Training Workshop on Research Proposal Writing for Faculty Members: Assessment of the Feedback of the Participants
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/ijerr.v6i3.67909Keywords:
Faculty, Feedback, Proposal, Research, Training, WorkshopAbstract
Proposal writing training enriches lecturers' capacity in conducting research. The purpose of this study was to assess direct feedback (reactions) from faculty members participating in a research proposal writing training workshop. This was a cross-sectional study conducted through a self-administered questionnaire. The data was analyzed for central tendency. Pre-questionnaire data were retro skewed, so the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test was used for median comparisons. Open question data were checked manually. The results of this study found a ranking of training workshop attributes, namely usefulness (8.71 ± 1.23), content (8.86 ± 1.15), relevance (8.90 ± 1.18) and facilitation (9.09 ± 1.15). .09) was also quite prominent and overall (9.05±.97). Participants' confidence levels increased significantly (<0.001) on six relevant cognitive skills items; conducting research (before Median-2, IQ-1, after Median-3, IQ-0); conducting a systemic review (before Median-2, IQ-1, after Median-3, IQ-1), choosing a research design (before Median-2, IQ-2, after Median-3, IQ-0), applying basic biostatistics ( before Median-2, IQ-1, after Median-3, IQ-0), academic writing (before Median-2, IQ-1, after Median-3, IQ-0) and research proposal writing (before Median-2, IQ-1, after Median-3, IQ-0). Overall the feedback from the participants was positive and excellent and their confidence levels increased significantly on the cognitive skills assessment.
References
Abdulghani, H. M., Shaik, S. A., Khamis, N., Al-Drees, A. A., Irshad, M., Khalil, M. S., Alhaqwi, A. I., & Isnani, A. (2014). Research methodology workshops evaluation using the Kirkpatrick’s model: translating theory into practice. Med Teach, 36(1), 24–29. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2014.886012.
Aggarwal, R. (2021). Why must faculty members in medical institutions engage in research? Int J Adv Med Health Res, 8, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijamr.ijamr_105_21.
Akatay, A., Eroğlu, U., & Özdemir, S. (2015). Competencies of Hr Professionals: a Study on the Hr Competencies of University Students. Journal of Life Economics, 2(4), 47–60. https://doi.org/10.15637/jlecon.104.
Al-Riyami, A. (2008). How to prepare a research proposal. Oman Medical Journal, 23(2), 66–69. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3282423/.
Alghanim, S. A., & Alhamali, R. M. (2011). Research productivity among faculty members at medical and health schools in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J, 32(12), 1297–1303. https://applications.emro.who.int/imemrf/Saudi_Med_J/Saudi_Med_J_2011_32_12_1297_1303.pdf.
Araujo Portugal, J. C. (2020). A proposal to teach implicature to intermediate students of English. IKASTORRATZA.e-Journal on Didactics, 96–132. https://doi.org/10.37261/25.
Auf, A. I., Awadalla, H., Ahmed, M. E., & Ahmed, M. H. (2018). Perception, barriers, and practice of research among teaching staff at five Sudanese medical faculties. J Public Health Emerg, 2(22). https://doi.org/10.21037/jphe.2018.07.01.
Baran, E., Correia, A. P., & Thompson, A. (2011). Transforming online teaching practice: Critical analysis of the literature on the roles and competencies of online teachers. Distance Education, 32(3), 421–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2011.610293.
Chung, C. H., Shen, C., & Qiu, Y. Z. (2019). Students’ acceptance of gamification in higher education. International Journal of Game-Based Learning, 9(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJGBL.2019040101.
Clack, A., & Dommett, E. J. (2021). Student learning approaches: Beyond assessment type to feedback and student choice. Education Sciences, 11(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11090468.
Donovan, J. D., Maritz, A., & McLellan, A. (2013). Innovation training within the Australian advanced manufacturing industry. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 65(2), 256–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2013.783614.
EA, K. (2008). A guide for the design and conduct of self-administered surveys of clinicians. CMAJ, 179(3), 245–252. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2474876/
Ghasya, D. A. V., Samodra, Y. T. J., Seli, S., Gustian, U., Pranata, R., Thamrin, L., & Riyanti, D. (2023). Workshop for Preparation of Lecturers’ Research Roadmap in Faculty of Teacher Training and Education. Tanjungpura University, 4(1), 771–783. https://doi.org/10.36526/gandrung.v4i1.
GP, P. R. M. D., S, P., & MS, N. (2018). Evaluation of teachers training workshop at Kirkpatrick level 1 using retro–pre-questionnaire. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 9, 453–457. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S154166.
Gurat, M. G., Rosario, F. Y. G., Dizon, P. K. L., & Saludarez, M. U. (2018). Assessment of research faculty development program efficacy in writing research proposals. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 5(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.21744/irjmis.v5n4.238.
Herder, A., Berenst, J., de Glopper, K., & Koole, T. (2018). Reflective practices in collaborative writing of primary school students. International Journal of Educational Research, 90(February), 160–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2018.06.004.
Kabirpanthi, V., Gupta, V., & Chavan, P. V. (2022). Barriers perceived by researchers in pursuing medical research in an evolving medical college of tribal Madhya Pradesh, India. J Family Med Prim Care, 11, 701–7. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1706_21.
Kamińska, D., Zwoliński, G., Wiak, S., Petkovska, L., Cvetkovski, G., Barba, P. Di, Mognaschi, M. E., Haamer, R. E., & Anbarjafari, G. (2021). Virtual Reality-Based Training: Case Study in Mechatronics. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 26(4), 1043–1059. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09469-z.
Komalasari, E., Sihite, M., & Supriyadi, E. (2021). The Performance of Distribution Government Assistance Toward School Dropout Communities Based on the E-Proposal Banper Management Information System, Organization Transformation and HR Capabilities in Course Institutions. Journal of Management and Leadership, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.47970/jml.v4i1.208.
Liao, S.-C., & Hsu, S.-Y. (2019). Evaluating a continuing medical education program: New World Kirkpatrick Model Approach. International Journal of Management, Economics and Social Sciences (IJMESS, 8(4), 266–279. https://doi.org/10.32327/IJMESS/8.4.2019.17.
McAllister, M., & McKinnon, J. (2009). The importance of teaching and learning resilience in the health disciplines: A critical review of the literature. Nurse Education Today, 29(4), 371–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2008.10.011.
Omair, A. (2015). Selecting the appropriate study design for your research: Descriptive study designs. Journal of Health Specialties, 3(3), 153. https://doi.org/10.4103/1658-600x.159892.
Petersen, S. C., McMahon, J. M., McFarlane, H. G., Gillen, C. M., & Itagaki, H. (2020). Mini-Review - Teaching Writing in the Undergraduate Neuroscience Curriculum: Its Importance and Best Practices. Neuroscience Letters, 737(August), 135302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2020.135302.
Raka, L., & Dedushaj, I. (2011). Medical education in Kosova. Medical Teacher, 33(4). https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2011.545843.
Rosa, A. T. R. (2020). Teacher Development Potential (Creativity and Innovation) Education Management in Engineering Training, Coaching and Writing Works through Scientific Knowledge Intensive Knowledge Based on Web Research in the Industrial Revolution and Society. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(4), 161–168. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1258955.
Sabzwari, S., Kauser, S., & Khuwaja, A. K. (2009). Experiences, attitudes and barriers towards research amongst junior faculty of Pakistani medical universities. BMC Med Educ, 9(68). https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-9-68.
Shrestha. (2019). Workshop on proposal writing for research for health care professionals: a brief report. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 12, 565–572. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S211257.
Susilowati, W. W., & Suyatno, S. (2021). Teacher competence in implementing higher-order thinking skills oriented learning in elementary schools. Premiere Educandum : Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Dan Pembelajaran. https://doi.org/10.25273/pe.v11i1.7762.
Syaifullah, D. H. (2021). The Effect of Employee Engagement and Organizational Citizenship Behavior on the Performance of Employees of the Research & Development and Education & Training Agency of the Ministry of Religion of the Republic of Indonesia. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 12(5), 1077–1084. https://doi.org/10.17762/turcomat.v12i5.1753.
Wakid, M., Usman, T., & Sulistyo, B. (2020). Project based learning model to increase the competency of automotive engineering teachers candidates. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1700(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1700/1/012063.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Rano Mal Piryani, Nudrat Zeba, Farah Naz Memon
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Review (IJERR) agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)