Students' Perceptions Of The Inorganic Chemistry Classroom Management Through A Web-Based Instructional System

Penulis

  • Daud Karel Walanda Pendidikan Kimia FKIP Universitas Tadulako Palu Indonesi 94119
  • Mery Napitupulu Pendidikan Kimia FKIP Universitas Tadulako Palu Indonesi 94119
  • Detris Poba Pendidikan Kimia FKIP Universitas Tadulako Palu Indonesi 94119

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23887/jpk.v6i1.41404

Kata Kunci:

Webpage, Google classroom, inorganic chemistry, perception, effect size

Abstrak

Pengelolaan kelas dalam proses pengajaran khususnya mata pelajaran kimia akan menjadi signifikan agar hasil belajar menjadi optimal. Namun kegitan pembelajaran yang dilaksanakan saat ini kurang optimal sedangkan berdampak pada hasil belajar. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis persepsi mahasiswa dalam manajemen kelas mata kuliah kimia anorganik. Jenis penelitian ini yaitu penelitian kuantitatif. Metode dan instrument yang digunakan untuk mengumpulkan data yaitu instrument. Subjek penelitian ini adalah 40 mahasiswa. Teknik yang digunakan untuk menganalsis data yaitu analisis deskriptif kualitati dan kuantitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa persepsi mahasiswa tentang GC berada pada kategori memuaskan dan merekomendasikan GC untuk digunakan dalam pelajaran lain. Effect size dihitung dari perbedaan rata-rata pre-test dan post-test sebelum dan sesudah pembelajaran dengan menggunakan rumus Cohen dan diperoleh efektivitas GC menurut kriteria Cohen adalah 1,77, yang berarti bahwa ukuran efek Google Classroom luas; maka GC sangat efektif digunakan dalam mengajar mata kuliah kimia anorganik. Disimpulkan bahwa pengelolaan kelas melalui sistem instruksional berbasis WEB efektif digunakan dalam pembelajaran.

Biografi Penulis

Daud Karel Walanda, Pendidikan Kimia FKIP Universitas Tadulako Palu Indonesi 94119

Pendidikan Kimia FKIP

Mery Napitupulu, Pendidikan Kimia FKIP Universitas Tadulako Palu Indonesi 94119

Pendidikan Kimia FKIP

Detris Poba, Pendidikan Kimia FKIP Universitas Tadulako Palu Indonesi 94119

Pendidikan Kimia FKIP

Referensi

Balkin, R.S, & Buckner, D. (2005). Issues in classroom management in an interactive distance education course. International Journal of Instructional Media, 32(4), 363–372.

Barrios, M., González-Teruel, A., Cosculluela, A., Fornieles, A., & Turbany, J. (2014). Structure and performance assessment in traditional face-to-face and blended learning statistics courses. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 1259–1262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.217

Bitterly, T. B., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2019). The impression management benefits of humorous self-disclosures: How humor influences perceptions of veracity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 151, 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.01.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.01.005

Chow, J., Tse, A., & Armatas, C. (2018). Comparing trained and untrained lecturers on their use of LMS tools using the Rasch analysis. Computers & Education, 123, 124–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.009

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education (7th ed.). London: UK: Routledge.

Derboven, J., Geerts, D., & De Grooff, D. (2017). Appropriating virtual learning environments: A study of teacher tactics. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing, 40, 20–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvlc.2017.01.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvlc.2017.01.002

Dukuzumuremyi, S., & Siklander, P. (2018). Interactions between pupils and their teacher in collaborative and technology-enhanced learning settings in the inclusive classroom. Teaching and Teacher Education, 76, 165–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.08.010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.08.010

Furtak, E. M., Bakeman, R., & Buell, J. Y. (2018). Developing knowledge-in-action with a learning progression: Sequential analysis of lecturers ’ questions and responses to student ideas. Teaching and Teacher Education, 76, 267–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.06.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.06.001

Icekson, T., & Pines, A. M. (2013). Positive perception: A three-dimensional model and a scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(2), 180–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.08.034. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.08.034

Iurea, C., Neacsu, I., Safta, C. G., & Suditu, M. (2011). The study of the relation between the teaching methods and the learning styles – the impact upon the students’ academic conduct. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 11, 256–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.01.072. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.01.072

Kong, S. C. (2014). Developing information literacy and critical thinking skills through domain knowledge learning in digital classrooms: An experience of practicing flipped classroom strategy. Computers & Education, 78, 160–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.05.009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.05.009

Kotrlik, J., Williams, H., & Jabor, K. (2011). Reporting and interpreting effect size in quantitative agricultural education research. Journal of Agricultural Education, 52(1), 132–142. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2011.01132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2011.01132

Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863

Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 22(140), 5–55.

Mishra, L., Gupta, T., & Shree, A. (2020) Online teaching-learning in higher education during lockdown period of COVID-19 pandemic, International Journal of Educational Research, 1, 100012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100012

Mersand, S. (2014). Google classroom: A sneak peek. Tech Learning, 16, 35(1 SRC-BaiduScholar).

Napitupulu, M., Walanda, D. K., Poba, D., & Pulukadang, S. H. V. (2020). Ace chemistry classroom management with LMS schoology. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 14(12), 179-185. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v14i12.15585. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v14i12.15585

Naveh, G., Tubin, D., & Pliskin, N. (2010). Student LMS use and satisfaction in academic institutions: The organizational perspective. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(3), 127–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.02.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.02.004

Norman, G. (2010). Likert scales, level of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 15(5), 625–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y

Phan, W. (2015). Head back to school with new features in google classroom: Google for education. Retrieved from http://www.edtechroundup.org/editorials--press/head-back-to-school-with-new-features-in-google-classroom.

Rahimi, M., & Fatemeh Hosseini K., S. (2011). The impact of computer-based activities on Iranian high-school students’ attitudes towards computer-assisted language learning. Procedia Computer Science, 3, 183–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2010.12.031. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2010.12.031

Rosemary, L., & Linda, A. (2011). From onsite to online: Lessons learned from faculty pioneers. Journal of Professional Nursing, 28(4), 255–258. https://doi.org101016jprofnurs11015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2011.11.015

Rosental, R., In, H., & York, N. (1994). Parametric measures of effect size. Copper L V Hedges Eds The Handbook for Research Synthesis New Russell Sage Foundation.

Schrum, B. (2005). Leadership and learning in health care. MGMA Connexion, 5(7), 38–41. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=pubmed&DbFrom=pubmed&Cmd=Link&LinkName=pubmed_pubmed&LinkReadableName=Related%20Articles&IdsFromResult=16173177&ordinalpos=3&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum.

Shaharanee, I. N. M., Jamil, J. M., & Rodzi, S. S. M. (2016). Google classroom as a tool for active learning. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1761, 020069. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4960909. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4960909

Singleton, R. A. J., & Strait, B. C. (1999). Approaches to Social Research (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103(2), 193–210. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.193

Vizeshfar, F., & Torabizadeh, C. (2018). The effect of teaching based on dominant learning style on nursing students’ academic achievement. Nurse Education in Practice, 28, 103–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2017.10.013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2017.10.013

Yadid, G., Roth-Deri, I., & Green-Sadan, T. (2017). Cocaine, β-endorphin, and δ-opioid receptors. In the Neuroscience of Cocaine (pp. 471–481). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803750-8.00047-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803750-8.00047-6

Diterbitkan

2022-05-26

Cara Mengutip

Walanda, D. K., Napitupulu, M., & Poba, D. (2022). Students’ Perceptions Of The Inorganic Chemistry Classroom Management Through A Web-Based Instructional System. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Indonesia, 6(1), 63–69. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpk.v6i1.41404

Terbitan

Bagian

Articles

Artikel paling banyak dibaca berdasarkan penulis yang sama