Jurisprudential Inquiry Based on Edmodo to Improving Students Critical Thinking in Citizenship Education Courses
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v6i2.43295Keywords:
Jurisprudential Inquiry, Edmodo, Critical ThinkingAbstract
This study aims to prove and analyze the application of the jurisprudential inquiry method based on the Edmodo electronic learning media to improve students' critical thinking skills in the Citizenship Education course. This type of research uses classroom action research by developing a model from Stephen Kemmis & Robin McTaggart in the form of a cycle of planning, action and observation, and reflection. The research subjects were 32 students. The data collection technique used a structured observation instrument and a free description test. The data analysis technique used descriptive statistics frequencies with the help of the SPSS 24 application to process the data from the student critical thinking observation questionnaire, the one sample t test with SPSS 24 to see the results of student learning completeness, and the nonparametric test - binomal test with SPSS 24 to see the results classical student learning mastery. The results showed that the high level of critical thinking of students in the Citizenship Education course by applying the jurisprudential inquiry learning method assisted by the Edmodo application. Learning Citizenship Education is no longer a boring subject for students because lecturers can apply learning methods and learning media that are combined innovatively, creatively, and effectively.
References
Alemnge, F. L. (2018). Distance learning models and their effusiveness in Cameroon higher education. Creative Education, 09(05), 791–817. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2018.95059.
Ali, M. M., & Hassan, N. (2018). Defining concepts of student engagement and factors contributing to their engagement in schools. Creative Education, 09(14), 2161–2170. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2018.914157.
Almeida, P., & Chase-Dunn, C. (2018). Globalization and social movements. Annual Review of Sociology, 44(1), 189–211. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073117-041307.
Aloisi, C., & Callaghan, A. (2018). Threats to the validity of the collegiate learning assessment (Cla+) as a measure of critical thinking skills and implications for learning gain. Higher Education Pedagogies, 3(1), 57–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2018.1449128.
Anderson, M., & Jiang, J. (2018). Teens, social media and technology 2018. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2018/05/31/teens-social-media-technology-2018/.
Arthanat, S., Vroman, K. G., Lysack, C., & Grizzetti, J. (2019). Multi-stakeholder perspectives on information communication technology training for older adults: implications for teaching and learning. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 14(5), 453–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2018.1493752.
Azmi, N., & Ashari, Z. S. M. (2017). Potential of edmodo; an educational social network sites (ESNS) in biology classroom. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(11), 1473–1488. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i11/3585.
Beesley, C., & Bastiaens, I. (2020). Globalization and intention to vote: the interactive role of personal welfare and societal context. Review of International Political Economy, 0(0), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2020.1842231.
Cantu, D. A., & Warren, W. J. (2016). Teaching history in the digital classroom. Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315290652.
Cetrulo, A., & Nuvolari, A. (2019). Industry 4.0: revolution or hype? reassessing recent technological trends and their impact on labour. Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, 46(3), 391–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40812-019-00132-y.
Cicek, J. S., Ingram, S., Friesen, M., & Ruth, D. (2019). Action research: a methodology for transformative learning for a professor and his students in an engineering classroom. European Journal of Engineering Education, 44(1–2), 49–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2017.1405242.
Cohen, A. (2021). Teaching to teach civics in fragile times: a conceptual framework. European Journal of Teacher Education, 44(2), 249–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1748880.
Danvers, E. (2018). Who is the critical thinker in higher education? A feminist re-thinking. Teaching in Higher Education, 23(5), 548–562. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2018.1454419.
Dhini, R., & Apriyanto, T. (2017). The effectiveness of the group investigation and jurisprudential inquiry models in learning to read children’s stories based on a decision support system. Seloka: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 6(2), 179–186. https://doi.org/10.15294/seloka.v6i2.17283.
Dumitru, D. (2019). Creating meaning the importance of arts, humanities and culture for critical thinking development. Studies in Higher Education, 44(5), 870–879. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1586345.
Ermawan, D. (2017). The influence of globalization on the existence of regional culture in Indonesia. Jurnal Kajian Lemhannas RI, 32(1), 1–54. http://www.lemhannas.go.id/images/Publikasi_Humas/Jurnal/Jurnal_Edisi_32_Desember_2017.pdf.
Fitriati, F., & Prayudi, S. (2021). 21st century teaching and learning: student teacher’s perceptions and challenges in higher education institutions. Al Khawarizmi: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Matematika, 5(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.22373/jppm.v5i1.9342.
Heru, N., Wagiran, W., & Daryono, R. W. (2021). Chassis maintenance and vehicle power transfer learning: the effectiveness of STEM on students’ critical thinking ability. Journal of Education Technology, 5(4), 588. https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v5i4.40534.
Hitchcock, D. (2017). Critical thinking as an educational ideal. In Argumentation Library (Vol. 30, pp. 477–497). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53562-3_30.
Indriyani, D. (2019). The role of project citizens on students’ critical thinking skills. Jurnal Pancasila Dan Kewarganegaraan, 4(2), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.24269/jpk.v4.n2.2019.pp20-29.
Iriansyah, H. S. (2020). Application of the project citizen learning model to improve students’ critical thinking. DWIJA CENDEKIA: Jurnal Riset Pedagogik, 4(1), 62. https://doi.org/10.20961/jdc.v4i1.40905.
Japar, M. (2017). Revitalizing the value of respecting differences through the jurisprudential inquiry learning model in high school. Seminar Nasional Dies Natalis Ke-53 Universitas Negeri Jakarta, 245–258. http://sipeg.unj.ac.id/repository/upload/artikel/Revitalisasi_Nilai_Menghargai_Perbedaan_melalui_Model_Pembelajaran_Inquiry.pdf.
Jennifer, W. (2017). Critical thinking: a beginner’s guide to critical thinking, better decision making and problem solving. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform. https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/34196518-critical-thinking.
Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). The action research planner. Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-67-2.
Kolesnichenko, E. A., Radyukova, Y. Y., & Pakhomov, N. N. (2019). The role and importance of knowledge economy as a platform for formation of industry 4.0. In Studies in Systems, Decision and Control (Vol. 169, pp. 73–82). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94310-7_7.
Lana, B. F., & Petitpierre, G. (2017). Designing a training programme to promote the exercise of self-determination and civic engagement in individuals having an intellectual disability: feedback on collaborative research. Creative Education, 08(06), 975–992. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2017.86071.
Lorencová, H., Jarošová, E., Avgitidou, S., & Dimitriadou, C. (2019). Critical thinking practices in teacher education programmes: a systematic review. Studies in Higher Education, 44(5), 844–859. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1586331.
Ma’azi, H., & Janfeshan, K. (2018). The effect of Edmodo social learning network on Iranian EFL learners writing skill. Cogent Education, 5(1), 1536312. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1536312.
McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2018). Evolution of the action research planners: towards critical participatory action research. In Education in an Era of Schooling (pp. 61–78). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2053-8_5.
Miller, B. (2018). The Palgrave Handbook of Global Citizenship and Education. In I. Davies, L.-C. Ho, D. Kiwan, C. L. Peck, A. Peterson, E. Sant, & Y. Waghid (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Global Citizenship and Education. Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59733-5.
Moghadam, V. M. (2021). What was globalization? Globalizations, 18(5), 695–706. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2020.1842095.
Mohammedid, M., & Omar, N. (2020). Question classification based on Bloom’s taxonomy cognitive domain using modified TF-IDF and word2vec. PLoS ONE, 15(3), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230442.
Munastiwi, E. (2021). The use of sspices as a media to stimulate children’s critical thinking ability while study from home period. Journal of Education Technology, 5(2), 183. https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v5i2.34984.
Nahdiana, H., Harjawati, T., & Nisa, J. (2020). The effect of the jurisprudential inquiry learning model on the argumentation ability of students. SOSIO-DIDAKTIKA: Social Science Education Journal, 6(2), 110–120. https://doi.org/10.15408/sd.v6i2.14487.
Nami, F. (2020). Edmodo in semi-technical English courses: towards a more practical strategy for language learning/practice. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 0(0), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1819340.
Okumura, S. (2020). Design and implementation of a telecollaboration project for primary school students to trigger intercultural understanding. Intercultural Education, 31(4), 377–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/14675986.2020.1752546.
O’Halloran, K. L., Tan, S., & E, M. K. L. (2017). Multimodal analysis for critical thinking. Learning, Media and Technology, 42(2), 147–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2016.1101003.
Payne, K. A. (2018). Young children’s everyday civics. The Social Studies, 109(2), 57–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/00377996.2018.1446897.
Pnevmatikos, D., Christodoulou, P., & Georgiadou, T. (2019). Promoting critical thinking in higher education through the values and knowledge education (V a KE) method. Studies in Higher Education, 44(5), 892–901. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1586340.
Puri, S. (2020). Effective learning through the case method. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 00(00), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2020.1811133.
Purnamasari, N. A., Al-Rasyid, M., & Suryono, H. (2017). The effect of the jurisprudential inquiry learning model on civic disposition in class VII D students of SMP Negeri 1 Bringin, Semarang regency in the 2012/2013 academic year. Educitizen, 2(1), 130–142. https://jurnal.fkip.uns.ac.id/index.php/civic/article/view/11945/8524.
Reichert, F., & Print, M. (2018). Civic participation of high school students: the effect of civic learning in school. Educational Review, 70(3), 318–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2017.1316239.
Rukmini, E., Artsanti, P., & Nugraha, A. S. (2021). Reflection on the online learning of Pancasila and Citizenship in an international class program. Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan, 18(2), 229–241. https://doi.org/10.21831/jc.v18i2.39857.
Sagun, R. D., & Prudente, M. (2021). Applying the plan-do-study-act (PDSA) action research model to re-structure the science classroom conforming to the metacognitive orientation standards. Educational Action Research, 00(00), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2021.1894964.
Samson, P. L. (2021). Reconsidering critical thinking: findings from a qualitative Delphi study. Social Work Education, 40(4), 427–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2019.1689235.
Santín, M. F., & Torruella, M. F. (2020). Developing critical thinking in early childhood through the philosophy of Reggio Emilia. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37(April), 100686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100686.
Shamboul, H. A. E. (2022). The importance of critical thinking on teaching learning process. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 10(01), 29–35. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2022.101003.
Shaw, A., Liu, O. L., Gu, L., Kardonova, E., Chirikov, I., Li, G., Hu, S., Yu, N., Ma, L., Guo, F., Su, Q., Shi, J., Shi, H., & Loyalka, P. (2020). Thinking critically about critical thinking: validating the Russian HEIghten critical thinking assessment. Studies in Higher Education, 45(9), 1933–1948. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1672640.
Simatupang, O. (2020). Competence of government public relations in facing the industrial era 4.0. Jurnal PIKOM (Penelitian Komunikasi Dan Pembangunan), 21(1), 85. https://doi.org/10.31346/jpikom.v21i1.2503.
Smith, A. (2017). Record shares of Americans now own smartphones, have home broadband. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/01/12/evolution-of-technology/.
Stark, E., Kintz, S., Pestorious, C., & Teriba, A. (2018). Assessment for learning: using programmatic assessment requirements as an opportunity to develop information literacy and data skills in undergraduate students. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(7), 1061–1068. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1432029.
Sugiyono. (2019). Quantitative research methods. Alfabeta.
Suyahman, Ramadanti, F., Oktaviani, D., & Wardhani, D. P. (2020). Problems in learning Civics in the Covid 19 era at SMA Negeri 3 Sukoharjo. PKn Progresif, 15(2), 68–77. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/pknprogresif/article/view/47951.
Swalwell, K., & Payne, K. A. (2019). Critical civic education for young children. Multicultural Perspectives, 21(2), 127–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/15210960.2019.1606641.
Tardeli, D. D. (2021). The notion of leadership and civic engagement in adolescents. OALib, 08(07), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1107646.
Teng, M. F. (2020). Tertiary-level students’ english writing performance and metacognitive awareness: a group metacognitive support perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 64(4), 551–568. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2019.1595712.
Tjeppy, T. (2021). Learning civic education on students’ legal awareness. Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan, 18(1), 97–108. https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/civics/article/view/38602.
Tobias, J. L. (2021). Teaching citizens: what can NAEP civics tell us about active learning in civics? Peabody Journal of Education, 96(3), 247–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2021.1942704.
Triyanto, T. (2020). Opportunities and challenges for character education in the digital era. Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan, 17(2), 175–184. https://doi.org/10.21831/jc.v17i2.35476.
Verburgh, A. (2019). Effectiveness of approaches to stimulate critical thinking in social work curricula. Studies in Higher Education, 44(5), 880–891. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1586336.
Wijaya, H., Tari, E., Sumule, L., Weismann, I. T. J., & Supartini, T. (2021). Online learning evaluation in higher education: study survey method. Journal of Education Technology, 5(3), 401–408. https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v5i3.35466.
Wyszomirska, R. M., Pennaforte, R. J., de Barros Costa, F. G., Warren, E. M. C., & Quintas-Mendes, A. (2021). Team-based learning: a promising strategy for use in online distance education. Creative Education, 12(01), 278–292. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2021.121020.
Zubaidah, S., Malang, U. N., & Aloysius, D. C. (2018). Integrated critical thinking assessment essay test. Conference Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Biologi Dengan Tema “Edubiodiversity: Inspiring Education with Biodiversity” Univerisitas Ahmad Dahlan, April 2015, 200–213.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Zulfah Lis Syafawati, Mukhamad Murdiono, Suyato Suyato
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the Journal of Education Technology agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)