Unpacking Stages of Mobile-Assisted Language Learning Adoption: A Narrative Inquiry
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v7i1.60644Kata Kunci:
Mobile-Assisted Language Learning, Narrative Inquiry, Stages of AdoptionAbstrak
Technological advancements necessitate adaptation in the field of education, particularly for language teachers. This need cannot simply be accommodated in the classroom. In the process of adopting technology, teachers experience various processes that must be got through. This current study was aimed at filling the gap in the issues related to the complexity of MALL adoption in higher education. To fill the need for descriptive richness and picture the entire adoption process, a qualitative approach was used; specifically, Narrative Inquiry (NI). There was a total of three people who participated in the research. Data was gathered through the use of a narrative frame, an empty box, and a structured interview guide. The study's findings highlight the simultaneous and ongoing nature of the adoption process. Three distinct phases of adoption were identified by this research: acceptance (before use), usage (during use), and confirmation (after use), with three distinct evaluation procedures for each phase. Another important finding is that intention is not necessarily a drive to usage. There is review process that bridges the intention and usage. The process of intention and review are simultaneous. Nevertheless, whereas intention is likely immediate, the review takes longer period of decision making. The review process could be the answer to the debate in TAM studies related to the reasons of inconsistency of the intention to use to the usage.
Referensi
Ajibade, P. (2018). Technology acceptance model limitations and criticisms: Exploring the practical applications and use in technology-related studies, mixed- method, and qualitative researches. Library Philosophy and Practice, 1941. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/189486068.pdf.
Al-Azawei, A. (2019). What drives successful social media in education and e-leaning? A comparative study on Facebook and Moodle. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 18, 253–274. https://doi.org/10.28945/4360.
Alrasheedi, M., & Capretz, L. F. (2013). A meta-analysis of critical success factors affecting mobile learning. Proceedings of 2013 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering (TALE), 18, 262–267. https://doi.org/10.1109/TALE.2013.6654443.
Ata, R., & Yildirim, K. (2019). Turkish pre-service teachers’ perceptions of digital citizenship in education programs. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 18, 419–436. https://doi.org/10.28945/4392.
Bagozzi, R. P. (2007). The legacy of the technology acceptance model and a proposal for a paradigm shift. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(7), 244–254. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00122.
Baran, E. (2014). A review of research on mobile learning in teacher education. Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 17–32. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.17.4.17.
Beatty, K. (2013). Beyond the classroom: Mobile learning the wider world. The International Research Foundation for English Language Education, 1–20. http://www.tirfonline.org/english-in-the-workforce/mobile-assisted-language-learning/.
Black, A. D., Car, J., Pagliari, C., Anandan, C., Cresswell, K., Bokun, T., Mckinstry, B., Procter, R., Majeed, A., & Sheikh, A. (2011). The impact of eHealth on the quality and safety of health care: A systematic overview. PlosMed, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000387.
Bozdoğan, D. (2015). Mall revisited: Current trends and pedagogical implications. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 932–939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.373.
Burston, J. (2015). Twenty years of MALL project implementation: A meta-analysis of learning outcomes. ReCALL, 27(1), 4–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344014000159.
Capretz, L. F., Ali, A., & Ouda, A. (2012). A conceptual framework for measuring the quality aspects of mobile learning. Bulletin of the IEEE Technical Committee on Learning Technology, 14(4), 31–34. http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/electricalpub/6.
Chang, C. K., & Hsu, C. K. (2011). A mobile-assisted synchronously collaborative translation-annotation system for English as a Foreign Language (EFL) reading comprehension. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(2), 155–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2010.536952.
Chen, C.-H., & Tsai, C.-C. (2021). In-service teachers’ conceptions of mobile technology-integrated instruction: Tendency towards student-centered learning. Comput. Educ., 170, 104224.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson.
Crompton, H. (2014). A diachronic overview of technology contributing to mobile learning: A shift towards student-centered pedagogies. In M. Ally & A. Tsinakos (Eds.), Increasing Access through Mobile Learning (pp. 7–15). Commonwealth of Learning and Athabasca University.
Davis, F. D. (1993). User acceptance of information technology: System characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. In International Journal of Man-Machine Studies (Vol. 38, Issue 3, pp. 475–487). https://doi.org/10.1006/imms.1993.1022.
Duman, G., Orhon, G., & Gedik, N. (2014). Research trends in mobile assisted language learning from 2000 to 2012. ReCALL, 27(2), 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344014000287.
Forkosh-Baruch, A., & Avidov-Ungar, O. (2019). ICT implementation in colleges of education: A frameworkfor teacher educators. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 18, 207–229. https://doi.org/10.28945/4312.
Gibson, I. W. (2001). At the intersection of technology and pedagogy: Considering styles of learning and teaching. Journal of Information Techology for Teacher Education, 10(1–2), 37–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759390100200102.
Hamutoglu, N. B., & Basarmak, U. (2020). External and internal barriers in technology integration: A structural regression analysis. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 19, 17–40. https://doi.org/10.28945/4497.
Haydon, G., Browne, G., & van der Riet, P. (2018). Narrative inquiry as a research methodology exploring person centred care in nursing. Collegian, 25(1), 125–129. .
Herrington, A., Herrington, J., & Mantei, J. (2009). Design principles for mobile learning. In J. Herrington, A. Herrington, J. Mantei, I. Olney, & B. Ferry (Eds.), New technologies, new pedagogies: Mobile learning in higher education (pp. 129–138). University of Wollongong. http://ro.uow.edu.au/
Heshan, S., & Ping, Z. (2004). A methodological analysis of user technology acceptance. Proceedings of the Hawaii Internatioanal Conference on System Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2004.1265621.
Hirschheim, R., & Klein, H. (2012). A glorious and not-so-short history of the information systems field. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13(4), 188–235. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00294.
Hockly, N. (2012). Mobile learning. ELT Journal, 67(1), 80–84. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccs064.
Hockly, N. (2013). Designer learning: The teacher as designer of mobile-based classroom learning experiences. The International Research Foundation English Language Education., 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.75.1956.660.
Hossain, M. A., & Quaddus, M. (2012). Expectation-confirmation theory in information system research: A review and analysis. In Y. K. Dwivedi, M. R. Wade, & S. L. Schneberger (Eds.), Information Systems Theory: Explaining and Predicting Our Digital Society (Vol. 1, pp. 441–469). Springer Science & Business. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6108-2_21.
Hwang, G. J., & Tsai, C. C. (2011). Research trends in mobile and ubiquitous learning: A review of publications in selected journals from 2001 to 2010. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(4), 65–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01183.x.
Jeong, K.-O. (2022). Facilitating sustainable self-directed learning experience with the use of mobile-assisted language learning. Sustainability, 14(5), 2894. https://doi.org/10.3390.
Johnson, L., Smith, R., Willis, H., Levine, A., & Haywood, K. (2011). The 2011 Horizon Report. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED515956.pdf.
Kelly, H. (2014). A path analysis of educator perceptions of open educational resources using the technology acceptance model. International Review of Research in Open & Distance Learning, 15(2), 26–42. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i2.1715.
Khaddage, F., Müller, W., & Flintoff, K. (2016). Advancing mobile learning in formal and informal settings via mobile app technology: Where to from here, and how? Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 16–26. http://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.19.3.16.
Kim, E. Y., Park, S. M., & Baek, S. H. (2011). Twitter and implications for its use in EFL learning. Sun-Hye. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 14(2), 113–137. http://kmjournal.bada.cc/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/14-2-5Kim.pdf.
Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2013). Re-skilling language learners for a mobile world. The International Research Foundation for English Language Education, 1–16. http://www.tirfonline.org/english-in-the-workforce/mobile-assisted-language-learning/re-skilling-language-learners-for-a-mobile-world/.
Lall, P., Rees, R., Law, G. C. Y., Dunleavy, G., Cotivc, Ž., & Car, J. (2019). Influences on the implementation of mobile learning for medical and nursing education: Qualitative systematic review by the digital health education collaboration. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21. https://doi.org/10.2196/12895.
Lee, Y., Kozar, K. A., & Larsen, K. R. T. (2003). The technology acceptance model: Past, present, and future. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 12(50), 752–780. https://doi.org/10.1037/0011816.
Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003). Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 40(3), 191–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-7206(01)00143-4.
Levin, T., & Wadmany, R. (2008). Teachers’ views on factors affecting effective integration of information technology in the classroom: developmental scenery. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 16(2), 233–263. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/22950/.
Liu, H., Lin, C.-H., & Zhang, D. (2017). Pedagogical beliefs and attitudes toward information and communication technology: A survey of teachers of English as a foreign language in China. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 8221(July), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1347572.
Mahdi, H. S. (2017). Effectiveness of mobile devices on vocabulary learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 56(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117698826.
Mahdum, M., Hadriana, H., & Safriyanti, M. (2019). Exploring teacher perceptions and motivations to ICT use in learning activities in Indonesia. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 18, 293–317. https://doi.org/10.28945/4366.
Miangah, T. M., & Nezarat, A. (2012). Mobile-assisted language learning. International Journal of Distributed and Parallel Systems, 3(1), 309–319. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijdps.2012.3126.
Nyoro, M., Kamau, J. W., Wanyembi, G. W., Titus, W. S., & Dinda, W. A. (2015). Review of technology acceptance model usage in predicting e-commerce adoption. International Journal of Application or Innovation in Engineering & Management (IJAIEM), 4(1), 46–48. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339616625.
Park, Y. (2011). A pedagogical framework for mobile learning: Categorizing educational applications of mobile technologies into four types. International Review of Research in Open & Distance Learning, 12(2), 78–102. https://doi.org/10.3394/0380-1330(2006)32.
Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (3rd ed.). The Free Press.
Salovaara, A., & Tamminen, S. (2008). Accept or appropriate? A design-oriented critique on technology acceptance models. In P. Saariluoma & H. Isomäki (Eds.), Future Interaction Design II (pp. 157–173). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-385-9_8.
Schwarz, A., & Chin, W. (2007). Looking forward: Toward an understanding of the nature and definition of IT acceptance. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(4), 230–243. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00123.
Straub, E. T. (2009). Understanding technology adoption: Theory and future directions for informal learning. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 625–649. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308325896.
Taj, I. H., Sulan, N. B., Sipra, M. A., & Ahmad, W. (2016). Impact of mobile assisted language learning (MALL) on EFL: A meta-analysis. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 7(2), 76–83. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.7n.2p.76.
Turner, M., Kitchenham, B., Brereton, P., Charters, S., & Budgen, D. (2009). Does the technology acceptance model predict actual use? A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 52, 463–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2009.11.005.
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926.
Wang, C. C., Andre, K., & Greenwood, K. M. (2015). Chinese students studying at Australian universities with specific reference to nursing students: A narrative literature review. Nurse Education Today, 35(4), 609–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2014.12.005.
Wang, C. C., & Geale, S. K. (2015). The power of story: Narrative inquiry as a methodology in nursing research. International Journal of Nursing Sciences, 2, 195–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2015.04.014.
Wani, T. A., & Ali, S. W. (2015). Innovation diffusion theory: Review & scope in the study of adoption of smartphones in india. Journal of General Management Research, 3(2), 101–118.
Wu, W. H., Jim Wu, Y. C., Chen, C. Y., Kao, H. Y., Lin, C. H., & Huang, S. H. (2012). Review of trends from mobile learning studies: A meta-analysis. Computers and Education, 59(2), 817–827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.016.
Yousafzai, S. Y., Foxall, G. R., & Pallister, J. G. (2007). Technology acceptance: A meta‐analysis of the TAM: Part 2. Journal of Modelling in Management, 2(3), 281–304. https://doi.org/10.1108/17465660710834462.
Zhao, Y., & Cziko, G. A. (2001). Teacher adoption of technology: A perceptual control theory perspective. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 5–30. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/8455.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2023 Anak Agung Ngurah Yudha Martin Mahardika, Sri Rahmajanti, Ni Komang Arie Suwastini
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the Journal of Education Technology agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)
