Enhancing Higher-Order Thinking and Conceptual Understanding through STEM-PjBL: A Comprehensive Assessment of Its Impact on Education

Authors

  • Sela Lufita Salim Nasution Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Wahyu Setyaningrum Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23887/ijerr.v7i3.81285

Keywords:

Project-Based Learning, STEM-PjBL, Systematic Literature Review

Abstract

STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) education often struggles to develop students' higher-order thinking skills and to address persistent conceptual misconceptions. To overcome these challenges, innovative educational approaches like STEM-PjBL (Project-Based Learning) are crucial for enhancing student learning outcomes. This study aims to critically assess the impact of STEM-PjBL on students' higher-order thinking skills, evaluate the effectiveness of models such as Ethno-STEM and STEM-PjBL Physics Modules in reducing misconceptions and improving conceptual understanding, and formulate strategic recommendations for integrating STEM-PjBL into STEM education curricula. The research employs a systematic literature review combined with meta-analysis, following PRISMA guidelines. The study design includes a rigorous search and critical evaluation of recent studies sourced from leading academic databases, including Web of Science, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar, with the latest search conducted on January 10, 2024. The results show that STEM-PjBL significantly enhances higher-order thinking skills, improves scientific practices and techniques, and fosters positive scientific attitudes, while also enriching cognitive and non-cognitive skills through the integration of entrepreneurial elements in STEM learning. These findings highlight the importance of incorporating STEM-PjBL into educational curricula to better prepare students for complex future careers and to improve overall educational quality. Implementing STEM-PjBL in the classroom can help equip students with the relevant skills needed for success in STEM fields. This study provides valuable insights into the potential of STEM-PjBL to strengthen student competencies and enhance the effectiveness of STEM curricula.

References

Admawati, H., & Jumadi, J. (2021). The impact of STEM PjBL on students’ engineering practice, scientific practice, and scientific attitude. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1882, 12151. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1882/1/012151.

Alibraheim, E. A., & El-Sayed, S. A. (2021). Exploring Female Undergraduate Education Students’ Perceptions of Collaborative Online Project-Based Learning (COPBL. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(8), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.29333/EJMSTE/11079.

Astuti, I. D., Toto, T., & Yulisma, L. (2019). Model Project Based Learning (Pjbl) Terintegrasi Stem Untuk Meningkatkan Penguasaan Konsep Dan Aktivitas Belajar Siswa. Quagga: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Biologi, 11(2), 93–98.

https://doi.org/10.25134/quagga.v11i2.1915.

Bakri, F. P., Budi, E., & Rahmawati, Y. (2023). The integration of mobile learning in STEM-PjBL for Physics learning: A systematic literature review. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2596. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2596/1/012065.

Bandjar, B. S., Rindarjono, M. G., & Prihadi, S. (2024). Effectiveness of STEM Learning Model and Project-Based Learning to Enhance Critical Thinking Skills in Senior High School. Jambura Geo Education Journal, 5(2), 127–139.

https://doi.org/10.37905/jgej.v5i2.26532.

Bosman, L., & Fernhaber, S. (2019). Applying authentic learning through cultivation of the entrepreneurial mindset in the engineering classroom. Education Sciences, 9(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9010007.

Bybee, R. W. (2010). Advancing STEM education: A 2020 vision. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70(1), 30.

https://search.proquest.com/openview/75bbe8b13bf3f54ebd755333ffd8621e/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=34845.

Chasanah, N., Widodo, W., & Suprapto, N. (2022). Pengembangan Instrumen Asesmen Literasi Sains Untuk Mendeskripsikan Profil Peserta Didik. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 6(2), 474–483. https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.6.2.474-483.

Chen, C.-S., & Lin, J.-W. (2019). A practical action research study of the impact of maker-centered STEM-PjBL on a rural middle school in Taiwan. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(Suppl 1), 85–108.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-09961-8.

Chiang, C. L., & Lee, H. (2016). The Effect of Project-Based Learning on Learning Motivation and Problem-Solving Ability of Vocational High School Students. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 6(9), 709–712. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJIET.2016.V6.779.

Eltanahy, M., Forawi, S., & Mansour, N. (2020). Incorporating entrepreneurial practices into STEM education: Development of interdisciplinary E-STEM model in high school in the United Arab Emirates. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37, 100697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100697.

Guo, P., Saab, N., Post, L. S., & Admiraal, W. (2020). A review of project-based learning in higher education: Student outcomes and measures. International Journal of Educational Research, 102, 101586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101586.

Hamad, S., Tairab, H., Wardat, Y., Rabbani, L., AlArabi, K., Yousif, M., & Stoica, G. (2022). Understanding science teachers’ implementations of integrated STEM: Teacher perceptions and practice. Sustainability, 14(6).

https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063594.

Handayani, R., & Wulandari, D. (2021). Modern Assessment dalam Menyongsong Pembelajaran Abad 21 dan Hambatan di Negara Berkembang. Jurnal Pendidikan Edutama, 8(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.30734/jpe.v8i1.1363.

Hidayat, A. A. (2021). Menyusun instrumen penelitian & uji validitas-reliabilitas. Health Books Publishing.

Hsiao, H. C., Chuang, C. F., Huang, T. C., & Wu, C. F. (2010). Web-based Collaborative learning in secondary education: Teachers’ reflection. International Journal of Cyber Society and Education, 3(1), 1–14. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/209204/.

Li, Y., Froyd, J. E., & Wang, K. (2019). Learning about research and readership development in STEM education: A systematic analysis of the journal’s publications from 2014 to 2018. International Journal of STEM Education, 6, 1–8.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0176-1.

Liebech-Lien, B., & Sjølie, E. (2021). Teachers’ conceptions and uses of student collaboration in the classroom. Educational Research, 63(2), 212–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2020.1839354.

Martawijaya, M. A., Rahmadhanningsih, S., Swandi, A., Hasyim, M., & Sujiono, E. H. (2023). The Effect of Applying the Ethno-STEM-Project-based Learning Model on Students’ Higher-order Thinking Skill and Misconception of Physics Topics Related to Lake Tempe, Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 12(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v12i1.38703.

Martín-Páez, T., Aguilera, D., Perales-Palacios, F. J., & Vílchez-González, J. M. (2019). What are we talking about when we talk about STEM education? A review of literature. Science Education. Wiley-Liss Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21522.

Maryanti, S., Lubis, N., & Widayat, P. (2022). Peran Perguruan Tinggi dalam Optimalisasi Penyerapan Tenaga Kerja di Kota Pekanbaru. Jurnal Indragiri Penelitian Multidisiplin, 2(2), 62–72. https://doi.org/10.58707/jipm.v2i2.145.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis (3th ed.). Sage.

Mustafa, N., Ismail, Z., Tasir, Z., & Mohamad Said, M. N. H. (2016). A meta-analysis on effective strategies for integrated STEM education. Advanced Science Letters, 22(12), 4225–4288. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2016.8111.

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The Prisma 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews. BMJ, 372, n71.

https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71.

Saraç, H. (2018). The Effect of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics-Stem Educational Practices on Students’ Learning Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis Study. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 17.

https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1176176.

Sari, R. F., & Afriansyah, E. A. (2022). Kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis dan belief siswa pada materi persamaan dan pertidaksamaan linear. Plusminus: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(2), 275–288.

https://doi.org/10.31980/plusminus.v2i2.1104.

Sattar, F., & Nawaz, M. (2024). STEM Learning Through Drones: A Pedagogical Approach for Critical Thinking and Problem Solving. IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON60312.2024.10578905.

Siew, N. M., Amir, N., & Chong, C. L. (2015). The perceptions of pre-service and in-service teachers regarding a project-based STEM approach to teaching science. SpringerPlus, 4(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-4-8.

Sulaiman, F. J., Rosales, J. J., & Kyung, L. J. (2024). The effectiveness of integrated science, technology, engineering and mathematics project-based learning module. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 13. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i3.26676.

Sumardiana, S., Hidayat, A., & Parno, P. (2019). Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis pada Model Project Based Learning disertai STEM Siswa SMA pada Suhu dan Kalor. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 4(7), 874. https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v4i7.12618.

Wahono, B., Lin, P. L., & Chang, C. Y. (2020). Evidence of STEM enactment effectiveness in Asian student learning outcomes. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00236-1.

Wu, Y. T., & Anderson, O. R. (2015). Technology-enhanced stem (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) education. Journal of Computers in Education, 2, 245–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-015-0041-2.

Yeung, R. C. Y., Yeung, C. H., Sun, D., & Looi, C. K. (2024). A systematic review of Drone integrated STEM education at secondary schools (2005–2023): Trends, pedagogies, and learning outcomes. Computers & Education.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.104999.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-25

How to Cite

Nasution, S. L. S. ., & Setyaningrum, W. . (2024). Enhancing Higher-Order Thinking and Conceptual Understanding through STEM-PjBL: A Comprehensive Assessment of Its Impact on Education . Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Review, 7(3), 656–666. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijerr.v7i3.81285

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): October

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Sela Lufita Salim Nasution, Wahyu Setyaningrum

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with the Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Review (IJERR) agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)