Invitation Strategy and Learners’ Controlled Politeness: A Case in Indonesian Students of EFL

Authors

  • I Made Rai Jaya Widanta Politeknik Negeri Bali, Jimbaran, Indonesia
  • Luh Nyoman Chandra Handayani Politeknik Negeri Bali, Jimbaran, Indonesia
  • I Wayan Dana Ardika Politeknik Negeri Bali, Jimbaran, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23887/ijerr.v6i2.65622

Keywords:

Invitation Strategy, Politeness, Control, Indonesian Learners, EFL

Abstract

Politeness strategies in making invitations appear to vary. The fact that there are politeness strategies in invitations of different forms covered by scientific theories raises ideas for further research. Therefore this study analyze how Indonesian learners of English as a foreign language (EFL) performed invitation strategies and controlled politeness. The research participants were 244 Indonesian learners of EFL in vocational higher education in Bali, Indonesia. The data were semantic realization of invitation performed by participants pursuant to discourse completion cards. The role play cards based on which the data were taken were divided into two divisions, role play card for hearers (Hs) with high power, high distance and high rank of imposition (P+D+R+) and low power, low distance, and high rank of imposition (P-D-R+). Data were analysed qualitatively. Analysis result revealed that there were nine new strategies of invitation. Speakers controlled politeness by a number of strategi, such as using ‘bi-clause sentences and if-conditional sentences, indirect sentences, passive sentences, formal sentences and markers such as would, could, look forward, please, Mr, Mr. director, sir, local both traditional and religious expressions, utterances with asking for permission, utterances with expression of permission, appreciation, apology to invite Hs with P+D+R+. In order to invite Hs with P-D-R+, S tended to use mono clauses and simple sentences, direct sentences, less formal sentences such as do, want, are, want, can, don’t, simple sentence, active sentences, intimacy greeting such as hallo, friends, hi guys, informal expression of suggestion, promise, imperative sentences, and direct sentences of willingness.

References

Adel, S. M. R., Davoudi, M., & Ramezanzadeh, A. (2016). A qualitative study of politeness strategies used by Iranian EFL learners in a class blog. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 4(1), 47–62. https://doi.org/10.30466/IJLTR.2016.20377.

Al-Hamzi, A. M. S., Sartini, N. W., Hapsari, N. F., Gougui, A., & Al-Nozili, R. M. A. (2020). A Cross-Cultural Pragmatic Study of Invitation Strategies As Produced by Indonesian and Yemeni EFL Language Learners. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 9(6), 42–53. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.9n.6p.42.

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1978). Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction, 56–311.

Dewi, M. I. K., Budasi, I. G., & Ramendra, D. P. (2017). An Analysis Of Balinese Swear Words Used In Cempaga Village. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Undiksha, 5(2). http://download.garuda.kemdikbud.go.id/article.php?article=839130&val=5108&title=an analysis of swear wordsof balinese language practices by bali aga people in cempaga villagenorth bali.

Djafar, H., Wahid, J. H. J., & Sahmadan, S. (2022). Students ’ Language Attitudes and Politeness as Character Education in the Implementation of Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka ( MBKM ). Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal), 5(2), 16028–16036. https://doi.org/DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i2.5519 16028.

Efrianto, E., & Afnita, A. (2019). The Politeness of Bungo Pasang Language Using Kato Nan Ampek in Minangkabau. Jurnal KATA, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.22216/kata.v3i1.3489.

Fatimah, A. S., & Santiana, S. (2017). Teaching in 21St Century: Students-Teachers’ Perceptions of Technology Use in the Classroom. Script Journal: Journal of Linguistic and English Teaching, 2(2), 125. https://doi.org/10.24903/sj.v2i2.132.

George, E. J., & Mamidi, R. (2020). Conversational implicatures in English dialogue: Annotated dataset. Procedia Computer Science, 171(2019), 2316–2323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.04.251.

Grabe, W. (2014). Key Issues in L2 Reading Development. 4th CELC Symposium Proceedings, 8–18. https://blog.nus.edu.sg/celcblog/files/2021/12/Alternative-pedagogies-in-the-English-language-Communication-classroom-4th-CELC-Symposium_2014.pdf#page=13.

Guswita, K. A., & Andriyanti, E. (2020). Conversational implicature in English learning process at senior high school in Yogyakarta. 240 Metalingua, 18(2), 239–250. https://doi.org/10.26499/metalingua.v18i2.548.

Hashim, H. U., Yunus, M. M., & Hashim, H. (2018). Language learning strategies used by adult learners of teaching english as a second language (tesl). TESOL International Journal, 13(4), 39–48. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1244116.

Hitchcock, M., & Dann, G. M. S. (1998). The Language of Tourism: A Sociolinguistic Perspective. In The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (Vol. 4, Issue 3). Cab International. https://doi.org/10.2307/3034171.

Isabella, R. A., Simanjuntak, N., Simaremare, R. M., & Sitorus, N. (2022). An Analysis of Politeness Strategy Used in Bataknese Traditional Wedding Ceremony: a Case on Pragmatics. American Journal of Art and Culture, 1, 18–26. https://americanjournal.org/index.php/ajac/article/view/73.

Khusniati, M., Parmin, & Sudarmin. (2017). Local wisdom-based science learning model through reconstruction of indigenous science to improve student’s conservationist character. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 14(3), 16–23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10202a.

Kurdghelashvili, T. (2015). Speech acts and politeness strategies in an EFL classroom in Georgia. International Journal of Cognitive and Language Sciences, 9(1), 306–309. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1338098.

Lyon, A. R., Coifman, J., Cook, H., McRee, E., Liu, F. F., Ludwig, K., & McCauley, E. (2021). The Cognitive Walkthrough for Implementation Strategies (CWIS): a pragmatic method for assessing implementation strategy usability. Implementation Science Communications, 2(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-021-00183-0.

Maharani, T. (2018). A Study of Politeness Strategies Used by Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump On The Second Presidential Debate.

Mahmud, M. (2019). The use of politeness strategies in the classroom context by English university students. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(3), 597–606. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v8i3.15258.

Mohammad, S., Adel, R., Davoudi, M., & Ramezanzadeh, A. (2016). A qualitative study of politeness strategies used by Iranian EFL learners in a class blog Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 4(1), 47–62. https://doi.org/10.30466/IJLTR.2016.20377.

Montag, J. L. (2019). Differences in sentence complexity in the text of children ’ s picture books and child-directed speech. First Language, 39(5), 527–546. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723719849996.

Mustafai, J., Zeqiri, J., & Ceka, D. (2022). Sociological Aspects of digital learning. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(7), 1525–1533. https://www.journalppw.com/index.php/jpsp/article/view/11548.

Nassar, H. (2021). Reasons behind mis/understanding English conversational implicatures by University learners in Yemen. Studies in Pragmatics and Discourse Analysis, 2(1), 40–55. https://doi.org/10.48185/spda.v2i1.291.

Ouyang, F., & Scharber, C. (2017). The influences of an experienced instructor’s discussion design and facilitation on an online learning community development: A social network analysis study. Internet High. Educ., 35, 34–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.07.002.

Purwanti, N. K. R., Suwastini, N. K. A., Adnyani, N. L. P. S., & Kultsum, U. (2022). Youtube videos for improving speaking skills: The benefits and challenges according to recent research in EFL context. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Dan Kejuruan, 19(1), 66–75. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23887/jptk-undiksha.v19i1.41108.

Putri, I. G. A. V. W., & Nurita, W. (2021). Critical condition in Balinese lexicon extinction. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(4), 1773–1786. https://doi.org/10.52462/jlls.129.

Rahmadani, & Wahyuni, D. (2018). Types and functions of address terms used by Ipmk-Sb “Kampar students studying in Padang.” E-Journal of English Language & Literature, 7(1), 132–142. https://doi.org/10.24036/ell.v7i1.9906.

Ratminingsih, N. M., Mahadewi, L. P. P., & Divayana, D. G. H. (2018). ICT-based interactive game in TEYL: Teachers’ perception, students’ motivation, and achievement. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 13(9), 190–203. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v13i09.8170.

Rovita, A., & Gulo, I. (2022). Politeness Strategy in Refusal of The Guests of The Ellen Show. Linguistics and Literature Journal, 3(1), 48–60. https://doi.org/10.33365/llj.v3i1.283.

Suandari, N. M. M., Simpen, I. W., & Malini, N. S. (2020). Language Attitudes among Balinese Workers in Cruise Ships toward Indonesian Language. American Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Research (AJHSSR), 4(8), 362–365. https://www.ajhssr.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/ZQ2048362365.pdf.

Sudarmawan, I. P. Y., Juliari, I. I. T., & Yuniari, N. M. (2022). An Analysis Of Speech Act And Politeness Strategy Used By English Lecturer of Dwijendra University in Online Classroom Interaction. Yavana Bhasha: Journal of English Language Education, 5(2), 176–185. https://doi.org/10.25078/yb.v5i2.1039.

Togatorop, F. (2019). Politeness Strategies Used in the Conversation between the Students of Finance and Banking Department in Murni Sadar Polytehnic Pematangsiantar. Journal of English Teaching as a Foreign Language, 5(1), 37–48. http://ejournal.uhn.ac.id/index.php/jetafl/article/view/115.

Downloads

Published

2023-07-27

How to Cite

Widanta, I. M. R. J. ., Handayani, L. N. C. ., & Ardika, I. W. D. . (2023). Invitation Strategy and Learners’ Controlled Politeness: A Case in Indonesian Students of EFL. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Review, 6(2), 266–280. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijerr.v6i2.65622

Issue

Section

Articles