Students' Perceptions Of The Inorganic Chemistry Classroom Management Through A Web-Based Instructional System
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jpk.v6i1.41404Kata Kunci:
Webpage, Google classroom, inorganic chemistry, perception, effect sizeAbstrak
Pengelolaan kelas dalam proses pengajaran khususnya mata pelajaran kimia akan menjadi signifikan agar hasil belajar menjadi optimal. Namun kegitan pembelajaran yang dilaksanakan saat ini kurang optimal sedangkan berdampak pada hasil belajar. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis persepsi mahasiswa dalam manajemen kelas mata kuliah kimia anorganik. Jenis penelitian ini yaitu penelitian kuantitatif. Metode dan instrument yang digunakan untuk mengumpulkan data yaitu instrument. Subjek penelitian ini adalah 40 mahasiswa. Teknik yang digunakan untuk menganalsis data yaitu analisis deskriptif kualitati dan kuantitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa persepsi mahasiswa tentang GC berada pada kategori memuaskan dan merekomendasikan GC untuk digunakan dalam pelajaran lain. Effect size dihitung dari perbedaan rata-rata pre-test dan post-test sebelum dan sesudah pembelajaran dengan menggunakan rumus Cohen dan diperoleh efektivitas GC menurut kriteria Cohen adalah 1,77, yang berarti bahwa ukuran efek Google Classroom luas; maka GC sangat efektif digunakan dalam mengajar mata kuliah kimia anorganik. Disimpulkan bahwa pengelolaan kelas melalui sistem instruksional berbasis WEB efektif digunakan dalam pembelajaran.
Referensi
Balkin, R.S, & Buckner, D. (2005). Issues in classroom management in an interactive distance education course. International Journal of Instructional Media, 32(4), 363–372.
Barrios, M., González-Teruel, A., Cosculluela, A., Fornieles, A., & Turbany, J. (2014). Structure and performance assessment in traditional face-to-face and blended learning statistics courses. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 1259–1262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.217
Bitterly, T. B., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2019). The impression management benefits of humorous self-disclosures: How humor influences perceptions of veracity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 151, 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.01.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.01.005
Chow, J., Tse, A., & Armatas, C. (2018). Comparing trained and untrained lecturers on their use of LMS tools using the Rasch analysis. Computers & Education, 123, 124–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.009
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education (7th ed.). London: UK: Routledge.
Derboven, J., Geerts, D., & De Grooff, D. (2017). Appropriating virtual learning environments: A study of teacher tactics. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing, 40, 20–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvlc.2017.01.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvlc.2017.01.002
Dukuzumuremyi, S., & Siklander, P. (2018). Interactions between pupils and their teacher in collaborative and technology-enhanced learning settings in the inclusive classroom. Teaching and Teacher Education, 76, 165–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.08.010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.08.010
Furtak, E. M., Bakeman, R., & Buell, J. Y. (2018). Developing knowledge-in-action with a learning progression: Sequential analysis of lecturers ’ questions and responses to student ideas. Teaching and Teacher Education, 76, 267–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.06.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.06.001
Icekson, T., & Pines, A. M. (2013). Positive perception: A three-dimensional model and a scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(2), 180–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.08.034. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.08.034
Iurea, C., Neacsu, I., Safta, C. G., & Suditu, M. (2011). The study of the relation between the teaching methods and the learning styles – the impact upon the students’ academic conduct. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 11, 256–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.01.072. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.01.072
Kong, S. C. (2014). Developing information literacy and critical thinking skills through domain knowledge learning in digital classrooms: An experience of practicing flipped classroom strategy. Computers & Education, 78, 160–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.05.009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.05.009
Kotrlik, J., Williams, H., & Jabor, K. (2011). Reporting and interpreting effect size in quantitative agricultural education research. Journal of Agricultural Education, 52(1), 132–142. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2011.01132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2011.01132
Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863
Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 22(140), 5–55.
Mishra, L., Gupta, T., & Shree, A. (2020) Online teaching-learning in higher education during lockdown period of COVID-19 pandemic, International Journal of Educational Research, 1, 100012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100012
Mersand, S. (2014). Google classroom: A sneak peek. Tech Learning, 16, 35(1 SRC-BaiduScholar).
Napitupulu, M., Walanda, D. K., Poba, D., & Pulukadang, S. H. V. (2020). Ace chemistry classroom management with LMS schoology. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 14(12), 179-185. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v14i12.15585. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v14i12.15585
Naveh, G., Tubin, D., & Pliskin, N. (2010). Student LMS use and satisfaction in academic institutions: The organizational perspective. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(3), 127–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.02.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.02.004
Norman, G. (2010). Likert scales, level of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 15(5), 625–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y
Phan, W. (2015). Head back to school with new features in google classroom: Google for education. Retrieved from http://www.edtechroundup.org/editorials--press/head-back-to-school-with-new-features-in-google-classroom.
Rahimi, M., & Fatemeh Hosseini K., S. (2011). The impact of computer-based activities on Iranian high-school students’ attitudes towards computer-assisted language learning. Procedia Computer Science, 3, 183–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2010.12.031. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2010.12.031
Rosemary, L., & Linda, A. (2011). From onsite to online: Lessons learned from faculty pioneers. Journal of Professional Nursing, 28(4), 255–258. https://doi.org101016jprofnurs11015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2011.11.015
Rosental, R., In, H., & York, N. (1994). Parametric measures of effect size. Copper L V Hedges Eds The Handbook for Research Synthesis New Russell Sage Foundation.
Schrum, B. (2005). Leadership and learning in health care. MGMA Connexion, 5(7), 38–41. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=pubmed&DbFrom=pubmed&Cmd=Link&LinkName=pubmed_pubmed&LinkReadableName=Related%20Articles&IdsFromResult=16173177&ordinalpos=3&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum.
Shaharanee, I. N. M., Jamil, J. M., & Rodzi, S. S. M. (2016). Google classroom as a tool for active learning. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1761, 020069. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4960909. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4960909
Singleton, R. A. J., & Strait, B. C. (1999). Approaches to Social Research (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103(2), 193–210. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.193
Vizeshfar, F., & Torabizadeh, C. (2018). The effect of teaching based on dominant learning style on nursing students’ academic achievement. Nurse Education in Practice, 28, 103–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2017.10.013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2017.10.013
Yadid, G., Roth-Deri, I., & Green-Sadan, T. (2017). Cocaine, β-endorphin, and δ-opioid receptors. In the Neuroscience of Cocaine (pp. 471–481). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803750-8.00047-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803750-8.00047-6
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2022 Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Indonesia
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Indonesia agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)
