Interest and Science Process Skills in Science Education Based on Gender
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jpp.v55i1.37738Keywords:
education, interests, science process skills, science, genderAbstract
The importance of students' interest in learning is learning skills, so research is carried out to assess students' interests and skills in depth based on grade level and gender in a school so that interests and skills can be known in depth based on the indicators tested. There has been no research that examines student interest and science process skills in detail based on grade level and generation in a school. So the autor make this study with purpose to analyze how the interest and science process skills between women and men compare in science subjects and to analyze how the relationship between students' interests and science process skills with science subjects. This study uses a quantitative method with a comparative type. Quantitative research is a field of inquiry that stands alone, is scientific in nature and aims to understand social reality. The instrument in this study used a questionnaire and an observation sheet, namely a student interest questionnaire and an observation sheet for science process skills. Based on the results of hypothesis testing, research testing and data analysis, the conclusion of this study is from the T-test there are differences in the interests of female students and male students in class VII A and VII B. From the results of the T test for students' science process skills there are differences in the interests of female students and male students in grades VII A and VII B. Based on the results of the correlation test between interests and science process skills of grade VII A students there is a relationship between interests and science process skills between female and male students as well as in class VII B. Students' interest and science process skills have a significant influence on curiosity, learning materials and teacher attitudes, student observation and communication.
References
Achdiyat, M., & Utomo, R. (2018). Kecerdasan Visual-Spasial, Kemampuan Numerik, dan Prestasi Belajar Matematika. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 7(3), 234–245. https://doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v7i3.2234.
Ahmad Agung Yuwono Putro, A., Suyanto, S., & Yoyon Suryono, Y. (2017). Educational Management for Elementary Based on Baiquniyyah Koranic School. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, 45(CoEMA), 132–137. https://doi.org/10.2991/coema-17.2017.22.
Anggraeni, H., Fauziyah, Y., & Fahyuni, E. F. (2019). Penguatan Blended Learning Berbasis Literasi Digital Dalam Menghadapi Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Al-Idarah : Jurnal Kependidikan Islam, 9(2), 190–203. https://doi.org/10.24042/alidarah.v9i2.5168.
Archu, A. (2019). Pengembangan Minat Belajar Dalam Pembelajaran. Idaarah: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 3(2), 205. https://doi.org/10.24252/idaarah.v3i2.10012.
Aslam, A. L. S. I. H. R. I. N. D. F. (2021). UMKM, Kesetaraan Gender, dan Pemberdayaan Perempuan di Indonesia. Berdikari : Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Statistik Indonesia, 1(1), 22–32. https://doi.org/10.11594/jesi.01.01.03.
Astalini, A., Kurniawan, D. A., & Sumaryanti, S. (2018). Sikap Siswa Terhadap Pelajaran Fisika di SMAN Kabupaten Batanghari. JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika), 3(2), 59. https://doi.org/10.26737/jipf.v3i2.694.
Astuti, L. I. N. S. (2017). Penguasaan Konsep IPA Ditinjau Dari Konsep Diri. Formatif : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 7(1), 40–48. https://doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v7i1.1293.
Bankole, Q. A., & Nasir, Z. (2020). Empirical Analysis of Undergraduate Students ’ Perception in the Use of Electronic Sources in Kwara State University Library. International Information & Library Review, 0(0), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572317.2020.1805274.
Chivandikwa, N., Makumbirofa, R., & Muwati, I. (2019). Traditional games and child-centred development: affirming disabled and female bodies in applied theatre projects in Zimbabwe. South African Theatre Journal, 32(3), 272–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/10137548.2018.1552190.
Crawley, E. F., Hosoi, A., Long, G. L., Kassis, T., Dickson, W., & Mitra, A. B. (2019). Moving Forward with the New Engineering Education Transformation (NEET) program at MIT - Building community, developing projects, and connecting with industry. In ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--33124.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research. University of Nebraska.
Darmaji, Astalini, Kurniawan, D. A., Parasdila, H., Iridianti, Susbiyanto, Kuswanto, & Ikhlas, M. (2019). E-Module based problem solving in basic physics practicum for science process skills. International Journal of Online and Biomedical Engineering, 15(15), 4–17. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v15i15.10942.
Dierks, P. O., Höffler, T. N., Blankenburg, J. S., Peters, H., & Parchmann, I. (2016). Interest in science: a RIASEC-based analysis of students’ interests. International Journal of Science Education, 38(2), 238–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1138337.
Dolch, C. (2020). Toys for the boys, tools for the girls? Gender and media usage patterns in higher education. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 21(3), 94–111. https://doi.org/10.17718/TOJDE.762031.
Dou, R., Brewe, E., Potvin, G., Zwolak, J. P., & Hazari, Z. (2018). Understanding the development of interest and self-efficacy in active-learning undergraduate physics courses. International Journal of Science Education, 40(13), 1587–1605. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1488088.
Ernawati, M. D., Asrial, Perdana, R., Septi, S. E., & Rahmi. (2021). Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif Middle School Science Subject in Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif, 1(2), 258–274. https://doi.org/10.23960/jpp.v1.
Fadilah, F. (2017). Konsep Kesetaraan Gender Dalam Pandangan Santri. In Studi Kasus (Vol. 1, Issue 1).
Ferreira, J., Behrens, M., Torres, P., & Marriott, R. (2018). The necessary knowledge for online education: Teaching and learning to produce knowledge. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(6), 2097–2106. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/86463.
Fuller, S. (2019). Education Diplomacy at the Intersection of Gender Equality and Quality Education. Childhood Education, 95(5), 70–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.2019.1663103.
Gelen Assoc, I. (2018). Academicians’ Predictions Of 21 St Century Education And Education In The 21 St Century. European Journal of Education Studies, 4, 165–204. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1233478.
Giglio, S., Bertacchini, F., Bilotta, E., & Pantano, P. (2020). Machine learning and points of interest: typical tourist Italian cities. Current Issues in Tourism, 23(13), 1646–1658. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2019.1637827.
Gürsoy, G. (2021). Digital storytelling: Developing 21st century skills in science education. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(1), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.12973/EU-JER.10.1.97.
Harefa, A. R. (2019). Peran Ilmu Fisika Dalam Kehidupan Sehari-Hari. Warta Dharmawangsa, 13(2), 91–96. https://doi.org/10.46576/wdw.v0i60.411.
Hong, L. Y., & Talib, C. A. (2018). Scientific Argumentation in Chemistry Education: Implications and Suggestions. Asian Social Science, 14(11), 16. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v14n11p16.
Jack, B. M., & Lin, H. shyang. (2017). Making learning interesting and its application to the science classroom. Studies in Science Education, 53(2), 137–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2017.1305543.
Kamza, M., Rasnawi, R., & Furqan, M. H. (2020). Pendidikan Humanistik Melalui Pembelajaran Sejarah. Seminar Nasional Peningkatan Mutu Pendidikan, 1(1), 33–39. http://publikasi.fkip-unsam.org/index.php/semnas2019/article/view/11.
Karina, R. M., Syafrina, A., & Habibah, S. (2017). Hubungan Antara Minat Belajar Dengan Hasil Belajar Siswa Dalam Mata Pelajaran Ipa Pada Kelas V Sd Negeri Garot Geuceu Aceh Besar. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 2(1), 61–77. http://www.jim.unsyiah.ac.id/pgsd/article/view/4396.
Kartika, Q., & Rabial Kanada. (2017). Peran Ganda Perempuan pada Keluarga Masyarakat Petani: Kasus Istri Petani di kecamatan Merapi Selatan Kabupaten Lahat. An Nisa’a: Jurnal Kajian Gender Dan Anak, 12, 151–162. http://jurnal.radenfatah.ac.id/index.php/annisa/article/view/1786.
Kruit, P. M., Oostdam, R. J., van den Berg, E., & Schuitema, J. A. (2018). Assessing students’ ability in performing scientific inquiry: instruments for measuring science skills in primary education. Research in Science and Technological Education, 36(4), 413–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2017.1421530.
Kwarikunda, D., Schiefele, U., Ssenyonga, J., & Muwonge, C. M. (2020). The Relationship between Motivation for, and Interest in, Learning Physics among Lower Secondary School Students in Uganda. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 24(3), 435–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2020.1841961.
Labouta, H. I., Kenny, N. A., Li, R., Anikovskiy, M., Reid, L., & Cramb, D. T. (2018). Learning science by doing science: an authentic science process-learning model in postsecondary education. International Journal of Science Education, 40(12), 1476–1492. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1484966.
Lestari, K. B., Dwi Lestari, I. F., & Santoso, I. (2021). The Impact of Health Education Using Online Learning on Adolescent Knowledge of Anaemia. KnE Social Sciences, 2021, 209–220. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v5i3.8541.
Llussà, A. S., Guilar, D., & Ibáñez, M. (2019). Video worked examples to promote elementary students’ science process skills: a fruit decomposition inquiry activity. Journal of Biological Education, 00(00), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2019.1699149.
Luo, Z., Jingying, C., Guangshuai, W., & Mengyi, L. (2020). A three-dimensional model of student interest during learning using multimodal fusion with natural sensing technology. Interactive Learning Environments, 0(0), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1710852.
Madu, B. C. (2020). Scientific Explanation of Phenomenon, Imagination and Concept Formation as Correlates of Students’ Understanding of Physics Concepts. Journal of Natural Sciences Research, 11(16), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.7176/jnsr/11-16-03.
Maison, M., Lestari, N., & Widaningtyas, A. (2019). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa Pada Materi Usaha Dan Energi. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 6(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v6i1.314.
Marniati, Sanova, R., Fachrizal, M. A., Safira, A., Hasibuan, S. P. B., & Mustina, N. (2019). Sosialisasi persiapan pendidikan di panti asuhan yatim piatu di era new normal socialization of education preparation in orphanage orphans in normal new era. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat (Kesehatan) V, 1(2), 38–42. http://www.jurnal.uui.ac.id/index.php/jpkmk/article/viewFile/860/433.
Marshel, J., & Ratnawulan. (2020). Analysis of Students Worksheet (LKPD) integrated science with the theme of the motion in life using integrated connected type 21st century learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1481(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1481/1/012046.
Mason, G. (2020). Higher education, initial vocational education and training and continuing education and training: where should the balance lie? Journal of Education and Work, 33(7–8), 468–490. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2020.1755428.
Mutakinati, L., Anwari, I., & Yoshisuke, K. (2018). Analysis of students’ critical thinking skill of middle school through stem education project-based learning. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(1), 54–65. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i1.10495.
Mutlu, A. (2020). Evaluation of students’ scientific process skills through reflective worksheets in the inquiry-based learning environments. Reflective Practice, 21(2), 271–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2020.1736999.
Nurmayani, L., Doyan, A., & Sedijani, P. (2018). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing Terhadap Hasil Belajar Fisika Peserta Didik. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 4(2), 2–7. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v4i2.113.
Puspitasari, T. O., Putri, Y. E., & Yohanes, Y. (2019). Sikap Terhadap Konsentrasi Belajar Siswa Pada Mata Pelajaran Fisika di Sekolah Menengah Atas. JIPFRI (Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika Dan Riset Ilmiah), 3(2), 79–85. https://doi.org/10.30599/jipfri.v3i2.537.
Ramdani, A., Jufri, A. W., Gunawan, G., Hadisaputra, S., & Zulkifli, L. (2019). Pengembangan Alat Evaluasi Pembelajaran Ipa Yang Mendukung Keterampilan Abad 21. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v5i1.221.
Retnowati, T. H., Mardapi, D., Kartowagiran, B., & Suranto, S. (2017). Model evaluasi kinerja dosen: pengembangan instrumen untuk mengevaluasi kinerja dosen. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 21(2), 206–2014. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v21i2.16626.
Rosdianto, H. (2018). Rancang Bangun Alat P Raktikum Gerak Jatuh Bebas. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika, 3(1), 20–23. https://www.academia.edu/download/60034195/2018_JIPF_Vol.3_No.120190716-109913-rebycy.pdf.
Saputro, B. I., & Amir, C. (2018). Kompetensi Pustakawan Perpustakaan Khusus: Studi Kasus Di Perpustakaan Kementerian Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan. Baca: Jurnal Dokumentasi Dan Informasi, 39(2), 207. https://doi.org/10.14203/j.baca.v39i2.428.
Shchurko, T. (2018). ‘Gender education’ in the post-Soviet Belarus: Between authoritarian power, neoliberal ideology, and democratic institutions. Policy Futures in Education, 16(4), 434–448. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210317719779.
Solé-Llussà, A., Aguilar, D., & Ibáñez, M. (2020). Video-worked examples to support the development of elementary students’ science process skills: a case study in an inquiry activity on electrical circuits. Research in Science and Technological Education, 00(00), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2020.1786361.
Stender, A., Schwichow, M., Zimmerman, C., & Härtig, H. (2018). Making inquiry-based science learning visible: the influence of CVS and cognitive skills on content knowledge learning in guided inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 40(15), 1812–1831. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1504346.
Stylinski, C. D., Peterman, K., Phillips, T., Linhart, J., & Becker-Klein, R. (2020). Assessing science inquiry skills of citizen science volunteers: a snapshot of the field. International Journal of Science Education, Part B: Communication and Public Engagement, 10(1), 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2020.1719288.
Sudibyo, E., Nurita, T., & Fauziah, A. N. M. (2018). Keterampilan Proses Untuk Melatihkan Keterampilan Proses. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 3(1), 21–26. https://doi.org/10.26740/jppipa.v3n1.p21-26.
Sultan, A. D., & Bancong, H. (2017). Pengaruh Pendekatan Multiple Intelligences Melalui Model Pembelajaran Langsung Terhadap Sikap Dan Hasil Belajar Fisika Peserta Didik Kelas XI IPA SMA Negeri 11 Makassar. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Unismuh, 5(1), 120620. https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v5i1.341.
Swirski, H., Baram-Tsabari, A., & Yarden, A. (2018). Does interest have an expiration date? An analysis of students’ questions as resources for context-based learning. International Journal of Science Education, 40(10), 1136–1153. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1470348.
Tao, H., & Ning, J. (2018). Computation Randomized quasi-random sampling / importance resampling. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation, 0(0), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2018.1547398.
Utami, R. W., & Wutsqa, D. U. (2017). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika dan self-efficacy siswa SMP negeri di Kabupaten Ciamis. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 166. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v4i2.14897.
Vansteensel, M. J., Kristo, G., Aarnoutse, E. J., & Ramsey, N. F. (2017). The brain-computer interface researcher’s questionnaire: from research to application. Brain-Computer Interfaces, 4(4), 236–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/2326263X.2017.1366237.
Vartiainen, J., & Kumpulainen, K. (2020). Playing with science: manifestation of scientific play in early science inquiry. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 28(4), 490–503. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2020.1783924.
Wahyudi, E. E., Aminah, N. S., & Sukarmin. (2017). Pembelajaran Optika Geometri Melalui Problem Based Learning (PBL) Ditinjau Dari Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Dan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa SMA Kelas X Tahun 2014/2015. Jurnal Inkuiri, 6(3), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.20961/inkuiri.v6i3.17842.
Wahyuningsih, N. E. (2020). Analisis Perbedaan Gender dalam Tingkat Kedisiplinan Belajar Mahasiswa di Masa Pandemi Covid 19. Jurnal Musawa, 12(2), 311–337. https://doi.org/10.24239/msw.v12i2.674.
Warfa, A. R. M., Nyachwaya, J., & Roehrig, G. (2018). The influences of group dialog on individual student understanding of science concepts. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0142-3.
Wegawati, N. P., Tastra, D. K., & Kusmariyatni, N. (2016). Pengaruh Pendekatan Starter Eksperimen Berbantuan Media Konkret terhadap Hasil Belajar IPA Siswa Kelas 5. E-Journal PGSD Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, 4(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.23887/jjpgsd.v4i1.7334.
Yunarti, Y. (2018). Pembelajaran Statistika Dalam Perspektif Gender. Tarbawiyah Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 2(02), 282. https://doi.org/10.32332/tarbawiyah.v2i02.1415.
Zurweni, Kurniawan, D. A., & Azzahra, M. Z. (2018). A Comparative Analysis of Students’ Attitudes and Interests in Science Subjects. Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif, 8(2), 53–67. https://doi.org/10.23960/jpp.v.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)
