Improving Students’ Conceptual Understanding Through Geogebra-Assisted “5E” Learning Cycle: Is It Effective?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jpp.v54i1.25219Keywords:
5E Learning Cycle, Geogebra, Conceptual UnderstandingAbstract
This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of GeoGebra-assisted 5E Learning Cycle model toward student’s understanding of mathematical concept with control of student’s prior knowledge. This study was a quasi-experiment with post-test only control group design. The population of the study was 324 ninth grader students where 81 of them were selected as sample through cluster random sampling technique. The data collected in this study were student’s mathematical prior knowledge obtained by giving objective tests before starting the learning process and data of student’s mathematical conceptual understanding obtained by giving an essay test at the end of learning process. The hypotheses were tested using t-test and one-way analysis of covariance test. The results showed that: the usage of GeoGebra-assisted 5E Learning Cycle Model has a positive impact toward student’s understanding of mathematical concept, where t = 2,977 and p = 0,002; the usage of GeoGebra-assisted 5E Learning Cycle Model has a positive impact toward student’s understanding of mathematical concept after the prior knowledge variable was controlled, where F = 31,880 and p = 0,000. The findings of this research implied that GeoGebra-assisted 5E Learning Cycle Model can be used as an alternative learning model in an effort to improve students' understanding of mathematical concepts.
References
Adelabu, F. ., Makgato, M., & Ramaligela, M. S. (2019). The Importance of Dynamic Geometry Computer Software on Learners’ Performance in Geometry. The Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 17(1), 52–63. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1216699.pdf.
Amir, A. (2013). Pembelajaran matematika dengan menggunakan kecerdasan majemuk (multiple intelligences). Logaritma: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Sains, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.24952/logaritma.v1i01.196.
Anghileri, J. (2006). Scaffolding Practices that Enhance Mathematics Learning. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9, 33–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-006-9005-9.
Ariawan, I. P. W. (2014). Pengembangan LKM Multi Representasi Berbantuan GeoGebra Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Mahasiswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 3(1). https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JPI/article/view/2918.
Bahr, C. M., & Rieth, H. J. (1989). The effects of Instructional Computer Games and Drill and Practice Software on Learning Disabled Students’ Mathematics Achievement. Computers in the Schools, 6(4), 87–102.
Bayram, Z., Oskay, Ö. Ö., Erdem, E., Özgür, S. D., & Şen, Ş. (2013). Effect of Inquiry based Learning Method on Students’ Motivation. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 106, 988–996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.112.
Burhanzade, H., & Aygör, N. (2014). Problems that the students face while solving 1 st Degree Equations with two Unknown , during their prepare to the High School Entrance Exam ( SBS ). Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 122, 477–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1378.
Bybee, R. W. (2014). The BSCS 5E Instructional Model: Personal reflections and contemporary implications. Science and Children, 51(8), 10–13. https://education.sdsu.edu/dle/resources/05329-5E_instructional_Model_R_Bybee.pdf.
Cahyarini, A., Rahayu, S., & Yahmin. (2016). The Effect of 5E Learning Cycle Instructional Model Using Socioscientific Issues (SSI) Learning Context on Students’ Critical Thinking. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(2), 222–229. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v5i2.7683.
Chazan, D., Yerushalmy, M., & Leikin, R. (2008). The Journal of Mathematical Behavior An analytic conception of equation and teachers ’ views of school algebra. 27, 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2008.07.003.
Duval, R. (1998). Geometry from a Cognitive Point of View in Perspective on the Teaching of Geometry for the 21st Century. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Eveline, E., Jumadi, Wilujeng, I., & Kuswanto, H. (2019). The Effect of Scaffolding Approach Assisted by PhET Simulation on Students’ Conceptual Understanding and Students’ Learning Independence in Physics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1233/1/012036.
Ionas, I. G., Cernusca, D., & Collier, H. L. (2012). Prior knowledge influence on self-explanation effectiveness when solving problems: an exploratory study in science learning. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 24(3), 349–358. http://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/.
Kodariyati, L., & Astuti, B. (2016). Pengaruh Model PBL Terhadap Kemampuan Komunikasi dan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa Kelas V SD. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 4(1), 93–106. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpe.v4i1.7713.
Lashley, L. (2017). The Effects of Computer-Aided Instruction in Mathematics on the Performance of Grade 4 Pupils. SAGE Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244017712775.
Litke, E. (2020). Instructional practice in algebra : Building from existing practices to inform an incremental improvement approach. Teaching and Teacher Education, xxxx, 103030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103030.
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M., & Tom, L. (2016). 20 Years of TIMSS: International Trends in Mathematics and Science Achievement Curriculum and Instruction. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA).
NCTM. (2014). Principles to Actions: Ensuring Mathematical Success for All. NCTM.
Nurhusain, M. (2017). Impact Analysis of Cooperative Learning Model Application Type Two Stay Two Stray (Tsts) Toward Learning Outcomes of Mathematics. JPMI (Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Indonesia), 2(2), 46. https://doi.org/10.26737/jpmi.v2i2.220.
Odell, B., Gierl, M., & Cutumisu, M. (2021). Testing measurement invariance of PISA 2015 mathematics, science, and ICT scales using the alignment method. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100965.
Ozdag, H., & Aygor, N. (2012). Undergraduate students ’ performances in linear algebra : factorization of a determinant of n * n dimensional matrices. 46, 125–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.080.
Piyayodilokchai, H., Panjaburee, P., Laosinchai, P., Ketpichainarong, W., & Ruenwongsa, P. (2013). A 5E Learning Cycle Approach–Based, Multimedia-Supplemented Instructional Unit for Structured Query Language. Educational Technology & Society, 16(4), 146–159. https://doi.org/10.2307/jeductechsoci.16.4.146.
Plaikoil, A. K. S., Pujani, N. M., & Tika, I. N. (2019). The Effect of 5E Learning Cycle Model on Problem Solving Ability in Terms of Student Numerical Ability. Proceeding of International Conference on Fundamental and Applied Research (I-CFAR). https://doi.org/10.36002/icfar.v0i0.942.
Purwati, S. (2016). Pengaruh Pengetahuan Awal Terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Usaha dan Energi. Prosiding SNFA (Seminar Nasional Fisika Dan Aplikasinya).
Putra, F. Y., Nurkholifah, I., Subali, B., & Rusilowati, A. (2018). 5E-Learning Cycle Strategy: Increasing Conceptual Understanding and Learning Motivation. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-BiRuNi, 7(2), 171–181. https://doi.org/10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v7i2.2898.
Qawasmeh, R. M., & Syouf., A. A. A. (2017). The Effect of Using Computerized 5E’s Learning Cycle Model on Acquiring Scientific Concepts among Fourth Graders. American Journal of Educational Research, 5(5), 579–587.
Scanlon, E., Anastopoulou, S., Kerawalla, L., & Mulholland, P. (2011). How Technology Resources Can Be Used to Represent Personal Inquiry And Support Students’ Understanding Of It Across Contexts. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(6), 516–529. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00414.x.
Simon, M. A. (2017). Explicating Mathematical Concept and Mathematical Conception as Theoretical Constructs. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 94(2), 117–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-016-9728-1.
Smith, M., Bill, V., & Raith, M. L. (2018). Promoting a Conceptual Understanding of Mathematics. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 24(1), 36–43. https://www.nctm.org/Publications/Mathematics-Teaching-in-Middle-School/2018/Vol24/Issue1/Promoting-a-Conceptual-Understanding-of-Mathematics/.
Sukardjo, M., & Salam, M. (2020). Effect of Concept Attainment Models and Self-Directed Learning (SDL) on Mathematics Learning Outcomes. International Journal of Instruction, 13(3), 275–292. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13319a.
Suryabrata, S. (2014). Metodologi Penelitian. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Tuna, A., & Kaçar, A. (2013). The Effect of 5E Learning Cycle Model in Teaching Trigonometry on Students’ Academic Achievement and the Permanence of Their Knowledge. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 4(1). http://www.ijonte.org/FileUpload/ks63207/File/07.tuna.pdf.
Widodo, S., & Kartikasari, K. (2017). Pembelajaran Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa Sekolah Dasar Dengan Model Creative Problem Solving (Cps). Prisma, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.35194/jp.v6i1.28.
Xin, Y. P., Park, J. Y., Tzur, R., & Si, L. (2020). The impact of a conceptual model-based mathematics computer tutor on multiplicative reasoning and problem-solving of students with learning disabilities. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2020.100762.
Yilmaz, M., Yildirim Sari, H., & Daghan, Ş. (2020). An exploratory study of intercultural effectiveness scale in nursing students. Heliyon, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02769.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)
