Pre-service Teachers’ Use and Usefulness of Blackboard Learning Management Systems for Self-Regulated Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v7i2.52194Kata Kunci:
pre-service teacher, blackboard learning, management system, Self-regulated LearningAbstrak
Although BLB has many applications students use, it is not clear which applications are used most and perceived most useful for Self-Regulated Learning (SRL). The objective of this research is to establish applications pre-service teachers use most and perceive as most useful for SRL. The study used a cross-sectional survey design with 120 technology education undergraduate pre-service teachers. A questionnaire was distributed during the Technology Education period and collected after 45 minutes. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) determined the most BLB applications and their perceived usefulness, while a t-test examined male and female differences in the use and usefulness of BLB applications for SRL. Both tests were done using SPSS version 22. The major result shows half of all BLB applications perceived as useful were the ones used most and had positive associations. Three out of eight accounted for 95.69% of the use, while four applications accounted for 73.33% variances in usefulness. Component loadings 1-3 for BLB use variance were: subject content 80.9%, assessment 11.2%, and 3.55%, while usefulness components 1-4 variance were: subject content 26.7%, assessment 17.9%, class task 16.1%, and grade centre 12.6%. There were differences between gender in the use and usefulness of BLB applications, with males taking the lead in both. Thus, this study extends the debate on the gender gap in technology use in higher education.
Referensi
Al-Dawood, I. (2022). Correlation of Self-regulated Learning on Blackboard and Academic Achievement of Islamic Studies Students. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(9), 370–388. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.9.21.
Al-khresheh, M. H. (2022). Revisiting the effectiveness of blackboard learning management system in Teaching English in the Era of COVID-19. World, 12(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v12n1p1.
Al-Naibi, S. A., Madarsha, K. B., & Ismail, N. A. (2015). Blackboard use by faculty members in the colleges of applied sciences in the Sultanate of Oman. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 3(4), 26–40. https://doi.org/http://irep.iium.edu.my/50441/.
Al Shammari, M. H. (2021). Devices and Platforms Used in Emergency Remote Learning and Teaching During Covid-19: A Case of English Major Students in Saudi Arabia. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ, 1, 80–94. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/covid.6.
Albakri, A., & Abdulkhaleq, A. (2021). An interactive system evaluation of blackboard system applications: a case study of higher education. Fostering Communication and Learning With Underutilized Technologies in Higher Education, 123–136. https://www.igi-global.com/chapter/an-interactive-system-evaluation-of-blackboard-system-applications/262726.
Alenezi, A. (2020). The role of e-learning materials in enhancing teaching and learning behaviors. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 10(1), 48–56. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2020.10.1.1338.
Alkhasawnh, S., & Alqahtani, M. A. M. (2019). Fostering students’ self-regulated learning through using a learning management system to enhance academic outcomes at the University of Bisha. TEM Journal, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM82-47.
Almoeather, R. (2020). Effectiveness of blackboard and Edmodo in self-regulated learning and educational satisfaction. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 21(2), 126–140. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.728140.
Alokluk, J. (2018). The effectiveness of Blackboard system, uses and limitations in information management. Intelligent Information Management, 10, 133–149. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4236/ iim.2018.106012.
Alturise, F. (2020). Difficulties in teaching online with Blackboard learn effects of the COVID-19 pandemic in the western branch colleges of Qassim University. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 11(5), 74–81. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/dad1/.
Angiolini, C., Ducato, R., Giannopoulou, A., & Schneider, G. (2020). Remote teaching during the emergency and beyond: Four open privacy and data protection issues of ‘platformised’education. Opinio Juris in Comparatione, 1, 45–47. https://doi.org/http://www.opiniojurisincomparatione.org/opinio/article/view/163/171.
Araka, E., Maina, E., Gitonga, R., Oboko, R., & Kihoro, J. (2021). University students’ perception on the usefulness of learning management system features in promoting self-regulated learning in online learning. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT, 17(1), 45–64. http://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke/handle/.
Asokan, A. G., Varghese, V. A., & Rajeev, A. (2019). Internet addiction among medical students and its impact on academic performance: an Indian study. Journal of Medicine of Science Clinical Research, 7, 670–676. https://doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v7i3.122.
Baburajan, P. K., Noushad, S., & Shaikh, A. A. (2019). Users Perceptions and Experience on Blackboard Learn Functionalities. 2019 Advances in Science and Engineering Technology International Conferences (ASET, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASET.2019.8714473.
Badaru, K. A., & Adu, E. O. (2022). Platformisation of Education: An Analysis of South African Universities’ Learning Management Systems. Research in Social Sciences and Technology, 7(2), 66–86. https://doi.org/10.46303/ressat.2022.10.
Baker, D., Unni, R., Kerr-Sims, S., & Marquis, G. (2020). Understanding factors that influence attitude and preference for hybrid course formats. E-Journal of Business Education & Scholarship of Teaching, 14(1), 174–188. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext.
Bervell, B., & Arkorful, V. (2020). LMS-enabled blended learning utilization in distance tertiary education: establishing the relationships among facilitating conditions, voluntariness of use and use behaviour. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-0183-9.
Brady, A. C., Kim, Y. E., & Cutshall, J. (2021). The what, why, and how of distractions from a self-regulated learning perspective. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 51(2), 153–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2020.1867671.
Darko, C. (2022). Quantitative Analysis Between Blackboard Learning Management System and Students’ Learning. Journal of Engineering Research and Sciences, 1(5), 119–133. https://doi.org/10.55708/js0105013.
Dashtaki, D. G. M., Mohammadi, A., Zolfaghari, M., Imani, S., & Tahmasebian, S. (2020). The Relationship of Satisfaction and Usage of Virtual Learning Facilities with Learning Style in Medical, Health, and Operating Room Students. The Strides in Development of Medical Education Journal, 17(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/doi:10.22062/SDME.2020.91007.
Davis, F. D. (1985). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. https://14927137-mit.
Dishon, G., & Gilead, T. (2020). Adaptability And Its Discontents : 21st- Century Skills And The Preparation For An Unpredictable Future. British Journal of Educational Studies, 00(00), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2020.1829545.
Elbasuony, M. M. M., Gangadharan, P., & Gaber, F. A. (2018). Undergraduate nursing students’ perception and usage of e-learning and Blackboard Learning System. Middle East Journal of Nursing, 101(6058), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.5742/MEJN.2018.93394.
Eldridge, B. A. (2014). Exploring Faculty Adoption and Utilization of Blackboard at a Community College in the Kentucky Community and Technical College System.
Fearnley, M. R., & Amora, J. T. (2020). Learning Management System Adoption in Higher Education Using the Extended Technology Acceptance Model. IAFOR Journal of Education, 8(2), 89–106. https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.8.2.05.
Fioletov, V., McLinden, C. A., Griffin, D., Krotkov, N., Liu, F., & Eskes, H. (2022). Quantifying urban, industrial, and background changes in NO 2 during the COVID-19 lockdown period based on TROPOMI satellite observations. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 22(6). https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-4201-2022.
Fox, W., & Bayat, M. S. (2007). A Guide to Managing Research. Juta Publications.
Granić, A., & Marangunić, N. (2019). Technology acceptance model in educational context: A systematic literature review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2572–2593. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12864.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate Data Analysis (8th ed.). Pearson Education Inc.
Hart, C., Costa, C., D’Souza, D., Kimpton, A., & Ljbusic, J. (2021). Exploring higher education students’ critical thinking skills through content analysis. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41(May), 100877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100877.
Hromalik, C. D., & Koszalka, T. A. (2018). Self-regulation of the use of digital resources in an online language learning course improves learning outcomes. Distance Education, 39(4), 528–547. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1520044.
Hyppönen, L., Hirsto, L., & Sointu, E. (2019). Perspectives on University Students’ SelfRegulated Learning, Task-Avoidance, Time Management and Achievement in a Flipped Classroom Context. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18(13), 87–106. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.18.13.5.
Ituma, A. (2011). An evaluation of students’ perceptions and engagement with e-learning components in a campus-based university. Active Learning in Higher Education, 12(1), 57–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787410387722.
Kerr-Sims, S., & Baker, D. M. A. (2021). Faculty perceptions of teaching online during the COVID-19 university transition of courses to an online format. Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, 10, 337–353. https://doi.org.
Kwon, S., Kim, W., Bae, C., Cho, M., Lee, S., & Dreamson, N. (2021). The identity changes in online learning and teaching: instructors, learners, and learning management systems. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00304-8.
Liao, S., Hong, J. C., Wen, M. H., & Pan, Y. C. (2018). Applying technology acceptance model (TAM) to explore users’ behavioral intention to adopt a performance assessment system for E-book production. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(10), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/93575.
Liaw, S. S., & Huang, H. M. (2013). Perceived satisfaction, perceived usefulness and interactive learning environments as predictors to self-regulation in e-learning environments. Computers & Education, 60(1), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.07.015.
Major, A., & Calandrino, T. (2018). Beyond chunking: Micro-learning secrets for effective online design. FDLA Journal, 3(13), 13. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/fdlajournal/vol3/iss1/13.
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81–97. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043158.
Moonsamy, D., & Govender, I. (2018). Use of blackboard learning management system: An empirical study of staff behavior at a South African university. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(7), 3069–3082. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/91623.
Motlhaka, H. (2020). Blackboard collaborated-based instruction in an academic writing class: sociocultural perspectives of learning. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 18(4), 337–346. https://doi.org/10.34190/EJEL.20.18.4.006.
Ofori, D. A., Anjarwalla, P., Mwaura, L., Jamnadass, R., Stevenson, P. C., Smith, P., Koch, W., Kukula-Koch, W., Marzec, Z., Kasperek, E., Wyszogrodzka-Koma, L., Szwerc, W., Asakawa, Y., Moradi, S., Barati, A., Khayyat, S. A., Roselin, L. S., Jaafar, F. M., Osman, C. P., … Slaton, N. (2020). No 主観的健康感を中心とした在宅高齢者における 健康関連指標に関する共分散構造分析Title. Molecules, 2(1), 1–12.
Onodipe, G., Keengwe, J., & Cottrell-Yongye, A. (2020). Using Learning Management System to Promote Self-regulated Learning in a Flipped Classroom. Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, 9(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.14434/jotlt.v9i1.29375.
Phejane, M. V. (2022). A case study on the advantages and disadvantages of using blackboard collaborate in the health sciences faculty at the University of the Free State. The Independent Journal of Teaching and Learning, 17(1), 151–166. https://doi.org/https://hdl.handle.net/10520/ejc-jitl1-v17-n1-a11.
Rizal, R., Rusdiana, D., Setiawan, W., & Siahaan, P. (2022). Learning Management System Supported Smartphone (Lms3): Online Learning Application in Physics for School Course To Enhance Digital Literacy of Pre-Service Physics Teachers. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 12(1), 191–203. https://doi.org/10.3926/JOTSE.1049.
Santiana, S., Silvani, D., & Ruslan, R. (2021). Optimizing LMS CANVAS for interactive online learning perceived by the students. Journal of English Education and Teaching, 5(4), 529–543. https://doi.org/10.33369/jeet.5.4.529-543.
Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, 101832. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5154.182410.
Setia, M. S. (2016). Methodology series module 3: Cross-sectional studies. Indian Journal of Dermatology, 61(3), 261. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5154.182410.
Shine, B., & Heath, S. E. (2020). Techniques for fostering self-regulated learning via learning management systems in on-campus and online courses. Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, 9(1), 119–126. https://doi.org/10.14434/jotlt.v9i1.29014.
Sindiani, A. M., Obeidat, N., Alshdaifat, E., Elsalem, L., Alwani, M. M., Rawashdeh, H., & Tawalbeh, L. I. (2020). Distance education during the COVID-19 outbreak: A cross-sectional study among medical students in North of Jordan. Annals of Medicine and Surgery, 59, 186–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2020.09.036.
Tegeh, I. M., Santyasa, I. W., Agustini, K., Santyadiputra, G. S., & Juniantari, M. (2022). Group Investigation Flipped Learning in Achieving of Students’ Critical and Creative Thinking Viewed from Their Cognitive Engagement in Learning Physics. Journal of Education Technology, 6(2), 350–362. https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JET.
Tonsmann, G. (2014). A Study of the effectiveness of blackboard collaborate for conducting synchronous courses at multiple locations. Sight: A Journal of Scholarly Teaching, 9, 54–63. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1035850.pdf.
Tran, T., Phan, H. A., Le, H. Van, & Nguyen, H. T. (2020). ICT integration in developing competence for pre-service mathematics teachers: A case study from six universities in Vietnam. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(14), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i14.14015.
Tschand, M., Mayer, B., & Sorkoa, S. R. (2020). An interdisciplinary digital learning and research factory: The Smart Production Lab. Procedia Manufacturing, 45, 491–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.061.
Wang, C.-H., Salisbury-Glennon, J. D., Dai, Y., Lee, S., & Dong, J. (2022). Empowering College Students to Decrease Digital Distraction Through the Use of Self-Regulated Learning Strategies. Contemporary Educational Technology, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/12456.
Whiting, S. B., Wass, S. V., Green, S., & Thomas, M. S. C. (2021). Stress and Learning in Pupils: Neuroscience Evidence and its Relevance for Teachers. Mind, Brain, and Education, 15(2), 177–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12282.
Zarrinfard, S., Rahimi, M., & Mohseny, A. (2021). Flipping an on-campus general English course: A focus on technology complexity of instruction and learners’ levels of impulsivity. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00280-z.
Zimmerman, B., & Pons, M. (1990). Student Differences in Self-Regulated Learning: Relating Grade, Sex, and Giftedness to Self-Efficacy and Strategy Use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 51–59. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.51.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2023 Israel Kibirige, Odora
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the Journal of Education Technology agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)
