The Demand for Feedback and its Value in a Management Accounting Course
Little effort has been expended on studying the role of feedback in accounting education. While most concerned consider that any precise information about students' thinking has value, such beliefs have not been empirical. They are using data generated by computerized databases that offer on-demand solutions to problems in management accounting courses. This research aims to analyze the feedback and its value in the Management Accounting course. The context for this research is an introduction to management accounting courses offered at major public universities in the Southeastern United States during the final semester. Two student sections taught by the same instructor opened 143 students majoring in accounting. The methods used to collect data are quizzes and tests. The technique used to analyze the data is descriptive qualitative and quantitative analysis. The result of this research is that there is a positive relationship between the frequency of access to feedback and higher academic performance. The timing of student access to solutions depends, in a meaningful way, on mastery of the material. The longer a student waits to demand a solution, the worse their performance will be. Important feedback on the effect of effort (H3 and H4) can provide additional or alternative meaning when juxtaposed with the significance of the non-hypothesized relationship between effort and performance.
Agustuna, N. E., Herlina, R., & Faridah, D. (2019). Corrective Feedback on Pronunciation Errors: Teacher’s Perception and EFL High School Students’ Self-Reflection. Journal Of English Education And Teaching, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.33369/jeet.3.3.311-327.
Andon, P., Chong, K. M., & Roebuck, P. (2010). Personality preferences of accounting and non-accounting graduates seeking to enter the accounting profession. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 21(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2010.01.001.
Brouwer, N., Besselink, E., & Oosterheert, I. (2017). The Power of Video Feedback with Structured Viewing Guides. Teaching and Teacher Education, 66, 60–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.03.013.
Gabriele, K. M., Holthaus, R. M., & Boulet, J. R. (2016). Usefulness of Video-Assisted Peer Mentor Feedback in Undergraduate Nursing Education. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 12(8), 337–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2016.03.004.
Jin, X., Tigelaar, D., Want, A. van der, & Admiraal, W. (2022). Novice teachers’ appraisal of expert feedback in a teacher professional development programme in Chinese vocational education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103652.
Jordan, A., & Audia, P. (2012). Self-Enhancement and Learning from Performance Feedback. Academy of Management Review, 37. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2010.0108.
Karlsson, P., & Noela, M. (2021). Beliefs influencing students’ career choices in Sweden and reasons for not choosing the accounting profession. Journal of Accounting Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2021.100756.
Mackintosh-Franklin, C. (2021). An evaluation of formative feedback and its impact on undergraduate student nurse academic achievement. Nurse Education in Practice, 50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102930.
Mireles-Rios, R., & Becchio, J. A. (2018). The evaluation process, administrator feedback, and teacher self-efficacy. Journal of School Leadership, 28(4), 462–487. https://doi.org/10.1177/105268461802800402.
Molin, F., Haelermans, C., Cabus, S., & Groot, W. (2020). Do feedback strategies improve students’ learning gain?-Results of a randomized experiment using polling technology in physics classrooms. Computers & Education, 175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104339.
Muehlbacher, S., Hartl, B., & Kirchler, E. (2017). Mental Accounting and Tax Compliance: Experimental Evidence for the Effect of Mental Segregation of Tax Due and Revenue on Compliance. Public Finance Review, 45(1), 118–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/1091142115602063.
Noroozi, O., & Mulder, M. (2017). Design and Evaluation of a Digital Module with Guided Peer Feedback for Student Learning Biotechnology and Molecular LifeSciences, Attitudinal Change, and Satisfaction. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 45(1), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20981.
O’Neil, H. F., Chuang, S. H. S., & Baker, E. L. (2010). Computer-based feedback for computer-based collaborative problem solving. In Computer-Based Diagnostics and Systematic Analysis of Knowledge. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5662-0_14.
Prilop, C. N., Weber, K. E., Prins, F. J., & Kleinknecht, M. (2021). Connecting feedback to self-efficacy: Receiving and providing peer feedback in teacher education. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101062.
Putra, I. G. K. M., Santosa, M. H., & Pratiwi, N. P. A. (2021). Students’ perceptions on online peer feedback practice in EFL writing. Indonesian Journal of English Education, 8(2), 213–231. https://doi.org/10.15408/ijee.v8i2.21488.
Rakoczy, K., Pinger, P., Hochweber, J., Klieme, E., Schütze, B., & Besser, M. (2019). Formative assessment in mathematics: Mediated by feedback’s perceived usefulness and students’ self-efficacy. Learning and Instruction, 60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.01.004.
Redifer, J. L., Bae, C. L., & Zhao, Q. (2021). Self-Efficacy and Performance Feedback: Impacts on Cognitive Load During Creative Thinking. Learning and Instruction, 71(June 2020), 101395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101395.
Schafer, B. A., Cleaveland, C., & Schafer, J. B. (2020). Stakeholder perceptions of the value of accounting student organizations. Journal of Accounting Education, 50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2020.100656.
Schles, R. A., & Robertson, R. E. (2019). The Role of Performance Feedback and Implementation of Evidence-Based Practices for Preservice Special Education Teachers and Student Outcomes: A Review of the Literature. Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 42(1), 36–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406417736571.
Seng, & Hill. (2014). Using a Dialogical Approach to examine Peer feedback During Chemidtry Investigative Task Discussion. Res Science Education, 44, 727–749.
Sudaryanti, D., Sukoharsono, E. G., Baridwan, Z., & Mulawarman, A. D. (2015). Critical Analysis on Accounting Information Based On Pancasila Value. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.399.
Sun, J. C.-Y., & Hsu, K. Y.-C. (2019). A smart eye-tracking feedback scaffolding approach to improving students’ learning self-efficacy and performance in a C programming course. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.01.036.
Thomson, H., Tanaka, N., & Morikoshi, K. (2021). Tour guiding practice and feedback in guide education: Lessons from London for Japan. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2020.100287.
Tomiko, & Yumiko. (2017). Feedback of the knowledge obtained through the analysis of learning needs for risk literacy education. Procedia Computer Science, 112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.08.223.
Winstone, N. E., & Boud, D. (2020). The need to disentangle assessment and feedback in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1779687.
Wu, W. H., Kao, H. Y., Wu, S. H., & Wei, C. W. (2019). Development and evaluation of affective domain using student’s feedback in entrepreneurial Massive Open Online Courses. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(MAY). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01109.
Wyness, L., & Dalton, F. (2018). The value of problem-based learning in learning for sustainability: Undergraduate accounting student perspectives. Journal of Accounting Education, 45, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2018.09.001.
Zhang, H., Liao, A. W. X., Goh, S. H. L., & Yoong, S. Q. (2022). Effectiveness and quality of peer video feedback in health professions education: A systematic review. Nurse Education Today, 109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105203.
Zhao, H. (2010). Investigating learners’ use and understanding of peer and teacher feedback on writing: A comparative study in a Chinese English writing classroom. Assessing Writing, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2010.01.002.
Zhou, J., Dawson, P., Tai, J. H. M., & Bearman, M. (2020). How conceptualising respect can inform feedback pedagogies. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1733490.
Copyright (c) 2022 Timothy J., Paul M. Goldwater
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Review (IJERR) agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)