Application of Student Worksheets Based on Hyperdocs in Chemistry Learning on Scientific Creativity

Authors

  • Detris Poba Universitas Tadulako, Palu, Indonesia
  • Taslima Universitas Tadulako, Palu, Indonesia
  • Daud K. Walanda Universitas Tadulako, Palu, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4821-9514
  • Mery Napitupulu Universitas Tadulako, Palu, Indonesia
  • Sitti Rahmawati Universitas Tadulako, Palu, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23887/jpki.v7i1.53328

Keywords:

Hyperdocs, Science creativity, Chemistry Learning

Abstract

Creativity problems are now considered a crucial ability/skill for the future of education and work. Currently, creativity is seen as urgently needing to be improved in the learning process to achieve better learning quality. This research was a descriptive-qualitative that aims to describe the utilization of Hyperdocs towards scientific creativity of SMA Labschool UNTAD Palu students in chemistry learning on the buffer topics The research subjects consisted of 20 students who were obtained based on a purposive sampling technique. The data collection instrument used hyperdocs-based worksheets which consisted of 14 scientific creativity questions that had been validated by a team of experts. Based on the analysis of percentage data and the category of scientific creativity, the test questions in the first and second sessions showed that the average scores for the aspects of unusual uses, problem finding, product improvement, creative imagination, and problem-solving were in a good category. Furthermore, the science experiment and product design aspects are in the sufficient category. So that it can be said that overall the scientific creativity of SMA Labschool UNTAD Palu class XI MIA 1 is in a good category.

References

Abdullah, N., Abdul Wahab, N., Wai, T., & Surif, J. (2018). Micro Imagination: Imagination with an Alternative Framework in a Chemistry Class. MATEC Web of Conferences, 215, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201821502013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201821502013

Aguilar, D., & Turmo, M. P. (2019). Promoting social creativity in science education with digital technology to overcome inequalities: A scoping review. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(JULY), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01474. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01474

Agustin, N. W., Sarwanto, S., & Supriyanto, A. (2021). Problem Based Learning on Newton’s Law: Can It Improve Student Creativity? Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 9(4), 528–539. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v9i4.20974. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v9i4.20974

Akbar, S. (2013). Instrumen perangkat pembelajaran. PT Remaja Rosdarkarya.

Amabile, T. M., & Pillemer, J. (2012). Perspectives on the Social Psychology of Creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.001

Carpenter, J. P., Trust, T., & Green, T. D. (2020). Transformative instruction or old wine in new skins? Exploring how and why educators use HyperDocs. Computers & Education, 157, 103979. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2020.103979. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103979

Centaury, B. (2015). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Fisika Berbasis Inkuiri Pada Materi Alat Optik Dan Indikator Dampak Terhadap Kompetensi Siswa Kelas X Sma. Jurnal Riset Fisika Edukasi Dan Sains, 1(2), 80–91. https://doi.org/10.22202/jrfes.2015.v1i2.1403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22202/jrfes.2015.v1i2.1403

Creswell, J. . (2005). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research, 2nd Edition. Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.

Egan, A., Maguire, R., Christophers, L., & Rooney, B. (2017). Developing creativity in higher education for 21st century learners: A protocol for a scoping review. International Journal of Educational Research, 82, 21–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJER.2016.12.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2016.12.004

Firdaus, M., Rusman, R., & Zulfadli, Z. (2022). Analysis of Students’ Learning Difficulties on the Concept of Buffer Solution Using Four-Tier Multiple Choice Diagnostic Test. Chimica Didactica Acta, 9(2), 57–61. https://doi.org/10.24815/jcd.v9i2.25099. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/jcd.v9i2.25099

Fraenkel, J., Wallen, N., & Hyun, H. (2011). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (M. Ryan & B. Mejia (eds.); 8th ed., Vol. 4, Issue 1). McGraw-Hill Education.

Fung, K. Y., & Ng, K. M. (2018). Teaching chemical product design using design projects. Education for Chemical Engineers, 24, 13–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECE.2018.06.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2018.06.001

Handayani, S. A., Rahayu, Y. S., & Agustini, R. (2021). Students’ creative thinking skills in biology learning: Fluency, flexibility, originality, and elaboration. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1747(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1747/1/012040. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1747/1/012040

Harjono, S. (2017). Model Pembelajaran Concept Attainment Meningkatkan Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematik. Jurnal of Educational and Evaluation, 6(1), 10–18. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jere/article/view/1334.

Henriksen, D., Mishra, P., & Fisser, P. (2016). Infusing creativity and technology in 21st century education: A systemic view for change. Educational Technology and Society, 19(3), 27–37.

Highfill, L., Hilton, K., & Landis, S. (2016). The HyperDoc Handbook: Digital Lesson Design Using Google Apps. EdTechTeam.

Holme, T. A. (2021). Can We Envision a Role for Imagination in Chemistry Learning? Journal of Chemical Education, 98(12), 3615–3616. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c01158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c01158

Hu, W., & Adey, P. (2002). A scientific creativity test for secondary school students. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 389–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110098912. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110098912

Hu, W., Shi, Q. Z., Han, Q., Wang, X., & Adey, P. (2010). Creative Scientific Problem Finding and Its Developmental Trend. Creativity Research Journal, 22(1), 46–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410903579551. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410903579551

Jankowska, D. M., & Karwowski, M. (2015). Measuring creative imagery abilities. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1591. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01591. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01591

Karwowski, M., & Soszynski, M. (2008). How to develop creative imagination?: Assumptions, aims and effectiveness of Role Play Training in Creativity (RPTC). Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3(2), 163–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TSC.2008.07.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2008.07.001

Kharkhurin, A. V. (2017). Does the Eye of the Beholder Construct Beauty? Contributions of Self-Efficacy Factors to Divergent Thinking Traits. Creativity Research Journal, 29(4), 370–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2017.1376493. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2017.1376493

Kim, K. H. (2006). Can We Trust Creativity Tests? A Review of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (TTCT). Creativity Research Journal, 18(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1801_2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1801_2

Kim, M., & Tan, H. T. (2013). A Collaborative Problem-solving Process Through Environmental Field Studies. International Journal of Science Education, 35(3), 357–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.752116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.752116

Kind, P. M., & Kind, V. (2007). Creativity in Science Education: Perspectives and Challenges for Developing School Science. Studies in Science Education, 43(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260708560225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260708560225

Krulwich, B., & Burkey, C. (1996). Elements of Scientific Creativity. AAAI Technical Report, 05, 110–112.

Krumm, G., Arán Filipppetti, V., Lemos, V., Koval, J., & Balabanian, C. (2016). Construct validity and factorial invariance across sex of the Torrance Test of Creative Thinking – Figural Form A in Spanish-speaking children. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 22, 180–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.10.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.10.003

Lee, M. R., & Chen, T. T. (2015). Digital creativity: Research themes and framework. Computers in Human Behavior, 42, 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHB.2014.04.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.001

Novianto, N. K., Masykuri, M., & Sukarmin, S. (2018). Pengembangan Modul Pembelajaran Fisika Berbasis Proyek (Project Based Learning) Pada Materi Fluida Statis Untuk Meningkatkan Kreativitas Belajar Siswa Kelas X Sma/ Ma. INKUIRI: Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 7(1), 81. https://doi.org/10.20961/inkuiri.v7i1.19792. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/inkuiri.v7i1.19792

Nursiwan, W. A., & Hanri, C. (2023). Relationship between level of scientific creativity and scientific attitudes among prospective chemistry teachers. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 12(1), 174–179. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v12i1.22852. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v12i1.22852

Orgill, M., & Sutherland, A. (2008). Undergraduate chemistry students’ perceptions of and misconceptions about buffers and buffer problems. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 9(2), 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1039/B806229N. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/B806229N

Pamenang, F. D. N., Harta, J., Listyarini, R. V., Wijayanti, L. W., Ratri, M. C., Hapsari, N. D., Asy’Ari, M., & Lee, W. (2020). Developing chemical equilibrium practicum module based on guided inquiry to explore students’ abilities in designing experiments. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1470(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1470/1/012097. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1470/1/012097

Park, J. (2011). Scientific creativity in science education. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 10(3), 144–145.

Plambech, T., & Konijnendijk van den Bosch, C. C. (2015). The impact of nature on creativity – A study among Danish creative professionals. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 14(2), 255–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.UFUG.2015.02.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.02.006

Reiter-Palmon, R., & Murugavel, V. R. (2020). Problem Finding. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), The Curated Reference Collection in Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Psychology (pp. 389–393). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809324-5.23713-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809324-5.23713-9

Samuelsen, L., Holm, R., Lathuile, A., & Schönbeck, C. (2019). Buffer solutions in drug formulation and processing: How pKa values depend on temperature, pressure and ionic strength. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 560, 357–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2019.02.019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2019.02.019

Sanjiwani, N. L. I., Muderawan, I. W., & Sudiana, I. K. (2020). Analysis of Student Chemistry Learning Difficulties on Buffer Solution at SMA Negeri 2 Banjar Buleleng Bali. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1503(1), 12038. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1503/1/012038. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1503/1/012038

Sidek, R., Halim, L., Buang, N. A., & Mohamad Arsad, N. (2020). Fostering Scientific Creativity in Teaching and Learning Science in Schools: A Systematic Review. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran IPA, 6(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.30870/jppi.v6i1.7149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30870/jppi.v6i1.7149

Silvia, P. J., Beaty, R. E., Nusbaum, E. C., Eddington, K. M., Levin-Aspenson, H., & Kwapil, T. R. (2014). Everyday creativity in daily life: An experience-sampling study of “little c” creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(2), 183–188. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035722. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035722

Vincent, J. (2016). Students’ use of paper and pen versus digital media in university environments for writing and reading-a cross-cultural exploration. Journal of Print Media and Media Technology Research, 5(2), 97–106. https://doi.org/10.622/JPMTR-1602.

Walanda, D. K., Napitupulu, M., Poba, D., & Sandewa, V. E. (2023). Leveraging Educational Technology ( Hyperdocs ) On Student ’ s Collaboration Skills. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Law, Social Sciences, and Education, ICLSSE 2022, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.28-10-2022.2326336. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.28-10-2022.2326336

Walsh, E., Anders, K., Hancock, S., & Elvidge, L. (2013). Reclaiming creativity in the era of impact: exploring ideas about creative research in science and engineering. Studies in Higher Education, 38(9), 1259–1273. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.620091. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.620091

Widoyoko, E. P. (2009). Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran. Pustaka Belajar.

Yuliatin, B. H., Purwoko, A. A., Studi, P., & Kimia, P. (2021). The Relationship Between Scientific Attitude and Creative Thinking Skill in Chemistry Education Students at University of Mataram. 0–5. https://doi.org/10.29303/cep.v4i3.2733. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/cep.v4i3.2733

Downloads

Published

2023-08-01

How to Cite

Poba, D., Taslima, Walanda, D. K., Napitupulu, M., & Rahmawati, S. (2023). Application of Student Worksheets Based on Hyperdocs in Chemistry Learning on Scientific Creativity. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Indonesia, 7(1), 10–18. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpki.v7i1.53328

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 1 (2023)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Taslima Taslima, Daud K. Walanda, Mery Napitupulu, Sitti Rahmawati, Detris Poba

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with the Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Indonesia agree to the following terms: 

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)