The Determinant Factor of the Principal Leadership Solutions in Facing the 21st-Century Learning

Authors

  • Muhammad Saifurrahman Department of Technological and Vocational Education, Yogyakarta State University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Putu Sudira Department of Technological and Vocational Education, Yogyakarta State University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Rihab Wit Daryono Department of Technological and Vocational Education, Yogyakarta State University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23887/jpp.v54i2.34102

Keywords:

Principal, Leadership, Vocational High School

Abstract

Principal leadership is very important in the education and learning efforts of the 21st-century. This study aims to find determinants of principal leadership solutions in dealing with 21st-century learning in Vocational High Schools (VHS). This research was conducted with a total sample of 64 respondents from the principals, the vice principal for field I-IV, the head of department, and staff. The data analysis used the Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) method to test the validity of the constructs and to estimate the reliability of the data. Furthermore, the t-test, One Way Anova, and Games-Howell test were used to test the difference in the average rating based on the characteristics of the respondent's dimensions. The results of the EFA analysis show that seven sub-variables are consisting of 29 determinants of the principal's leadership solution which are identified at 74.266%. The results of the instrument reliability estimation have a reliable level. Based on the different tests using the t-test on the gender dimension and the One Way Anova test on the last position and education dimension, it was concluded that there was no significant difference in the assessment of respondents. The Games-Howell test post-hoc revealed that there were significant differences based on the 29-33 year age dimension and the 5-9-year-old teaching experience dimension.

References

Abrahamsen, H., Aas, M., & Hellekjær, G. O. (2015). How do principals make sense of school leadership in Norwegian reorganised leadership teams? School Leadership & Management, 35(1), 62–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2014.992775.

Banerjee, R. (2014). Human capital, technological progress and trade: What explains India’s long run growth? Journal of Asian Economics, 30(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2013.12.003.

Boonk, L. M., Gijselaers, H. J. M., Ritzen, H., & Brand-Gruwel, S. (2020). Student-perceived parental involvement as a predictor for academic motivation in vocational education and training (VET). Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2020.1745260.

Bukit, M. (2014). Strategi dan inovasi pendidikan kejuruan dari kompetensi ke kompetisi. Alfabeta.

Bush, T., Abdul Hamid, S., Ng, A., & Kaparou, M. (2018). School leadership theories and the Malaysia Education Blueprint: Findings from a systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Management, 32(7), 1245–1265. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-06-2017-0158.

Çetin, Z., Özözen Danacı, M., & Kuzu, A. (2020). The effect of psychological violence on preschool teachers’ perceptions of their performance. South African Journal of Education, 40(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v40n1a1738.

Cetrulo, A., & Nuvolari, A. (2019). Industry 4.0: Revolution or hype? Reassessing recent technological trends and their impact on labour. Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, 46(3), 391–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40812-019-00132-y.

Chan, C. K. Y., & Luk, L. Y. Y. (2020). Development and validation of an instrument measuring undergraduate students’ perceived holistic competencies. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1784392.

Daryono, R. W., Hariyanto, V. L., & Usman, H. (2020). Factor analysis: Competency framework for measuring student achievements of architectural engineering education in Indonesia. REID (Research and Evaluation in Education), 6(2), 98–108. https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v6i2.32743.

Daryono, R. W., Rochmadi, S., & Hidayat, N. (2021). Development and validation of video-based learning media to increase competency achievement in civil engineering education. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1833(1–10), 012022. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1833/1/012022.

Eckman, E. W. (2018). A Case Study of the Implementation of the Co-Principal Leadership Model. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 17(2), 189–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2016.1278243.

Febrianti, R. A. M., Haizam Mohd Saudi, M., Kaniawati, K., & Hermina, N. (2018). Transformation of Digital Marketing in the 4.0 Industry Revolution: A Study on Batik MSMEs. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.34), 352–357. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.34.25779.

Fox, A., Feng, W., & Asal, V. (2019). What is driving global obesity trends? Globalization or “modernization”? Globalization and Health, 15(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-019-0457-y.

Freeman, G. T., & Fields, D. (2020). School leadership in an urban context: Complicating notions of effective principal leadership, organizational setting, and teacher commitment to students. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2020.1818133.

Gawlik, M. (2018). Instructional leadership and the charter school principal. School Leadership & Management, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2018.1439467.

González-Falcón, I., García-Rodríguez, M. P., Gómez-Hurtado, I., & Carrasco-Macías, M. J. (2020). The importance of principal leadership and context for school success: Insights from ‘(in)visible school.’ School Leadership & Management, 40(4), 248–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1612355.

Grabowski, R. (2020). What factors influence the quality of governance institutions? An Asian perspective. Journal of Asian Economics, 70(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2020.101238.

Gunuc, S. (2015). Student engagement scale: Development, reliability and validity. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(4), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.938019.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. C., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (Seventh Edition). Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

Hallinger, P., Hosseingholizadeh, R., Hashemi, N., & Kouhsari, M. (2018). Do beliefs make a difference? Exploring how principal self-efficacy and instructional leadership impact teacher efficacy and commitment in Iran. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(5), 800–819. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143217700283.

Hallinger, P. P., & Liu, D. S. (2016). Leadership and teacher learning in urban and rural schools in China: Meeting the dual challenges of equity and effectiveness. International Journal of Educational Development, 51(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2016.10.001.

Hariri, H., Monypenny, R., & Prideaux, M. (2016). Teacher-perceived principal leadership styles, decision-making styles and job satisfaction: How congruent are data from Indonesia with the Anglophile and Western literature? School Leadership & Management, 36(1), 41–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2016.1160210.

Hollman, A., Bice, M. R., Ball, J., Bickford, N., Shafer, A. B., & Bickford, S. (2018). A comparison of scholarly productivity among current professors who obtained terminal degrees. American Journal of Distance Education, 32(4), 17. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2018.1511514.

Huang, F., Teo, T., & Zhou, M. (2020). Chinese students’ intentions to use the Internet-based technology for learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(1), 575–591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09695-y.

Huang, T., Hochbein, C., & Simons, J. (2020). The relationship among school contexts, principal time use, school climate, and student achievement. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 48(2), 305–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143218802595.

Kaiser, M., Bauer, J. M., & Sousa-Poza, A. (2017). Does unemployment lead to a less healthy lifestyle? Applied Economics Letters, 24(12), 815–819. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2016.1231888.

Khanal, J., Perry, F., & Park, S.-H. (2020). Leadership practices of principals of high-performing community high schools: Evidence from Nepal. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 48(6), 1026–1045. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143219884076.

Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. The Guilford Press.

Kolesnichenko, E. A., Radyukova, Y. Y., & Pakhomov, N. N. (2019). The Role and Importance of Knowledge Economy as a Platform for Formation of Industry 4.0. In E. G. Popkova, Y. V. Ragulina, & A. V. Bogoviz (Eds.), Industry 4.0: Industrial Revolution of the 21st Century (Vol. 169, pp. 73–82). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94310-7_7.

Lai, E. (2014). Principal leadership practices in exploiting situated possibilities to build teacher capacity for change. Asia Pacific Education Review, 15(2), 165–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-014-9314-0.

Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077.

Liu, L., Du, X., Zhang, Z., & Zhou, J. (2019). Effect of problem-based learning in pharmacology education: A meta-analysis. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 60, 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.11.004.

Lochmiller, C. R. (2015). Exploring Principal Leadership for Math and Science. Journal of School Leadership, 25(1), 24–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/105268461502500102.

Marfan, J., & Pascual, J. (2018). Comparative study of school principals’ leadership practices: Lessons for Chile from a cross-country analysis. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(2), 279–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143217732792.

Miller, P. (2014). What is a Principal’s Quality Mark? Issues and Challenges in Leadership Progression among Primary Teachers in Jamaica. Research in Comparative and International Education, 9(1), 126–136. https://doi.org/10.2304/rcie.2014.9.1.126.

Pala, F. K., & Erdem, M. (2020). Development of a participation style scale for online instructional discussions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(6), 3213–3233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09817-x.

Piirto, J. (2011). Creativity for 21st century skills: How to embed creativity into the curriculum. Sense Publ.

Popkova, E. G., Ragulina, Y. V., & Bogoviz, A. V. (Eds.). (2019). Industry 4.0: Industrial Revolution of the 21st Century (Vol. 169). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94310-7.

Printy, S. (2010). Principals’ influence on instructional quality: Insights from US schools. School Leadership & Management, 30(2), 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632431003688005.

Reynolds, A. J., & Candee, A. J. (2019). Dimensionality and Predictive validity of the Classroom Learning Activities Checklist in Prekindergarten. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 31(4), 381–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-019-09306-7.

Sanchez, J. E., Paul, J. M., & Thornton, B. W. (2020). Relationships among teachers’ perceptions of principal leadership and teachers’ perceptions of school climate in the high school setting. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2019.1708471.

Sanderson, S. W., & Simons, K. L. (2014). Light emitting diodes and the lighting revolution: The emergence of a solid-state lighting industry. Research Policy, 43(10), 1730–1746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.07.011.

San-Mateo-Valdehíta, A. (2019). Learning word class in a second language through vocabulary learning activities: Definition-choosing, gap-filling, and sentence-writing. Journal of Spanish Language Teaching, 6(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/23247797.2019.1590001.

Schwab, K. (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. World Economic Forum.

Sebastian, J., Allensworth, E., Wiedermann, W., Hochbein, C., & Cunningham, M. (2019). Principal Leadership and School Performance: An Examination of Instructional Leadership and Organizational Management. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 18(4), 591–613. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2018.1513151.

ShayesteFar, P. (2020). A model of interplay between student English achievement and the joint affective factors in a high-stakes test change context: Model construction and validity. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 32(3), 335–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-020-09326-8.

Sima, V., Gheorghe, I. G., Subić, J., & Nancu, D. (2020). Influences of the Industry 4.0 Revolution on the Human Capital Development and Consumer Behavior: A Systematic Review. Sustainability, 12(10), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104035.

Sleegers, J. C. P., E.J. Thoonen, E., J. Oort, F., & T.D. Peetsma, T. (2014). Changing classroom practices: The role of school-wide capacity for sustainable improvement. Journal of Educational Administration, 52(5), 617–652. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-11-2013-0126.

Stein, K. C., Macaluso, M., & Stanulis, R. N. (2016). The Interplay between Principal Leadership and Teacher Leader Efficacy. Journal of School Leadership, 26(6), 1002–1032. https://doi.org/10.1177/105268461602600605.

Stringer, P., & Hourani, R. B. (2016). Transformation of roles and responsibilities of principals in times of change. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 44(2), 224–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143214549971.

Sudibjo, N., & Nasution, R. A. (2020). Work environment, work motivation and organizational culture in influencing teachers’ performance. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 53(3), 276. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpp.v53i3.28533 .

Sun, H., Wang, X., & Sharma, S. (2014). A study on effective principal leadership factors in China. International Journal of Educational Management, 28(6), 716–727. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-11-2013-0173.

Tan, C. Y. (2018). Examining school leadership effects on student achievement: The role of contextual challenges and constraints. Cambridge Journal of Education, 48(1), 21–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2016.1221885.

Triyono, B. M., Mohib, N., Kassymova, G. K., Pratama, G. N. I. P., Adinda, D., & Arpentieva, M. R. (2020). The Profile Improvement of Vocational School Teachers’ Competencies. Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia, 29(2), 151–158. https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2020-29-2-151-158.

Weinstein, J., & Muñoz, G. (2014). When duties are not enough: Principal leadership and public or private school management in Chile 1. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 25(4), 651–670. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2013.792850.

Xu, L. D. (2020). Industry 4.0-Frontiers of fourth industrial revolution. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 37(4), 531–534. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2719.

Yaya, S., Otu, A., & Labonté, R. (2020). Globalisation in the time of COVID-19: Repositioning Africa to meet the immediate and remote challenges. Globalization and Health, 16(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-020-00581-4.

Yeigh, T., Lynch, D., Turner, D., Provost, S. C., Smith, R., & Willis, R. L. (2019). School leadership and school improvement: An examination of school readiness factors. School Leadership & Management, 39(5), 434–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2018.1505718.

Yuliawati, & Enas. (2018). Implementasi Kompetensi Kepala Sekolah Dalam Meningkatkan Kompetensi Guru. Indonesian Journal of Education Management and Administration Review, 2(2), 318–324.

Zheng, Q., Li, L., Chen, H., & Loeb, S. (2017). What Aspects of Principal Leadership Are Most Highly Correlated with School Outcomes in China? Educational Administration Quarterly, 53(3), 409–447. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X17706152.

Downloads

Published

2021-07-17

How to Cite

Saifurrahman, M., Sudira, P., & Daryono, R. W. (2021). The Determinant Factor of the Principal Leadership Solutions in Facing the 21st-Century Learning. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 54(2), 230–243. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpp.v54i2.34102

Issue

Vol. 54 No. 2 (2021): July

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran agree to the following terms:
  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)

Most read articles by the same author(s)