A Comparative study: Cooperative Learning in Science Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jpp.v55i1.37741Keywords:
Jigsaw, STAD, ScienceAbstract
A suitable learning model is needed in learning science at the junior high school level. Educators need to be able to determine the appropriate learning model for learning activities. Therefore, this study aims to analyze student responses to jigsaw and STAD learning models in SMPN and MTsN and to compare student responses to jigsaw and STAD learning models in science subjects at SMPN and MTsN. This type of research is quasi-experimental quantitative research by comparing 8 classes that use the jigsaw and STAD models in science learning. This research was carried out in 4 schools, namely 2 SMP and 2 MTs with the number of students in each class of 35 students, the number of students being 280 students. In data analysis using SPSS 26. Based on the results of the T-test, namely the value of sig. (2-tailed <0.05) it can be said that there are differences in student responses to the Jigsaw and STAD learning models in science subjects in SMP/MTs.
References
Alfiriani, A., & Hutabri, E. (2017). Kepraktisan Dan Keefektifan Modul Pembelajaran Bilingual Berbasis Komputer. Jurnal Kependidikan, 1(1), 12–23. https://doi.org/DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v1i1.10896.
Arifin, J. (2017). SPSS 24 untuk Penelitian dan Skripsi. PT. Elex Media Komputindo.
Banggur, M. D. V., Situmorang, R., & Rusmono, R. (2018). Pengembangan Pembelajaran Berbasis Blended Learning Pada Mata Pelajaran Etimologi Multimedia. JTP - Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 20(2), 152–165. https://doi.org/10.21009/jtp.v20i2.8629.
Chang, W. L., & Benson, V. (2020). Jigsaw teaching method for collaboration on cloud platforms. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 00(00), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2020.1792332.
Demirci, C., & Akcaalan, M. (2020). Active Learning: English Language Teaching via Write Share Learn Strategy. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 5(3), 214–220. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.732948.
Elpisah, E., & Bin-Tahir, S. Z. (2019). Student team achievement division (Stad) model in increasing economic learning outcomes. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 8(10), 3089–3092. https://doi.org/https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336927764_Student_Team_Achievement_Division_STAD_Model_in_Increasing_Economic_Learning_Outcomes.
Gambari, A. I., & Yusuf, M. O. (2017). Relative Effectiveness of Computer-Supported Jigsaw II, STAD and TAI Cooperative Learning Strategies on Performance, Attitude, and Retention of Secondary School Students in Physics. Journal of Peer Learning, 10(1), 76. https://doi.org/http://ro.uow.edu.au/ajpl/vol10/iss1/6.
Istiqomah, Wiyono, B. B., Rahmawati, H., Prastuti, E., Eva, N., & Ardani, T. A. (2021). Jigsaw On Line Model as the Improvization of Learning Methods in the Covid-19 Pandemic. PSYCHOLOGY AND EDUCATION, 58(1), 5408–5416. https://doi.org/http://psychologyandeducation.net/pae/index.php/pae/article/view/1798/1574.
Jahanbakhsh, A. A., AliAsgariZamani, M., & Garman, Z. (2019). CIRC and STAD in Iranian context: Through the five elements to cooperative learning of lexical collocations. Cogent Arts and Humanities, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2019.1692469.
Kamaruddin, S., & Yusoff, N. M. R. N. (2019). The Effectiveness of Cooperative Learning Model Jigsaw and Team Games Tournament (TGT) towards Social Skills. Creative Education, 10(12), 2529–2539. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2019.1012180.
Kartikasari, A., Roemintoyo, R., & Yamtinah, S. (2018). The Effectiveness of Science Textbook Based on Science Technology Society for Elementary School Level. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 7(2), 127–131. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v7i2.13022.
Kim, D. (2018). A study on the influence of Korean Middle School Students’ relationship through science class applying stad cooperative learning. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 8(4), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.407.
Kisaran, S. R. (2018). Game Edukasi Tantangan Otak ( Brain Challenge ) Dengan Metode Jigsaw. August 2016.
Kumar, C. S. V., Kalasuramath, S., Patil, S., Kumar, K. G. R., Taj, K. R. S., Jayasimha, V. L., Basavarajappa, K. G., Shashikala, P., Kukkamalla, A., & Chacko, T. (2017). Effect of Jigsaw Co-Operative Learning Method in Improving Cognitive Skills among Medical Students. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 6(3), 164–173. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.603.018.
Kurniawan, D. A., Astalini, A., & Kurniawan, N. (2019). Identifikasi Sikap Siswa Terhadap Mata Pelajaran IPA di SMP Se Kabupaten Muaro Jambi. Curricula: Journal Of Teaching And Learning, 4(3), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v14i2.1065.
Kusuma, A. W. (2018). Meningkatkan Kerjasama Siswa dengan Metode Jigsaw. Konselor, 7(1), 26–30. https://doi.org/10.24036/02018718458-0-00.
Mukti, N. I. C., & Nurcahyo, H. (2017). Developing Computer- Based Biology Learning Media to Improve the Students ’ Learning Outcom. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 3(2), 137–149. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v3i2.7644.
Mulia, M. W., Usodo, B., & Kusmayadi, T. A. (2019). Quadrilateral Learning Based on Brain Potencies of 7th Grade in Karanganyar Regency, Indonesia. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 4(4), 652–659. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.628478.
Nair, S. M. (2018). Effects of utilizing the stad method (Cooperative learning approach) in enhancing students’ descriptive writing skills. International Journal of Education and Practice, 6(4), 239–252. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61.2018.64.239.252.
Norfai. (2021). Analisis Data Penelitian. CV. Penerbit Qiara Media.
Nuayi, A. W., Supartin, S., & Buhungo, T. J. (2018). Stimulation of Pressure on Liquid Concept in Stad Learning Model to Improve Rational Thinking Skills and Learning Outcomes of Students. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 14(2), 83–91. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi.v14i2.11990.
Nurbianta, N., & Dahlia, H. (2018). The Effectiveness of Jigsaw Method in Improving Students Reading Comprehension. ETERNAL (English Teaching Journal), 9(1), 70–86. https://doi.org/10.26877/eternal.v9i1.2416.
Pahlevi, T., Rosy, B., & Elizabeth Ranu, M. (2018). A Scientific Approach Based on Portfolio Assessment for Autonom Problem Solving. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 3(2), 29–36. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.406124.
Patimah, S., Slameto, S., & Setyaningtyas, E. W. (2018). Student teams achievement divisions (STAD) to enhance learning outcome. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 51(2), 81–85. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpp.v51i2.15416.
Payadnya, I. P. A. A., & Jayantika, I. G. A. N. T. (2018). Panduan Penelitian Eksperimen Beserta Analisis Statistik Dengan SPSS. Deepublish.
Prihatini, E. (2017). Pengaruh Metode Pembelajaran Dan Minat Belajar Terhadap Hasil Belajar Ipa. Jurnal Formatif, 7(2), 171–179. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v7i2.1831.
Puspitawati, H., & Herawati, T. (2018). Metode Penelitian Keluarga. PT. Penerbit IPB Pres.
Rahayu, T., Syafril, S., Wati, W., & Yuberti, Y. (2017). The Application of STAD- Cooperative Learning in Developing Integrated Science on Students Worksheet. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 6(2), 247–254. https://doi.org/10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v6i2.1933.
Ratnasari, D., Sukarmin, S., & Radiyono, Y. (2017). Implementasi Pendekatan Konstruktivisme melalui Model Pembelajaran CLIS (Children Learning In Science) dan Pengaruhnya terhadap Aktivitas Belajar dan Kemampuan Kognitif Siswa. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 3(1), 111. https://doi.org/10.21009/1.03115.
Riyanto, P. (2019). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Jigsaw Terhadap Peningkatan Kemampuan Drible Bola Basket. Musamus Journal of Physical Education and Sport (MJPES), 2(01), 59–67. https://doi.org/10.35724/mjpes.v2i01.2069.
Rusmono, & Alghazali, M. I. (2019). Pengaruh Media Cerita Bergambar Dan Literasi Membaca Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Sekolah Dasar. JTP - Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 21(3), 269–282. https://doi.org/10.21009/jtp.v21i3.13386.
Santoso, S. (2019). Mahir Statistik Parametrik. Elex Media Komputindo.
Sharma, S., Chauhan, S., & Kaur, M. (2019). Introduction and Assessment of Jigsaw Method of Teaching on Challenging Topics in Physiology for First Year Medical Students. International Journal of Physiology, 7(4), 238. https://doi.org/10.5958/2320-608x.2019.00178.1.
Soedimardjono, F. P. P., & Pratiwi. (2021). Cooperative Learning Model with Jigsaw Type Improves Students’ Sciences Process Skills and Learning Outcomes. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 10(1), 172. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v10i1.25203.
Sugiharto. (2020). Geographical students’ learning outcomes on basic political science by using cooperative learning model with Group Investigation (GI) type in State University of Medan, Indonesia. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 30(4), 447–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2019.1696261.
Taofiq, M., Setiadi, D., & Hadiprayitno, G. (2018). Implementasi Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Dan Problem Based Learning (Pbl) Terhadap Keterampilan Generik Sains Biologi Ditinjau Dari Kemampuan Akademik Siswa. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 4(2), 29–33. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v4i2.114.
Usman Fauzan, A., & Aldila Afriansyah, E. (2017). Kemampuan Pemahaman Matematis Siswa Melalui Model Pembelajaran Auditory Intellectualy Repetition dan Problem Based Learning. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.11.1.3890.67-78.
Wardana. (2020). Pengantar Aplikasi SPSS Versi 20. LPPM Univesitas Muhammadyah Buton Press.
Wati, M., & Anggraini, W. (2019). Strategi Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Jigsaw: Pengaruhnya Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa. Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(1), 98–106. https://doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v2i1.3976.
Wibowo, A. (2017). Pengaruh pendekatan pembelajaran matematika realistik dan saintifik terhadap prestasi belajar, kemampuan penalaran matematis dan minat belajar. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v4i1.10066.
Wirantasa, U. (2017). Pengaruh Kedisiplinan Siswa Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 7(1), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v7i1.1272.
Wulandari, D. G. R., & Mustadi, A. (2019). Comparison of Discovery and Inquiry Model: Which Model is More Effective in Natural Science (IPA) Learning? International Journal of Educational Research Review, 4(Special Issue), 711–718. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.628710.
Wyk, M. M. van. (2012). The Effects of the STAD-Cooperative Learning Method on Student Achievement, Attitude and Motivation in Economics Education. Journal of Social Sciences, 33(2), 261–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/09718923.2012.11893104.
Yurdakul, C. (2017). An Investigation of the Relationship between Autonomous Learning and Lifelong Learning. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 2(1), 15–20. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.309968.
Zuhara, E., Jufri, A. W., & Soeprianto, H. (2019). Kemampuan Literasi Biologi Berdasarkan Gender Pada Siswa Peminatan Mipa Di Sma Negeri Kabupaen Lombok Barat. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 5(1), 115–119. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v5i1.234.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)
