A Study of Process Skills in Mathematics: Elementary School and Madrasah Ibtidaiyah
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v5i4.37098Keywords:
Education, Learning, Mathematics, Student SkillsAbstract
Mathematics is learning that uses many numbers, so that many students do not like mathematics. Other research also states that students find it difficult to learn mathematics. The purpose of this is to compare and relate the skills of elementary school students and Islamic school students to the material. This study uses quantitative methods with associative and comparative types. The population in this study were 36 students in each school. The research instrument for students' process skills between SD (Elementary School) and MI (Madrasah Ibtidaiyah) on mathematics lessons. This study tested the statistics after performing statistical tests and assumption tests in normality tests, homogeneity tests, and linearity tests. The study results are that the data of SD and MI students are said to be expected, and the data are homogeneous, and there is a linear relationship between SD and MI students. There is a process of student skills between students in SD (Elementary School) and MI (Masrasah Ibtidaiyah) in learning mathematics. The correlation test results for each school shows that student responses affect students' learning process skills.
References
Aziz, A. F., Kusumaningsih, W., & Rahmawati, N. D. (2020). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Missouri Mathematics Project (MMP) dengan Strategi Think Talk Write (TTW) Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa SMP. Imajiner: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika. https://doi.org/10.26877/imajiner.v2i2.5774.
Banks, H. T., Flores, K. B., Langlois, C. R., Serio, T. R., & Sindi, S. S. (2018). Estimating the rate of prion aggregate amplification in yeast with a generation and structured population model. Inverse Problems in Science and Engineering, 26(2), 257–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/17415977.2017.1316498.
Bortnik, B., Stozhko, N., Pervukhina, I., Tchernysheva, A., & Belysheva, G. (2017). Effect of Virtual Analytical Chemistry Laboratory on Enhancing Student Research Skills and Practices. Research in Learning Technology, 25, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v25.1968.
Bosica, J., S.Pyper, J., & MacGregor, S. (2021). Incorporating problem-based learning in a secondary school mathematics preservice teacher education course. Teaching and Teacher Education, 102, 103335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103335.
Bui, V. H., & Do Van Dung. (2019). Development of Vietnamese Vocational Education Teachers to adapt the Industrial Revolution 4.0. Asian Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 2(4), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.34256/ajir1941.
Choridah, D. T. (2013). Peran Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Komunikasi Dan Berpikir Kreatif Serta Disposisi Matematis Siswa Sma. Infinity Journal, 2(2), 194. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v2i2.35.
Churchill, D., King, M., & Fox, B. (2013). Learning design for science education in the 21st century. Zbornik Instituta Za Pedagoska Istrazivanja, 45(2), 404–421. https://doi.org/10.2298/ZIPI1302404C.
Dang, T. N. Y. (2021). English for Vocational Purposes: Language uses in trades education, Averil Coxhead, Jean Parkinson, James Mackay, Emma McLaughlin, 1st Edition, Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, London (2019). English for Specific Purposes, 63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2021.04.002.
Darmani, J. W., & Renaldi, A. (2018). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis : Dampak Model Pembelajaran Reciprocal Teaching Dengan Fieldtrip. Desimal: Jurnal Matematika, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.24042/djm.v1i3.3108.
Dhanalakshmi, R., Anuja Mary, A., Shrijith, D., & Vijayaraghavan, N. (2021). A study on Covid-19 – Impacting Indian education. Materials Today: Proceedings, xxxx. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.02.786.
Diantari. (2019). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Missouri Mathematics Project Realistik Berbantuan LKS Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika. Jurnal Imiah Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 3(2), 127–136. https://doi.org/10.23887/jipp.v3i2.18069.
Faisal, & Martin, S. N. (2019). Science education in Indonesia: past, present, and future. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-019-0032-0.
Handayani, D., Elvinawati, E., Isnaeni, I., & Alperi, M. (2021). Development Of Guided Discovery Based Electronic Module For Chemical Lessons In Redox Reaction Materials. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (IJIM), 15(07), 94. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v15i07.21559.
Harta, J., Rasuh, N. T., & Seriang, A. (2020). Using HOTS-Based Chemistry National Exam Questions to Map the Analytical Abilities of Senior High School Students. Journal of Science Learning, 3(3), 143–148. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v3i3.22387.
Hasiana, & Wirastania. (2018). Pengaruh Musik dalam Mengembangkan Kemampuan Mengenal Bilangan Siswa Kelompok A di TK Lintang Surabaya. Jurnal Obsesi, 1(2), 131–138. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v1i2.25.
Haviz, M., Lufri, L., & Maris, I. M. (2020). Assessing prospective biology teachers (PBTs) perceptions on thinking as a 21st century skill: A case study at Islamic University. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(3), 319–329. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i3.24077.
Helsa, Y., Ariani, Y., & Kenedi, A. (2021). Digital Class Model in Mathematics Learning in Elementary School Using Social Learning Network Schoology. 382(Icet 2019), 2016–2019. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.4-11-2020.2304599.
Hendawi, M., & Nosair, M. R. (2020). Students’ technological awareness at the College of Education, Qatar University. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 15(4), 749–765. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v15i4.5057.
Hirschman, K., & Wood, B. (2018). 21st century learners: Changing conceptions of knowledge, learning and the child. The New Zealand Annual Review of Education, 23(June), 20. https://doi.org/10.26686/nzaroe.v23i0.5280.
Horasan-Doğan, S., & Cephe, P. T. (2020). The effects of creative drama on student teachers’ creative pedagogy and identity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100736.
Ihsan, I. A., . M., & Saputra, H. J. (2019). Keefektifan Model Pembelajaran Student Teams Achievement Division Berbantu Media Puzzle terhadap Keterampilan Berbicara Siswa. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v3i4.21799.
Istuningsih, W., Baedhowi, & Bayu Sangka, K. (2018). The Effectiveness of Scientific Approach Using E-Module Based on Learning Cycle 7E to Improve Students’ Learning Outcome. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 3(3), 75–85. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.449313.
Jayadiputra, E., & Karim, A. A. (2020). 21st Century Competences in Civic Education Curriculum of Indonesia. 2nd Annual Civic Education Conference (ACEC 2019), 99–102. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200320.019.
Kartika, Y., Wahyuni, R., Sinaga, B., & Rajagukguk, J. (2019). Improving Math Creative Thinking Ability by using Math Adventure Educational Game as an Interactive Media. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1179(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1179/1/012078.
Kebritchi, M., Lipschuetz, A., & Santiague, L. (2017). Issues and Challenges for Teaching Successful Online Courses in Higher Education. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 46(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239516661713.
Kidd, D., Miner, J., Schein, M., Blauw, M., & Allen, D. (2020). Ethics across the curriculum: Detecting and describing emergent trends in ethics education. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100914.
Kivunja, C. (2015). Unpacking the Information, Media, and Technology Skills Domain of the New Learning Paradigm. International Journal of Higher Education, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v4n1p166.
Komalasari, K., & Rahmat, R. (2019). Living Values Based Interactive Multimedia in Civic Education Learning. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.1218a.
Kowiyah, & Mulyawati, I. (2018). An analysis of primary school students’ representational ability in mathematics based on gender perspective. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 948(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/948/1/012016.
Kruit, P. M., Oostdam, R. J., van den Berg, E., & Schuitema, J. A. (2018). Assessing students’ ability in performing scientific inquiry: instruments for measuring science skills in primary education. Research in Science and Technological Education, 36(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2017.1421530.
Kubilinskiene, S., & Dagiene, V. (2010). Technology-Based Lesson Plans: Preparation and Description. Informatics in Education, 9(2), 217–228. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2010.15.
Lavi, R., Tal, M., & Dori, Y. J. (2021). Perceptions of STEM alumni and students on developing 21st century skills through methods of teaching and learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 70, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101002.
Luciana, N. L. R. (2020). Teachers’ Readiness in Inserting the 21st Century Skills in the Lesson Plan in Teaching English. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 53(2), 168. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpp.v53i2.26406.
Macnab, D. S., & Payne, F. (2003). Beliefs, attitudes and practices in mathematics teaching: Perceptions of Scottish primary school student teachers. Journal of Education for Teaching, 29(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260747022000057927.
Matsun, Andrini, V. S., Maduretno, T. W., & Yusro, A. C. (2019). Development of physics learning e-module based on local culture wisdom in Pontianak,West Kalimantan. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1381(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1381/1/012045.
Moh’d, S. S., Uwamahoro, J., Joachim, N., & Orodho, J. A. (2021). Assessing the Level of Secondary Mathematics Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(6), em1970. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/10883.
Mullis, I. V., Martin, M. O., Minnich, C. A., Stanco, G. M., Arora, A., Centurino, V. A., & Castle, C. E. (2012). Encyclopedia: Education Policy and Curriculum in Mathematics and Science. In Pirls (Vol. 1). https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.2017.62(1).03.
Mutlu, A. (2020). Evaluation of students’ scientific process skills through reflective worksheets in the inquiry-based learning environments. Reflective Practice, 21(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2020.1736999.
Netriwati. (2018). Penerapan Taksonomi Bloom Revisi untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Matematis. Desimal: Jurnal Matematika, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.24042/djm.v1i3.3238.
Ngilamele, M., Laamena, C. M., & Palinussa, A. (2019). Efektifitas Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Tai (Teams Assited Individualization) Terhadap Hasil Belajar Materi Himpunan Pada Siswa Smp Maria Mediatrix Ambon. Journal of Honai Math, 2(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.30862/jhm.v2i1.51.
Nurtanto, M., Sofyan, H., Fawaid, M., & Rabiman, R. (2019). Problem-based learning (PBL) in industry 4.0: Improving learning quality through character-based literacy learning and life career skill (LL-LCS). Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(11), 2487–2494. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.071128.
Pamungkas, D., Mawardi, & Astuti, S. (2019). Peningkatan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Dan Hasil Belajar Matematika Melalui Model Discovery Learning Di Kelas IV SD. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v3i1.98.
Puspita, L. (2019). Pengembangan Modul Berbasis Keterampilan Proses Sains Sebagai Bahan Ajar Dalam Pembelajaran Biologi. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 5(1), 79–87. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v5i1.22530.
Rahmiati, R., & Fahrurrozi, F. (2016). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Missouri Mathematics Project (Mmp) Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.10.2.3634.75-86.
Ratnawati, Handayani, & Hadi. (2020). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran PBL Berbantu Question Card terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matematis Siswa SMP. Edumatica: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.22437/edumatica.v10i01.7683.
Rekysika, N. S., & Haryanto, H. (2019). Media Pembelajaran Ular Tangga Bilangan Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Kognitif Anak Usia 5-6 Tahun. Cakrawala Dini: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 10(1), 56–61. https://doi.org/10.17509/cd.v10i1.16000.
Rizaldi, D. R., Nurhayati, E., & Fatimah, Z. (2020). The Correlation of Digital Literation and STEM Integration to Improve Indonesian Students’ Skills in 21st Century. International Journal of Asian Education, 1(2), 73–80. https://doi.org/10.46966/ijae.v1i2.36.
Rusydiyah, E. F., Indrawati, D., Jazil, S., Susilawati, & Gusniwati. (2021). Stem learning environment: Perceptions and implementation skills in prospective science teachers. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 10(1), 138–148. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v10i1.28303.
Setianingrum, R. S., Syamsuri, S., & Setiani, Y. (2020). Analyzing Students’ Learning Difficulties In Algebra. MaPan : Jurnal Matematika Dan Pembelajaran, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.24252/mapan.2020v8n1a2.
Shofiah, Lukito, & Siswono. (2018). Pembelajaran Learning Cycle 5E Berbasis Pengajuan Masalah untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas X pada Topik Trigonometri. Jurnal Matematika Kreatif, 9(1), 54–62. https://doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v9i1.9856.
Solé-Llussà, Anna, Aguilar, D., & Ibáñez, M. (2019). Video worked examples to promote elementary students’ science process skills: a fruit decomposition inquiry activity. Journal of Biological Education, 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2019.1699149.
Sorensen, E. (2013). Implementation and student perceptions of e-assessment in a Chemical Engineering module. European Journal of Engineering Education, 38(2), 172–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2012.760533.
Stender, A., Schwichow, M., Zimmerman, C., & Härtig, H. (2018). Making inquiry-based science learning visible: the influence of CVS and cognitive skills on content knowledge learning in guided inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 40(15). https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1504346.
Stover, K., Yearta, L., & Harris, C. (2016). Experiential Learning for Preservice Teachers: Digital Book Clubs With Third Graders. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 32(1), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2015.1055013.
Suarsana, I. M. (2021). Developing Interactive Digital Mathematics Book with Multi Representation Approach for Deaf Students. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 16(13). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i13.22459.
Suratmi, Laihat, & Asnimar. (2020). Development of Assessment Instruments Based on Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) for Elementary School Students. Jurnal Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar (JPsd), 6(1), 199–211. https://doi.org/10.30870/jpsd.v6i2.7356.
Vartiainen, J., & Kumpulainen, K. (2020). Playing with science: manifestation of scientific play in early science inquiry. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 28(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2020.1783924.
Wahyuniar, L. S., & Widyawati, S. (2017). Proses Berpikir Mahasiswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Kombinatorial Berdasarkan Kecerdasan Logis Matematis. Numerical: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.25217/numerical.v1i2.177.
Widodo, P. B. (2006). Reliabilitas Dan Validitas Konstruk Skala Konsep Diri Untuk Mahasiswa Indonesia. Reliabilitas Dan Validitas Konstruk Skala Konsep Diri Untuk Mahasiswa Indonesia, 3(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.14710/jpu.3.1.1.
Wulandari, F. A., Mawardi, M., & Wardani, K. W. (2019). Peningkatan Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Kelas 5 Menggunakan Model Mind Mapping. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v3i1.17174.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with the Journal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)