Modelling Experiences And Its Factors In General Mathematics: The Case Of Grade 11 Students

Authors

  • Leomarich F Casinillo Visayas State University
  • Emily L Casinillo Visayas State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23887/ijerr.v3i2.25670

Keywords:

Learning experiences, influencing factors, general mathematics, grade 11 students, multiple regression model

Abstract

Student’s experiences in learning plays an essential role in producing quality academic achievement. This study aimed to develop multiple regression models on the students’ experiences in learning mathematics in regards to its influencing factors. A simple random sampling of 112 grade 11 students in the first semester of school year 2018-2019 from Visayas State University were used as the respondents of this study. Result of the study reveals that grade 11 students’ learning experience in general mathematics is challenging and logical. However, it is found out that it is satisfying and rewarding since it develops their critical thinking and decision making in real life. The number of hours in studying and studying with internet positively influence the students’ learning experience in mathematics. It is also revealed that STEM students are more fond learning mathematics compare to non-STEM students. Furthermore, result also shows that a conducive learning environment and religious activities in the campus helps the students to have a peaceful and positive learning experience.

References

Akinsola, M. A. &Tella, A. (2007). Correlates of academic procrastination and mathematics achievement of university undergraduate students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 3(4), 363-370.

Allison, P. (2012). When Can You Safely Ignore Multicollinearity? Retrieved from http://statisticalhorizons.com/multicollinearity

Amaliyah, S., Anwar, K. & Nuqul, F. L. (2017). The effect of religious identity toward academic performance: an experimental study. 6th Annual International Conference on Cognitive and Behavioral Psychology (CBP 2017). Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315099787.

Beghetto, R. A. (2016). Creative learning: A fresh look. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 15(1), 6-23.

Bradley, R. H., & Corwyn, R. F. (2002). Socioeconomic status and child development. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 371–399.

Casinillo, L. F. (2019). Factors affecting the failure rate in mathematics: the case of Visayas State University (VSU). Review of Socio-Economic Research and Development Studies, 3(1), 1-18.

Casinillo, L. F. & Aure, M. R. K. L. (2018). Econometric evidence on academic performance in basic calculus of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) senior high students. Journal of Educational and Human Resource Development, 6, 238-249.

Casinillo, L. F., Camulte, M. C. G., Raagas, D. L. and Riña, T. S. (2020a). Cultural factors in learning mathematics: the case on achievement level among Badjao students. International Journal of Indonesian Education and Teaching, 4(1), 71-81.

Casinillo, L. F. & Guarte, J. M. (2018). Evaluating the effectiveness of teaching strategies: The case of a national vocational school in Hilongos, Leyte. Review of Socio-Economic Research and Development Studies, 2(1), 64-79.

Casinillo, L. F., Palen, M. A. E., Casinillo, E. L., & Batidor, P. G. (2020b). Assessing Senior High Student’s Learning Experiences in Mathematics. Indonesian Journal of Educational Studies, 23(1), 44-60.

Cochran, W. G. (1953). Sampling Techniques. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

Code, W., Merchant, S., Maciejewski, W., Thomas, M., & Lo, J. (2016). The Mathematics Attitudes and Perceptions Survey: an instrument to assess expert-like views and dispositions among undergraduate mathematics students. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 47(6), 917-937. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2015.1133854

Das, G. C. & Sinha, S. (2017). Effect of Socioeconomic status on performance in mathematics among students of secondary schools of Guwahati city. IOSR Journal of Mathematics, 13(1), 26-33.

Geist, E. A., & King, M. (2008). Different, not better: Gender differences in mathematics learning and achievement. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 35(1;1), 43-52.

Gelman A. & Hill J. (2007). Data Analysis using Regression and multilevel/Hierarchical models. Cambridge University Press, New York.

Kitchen, J. A., Sonnert, G., & Sadler, P. M. (2018). The impact of college-and university-run high school summer programs on students’ end of high school STEM career aspirations. Science Education, 102(3), 529–547.

Kunal, D. S. (2008). Cultivating competence, self-efficacy and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4(3), 586-598.

Ma, X. (2003). Effects of early acceleration of students in mathematics on attitudes toward mathematics and mathematics anxiety. Teachers College Record, 105(3), 438-464.

O’Connell, A. A., & Liu, X. (2011). Model diagnostic for proportional and partial proportional odds models. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 10(1), 139-175.

doi:10.22237/jmasm/1304223240

Prestridge S. (2012). The beliefs behind the teacher that influences their ICT practices. Computers & Education, 58(1), 449 458. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.028

Riis, Ole. (2011). Rejection of Religious Pluralism: The Danish Case. Nordic Journal of Religion and Society, 24(1), 19–36.

Riley, N., Lubans, D. R., Holmes, K., Hansen, V., Gore, J., & Morgan, P. J. (2017). Movement-based mathematics: enjoyment and engagement without compromising learning through the EASY minds program. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 1653-1673.

Ruzek, E. A., & Schenke, K. (2019). The tenuous link between classroom perceptions and motivation: A within-person longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(5), 903–917.

Salam, S., Zeng, J. Q., Pathan, Z. H., Latif, Z., & Shaheen, A. (2018). Impediments to the Integration of ICT in Public Schools of Contemporary Societies: A Review of Literature. Journal of Information Processing Systems, 14(1), 252-269. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3745/JIPS.04.0062

Sharp, J. (2012). Success with your education research project (2nd edition). Sage. London, England.

Şen, H. S. (2013). The attitudes of university students towards learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 83, 947 – 953.

Singh, A. (2014). Conducive Classroom Environment in Schools. International Journal of Science and Research, 3(1), 387-392.

Stock, J. H. & Watson, M. W. (2007). Introduction to Econometrics. 2nd edition. Boston: Pearson Addison Wesley.

Downloads

Published

2020-06-26

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 2: July 2020

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with the Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Review (IJERR) agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)