E-Module of Mathematics Economic Using Heutagogy Approach for Distance Learning: Is It Effective?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v6i2.45619Keywords:
E-module, Heutagogy Approach, Distance LearningAbstract
Heutagogy approach is the development of andragogy learning which focuses on students’ self-determined learning. This approach can be used as an alternative for distance learning. To support the learning process, an e-module based on heutagogy is needed. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to create and analyze the effectiveness of E-Module in Mathematics Economic based on the Heutagogy Approach in distance learning. Research design used 4-D model consists of define, design, develop, and desseminate stages. Examining the E-module effectiveness was using experiment research with one group pre-test-post-test design which involved 66 students of Economics Education as participants. Data collection are carried out with questionnaire and analyzed with several test, namely: Kolmogorov-Smirnov Normality Test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test.The results of this study revealed that: 1) E-module of mathematics economic using Heutagogy Approach feasible as learning media, 2) there is an effect of using E-module of Mathematics Economic using Heutagogy Approach for Distance Learning. E-module can increases students learning outcomes and helps them to study independently during distance learning. For future research, it is suggested to analyze another variabels, such as: students’ critical thinking skills and students’ logical- mathematical thinking ability.
References
Abraham, R. R., & Komattil, R. (2017). Heutagogic approach to developing capable learners. Medical Teacher, 39(3), 295–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2017.1270433.
Agonács, N., & Matos, J. F. (2019). Heutagogy and self-determined learning: a review of the published literature on the application and implementation of the theory. Open Learning, 34(3), 223–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2018.1562329.
Akyıldız, S. T. (2019). Do 21st Century Teachers Know about Heutagogy or Do They Still Adhere to Traditional Pedagogy and Andragogy? International Journal of Progressive Education, 15(6), 151–169. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2019.215.10.
Alhih, M., Ossiannilsson, E., & Berigel, M. (2017). Levels of interaction provided by online distance education models. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(6), 2733–2748. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01250a.
Anand, N., Pujar, S., & Rao, S. (2021). A heutagogical interactive tutorial involving Fishbowl with Fish Battle and Round Robin Brainstorming: A novel syndicate metacognitive learning strategy. Medical Journal Armed Forces India, 77, S73–S78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mjafi.2020.12.003.
Anderson, T. (2010). Theories For Learning With Emerging Technologies. In G. Veletsianos (Ed.), Emerging technologies in distance education (pp. 23–39). Athabasca University. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2011.549680.
Arasaratnam-Smith, L. A., & Northcote, M. (2017). Community in online higher education: Challenges and opportunities. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 15(2), 188–198. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1141773.
Bansal, A., Jain, S., Sharma, L., Sharma, N., Jain, C., & Madaan, M. (2020). Students’ Perception Regarding Pedagogy, Andragogy, and Heutagogy as Teaching-Learning Methods in Undergraduate Medical Education. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 9(301), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp.
Blaschke, L. M. (2012). Heutagogy and Lifelong Learning: A Review of Heutagogical Practice and Self-Determined Learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(1), 56–71. http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1076.
Blaschke, L. M. (2014). Using social media to engage and develop the online learner in self-determined learning. Research in Learning Technology, 22(1063519), 1–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v22.21635.
Blaschke, L. M., & Hase, S. (2016). Heutagogy: A Holistic Framework for Creating Twenty-First-Century Self-determined Learners. In: Gros B., Kinshuk, Maina M. (eds) The Future of Ubiquitous Learning. Lecture Notes in Educational Technology. In The Future of ubiquitous Computing (Issue July, pp. 25–40). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47724-3.
Cahyani, N. M. W. S., Suwastini, N. K. A., Dantes, G. R., Jayantini, I. G. A. S. R., & Susanthi, I. G. A. A. D. (2021). Blended Online Learning: Combining the Strengths of Synchronous and Asynchronous Online Learning in Efl Context. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Dan Kejuruan, 18(2), 174–184. https://doi.org/10.23887/jptk-undiksha.v18i2.34659.
Fabriz, S., Mendzheritskaya, J., & Stehle, S. (2021). Impact of Synchronous and Asynchronous Settings of Online Teaching and Learning in Higher Education on Students’ Learning Experience During COVID-19. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(October). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.733554.
Gillaspy, E., & Vasilica, C. (2021). Developing the digital self-determined learner through heutagogical design. Higher Education Pedagogies, 6(1), 135–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2021.1916981.
Glassner, A., & Back, S. (2019). Heutagogy (Self-Determined Learning): New Approach to Student Learning in Teacher Education. Journal Plus Education, XXIV(Special Issue), 39–44. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=778085.
Hase, S., & Blaschke, L. M. (2021). So, You Want to Do Heutagogy: Principles and Practice. In S. Hase & L. M. Blaschke (Eds.), Unleashing the Power of Learner Agency (Issue July, pp. 21–56). https://edtechbooks.org/pdfs/print/up/_up.pdf#page=13.
Hiryanto. (2017). Pedagog, Andragogi dan Heutagogi serta Implikasinya dalam Pemberdayaan Masyarakat. Dinamika Pendidikan, 22(1), 65–71. https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/dinamika-pendidikan/article/view/19771.
Jazeel, A. M. (2016). Effectiveness of Heutagogy Integrated E-Content Modules on Undestanding Osmosis Among Science Students in Colleges of Education in Sri Lanka. International Educational Applied Scientific Research Journal, 1, 2456–5040.
Kamrozzaman, N. A., Badusah, J., & Ruzanna, W. M. (2020). Development of heutagogy approach in M-learning for sustainability education. Education and Information Technologies, 25(4), 3035–3047. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10101-x.
Lockey, A., Conaghan, P., Bland, A., & Astin, F. (2021). Educational theory and its application to advanced life support courses: a narrative review. Resuscitation Plus, 5(September), 100053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2020.100053.
Loeng, S. (2020). Self-directed learning: A core concept in adult education. Education Research International, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3816132.
Lynch, M., Sage, T., Hitchcock, L. I., & Sage, M. (2021). A heutagogical approach for the assessment of Internet Communication Technology (ICT) assignments in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(55), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00290-x.
Maydiantoro, A. (2021). Model-Model Penelitian Pengembangan (Research and Development). Universitas Negeri Lampung.
Miller, L. B., Motter, J. L., & Sral, V. A. (2018). Lessons learned from international education: Three educators’ perspectives on heutagogical practices in Pennsylvania public school teachers. Thresholds, 41(1), 26–43.
Mohamad, M. M., Masek, A., Yunos, J. M., Alias, M., Hamdan, N. H., & Rahma Putra, A. B. N. (2020). Assessing heutagogical elements in learning of engineering education: Instrument validation. Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems, 5(5), 245–252. https://doi.org/10.25046/AJ050530.
Mohammad, S., Siang, T. C., Osman, S., Jamaluddin, N. Y., Alfu, N. A. M., & Huei, L. Y. (2019). A proposed heutagogy framework for structural steel design in civil engineering curriculum. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14(24), 96–105. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i24.12091.
Morris, T. H. (2019). Self-directed learning: A fundamental competence in a rapidly changing world. International Review of Education, 65(4), 633–653. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-019-09793-2.
Msila, V., & Setlhako, A. (2012). Teaching (still) Matters: Experiences on Developing a Heutagogical Online Module at UNISA. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69(May), 136–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.392.
Nuryadi, Astuti, T. D., Utami, E. S., & Budiantara, M. (2017). Dasar-dasar Statistik Penelitian. Sibuku Media.
Oliveira, M. M. S. de, Penedo, A. S. T., & Pereira, V. S. (2018). Distance Education: Advantages and Disadvantages of the Point of View of Education and Society. Dialogia, 29, 139–152. https://doi.org/10.5585/Dialogia.n29.7661.
Pelikan, E. R., Korlat, S., Reiter, J., Holzer, J., Mayerhofer, M., Schober, B., Spiel, C., Hamzallari, O., Uka, A., Chen, J., Välimäki, M., Puharić, Z., Anusionwu, K. E., Okocha, A. N., Zabrodskaja, A., Salmela-Aro, K., Käser, U., Schultze-Krumbholz, A., Wachs, S., … Lüftenegger, M. (2021). Distance learning in higher education during COVID-19: The role of basic psychological needs and intrinsic motivation for persistence and procrastination–a multi-country study. PLoS ONE, 16(10), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257346.
Richardson, L. P., McGowan, C. G., & Styger, L. E. J. (2018). A quality approach to masters education using an australian case study--A reflection. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6(8), 1837–1847. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2018.060829.
Riduwan. (2012). Skala Pengukuran Variabel-Variabel Penelitian. Alfabeta.
Rinekso, A. B., & Muslim, A. B. (2020). Synchronous online discussion: teaching English in higher education amidst the covid-19 pandemic. Journal of English Educators Society, 5(2), 155–162. https://doi.org/10.21070/jees.v5i2.646.
Rozi, F., Ramdlani, M., Najah, F., Azizah, N., Niswa, H., Abdillah, M., & Rozi, F. (2021). Distance Learning and Independent Learning of Students in Higher Education. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1–6. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/1899/1/012177/meta.
Sadeghi, M. (2019). A Shift from Classroom to Distance Learning: Advantages and Limitations. Internasional Journal of Reserach in Englissh (IJREE), March, 80–88. http://ijreeonline.com/browse.php?a_id=132&sid=1&slc_lang=fa.
Segara, N. B., Suprijono, A., & Setyawan, K. G. (2021). The Influence of E-Learning towards Students’ Heutagogy Skills in Higher Education. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 54(2), 286. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpp.v54i2.33128.
Siregar, S. (2014). Statistika Deskriptif untuk Penelitian: Dilengkapi Perhitungan Manual dan Aplikasi SPSS Versi 17. PT RajaGrafindo Persada.
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Suyanto, & Gio, P. U. (2017). Statistika Nonparametrik dengan SPSS, Minitab, dan R: Dilengkapi dengan Penyelesaian Perhitungan Secara Manual. USU Press.
Tarteer, S., & Ismail, I. A. (2020). Investigating the Possible Reasons Beyond Students’ Low Achievement in Mathematics in the Tawjih Exam: A Case Study. British Journal of Education, 9(1), 20–41. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3770164.
Thiagarajan, S., Semmel, D.S., & Semmel, M. I. (1974). Instructional development for training teacher of exceptional children. Bloomington Indiana: Indiana University.
Wahyuddin. (2017). The Analysis of the Problem of Economic Mathematical Problems Reversed from the Ability of Logic Thinking in Students. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 12(3), 585–598.
Widiaty, I., Ana, Riza, L. S., Abdullah, A. G., & Mubaroq, S. R. (2020). Multiplatform application technology – based heutagogy on learning batik: A curriculum development framework. Indonesian Journal of Science and Technology, 5(1), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijost.v5i1.18754.
Zeidmane, A., & Rubina, T. (2017). Causes of Failures in Mathematics by Engineering Stdents at Latvia University of Agriculture. Rural Environment, Education, Personality (REEP). Proceedings of the 10th International Scientific Conference, 10, 220–227. https://llufb.llu.lv/conference/REEP/2017/Latvia-Univ-Agricult-REEP-2017_proceedings-220-227.pdf.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Nimatush Sholikhah, Heni Purwa Pamungkas, Jun Surjanti, Norida Canda Sakti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the Journal of Education Technology agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)
