Assessing Feedback Efficacy in Classroom Assessment: The Art of Grading With a Wink and a Nod
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jpbi.v12i2.84255Keywords:
Feedback efficacy, Assessment methods, Higher education, Classroom assessmentAbstract
Although higher education used a range of assessment methods, yet there remains uncertainty about how effectively feedback is provided to students. This study focused on evaluating current feedback practices in classroom assessments within the English Language Education Study Program at the university level. The study, conducted as a descriptive quantitative study, involved 87 participants selected through stratified random sampling, comprising 8 lecturers and 79 students. Data was collected using a questionnaire and analysed using SPSS software. Findings revealed that lecturers predominantly utilized class tests (62%), exercises, and homework for evaluation, with a preference for essay (87.5%) and multiple-choice formats (75%). Nevertheless, both lecturers (50%) and students (65.82%) identified challenges such as delays in returning graded tests, inefficient distribution of results, unclear explanation of errors, lack of student motivation for improvement, inadequate support for revisions, and ineffective communication of results to parents. Indeed, some lecturers provided feedback, guided students’ development, and used assessments for counseling purposes. The study concluded that although traditional assessment methods were used, there was a need for more efficient feedback practices.
References
Aben, J. E. J., Timmermans, A. C., Dingyloudi, F., & Strijbos, J. W. (2023). In the eye of the beholder: The relationship between perceived peer language skills, provided peer feedback and peer grading in secondary education. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2023.101248.
Al Mamun, M. A., Lawrie, G., & Wright, T. (2022). Exploration of learner-content interactions and learning approaches: The role of guided inquiry in the self-directed online environments. Computers & Education, 178, 104398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104398.
Alt, D., Naamati-Schneider, L., & Weishut, D. J. N. (2023). Competency-based learning and formative assessment feedback as precursors of college students’ soft skills acquisition. Studies in Higher Education, 48(12). https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2023.2217203.
Andrews, M., Brown, R., & Mesher, L. (2018). Engaging Students With Assessment And Feedback: Improving Assessment For Learning With Students As Partners. Practitioner Research in Higher Education, 11(1). https://callej.org/index.php/journal/article/view/11.
Basori, B., & Mubarok, H. (2020). Formative Assessment in Language Evaluation Class. Scope : Journal of English Language Teaching, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.30998/scope.v5i1.6535.
Batlle, J., & Seedhouse, P. (2022). Affiliation and negative assessments in peer observation feedback for foreign language teachers professional development. Applied Linguistics Review, 13(6). https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2020-0001.
Binmahboob, T. (2020). YouTube as a Learning Tool to Improve Students’ Speaking Skills as Perceived by EFL Teachers in Secondary School. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 9(6), 13. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.9n.6p.13.
Boylu, E. (2021). Turkish as a Foreign Language Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Assessment and Evaluation. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.9n.1p.72.
Castleberry, C., Hanner, A., Burks, G., & Amos, J. (2023). Instructor perspectives on the use of tag-organised assessment to facilitate formative assessment strategies in STEM courses. European Journal of Engineering Education, 48(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2023.2173559.
Chukharev-Hudilainen, E., & Ockey, G. J. (2021). The Development and Evaluation of Interactional Competence Elicitor for Oral Language Assessments. ETS Research Report Series, 2021(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/ets2.12319.
Clack, A., & Dommett, E. J. (2021). Student learning approaches: Beyond assessment type to feedback and student choice. Education Sciences, 11(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11090468.
Clayton Bernard, R., & Kermarrec, G. (2022). Peer Assessment and Video Feedback for Fostering Self, Co, and Shared Regulation of Learning in a Higher Education Language Classroom. Frontiers in Education, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.732094.
Cohen, J., Wong, V., Krishnamachari, A., & Berlin, R. (2020). Teacher coaching in a simulated environment. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 42(2), 208–231. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373720906217.
Davis, J. M. C. E., Norris, J. M., Malone, M. E., McKay, T. H., & Son, Y. A. (2018). Useful Assessment and Evaluation in Language Education. In Useful Assessment and Evaluation in Language Education. https://doi.org/10.31046/wabashcenter.v1i2.1727.
Day, I. N. Z., Admiraal, W., & Saab, N. (2021). Designing assessment and feedback to improve student learning and student success. In Student Retention and Success in Higher Education: Institutional Change for the 21st Century. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80045-1_11.
Elaish, M. M., & Shuib, L. (2019). Mobile Learning for English Language Learning Assessment and Evaluation: A Review. In bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/512186.
Fitzsimons, E. (2015). Character education: A role for literature in cultivating character strengths in adolescence. Master of Applied Positive Psychology, 8(1), 135–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9667-5_7.
Giraldo, F. (2018). Language assessment literacy: Implications for language teachers. Profile: Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v20n1.62089.
Gokturk-Saglam, A. L., & Sevgi-Sole, E. (2023). Emerging Practices for Online Language Assessment, Exams, Evaluation, and Feedback. In Emerging Practices for Online Language Assessment, Exams, Evaluation, and Feedback. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-6227-0.
Hass, A. (2022). Using plagiarism feedback as assessment for learning to socialise students into disciplinary writing: A theoretical perspective. South African Journal of Higher Education, 36(2). https://doi.org/10.20853/36-2-4648.
Heydarnejad, T. (2023). Mirroring Learning-oriented Assessment in On-line Classes: The Nexus Between Self-evaluation, Academic Resilience, Positive Orientation, Enjoyment, and Language Achievement. CALL-EJ, 24(2). https://callej.org/index.php/journal/article/view/11.
Hooda, M., Rana, C., Dahiya, O., Rizwan, A., & Hossain, M. S. (2022). Artificial Intelligence for Assessment and Feedback to Enhance Student Success in Higher Education. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5215722.
Huang, J., & Chen, G. (2022). Individualized feedback to raters in language assessment: Impacts on rater effects. Assessing Writing, 52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2022.100623.
Huang, S. C. (2016). Understanding learners’ self-assessment and self-feedback on their foreign language speaking performance. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(6). https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1042426.
Huo, Y., Wong, D. F., Ni, L. M., Chao, L. S., & Zhang, J. (2020). Knowledge modeling via contextualized representations for LSTM-based personalized exercise recommendation. Information Sciences, 523, 266–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2020.03.014.
Hwang, G. J., Chang, C. C., & Chien, S. Y. (2022). A motivational model‐based virtual reality approach to prompting learners’ sense of presence, learning achievements, and higher‐order thinking in professional safety training. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(5). https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13196.
Jónsson, Í. R., Smith, K., & Geirsdóttir, G. (2018). Shared language of feedback and assessment. Perception of teachers and students in three Icelandic secondary schools. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.11.003.
Kassem, M. A. M. (2018). The Effect of Using Blackboard on English Majors’ Writing Proficiency and Attitudes. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 7(6), 73. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.7n.6p.73.
Khasanah, A. N., Sajidan, S., & Widoretno, S. (2017). Effectiveness of critical thinking indicator-based module in empowering student’s learning outcome in respiratory system study material. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(1), 187–195. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v6i1.8490.
Kim, H. J., & Kim, A. A. (2021). Examining the Effectiveness of Learning-Oriented Language Assessment in Second Language Reading-to-Write Tasks: Focusing on Instructor Feedback and Self-Assessment. Journal of Asia TEFL, 18(4). https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2021.18.4.11.1250.
Kjell, O. N. E., Kjell, K., & Schwartz, H. A. (2024). Beyond rating scales: With targeted evaluation, large language models are poised for psychological assessment. In Psychiatry Research (Vol. 333). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115667.
Kvasova, O. (2022). The Impact of Student Teachers’ Pre-Existing Conceptions of Assessment on the Development of Language Assessment Literacy within an LTA Course. Languages, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7010062.
Li, W., & Mohamad, M. (2023). An Efficient Probabilistic Deep Learning Model for the Oral Proficiency Assessment of Student Speech Recognition and Classification. International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication, 11(6). https://doi.org/10.17762/ijritcc.v11i6.7734.
Magulod, G. C. (2019). Learning styles, study habits and academic performance of Filipino university students in applied science courses: Implications for instruction. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 9(2), 184–198. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.504.
Mäkipää, T., Hahl, K., & Luodonpää-Manni, M. (2021). Teachers’ perceptions of assessment and feedback practices in finland’s foreign language classes during the covid-19 pandemic. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 11(Special Issue). https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.1108.
Mambu, J. G. Z., Pitra, D. H., Rizki, A., Ilmi, M., Nugroho, W., Leuwol, N. V, Muh, A., & Saputra, A. (2023). Pemanfaatan Teknologi Artificial Intelligence (AI) dalam Menghadapi Tantangan Mengajar Guru di Era Digital. Journal on Education, 06(01), 2689–2698. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v6i1.3304.
Meidasari, V. E. (2017). The Assessment And Evaluation In Teaching English As A Foreign Language. Indonesian EFL Journal, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.25134/ieflj.v1i2.629.
Menbet, A. A. (2018). The Use of Effective Strategies to Improve Saudi EFL Dyslexic Learners’ Writing Skills. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 8(12), 1611. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0812.06.
Papadima-Sophocleous, S. (2022). Teacher Education for Language Assessment and Testing: Postgraduate Program Evaluation from its Students’ Perspective. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.14483/22487085.17373.
Parnabas, V., Abdullah, N. M., Mohamed Shapie, M. N., Abdul Rahim, M. R., Parnabas, J., Parnabas, A. M., Isa, M., & Indrakisyah, M. (2023). E-Learning Motivation Among Student-Athletes Of Universiti Teknologi Mara (Uitm), Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Sport Science and Recreation, 19(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.24191/mjssr.v19i1.21755.
Pfingsthorn, J., & Weltgen, J. (2022). Inclusive and fair assessment in foreign language education: The role of fundamental attribution error in the evaluation of students’ performance. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2022.100160.
Prasad, K., Aladini, A., Normurodova, N. Z., & Belton, B. (2023). Take language assessment easy: the mediator impacts of self-assessment, test-taking skills in predicting student evaluation apprehension, foreign language learning self-esteem, and language achievement in online classes. Language Testing in Asia, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-023-00246-0.
Prasetya, R. E., & Syarif, A. (2022). Assessment and Feedback to Enhance Online English Language Learning. Metathesis: Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.31002/metathesis.v6i1.185.
Putri, D. D., . M., & Damayanti, I. (2017). Descriptive Study Of Grammar Learning Applied By Students Of English Diploma III Study Program On Their Personality Types. Journal of English Education and Teaching, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.33369/jeet.1.1.74-85.
Ray, S., Ngomba, R. T., & Ahmed, S. I. (2022). The impact of assessment and feedback practice on the student learning experiences in higher education. In Essays in Biochemistry (Vol. 66, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1042/EBC20210056.
Reyes, R. P., Samson, E. C., & Garcia, J. G. (2020). An Interactive Foreign Language Trainer Using Assessment and Feedback Modalities. International Journal in Information Technology in Governance, Education and Business, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.32664/ijitgeb.v2i1.61.
Rouhshad, A., Flynn, C., Turnbull, L., & Ross, B. (2022). Social work students with English as an additional language: examining written assessment feedback. Teaching in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2022.2114336.
Setyowati, L., Abiyasa, F. R., & El-Sulukiyyah, A. A. (2022). The students’ perception on writing tools application for essay writing class. Jurnal Dimensi Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.24269/dpp.v10i1.4446.
Shah, S. (2022). Influence of Teachers’ Formative Assessment Feedback and Students’ Learning Activities on English Subject at Secondary School Level. Pakistan Social Sciences Review, 6(II). https://doi.org/10.35484/pssr.2022(6-ii)91.
Shrestha, P. N. (2022). Examining evaluative language used in assessment feedback on business students’ academic writing. Assessing Writing, 54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2022.100664.
Solano, Q. P., Hayward, L., Chopra, Z., Quanstrom, K., Kendrick, D., Abbott, K. L., Kunzmann, M., Ahle, S., Schuller, M., Ötleş, E., & George, B. C. (2021). Natural Language Processing and Assessment of Resident Feedback Quality. Journal of Surgical Education, 78(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2021.05.012.
Son, Y. A. (2017). Toward Useful Assessment and Evaluation of Heritage Language Learning. Foreign Language Annals, 50(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12273.
Srivastava, T. K., Mishra, V., & Waghmare, L. S. (2018). Formative Assessment Classroom Techniques (FACTs) for better learning in pre-clinical medical education: A controlled trial. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 12(9). https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Tripti-Srivastava/publication/327229061.
Sukmawati, S., Sujarwo, S., Soepriadi, D. N., & Amaliah, N. (2022). Online English Language Teaching in the Midst of Covid-19 Pandemic: Non EFL Students’ Feedback and Response. Al-Ta Lim Journal, 29(1), 62–69. https://doi.org/10.15548/jt.v29i1.732.
Taghizadeh, M., & Mazdayasna, G. (2023). Language assessment course at Iranian state universities: An evaluation of the incorporation of assessment principles into the course content. Heliyon, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e12857.
Tofade, T., Elsner, J., & Haines, S. T. (2013). Best Practice Strategies for Effective Use of Questions as a Teaching Tool. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 77(7). https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe777155.
Vattøy, K. D. (2020). Teachers’ beliefs about feedback practice as related to student self-regulation, self-efficacy, and language skills in teaching English as a foreign language. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.100828.
Vattøy, K. D., & Gamlem, S. M. (2020). Teacher–student interactions and feedback in English as a foreign language classrooms. Cambridge Journal of Education, 50(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2019.1707512.
Waskito, Irzal, Wulansari, R. E., & Ya, K. Z. (2022). The Adventure of Formative Assessment with Active Feedback in The Vocational Learning: The Empirical Effect for Increasing Students’ Achievement. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.30880/jtet.2022.14.01.005.
Weiss, M., Barth, M., & von Wehrden, H. (2021). The patterns of curriculum change processes that embed sustainability in higher education institutions. Sustainability Science, 16(5), 1579–1593. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-021-00984-1.
Widiastuti, I. A. M. S. (2021). Assessment and feedback practices in the EFL classroom. REID (Research and Evaluation in Education), 7(1). https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v7i1.37741.
Xiao, Y., & Yang, M. (2019). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: How formative assessment supports students’ self-regulation in English language learning. System, 81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.01.004.
Yao, Y., Wang, W., & Yang, X. (2021). Perceptions of the inclusion of Automatic Writing Evaluation in peer assessment on EFL writers’ language mindsets and motivation: A short-term longitudinal study. Assessing Writing, 50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2021.100568.
Yesilyurt, Y. E. (2023). AI-Enabled assessment and feedback mechanisms for language learning: Transforming pedagogy and learner experience. In Transforming the Language Teaching Experience in the Age of AI. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-9893-4.ch002.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 I Putu Andre Suhardiana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Undiksha agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)