Implementation of Pedagogical, Andragogical, and Heutagogical Approaches in Education System Sustainability
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/ijerr.v6i2.59889Keywords:
learning, pedagogy, andragogic, heutagogic, digitalAbstract
Nowadays it is very important for educators to know a theme regarding approaches to learning. Therefore, this study aims to analyze various learning approaches such as pedagogic, andragogic, and heutagogic as learning approaches that are commonly used in education delivery. The research method used is a literature review. The data collection technique for this research was to study articles related to pedagogic, andragogic, and heutagogic followed by analysis of qualitative descriptive data with a sample number after going through the screening and feasibility stages of 14 papers, total of 459 papers found from three databases during the identification process. The results of this study indicate that each approach has different characteristics and can be applied according to the characteristics of the students and the material, the pedagogic approach can be applied at the early education level, andragogic is very suitable for adult learning, and the heutagogic approach. This approach is relevant to higher education. Through this research can be used as a reference for teachers to choose an approach that suits the characteristics of their students.
References
Akbar, A. (2021). Pentingnya Kompetensi Pedagogik Guru. JPG: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru, 2(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.32832/jpg.v2i1.4099.
Akin, G. (2014). The Term of Andragogy and the Difference between Andragogy and Pedagogy. Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences, 47. https://doi.org/10.1501/Egifak_0000001327.
Ali, M. (2013). Implementasi Kurikulum Pendidikan Nasional 2013. Jurnal Pedagogi, 2(2), 49–60. http://dosen.unimma.ac.id/public/document/pengabdian/56277-notowidodo_jurnalberdikari.pdf.
Anderson, T., & Rivera-Vargas, P. (2020). A Critical look at Educational Technology from a Distance Education Perspective. Digital Education Review, 37, 208–229. https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2020.37.208-229.
Arghode, V., Brieger, E. W., & McLean, G. N. (2017). Adult learning theories: implications for online instruction. European Journal of Training and Development, 41(7), 593–609. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-02-2017-0014.
Bakhshi, P., Babulal, G. M., & Trani, J. F. (2017). Education of children with disabilities in New Delhi: When does exclusion occur? PLoS ONE, 12(9), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183885.
Bansal, A., Jain, S., Sharma, L., Sharma, N., Jain, C., & Madaan, M. (2020). Students’ perception regarding pedagogy, andragogy, and heutagogy as teaching-learning methods in undergraduate medical education. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_221_20.
Baran, E., Correia, A. P., & Thompson, A. (2011). Transforming online teaching practice: Critical analysis of the literature on the roles and competencies of online teachers. Distance Education, 32(3), 421–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2011.610293.
Bilqis, Syachruroji, A., & Taufik, M. (2016). Perbedaan Hasil Belajar Siswa pada Mata Pelajaran Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam antara Model Problem Based Learning dengan Model Pembelajaran Langsung. JPSD (Jurnal Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar), 2(2), 147–155. https://doi.org/10.30870/jpsd.v2i2.794.
Blaschke, L. M. (2012). Heutagogy and lifelong learning: A review of heutagogical practice and self-determined learning. In International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning (Vol. 13, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i1.1076.
Blaschke, L. M., & Hase, S. (2019). Heutagogy and digital media networks. Pacific Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 1(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.24135/pjtel.v1i1.1.
Cahyani, A., Manzilah, A., Nurfadilah, F. R., & Adawiyah, R. (2019). Kompetensi Pedagogik Guru Dengan Strategi Pembelajaran Kreatif Pada Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Indonesia. Pgmi, 11(1), 353–360. https://doi.org/https://www.bing.com/search?pglt=41&q=kompetensi+pedagogik+guru+dengan+strategi+pembelajaran+kreatif+pada+mata+pelajaran+bahasa+indonesia+annisa+cahyani1%2c+asfi+manzilah2%2c+febriyanti+rizki+nurfadilah3%2c+raabiah+adawiyah4+pendidikan&cvid=511db08489e548799a5928599ec79e18&aqs=edge.0.69i59.983j0j1&form=annta1&pc=asts.
Candra, P., Soepriyanto, Y., & Praherdhiono, H. (2020). Pedagogical Knowledge (PK) Guru Dalam Pengembangan dan Implementasi Rencana Pembelajaran. JKTP: Jurnal Kajian Teknologi Pendidikan. https://doi.org/10.17977/um038v3i22020p166.
Canning, N. (2010). Playing with heutagogy: Exploring strategies to empower mature learners in higher education. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 34(1), 59–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098770903477102.
Chan, S. (2010). Applications of Andragogy in Multi-Disciplined Teaching and Learning. Journal of Adult Learning, 39(2), 25–35. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ930244.
Chen, J. C. (2014). Teaching nontraditional adult students: Adult learning theories in practice. Teaching in Higher Education, 19(4), 406–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2013.860101.
Cherni, H., Métayer, N., & Souliman, N. (2020). Literature review of locomotion techniques in virtual reality. International Journal of Virtual Reality, 20(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.20870/ijvr.2020.20.1.3183.
Diah Rusmala Dewi. (2019). Pengembangan Kurikulum Di Indonesia Dalam Menghadapi Tuntutan Abad Ke-21. As-Salam: Jurnal Studi Hukum Islam & Pendidikan, 8(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.51226/assalam.v8i1.123.
Dopo, F. B., & Ismaniati, C. (2016). Persepsi guru tentang digital natives, sumber belajar digital dan motivasi memanfaatkan sumber belajar digital. Jurnal Inovasi Teknologi Pendidikan, 3(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.21831/tp.v3i1.8 280.
Galustyan, O. V., Borovikova, Y. V., Polivaeva, N. P., Kodirov, B. R., & Zhirkova, G. P. (2019). E-learning within the Field of Andragogy. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14(9). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i09.10020.
Gravett, K., Taylor, C. A., & Fairchild, N. (2021). Pedagogies of mattering: re-conceptualising relational pedagogies in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1989580.
Greene, J. A., Copeland, D. Z., & Deekens, V. M. (2021). A Model of Technology Incidental Learning Effects. In Educational Psychology Review (Vol. 33, Issue 3, pp. 883–913). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09575-5.
Hafeez, M. (2021). Systematic Review on Modern Learning Approaches, Critical Thinking Skills and Students Learning Outcomes. Indonesian Journal Of Educational Research and Review, 4(1), 167. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijerr.v4i1.33192.
Handayani, S. M., Yeigh, T., Jacka, L., & Peddell, L. (2021). Developing a heutagogy approach to promoting teacher competencies in Indonesia. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 16(3), 939–951. https://doi.org/10.18844/CJES.V16I3.5765.
Hiemstra, R., & Brockett, R. G. (2012). Reframing the Meaning of Self-Directed Learning: An Updated Modeltt. Adult Education Research Conference Proceedings, 155–161. https://newprairiepress.org/aerc/2012/papers/22/.
Hiryanto. (2017). Pedagogi, Andragogi Dan Heutagogi Serta Implikasinya Dalam Pemberdayaan Masyarakat. Dinamika Pendidikan, 1, 65–71. http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/dinamika-pendidikan/article/view/19771.
Imam, I., Ayubi, A., & Bernard, M. (2018). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa SMA. JPMI:Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif, 1(3), 355–360. https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v1i3.355-360.
Jayanti, G. D., Setiawan, F., Azhari, R., & Putri Siregar, N. (2021). Analisis Kebijakan Peta Jalan Pendidikan Nasional 2020-2035. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Dan Keguruan, 6(1), 40–48. https://doi.org/10.47435/jpdk.v6i1.618.
Kamrozzaman, N. A., Badusah, J., & Wan Mohammad, W. M. R. (2019). Heutagogy Approach : Effectiveness of M-Learning For Lifelong Learning Education. Sains Humanika, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v11n3.1496.
Koteva-Mojsovska, T., & Bancotovska, S. N. (2015). The effects of the pedagogical experience on the quality of teacher education. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education, 3(2), 41–46. https://doi.org/10.23947/2334-8496-2015-3-2-41-46.
Lai, E. R., & Viering, M. (2012). Assessing 21 st Century Skills : Integrating Research Findings National Council on Measurement in Education. Pearson, April, 1–67. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED577778.
Lapele, F., Kartowagiran, B., Haryanto, H., & Wahyunanto, E. (2021). Heutagogy : The Most Holistic Approach Utilizing Technology in Learning. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Current Issues in Education (ICCIE 2021), 640(Iccie), 154–159. https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/iccie-21/125969682.
Lassoued, Z., Alhendawi, M., & Bashitialshaaer, R. (2020). An exploratory study of the obstacles for achieving quality in distance learning during the covid-19 pandemic. Education Sciences, 10(9), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10090232.
Lewis, N., & Bryan, V. (2021). Andragogy and teaching techniques to enhance adult learners’ experience. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 11(11). https://doi.org/10.5430/jnep.v11n11p31.
Lima, C. B. De, Walton, S., & Owen, T. (2022). A critical outlook at augmented reality and its adoption in education. Computers and Education Open, 3(August), 100103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100103.
Lugosi, Z., & Lee, P. C. (2021). A Case Study Exploring the Use of Virtual Reality in the Zoo Context. Animal Behavior and Cognition, 8(4), 576–588. https://doi.org/10.26451/abc.08.04.09.2021.
Marangunić, N., & Granić, A. (2015). Technology acceptance model: a literature review from 1986 to 2013. Universal Access in the Information Society, 14(1), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1.
Marie, B. L. (2012). Heutagogy and Lifelong Learning: A Review of Heutagogical Practice and Self Determined Learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(1), 56–71. http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1076.
Matthew B. Miles, A. M. H. (1994). An Expanded Sourcebook "Qualitative Data Analysis Second Edition. In SAGE Publications.
Morrar, R., Arman, H., & Mousa, S. (2017). The fourth industrial revolution (Industry 4.0): A social innovation perspective. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(11), 12–20. https://timreview.ca/sites/default/files/Issue_PDF/TIMReview_November2017.pdf#page=12.
Mulyatiningsih, E., Munif, N., & Sugiyono. (2022). Dampak Pendekatan Heutagogy terhadap Tanggung Jawab Belajar Online pada Mata Kuliah Statistik. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 22(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.24036/pedagogi.v22i1.1189.
Nellitawati, N. (2017). The Role of the Headmaster and Pedagogical Competences of Teacher in Vocational School. Jurnal Konseling Dan Pendidikan, 5(2), 102–108. https://doi.org/10.29210/118200.
Nurchinta, A., & Tandyonomanu, D. (2015). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Andragogi Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Mata Diklat Pemetaan Keluarga Sejahtera Di Bidang Pelatihan Dan Pengembangan Bkkbn Provinsi Jawa Timur. Jurnal Mahasiswa Teknologi Pendidikan, 6(2). https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/230607351.pdf.
Palis, A. G., & Quiros, P. A. (2014). Adult learning principles and presentation pearls. Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology, 21(2), 114–122. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-9233.129748.
Pandi. (2011). Penerapan Model Problem Based Instruction Untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Peserta Pada. Manajerial, 11(21), 1–12. https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/manajerial/article/download/2170/1522.
Pradana, D. A., Mahfud, M., Hermawan, C., & Susanti, H. D. (2021). Nasionalism: Character Education Orientation in Learning Development. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(4), 4026–4034. https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v3i4.1501.
Pratama, L. D., & Lestari, W. (2020). Pengaruh Pelatihan Terhadap Kompetensi Pedagogik Guru Matematika. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 278–285. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v4i1.207.
Raharjo, T. J., & Suminar, T. (2016). Penerapan Pedagogi Dan Andragogi Pada Pembelajaran Pendidikan Kesetaraan Kelompok Belajar Paket a, B, Dan C Di Kota Semarang. FIP Universitas Negeri Semarang, 1(1), 3. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/edukasi/article/view/954.
Rahman, A., & Elshap, D. safitri. (2016). Implementasi Kekuatan Motivasi Belajar Dalam Pendekatan Andragogi. Empowerment : Jurnal Ilmiah Program Studi Pendidikan Luar Sekolah, 5(2), 1–12. http://e-journal.stkipsiliwangi.ac.id/index.php/empowerment/article/view/548.
Rands, V. F., S., H., Gerrits, R., & Jensen, M. (2021). Implementing Guided Inquiry Active Learning in an Online Synchronous Classroom and its Impact on Test Question Performance. HAPS Educator, 25(2), 6–12. https://doi.org/10.21692/haps.2021.015.
Rhamdan, D., Kule, A., & Al Wahid, S. M. (2021). Analisis Pemanfaatan e-Learning di Masa Pandemi (Studi Kepustakaan: Learning Loss pada Peserta Didik). Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kewirausahaan, 9(2), 432–446. https://doi.org/10.47668/pkwu.v9i2.263.
Roemintoyo, R., & Budiarto, M. K. (2021). Flipbook as Innovation of Digital Learning Media: Preparing Education for Facing and Facilitating 21st Century Learning. Journal of Education Technology, 5(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v5i1.32362.
Sadiku, L. M. (2015). The Importance of Four Skills Reading, Speaking, Writing, Listening in a Lesson Hour. European Journal of Language and Literature, 1(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.26417/ejls.v1i1.p29-31.
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039.
Somantri, D. (2021). Pentingnya Kompetensi Pedagogik Guru. Equilibrum: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Dan Ekonomi, 18(2), 188–195. https://doi.org/10.25134/equi.v18i2.4154.
Sosibo, Z. C. (2019). Self-assessment: A learner-centred approach towards transforming traditional practices and building self-directed learners. South African Journal of Higher Education, 33(5), 76–97. https://doi.org/10.20853/33-5-3586.
Stoten, D. W. (2020). Practical Heutagogy: Promoting Personalized Learning in Management Education. Adult Learning, 31(4), 161–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045159520905364.
Sulfemi, W. B. (2019). Kemampuan pedagogik guru. Prosiding Seminar Nasional STKIP Muhammadiyah Bogor 2015, 1(1), 75–86. https://osf.io/7j3pr/download.
Sulistya, R. (2019). Heutagogy As a Training Approach for Teachers in the Era of Industrial Revolution 4.0. Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 4(2), 127–138. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v4i2.1222.
Syahrudin, A., Madjid, A., Yuliani, L., & Qomariah, D. N. (2019). Penerapan konsep andragogi oleh tutor kesetaraan paket c dalam meningkatkan motivasi belajar pada warga belajar 1,2,3,4. Jurnal Cendekiawan Ilmiah PLS, 4(1), 26–30. https://doi.org/10.37058/jpls.v4i1.1597.
Szabo, Z. K., Körtesi, P., Guncaga, J., Szabo, D., & Neag, R. (2020). Examples of Problem-Solving Strategies in Mathematics Education Supporting The Sustainability of 21st-Century Skills. Sustainability, 12(23), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122310113.
Traicoff, D., Tchoualeu, D., Opare, J., Wardle, M., Quaye, P., & Sandhu, H. S. (2021). Applying Adult Learning Best Practices to Design Immunization Training for Health Care Workers in Ghana. Global Health: Science and Practice, 9(3), 487–497. https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-21-00090.
Wiley, D., & Hilton, J. (2018). Defining OER-enabled pedagogy. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 19(4). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i4.3601.
Wong, K. T., bt Osman, R., Goh, P. S. C., & Rahmat, M. K. (2013). Understanding student teachers’ behavioural intention to use technology: Technology acceptance model (TAM) validation and testing. International Journal of Instruction, 6(1), 89–104. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/eiji/issue/5138/70018.
Yusri, Y. (2017). Strategi Pembelajaran Andragogi. Al-Fikra : Jurnal Ilmiah Keislaman, 12(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.24014/af.v12i1.3861.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Mochamad Kamil Budiarto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Review (IJERR) agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)
