Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Sikap Sosial Aspek Tanggung Jawab Pembelajaran Tematik Terpadu Siswa Kelas 4 SD
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jp2.v4i1.33352Abstract
Pada Kurikulum 2013 penilaian dalam pembelajaran sekolah dasar mencakup tiga ranah pembelajaran yaitu sikap, pengetahuan dan keterampilan. Fokus pada penilaian sikap pada pembelajaran yang dirasa masih kurang tepat. Hal tersebut dapat diketahui berdasarkan pengamatan yang telah dilakukan selama penelitian bahwa guru dalam melakukan penilaian sikap hanya melalui observasi selama proses pembelajaran. Untuk itu instrumen penilaian sikap perlu dikembangkan. Penelitian pengembangan ini bertujuan untuk menghasilkan instrument penilaian sikap sosial yang valid khususnya pada aspek tanggung jawab. Produk ini penting untuk dikembangkan supaya dapat mengetahui tingkat perkembangan sikap tanggung jawab peserta didik. Metode penelitian yang digunakan yaitu jenis penelitian RND (Research and Development) dengan model penelitian ADDIE (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementasi, Evaluation). Sample dalam penelitian ini menggunakan subjek peserta didik kelas 4 yang secara keseluruhan berjumlah 15 responden. Dari uji coba terbatas didapatkan bahwa dari 40 butir pernyataan yang diujicobakan, 12 (30%) butir pernyataan memiliki tingkat validitas sangat tinggi, 14 (35%) butir pernyataan memiliki tingkat validitas tinggi, 12 (32,5%) butir pernyataan memiliki tingkat validitas cukup, 1 (27,5%) butir pernyataan memiliki tingkat validitas rendah dan memiliki rata-rata rhitung sebesar 0,671 ≥ 0,20 maka instrumen dinyatakan valid. Sedangkan reliabilitas pada uji terbatas diperoleh α sebesar 0.970 dengan kriteria sangat reliabel. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian tersebut dapat disimpulkan bahwa instrument penilaian sikap sosial aspek tanggung jawab pada pembelajaran tematik terpadu kelas 4 layak untuk digunakan.References
Astalini, A., & Kurniawan, D. A. (2019). Pengembangan Instrumen Sikap Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama Terhadap Mata Pelajaran Ipa. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains (Jps), 7(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.26714/jps.7.1.2019.1-7
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2018). Classroom assessment and pedagogy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 25(6), 551–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2018.1441807
Carpenter, S. K., Witherby, A. E., & Tauber, S. K. (2020). On Students’ (Mis)judgments of Learning and Teaching Effectiveness. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 9(2), 137–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2019.12.009
Delita, F. (2017). Penerapan Authentic Assesment Pada Mata Kuliah IPS Terpadu Semester Gasal Tahun Ajaran 2016/2017. Jurnal Geografi, 9(2), 133. https://doi.org/10.24114/jg.v9i2.6970
Granberg, C., Palm, T., & Palmberg, B. (2021). A case study of a formative assessment practice and the effects on students’ self-regulated learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 68(August 2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100955
Kartowagiran, B., & Jaedun, A. (2016). Model asesmen autentik untuk menilai hasil belajar siswa sekolah menengah pertama (SMP): implementasi asesmen autentik di SMP. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 20(2), 131–141. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v20i2.10063
Leong, W. S., Ismail, H., Costa, J. S., & Tan, H. B. (2018). Studies in Educational Evaluation Assessment for learning research in East Asian countries. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 59(September), 270–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.09.005
Machts, N., Zitzmann, S., & Möller, J. (2020). Dimensionality of teacher judgments on a competency-based report card in elementary school. Learning and Instruction, 67(March), 101328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101328
Msosa, A., Bruce, J., & Crouch, R. (2021). Effect of a formative assessment intervention on nursing skills laboratory learning in a resource-constrained country. Nurse Education Today, 97(October 2019), 104677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104677
Muslimah, I., Nugraha, A., & Hamdu, G. (2017). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Sikap Sosial pada Outdoor Learning di Sekolah Dasar. PEDADIDAKTIKA: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 4(2), 158–168. https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/pedadidaktika/article/view/7204/8041
Riscaputantri, A., & Wening, S. (2018). Pengembangan instrumen penilaian afektif siswa kelas IV sekolah dasar di Kabupaten Klaten. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 22(2), 231–242. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v22i2.16885
Sa’adah, E. N. L., & Sigit, D. (2018). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Sikap dan Keterampilan Psikomotorik pada Materi Elektrokimia. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 3(8), 1023–1026. http://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jptpp/article/view/11405/5413
Saenz, G. D., & Smith, S. M. (2018). Testing Judgments of Learning in New Contexts to Reduce Confidence. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 7(4), 540–551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.07.003
Tridane, M., Belaaouad, S., Benmokhtar, S., Gourja, B., & Radid, M. (2015). The Impact of Formative Assessment on the Learning Process and the Unreliability of the Mark for the Summative Evaluation. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197(February), 680–685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.058
Ulfa, I. R. (2019). Implementasi Instrumen Penilaian Sikap di SDN Gunungsaren Bantul. Palapa, 7(2), 251–266. https://doi.org/10.36088/palapa.v7i2.357
Uttl, B., White, C. A., & Gonzalez, D. W. (2017). Meta-analysis of faculty’s teaching effectiveness: Student evaluation of teaching ratings and student learning are not related. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 51, 22–42.
Wicaksono, T. P., Muhardjito, & Harsiati, T. (2016). Pengembangan penilaian sikap dengan teknik observasi , self assessment , dan peer assessment pada pembelajaran tematik kelas V SDN Arjowinangun 02 Malang. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 1(1), 45–51. http://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jptpp/article/view/5214
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with Jurnal Pedagogi dan Pembelajaran agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)
