Meritocracy, the Reproduction of Inequality, and the Academic Scandal in Indonesia: Philosophical Perspective of Michael Sandel
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/ijerr.v7i1.66253Keywords:
Meritocracy, education, academic cheating, inequality, humanistic intellectualAbstract
The practice of academic cheating is one of the biggest scandals in the educational process at various universities throughout Indonesia. This study aims to elaborate on the issue from Michael Sandel's philosophical criticism of the tyranny of meritocracy and the reproduction ofeducational inequality. The research uses the literature review research method, which is carried out by identifying, analyzing, and interpreting Sandel's works critically, especially his book, The Tyranny of Merit: What Becomes the Common Good? The results of this study indicate that academic cheating in university is not only the result of personal academic incompetence or degradation of personal moral integrity but mainly the result of the educational system and paradigm that exalts and adores meritocracy. Under the tyranny of meritocracy, the academicians concentrate on pursuing academic titles and individual pride rather than being an organic and humanistic intellectual. It can be concluded that under meritocracy, the education system fails to implement its humanistic and liberating role and instead reproduces the new social inequality and oppression. This research has implications for the revitalization of education’s role as an agent of liberation, equality, and justice in Indonesia.
References
Akanbi, T. A. (2018). The moral value of Yorùbá moonlight tales. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 4(04), 481–486. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojml.2014.44040.
Amiruddin, I. A., Alwi, M. A., & Fakhri, N. (2022). Prokrastinasi dan kecurangan akademik pada mahasiswa. Jurnal Psikologi Talenta Mahasiswa, 1(4), 183–195. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Nurfitriany-Fakhri/publication/360834087_Prokrastinasi_dan_Kecurangan_Akademik_pada_Mahasiswa/links/628d9d7e6773462154d70a08/Prokrastinasi-dan-Kecurangan-Akademik-pada-Mahasiswa.pdf.
Amka. (2019). Pendidikan Inklusif Bagi Siswa Berkebutuhan Khusus Di Kalimantan Selatan. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 4(1), 86–101. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v4i1.1234.
Arribas Lozano, A. (2018). Knowledge co-production with social movement networks. Redefining grassroots politics, rethinking research. Social Movement Studies, 17(4), 451–463. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2018.1457521.
Awaludin, H. (2023). Ingin Menjadi Profesor. Kompas. https://doi.org/https://www.kompas.id/baca/opini/2023/02/16/ingin-menjadi-profesor.
Awdry, R., & Ives, B. (2022). International Predictors of Contract Cheating in Higher Education. Journal of Academic Ethics, 21(2), 193–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-022-09449-1.
Bagus, L. (2002). Kamus Filsafat. Gramedia.
Baran, L., & Jonason, P. K. (2020). Academic dishonesty among university students: The roles of the psychopathy, motivation, and self-efficacy. PLoS ONE, 15(8 august), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238141.
Batruch, A., Jetten, J., Van de Werfhorst, H., Darnon, C., & Butera, F. (2023). Belief in School Meritocracy and the Legitimization of Social and Income Inequality. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 14(5), 621–635. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506221111017.
Bourn, D. (2021). Pedagogy of hope: global learning and the future of education. International Journal of Development Education and Global Learning, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.14324/ijdegl.13.2.01.
Budiarto, M. K., & Yusuf, M. (2023). Implementation of Pedagogical , Andragogical , and Heutagogical Approaches in Education System Sustainability. Indonesian Journal Of Educational Research And Review, 6(1), 281–298. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijerr.v6i2.59889.
Cheang, B., & Choy, D. (2023). Culture of Meritocracy, Political Hegemony, and Singapore’s Development. International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-023-09458-x.
Cheng, Y. C., Hung, F. C., & Hsu, H. M. (2021). The relationship between academic dishonesty, ethical attitude and ethical climate: The evidence from Taiwan. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(21), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111615.
Chiang, F. K., Zhu, D., & Yu, W. (2022). A systematic review of academic dishonesty in online learning environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(4), 907–928. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12656.
Cowden, S., & Singh, G. (2017). Community cohesion, communitarianism and neoliberalism. Critical Social Policy, 37(2), 268–286. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018316670252.
Dewanti, P. W., Purnama, I. A., Siregar, M. N., & Sukirno, S. (2020). Cheating Intention of Students Based on Theory of Planned Behavior. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Dan Bisnis, 15(2), 268. https://doi.org/10.24843/jiab.2020.v15.i02.p09.
Dewi, N. P. M. A., & Wiarta, I. W. (2021). The Correlation of Self Concept and Work Ethic to Teacher’s Performance in Online Learning. Indonesian Journal Of Educational Research and Review, 4(1), 63. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijerr.v4i1.33305.
Diningrat, R. A. (2019). Mengapa Anak dari Keluarga Miskin Cenderung akan Tetap Miskin Ketika Dewasa: Penjelasan Temuan Riset SMERU. SMERU Research Institute.
Dougherty, M. (2022). Plagiarism in Philosophy Research (J. F. and S. Faintuch (ed.)). Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99680-2.
Firdaus, F. A., & Mariyat, A. (2017). Humanistic Approach In Education According To Paulo Freire. At-Ta’dib, 12(2), 25. https://doi.org/10.21111/at-tadib.v12i2.1264.
Fontanella, A., Sukartini, S., Chandra, N., & Sriyunianti, F. (2020). Kecurangan Akademis Mahasiswa: Kenapa Terjadi dan Apa yang Harus Dilakukan? Jurnal ASET (Akuntansi Riset), 12(1), 155–164. https://doi.org/10.17509/jaset.v12i1.22378.
Fransiska, I. S., & Utami, H. (2019). Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik Mahasiswa: Perspektif Fraud Diamond Theory. Jurnal Akuntansi Aktual, 6(2), 316–323. https://doi.org/10.17977/um004v6i22019p316.
Gessler, M., Nägele, C., & Stalder, B. E. (2021). Scoping Review on Research at the Boundary Between Learning and Working: A Bibliometric Mapping Analysis of the Last Decade. International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training, 8(4), 170–206. https://doi.org/10.13152/IJRVET.8.4.8.
Gomes, A. (2022). Paulo Freire: Review of “The Pedagogy of the Oppressed” : 1st Edition, Penguin Random House UK, London, 2017. Harm Reduction Journal, 19(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-022-00605-9.
Gramsci, A. (2003). Selection from the Prison Notebooks. Lawrance and Wishart.
Hadinata, F. (2021). Analisis Filosofis Implementasi Merdeka Belajar sebagai Instrumen Kesetaraan dan Pendidikan Demokratis. Mozaik Humaniora, 21(2), 158–168. https://doi.org/10.20473/mozaik.v21i2.29695.
Hall, T. (2003). An Introduction to Contemporary Liberal Political Theory and Its Critics (C. Wolfe (ed.)). Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
Hamudy, N. A. (2020). Justice for Community: Political Perspective of Michael Sandel’s Communitarianism. Jurnal Bina Praja, 12(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.12.2020.43-52.
Heriyati, D., & Ekasari, W. F. (2020). A Study on Academic Dishonesty and Moral Reasoning. International Journal of Education, 12(2), 56–62. https://doi.org/10.17509/ije.v12i2.18653.
Hochschild, J. (2021). Left, Right, And Meritocracy Comment On M. Sandel’s The Tyranny Of Merit. American Journal of Law and Equality, 1(1), 106–110. https://doi.org/10.1162/ajle_a_00015.
Huang, Y. (2018). Encountering China, Michael Sandel and Chinese Philosophy. Harvard University Press.
Huiling, Z. (2018). Encountering China, Michael Sandel and Chinese Philosophy. Harvard University Press.
Humaeroh, S., & Dewi, D. A. (2021). Peran Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan di Era Globalisasi Dalam Pembentukan Karakter Siswa. Journal on Education, 3(3), 216–222. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v3i3.381.
Hung, A. T. W. (2023). A Case for Communitarian Meritocracy: A Critical Engagement with Michael Sandel. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-023-00375-z.
Johnson, K. (2015). Behavioral Education in the 21st Century. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 35(1–2), 135–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/01608061.2015.1036152.
Jonsson, A.-C., & Beach, D. (2013). A problem of democracy – Stereotypical notions of intelligence and identity in college preparatory academic programmes in the Swedish upper secondary school. Nordic Studies in Education, 33(1), 50–62. https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1891-5949-2013-01-07.
Kaul, V. (2018). Populism and the crisis of liberalism. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 44(4), 346–352. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1177/019145371877495.
Khusnun Nadhifah & Thamrin Hasan. (2022). Tingkat Kemutakhiran Literatur Rujukan Dalam Artikel Ilmiah Pada Jurnal Online Mahasiswa (JOM) Bidang Keperawatan Universitas Riau Publikasi Tahun 2019-2021. Jurnal Gema Pustakawan, 10(1), 20–32.
Kooli, C., & Abadli, R. (2021). Could Education Quality Audit Enhance Human Resources Management Processes of the Higher Education Institutions? Vision, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/09722629211005599.
Krisnawati, E. (2022). Meritokrasi Dalam Film Parasit. Jurnal Komunikatif, 11(1), 104–117. https://doi.org/10.33508/jk.v11i1.3387.
Kuppens, T., Spears, R., Manstead, A. S., Spruyt, B., & Easterbrook, M. J. (2018). Educationism and the irony of meritocracy: Negative attitudes of higher educated people towards the less educated. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 76, 429–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.11.001.
Madeira, A. F., Costa-Lopes, R., Dovidio, J. F., Freitas, G., & Mascarenhas, M. F. (2019). Primes and Consequences: A Systematic Review of Meritocracy in Intergroup Relations. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(September). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02007.
Madung, O. G. (2020). Krisis Demokrasi dan Tirani Meritokrasi Menurut Michael Sandel. Jurnal Ledalero, 19(2), 127. https://doi.org/10.31385/jl.v19i2.212.127-144.
Mahur, Y., Riyanto, Y., & Roesminingsih, E. (2019). Paulo Freire: Critical, Humanist and Liberating Education (Critical Reflections on Indonesian Education). International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies, 1(8), 873. https://doi.org/10.29103/ijevs.v1i8.2242.
Masfiah, U., Darweni, D., Zakiyah, Z., Muzayanah, U., & Parray, T. A. (2021). Character Education Values in Javanese Literature. El-HARAKAH (Terakreditasi), 23(1), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.18860/eh.v23i1.11455.
Mijs, J. J. B. (2016). The Unfulfillable Promise of Meritocracy: Three Lessons and Their Implications for Justice in Education. Social Justice Research, 29(1), 14–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-014-0228-0.
Mijs, J. J. B. (2021). The Paradox of Inequality: Income Inequality and Belief in Meritocracy go Hand in Hand. Socio-Economic Review, 19(1), 58–66. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwy051.
Molnar, K. K. and M. G. K. (2012). Does the Type of Cheating Influence Undergraduate Students’ Perceptions of Cheating? Journal of Academic Ethics, 10(3), 201–212. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/s10805- 012- 9164-5.
Moore, M. (2019). Contemporary Debates in Political Theory (T. C. and J. Christman (ed.)). Wiley-Blackwell.
Moreau, S. (2021). WHAT’S NEEDED FOR EQUALITY OF CONDITION? Comment on M. Sandel’s The Tyranny of Merit . American Journal of Law and Equality, 1(1), 132–138. https://doi.org/10.1162/ajle_a_00011.
Mubin, F., & Roziqin, A. (2018). Meritocracy of Bureaucracy in Indonesia. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 8(8), 241–246. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijssh.2018.v8.968.
Mushthofa, Z., Rusilowati, A., Sulhadi, S., Marwoto, P., & Mindiyarto, B. N. (2021). Analisis Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik Siswa dalam Pelaksanaan Ujian di Sekolah. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian Dan Kajian Kepustakaan Di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran, 7(2), 446. https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v7i2.3302.
Mustapha, R., Hussin, Z., Siraj, S., & Darusalam, G. (2017). Academic Dishonesty Among Higher Education Students: The Malaysian Evidence (2014 To 2016). Journal of KATHA, 13(1), 73–93. https://doi.org/10.22452/katha.vol13no1.4.
Nagarajan, R., Patrick, C. F., Tracey, S., & Ron, S. (2005). Determinants Of Innovative Work Behaviour: Development And Test Of An Integrated Model. Creativity and Innovation Management, 14(2), 142–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2005.00334.x.
Neroni, J., Meijs, C., Kirschner, P. A., Xu, K. M., & de Groot, R. H. M. (2022). Academic self-efficacy, self-esteem, and grit in higher online education: Consistency of interests predicts academic success. Social Psychology of Education, 25(4), 951–975. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-022-09696-5.
Newton, P. M. (2018). How Common Is Commercial Contract Cheating in Higher Education and Is It Increasing? A Systematic Review. Frontiers in Education, 3(August). https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2018.00067.
Niedlich, S., Kallfaß, A., Pohle, S., & Bormann, I. (2021). A comprehensive view of trust in education: Conclusions from a systematic literature review. Review of Education, 9(1), 124–158. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3239.
Osnos, E. (2018). Encountering China Michael Sandel and Chinese Philosophy. In M. J. S. and P. J. D’Ambrosio (Ed.), Encountering China. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674982710.
Patak, A. A., Wirawan, H., Abduh, A., Hidayat, R., Iskandar, I., & Dirawan, G. D. (2021). Teaching English as a Foreign Language in Indonesia: University Lecturers’ Views on Plagiarism. Journal of Academic Ethics, 19(4), 571–587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-020-09385-y.
Plattner, M. F. (2021). Is Meritocracy Just? Journal of Democracy, 32(1), 155–159. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2021.0007.
Rawls, J. (2009). A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press.
Rhode, D. L. (2022). Comment on M . Sandel ’ s The Tyranny of Merit. February, 27–32. https://doi.org/10.1162/ajle.
Roe, J. (2022). Reconceptualizing academic dishonesty as a struggle for intersubjective recognition: a new theoretical model. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01182-9.
Rosenbaum, S. (2018). Race, Justice and American Intellectual Traditions. Palgrave Pivot.
Sandel, M. J. (1998). Liberalism and The Limit of Justice. Cambridge University Press.
Sandel, M. J. (2018). Populism, liberalism, and democracy. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 44(4), 353–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453718757888.
Sandel, M. J. (2020). The Tyranny of Merit: What’s Become of the Common Good? Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Segoshi, M. S., & Poon, O. Y. A. (2016). Review by Megan S. Segoshi and OiYan A. Poon. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 20(2), 169–174. https://openjournals.libs.uga.edu/jheoe/article/download/1284/1281.
Skobelev, P. O., & Borovik, S. Y. (2017). On The Way from Industry 4.0 To Industry 5.0: From Digital Manufacturing To Digital Society. On The Way from Industry 4.0 To Industry 5.0: From Digital Manufacturing To Digital Society, 2(6), 307–311. https://stumejournals.com/journals/i4/2017/6/307.
Sousa, J. W. (2022). Liberating Community-based Research: Rescuing Gramsci’s Legacy of Organic Intellectuals. Engaged Scholar Journal, 8(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15402/esj.v8i3.70755.
Stewart, P., & Lucio, M. M. (2017). Research, Participation and the Neo-Liberal context: The Challenges of Emergent Participatory and Emancipatory Research Approaches. Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization, 17(3), 1–35. https://ephemerajournal.org/sites/default/files/2022-01/17-3ephemera-aug17.pdf#page=73.
Stosich, E. L. (2016). Building teacher and school capacity to teach to ambitious standards in high-poverty schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 58, 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.04.010.
Tan, P. (2023). Tirani Meritokrasi dan Reimajinasi Solidaritas: Sebuah Kajian Berdasarkan Perspektif Michael Sandel. Jurnal Ledalero, 22(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.31385/jl.v22i1.332.1-19.
Tsai, R. L. (2021). Can Sandel Dethrone Meritocracy? Comment on M. Sandel’s The Tyranny of Merit. American Journal of Law and Equality, 1(1), 70–80. https://doi.org/10.1162/ajle_a_00001.
Utama, F. A. (2016). Meritokrasi Di Berbagai Negara Di Dunia ( Perbandingan Konstitusi ). Jurnal Civil Service, 10(2), 17–27. https://jurnal.bkn.go.id/index.php/asn/article/download/186/176.
Yindi Cardina, Kristiani, & Khresna Bayu Sangka. (2022). Kecurangan Akademik (Academic Fraud) Pada Pembelajaran Daring. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 1(1), 27–35. https://doi.org/10.25134/prosidingsemnaspgsd.v1i1.8.
Yudiana, I. K. (2020). Effectiveness of Value Clarification Technique (VCT) in Learning History to Increase the Value Nationalism, Democracy, and Multiculturalism. Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal, 3(1), 552–563. https://doi.org/10.33258/birle.v3i1.851.
Yustisia, W. (2023). Akar Masalah Joki Karya Ilmiah Dosen. Kompas. https://doi.org/https://www.kompas.id/baca/opini/2023/02/19/akar-masalah-joki-karya-ilmiah-dosen.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Peter Tan, Oktovianus Kosat
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Review (IJERR) agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)