The Use of Technology-Based Formative Assessment in Improving Mathematics Achievement of Elementary School Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v7i3.67770Keywords:
Formative Assessment, Technology, Mathematics Achievement, Elementary SchoolAbstract
Mathematics achievement can be considered low among elementary school students. Formative assessments allow educators to understand where students are in their learning process. This research will analyze the use of technology-based formative assessments that can help overcome several problems in elementary schools, especially in improving student mathematics achievement. This type of research is quantitative research that uses a quasi-experimental design. The research sample will consist of elementary school students divided into two groups: an experimental group that receives a technology-based formative assessment. In contrast, the other group will be a control group that receives a traditional formative assessment. The data collection instrument consists of a pretest and post-test mathematics test. Data analysis will use statistical software such as SPSS with the t-test. This research concludes that using technology-based formative assessment significantly positively influences elementary school students' mathematics achievement. The implications of this research can help design better learning strategies for mathematics subjects in the future.
References
Ardina, F. N., Fajriyah, K., & Budiman, M. A. (2019). Keefektifan Model Realistic Mathematic Education Berbantu Media Manipulatif Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika pada Materi Operasi Pecahan. Jurnal Pedagogi Dan Pembelajaran, 2(2), 151. https://doi.org/10.23887/jp2.v2i2.17902.
Azizah, M., Sulianto, J., & Cintang, N. (2018). Analisis Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Sekolah Dasar pada Pembelajaran Matematika Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Penelitian PendidikanA & A (Semarang), 35(1), 61–70. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpp.v35i1.13529.
Bhat, B. A., & Bhat, G. J. (2019). Formative and summative evaluation techniques for improvement of learning process. ,. European Journal of Business & Social Sciences, 7(5), 776–785. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Bilal-Bhat-6/publication/333633265.
Dinni, H. N. (2018). Pengembangan Mutu Pendidikan Menuju Era Global: Penguatan Mutu Pembelajaran dengan Penerapan HOTS (High Order Thinking Skills). PRISMA I, 1, 170–176. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/prisma/article/view/19597.
Dunn, K. E., & Mulvenon, S. W. (2009). A critical review of research on formative assessments: The limited scientific evidence of the impact of formative assessments in education. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 14(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.7275/jg4h-rb87.
Elmahdi, I., Al-Hattami, A., & Fawzi, H. (2018). Using Technology for Formative Assessment to Improve Students’ Learning. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 17(2), 182–188. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1176157.
Habibi, H., Winiati, I., & Kurniawati, Y. (2020). Analisis Berpikir Kritis Matematis Siswa SMP Ditinjau Dari Gaya Kognitif Visualizer dan Verbalizer. Indonesian Journal of Mathematics and Natural Science Education, 1(2), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.35719/mass.v1i2.34.
Hadi, S., & Novaliyosi, N. (2019). TIMSS Indonesia (trend in Indonesia mathematic and science study). Prosiding Seminar Nasional & Call For Papers, 0(0). http://jurnal.unsil.ac.id/index.php/sncp/article/view/1096.
Hendra Saputra, V., & Pasha, D. (2021). Komik Berbasis Scientific Sebagai Media Pembelajaran di Masa Pandemik Covid-19. SJME (Supremum Journal of Mathematics Education), 5(1). https://doi.org/10.35706/sjme.v5i1.4514.
Indrianti, N., Chung, E., & Adil, A. H. (2022). Kesiapan dan Motivasi Mahasiswa dalam Mengikuti Pembelajaran Online di Masa Pandemi COVID-19. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 7(7), 236. https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v7i7.14661.
Jafar, M., Marjo, H. K., & Sugilar, S. (2022). Pengaruh Metode Resitasi Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Kelas V Sd Islam Di Cikarang Pusat Bekasi Ditinjau Dari Kemandirian Belajar. ELSE (Elementary School Education Journal) : Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Sekolah Dasar, 6(1), 180. https://doi.org/10.30651/else.v6i1.11157
Kamara, S. S., & Dadhabai, S. (2022). Assessment Factors Influencing Students’ Academic Achievement. Journal of Management Information & Decision Sciences, 25(1), 1–13. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&profile=ehost&scope=site&authtype=crawler&jrnl=15247252&AN=154576612.
Karim, N. (2015). Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Matematika dengan Menggunakan Model Jucama di Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3(1), 92–104. https://doi.org/10.20527/edumat.v3i1.634.
Khasanah, U., Rahayu, R., & Ristiyani. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa Kelas IV Materi Bangun Datar Berdasarkan Teori Polya. Jurnal Didaktika, 1(2), 230–242. https://doi.org/10.17509/didaktika.v1i2.36538.
Kusairi. (2012). Analisis Asesmen Formatif Fisika Sma Berbantuan Komputer. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 3, 68–87. https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jpep/article/view/1106
Lai, K., & Hong, K. (2015). Technology use and learning characteristics of students in higher education: Do generational differences exist? British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(4), 725–738. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12161.
Lyon, A. R., Coifman, J., Cook, H., McRee, E., Liu, F. F., Ludwig, K., & McCauley, E. (2021). The Cognitive Walkthrough for Implementation Strategies (CWIS): a pragmatic method for assessing implementation strategy usability. Implementation Science Communications, 2(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-021-00183-0.
Madadizadeh, F. (2022). A tutorial on Quasi-experimental designs. Journal of Community Health Research, 11(1), 3–4. https://doi.org/10.18502/jchr.v11i1.9089.
Mashuri, S., Djidu, H., & Ningrum, R. K. (2019). Problem-based learning dalam pembelajaran matematika: Upaya guru untuk meningkatkan minat dan prestasi belajar siswa. Pythagoras: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 14(2), 112–125. https://doi.org/10.21831/pg.v14i2.25034.
Masjaya, & Wardono. (2018). Pentingnya Kemampuan Literasi Matematika untuk Menumbuhkan Kemampuan Koneksi Matematika dalam Meningkatkan SDM. PRISMA (Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika), 568–574. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/prisma/article/view/20196.
Mawaddah, S., & Anisah, H. (2015). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa Pada Pembelajaran Matematika dengan Menggunakag) di SMPn Model Pembelajaran Generatif (Generative Learning) di SMP. EDU-MAT: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2), 166–175. https://doi.org/10.20527/edumat.v3i2.644.
Mustangin, M. (2015). Representasi Konsep Dan Peranannya Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Di Sekolah. JPM : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.33474/jpm.v1i1.405.
Nurani, M., Riyadi, R., & Subanti, S. (2021). Profil Pemahaman Konsep Matematika Ditinjau Dari Self Efficacy. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 10(1), 284–292. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v10i1.3388.
Prijanto, J. H., & Kock, F. De. (2021). Peran Guru Dalam Upaya Meningkatkan Keaktifan Siswa Dengan Menerapkan Metode Tanya Jawab Pada Pembelajaran Online. Scholaria: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 11(3), 238–251. https://ejournal.uksw.edu/scholaria/article/view/4318.
Rachmantika, A. R., & Wardono. (2019). Peran Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Pada Pembelajaran Matematika Dengan Pemecahan Masalah. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 2(1), 441. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/prisma/article/view/29029.
Rahayu, R., & Ismawati, R. (2019). Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Pada Materi Pencemaran Lingkungan Sebagai Upaya Melatih Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Pada Siswa Smk. Indonesian Journal of Natural Science Education (IJNSE), 2(2). https://doi.org/10.31002/nse.v2i2.706.
Rahmani, E. F. (2020). The Benefits of Gamification in the English Learning Context. IJEE (Indonesian Journal of English Education), 7(1), 32–47. https://doi.org/10.15408/ijee.v7i1.17054.
Ridhwan, M. (2017). Understanding Formative and Summative Assessment for EFL Teachers: Theoretical Reflections on Assessment for Learning. J-SHMIC : Journal of English for Academic, 4(1), 40–50. https://doi.org/10.25299/jshmic.2017.vol4(1).505.
Rohim, D. C. (2019). Strategi Penyusunan Soal Berbasis HOTs pada Pembelajaran Matematika SD. Briliant: Jurnal Riset Dan Konseptual, 4(4), 436. https://doi.org/10.28926/briliant.v4i4.374.
Rosyad, S., Diantoro, M., & Kusairi, S. (2021). Pengaruh Scientific Approach Berbantuan Penilaian Formatif terhadap Motivasi Belajar dan Hasil Belajar Fisika Siswa Kelas XI Perempuan pada Materi Elastisitas. , . Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 5(10), 1480–1484. https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v5i10.14134.
Rusmana, N., & Suprihatin, D. (2019). A quasi experiment on group exercises to improve students’ resilience. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1318(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1318/1/012128.
Sari, I. P., Mustikasari, V. R., & Pratiwi, N. (2019). Pengintegrasian penilaian formatif dalam pembelajaran IPA berbasis saintifik terhadap pemahaman konsep peserta didik. JIPVA (Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Veteran), 3(1), 52–62. https://doi.org/10.31331/jipva.v3i1.778.
Schildkamp, K., van der Kleij, F. M., Heitink, M. C., Kippers, W. B., & Veldkamp, B. P. (2020). Formative assessment: A systematic review of critical teacher prerequisites for classroom practice. International Journal of Educational Research, 103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101602.
Simanjuntak, I. A., & Mudiono, A. (2019). Asesmen formatif perkembangan bahasa anak. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 4(8), 1097–1102. https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v4i8.12686.
Sobarningsih, I. and T. M. (2022). Kompetensi Pedagogik Guru Abad Ke-21: Sebuah Tinjauan Peran Guru pada Generasi Z. Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 7(5), 5143–5155. https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-literate.v7i5.6905.
Solehuzain, & Dwidayati, N. K. (2017). Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif dan Rasa Ingin Tahu pada Model Problem-Based Learning dengan Masalah Open Ended. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 6(1), 103–111. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ujmer/article/view/18422.
Srivastava, T. K., Mishra, V., & Waghmare, L. S. (2018). Formative Assessment Classroom Techniques (FACTs) for better learning in pre-clinical medical education: A controlled trial. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 12(9). https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Tripti-Srivastava/publication/327229061.
Sumartini, T. S. (2019). Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Mahasiswa Melalui Pembelajaran Mood, Understanding, Recall, Detect, Elaborate, And Review. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 8(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v8i1.366.
Suparman. (2016). Meningkatkan Prestasi Belajar Pengetahuan Sosial Melalui Gabungan Metode Ceramah dengan Metode Belajar Aktif Model Pengajaran Autentik pada Siswa Sekolah Dasar pada Siswa Kelas IV SDN Beji IV Kec. Beji Kabupaten Pasuruan Tahun Pelajaran 2013/2014. Jurnal Ilmiah Edukasi & Sosial, 7(1), 98–104. https://doi.org/10.31004/jptam.v3i3.319.
Ulya, H. (2016). Profil Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa Bermotivasi Belajar Tinggi Berdasarkan Ideal Problem Solving. Jurnal Konseling Gusjigang, 2(1), 90–96. https://doi.org/10.24176/jkg.v2i1.561.
Vaportzis, E., Giatsi Clausen, M., & Gow, A. J. (2017). Older adults perceptions of technology and barriers to interacting with tablet computers: a focus group study. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1687. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01687.
Warti, E. (2018). Pengaruh Motivasi Belajar Siswa terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa di SD Angkasa 10 Halim Perdana Kusuma Jakarta Timur. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2), 177–185. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v5i2.273.
Yanda, K. O., Jumroh, J., & Octaria, D. (2019). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terhadap Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Ditinjau Dari Motivasi Belajar Siswa. Indiktika : Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 58. https://doi.org/10.31851/indiktika.v2i1.3428.
Yu, J., Kreijkes, P., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2022). Students’ growth mindset: Relation to teacher beliefs, teaching practices, and school climate. Learning and Instruction, 80, 101616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101616.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Ni Wayan Rasmini, Putu Aditya Antara, I Gusti Ayu Agung Manik Wulandari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the Journal of Education Technology agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)