a Case Study At Sman 2 Pare in Kediri. International Seminar on Language, Education, and Culture (ISoLEC), 7(1), 173–181. http://conference.um.ac.id/index.php/isolec.
Marisa, M. (2021). Inovasi Kurikulum “Merdeka Belajar” di Era Society 5.0. Santhet: (Jurnal Sejarah, Pendidiikan Dan Humaniora), 5(1), 72. https://doi.org/10.36526/js.v3i2.e-ISSN.
Marquez, B. J., Andrada, J., Baldomar, T., Cunanan, G. M., Ortiguero, F., Padre, M., & Rey, H. (2023). The Challenges of Pre-Service Teachers in the New Normal Set up of Field Study Amidst COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Research in STEM Education, 5(1), 29–37. https://doi.org/10.33830/ijrse.v5i1.1367.
Massod, S., Siddiqui, M., & Arif, K. (2022). Challenges Pre-Service Teachers Face During Teaching Practicum : An Anatomy of Teachers ’ Education Programs. VFAST Transactions on Education and Social Sciences, 10(2), 131–141. https://doi.org/10.21015/vtess.v10i2.1049.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Napanoy, J. B., Gayagay, G. C., & Tuazon, J. R. C. (2021). Difficulties Encountered by Pre-service Teachers: Basis of a Pre-service Training Program. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 9(2), 342–349. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2021.090210.
Obispo, K. P. (2023). Experiences and Challenges encountered by the Pre-service teachers in a Community Immersion Program. Asian Journal of Community Services, 2(2), 163–172. https://doi.org/10.55927/ajcs.v2i.
Octaberlina, L. R. (2023). Exploring the Use of Digital Technology in English Language Teaching: Strategies and Methods for Effective Implementation. ENGLISH FRANCA : Academic Journal of English Language and Education, 7(1), 175. https://doi.org/10.29240/ef.v7i1.6977.
Ordu, U. B.-A. (2021). The Role of Teaching and Learning Aids/Methods in a Changing World. Bulgarian Comparative Education Society, 9, 210–216. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED613989.
Ozdal, H., & Ozdamli, F. (2017). The Effect of Infographics in Mobile Learning: Case Study in Primary School. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 23(12), 1256–1275.
Pakpahan, E. M. (2023). Challenges Faced by Pre-Service Teachers During Teaching Practicum. International Journal of Educational Narratives, 1(5), 258–263. https://doi.org/10.55849/ijen.v1i5.389.
Prayudi, R. A., Hakiki, A. K., Putra, N. R. D., Anzka, T. O., & Ihsan, M. T. (2021). the Use of Technology in English Teaching & Learning Process. Jurnal Riset Dan Inovasi Pembelajaran, 1(2), 102–111. https://doi.org/10.51574/jrip.v1i2.38.
Priestley, M., Biesta, G., & Robinson, S. (2013). Teachers as Agents of Change: Teacher Agency and Emerging Models of Curriculum (pp. 187–206). https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472553195.ch-010.
Puspitasari, E. (2016). Literature-Based Learning to Build Students’ Vocabulary. Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Learning, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.18196/ftl.115.
Putri, Z., Yoestara, M., & Munawir, M. (2024). High School Teachers’ Perception of Digital Learning and E-Learning Training. Visipena, 14(2), 98–107. https://doi.org/10.46244/visipena.v14i2.2531.
Ramadhanti, I. (2023). Challenges of 21st Century Education, Education in the 21st Century, Teacher Strategies Ileena Ramadhanti (2023). Journal Visipena, 14(2), 122–134. https://ejournal.bbg.ac.id/visipena/article.
Sale, M. (2016). The Place of Instructional Materials in Quality Teaching at Primary School Level in Katsina Metropolis , Katsina State. International Journal of Humanities and Management Sciences, 4(2), 157–160. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Murtala-Sale/publication/345897715_instructional.
Seixas, B. V., Smith, N., & Mitton, C. (2018). The qualitative descriptive approach in international comparative studies: Using online qualitative surveys. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 7(9), 778–781. https://doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2017.142.
Shabrina, L. M. (2022). Kegiatan Kampus Mengajar dalam Meningkatkan Keterampilan Literasi dan Numerasi Siswa Sekolah Dasa. JURNALBASICEDU, 6(1), 916–924. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.
Sintiya, K. D., Muchyidin, M. S., & Asyhar, W. I. (2024). Students’ Perception of The Implementation of Kampus Mengajar. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Undiksha, 11(2), 143–149. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpbi.v11i2.
Sulistyaningsih, Sulam, K., Syakur, A., & Musyarofah, L. (2019). The Implementation of 21st Century Skills as the New Learning Paradigm to the Result of Student’s Career and Life Skills. Magister Scientiae, 1(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.51836/journeel.v1i1.37.
Suyatno, S., Wantini, W., Pambudi, D. I., Muqowim, M., Tinus, A., & Patimah, L. (2023). Developing Pre-Service Teachers’ Professionalism by Sharing and Receiving Experiences in the Kampus Mengajar Program. Education Sciences, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13020143.
Tegeh, I. M., Astawan, I. G., Sudiana, I. K., & Kristiantari, M. G. R. (2021). Murder Learning Model Assisted By Metacognitive Scaffolding To Improve Students’ Scientific Literacy and Numeracy Skills Through Science Studies in Elementary Schools. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 10(4), 618–626. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v10i4.32926.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Irwan Sulistyanto, Erwin Hari Kurniawan, Krisna Adi Prayoga
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Undiksha agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)