The Impact of Students’ Learning Interest on Students’ Process Skill in Mathematics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v5i4.37183Keywords:
Education, Interest, Process SkillsAbstract
The success of education in a country automatically also shows the progress of a country. In essence, education itself is a conscious effort to develop personality and within oneself. School is a place where education is held for the purpose of national education. However, not all schools can achieve the expected goals. Like a school that has priority on certain subjects. One of them is Madrasah Tsanawiyah which dominates subjects with religion. So the importance of this study aims to determine the differences and the relationship between the interests and skills of students in learning mathematics with flat side space material. This study uses quantitative methods with associative and comparative types. The sampling technique used in this study used simple random sampling. From the results of the T test and the correlation obtained, it was found that there were differences in the process skills and interests of students with regard to the material build flat side space. This is evidenced by the value of sig (2-tailed) 0.000 < 0.05. So can be concluded that student interest affects the process skills of students at MTsN (Madrasah Tsanawiyah) and there is a significant relationship between students' interest and process skills in mathematics with flat-sided geometry. There are limitations in this study where this study only measures students' skills, interests have not been tested with other variables such as attitudes, motivation and others.
References
Alhassan, A., & Chen, D. (2019). Investigating business EFL postgraduate student writing in a UK university: a qualitative study Investigating business EFL postgraduate student writing in a UK university: a qualitative study. Cogent Education, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1699741.
Astrini, F., N.M, R., & G.A. L.P, U. I. (2020). The Model of Strategies Employed by English Teachers in Teaching Writing Skill in National Plus Schools. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 4(1), 59. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v4i1.23682.
Astuti, S., Subagia, I. W., & Sudiana, I. K. (2018). Student’ satisfaction toward chemistry learning process at SMA laboratorium undiksha. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia (Denpasar), 6(2), 233–241. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v6i2.11880.
Banks, H. T., Flores, K. B., Langlois, C. R., Serio, T. R., & Sindi, S. S. (2018). Estimating the rate of prion aggregate amplification in yeast with a generation and structured population model. Inverse Problems in Science and Engineering, 26(2), 257–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/17415977.2017.1316498.
Bruyckere, P. De, Kirschner, P. A., Bruyckere, P. De, & Kirschner, P. A. (2017). Measuring teacher authenticity : Criteria students use in their perception of teacher authenticity. Cogent Education, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2017.1354573.
Cahya, W. D., & Artini, L. P. (2020). The Implementation of Independent Reading Literacy Activities in Secondary Education. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 4(1), 63. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v4i1.23515.
Cai, S., Liu, E., Shen, Y., Liu, C., Li, S., & Shen, Y. (2020). Probability learning in mathematics using augmented reality: impact on student’s learning gains and attitudes. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(5), 560–573. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1696839.
Campbell, C., Pollock, K., Briscoe, P., & Carr-harris, S. (2017). Developing a knowledge network for applied education research to mobilise evidence in and for educational practice. Educational Research, 59(2), 209–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2017.1310364.
Dishon, G. (2021). The new natural? Authenticity and the naturalization of educational technologies. Learning, Media and Technology, 46(2), 156–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1845727.
Dou, R., Brewe, E., Potvin, G., Zwolak, J. P., & Hazari, Z. (2018). Understanding the development of interest and self-efficacy in active-learning undergraduate physics courses. International Journal of Science Education, 40(13), 1587–1605. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1488088.
Dwi Rahmani, B., & Alyani, F. (2020). Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) on Teacher Competencies Test of Indonesian EFL Senior High School Teachers. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 4(2), 103. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v4i2.17515.
Elvanisi, A., Hidayat, S., & Fadillah, E. N. (2018). Analisis keterampilan proses sains siswa sekolah menengah atas Skills analysis of science process of high school students. 4(20), 245–252. https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jipi/article/view/21426.
Fromowitz, D. B. (2017). Batch and history sampling for fixed-source monte carlo problems. Nuclear Science and Engineering, 187(2), 142–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2017.1312944.
Giglio, S., Bertacchini, F., Bilotta, E., & Pantano, P. (2020). Machine learning and points of interest: typical tourist Italian cities. Current Issues in Tourism, 23(13), 1646–1658. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2019.1637827.
Grobler, R., & Grobler, R. (2018). Students ’ Perceptions of Code-Switching in Natural Sciences Classrooms : A South African Perspective Students ’ Perceptions of Code- switching in Natural Sciences Classrooms : A South African Perspective. 6627. https://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2016.1224593.
Habig, S., Blankenburg, J., van Vorst, H., Fechner, S., Parchmann, I., & Sumfleth, E. (2018). Context characteristics and their effects on students’ situational interest in chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 40(10), 1154–1175. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1470349.
Hamdani, H., Mursyid, S., Sirait, J., & Etkina, E. (2017). Analisis Hubungan antara Sikap Penyelesaian Soal dan Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa Calon Guru Fisika. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 3(2), 151–156. https://doi.org/10.21009/1.03205.
Hendrickson, P. (2021). Effect of Active Learning Techniques on Student Excitement, Interest, and Self-Efficacy. Journal of Political Science Education, 17(2), 311–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/15512169.2019.1629946.
Høgheim, S., & Reber, R. (2019). Interesting, but Less Interested: Gender Differences and Similarities in Mathematics Interest. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 63(2), 285–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2017.1336482.
Jack, B. M., & Lin, H. shyang. (2017). Making learning interesting and its application to the science classroom. Studies in Science Education, 53(2), 137–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2017.1305543.
Jalaludin, M. A., Yunita, W., Indahsari, I. N., & Purwasih, R. (2019). Analysis of Mathematical Connection and Students’ Self Confidence in Flat-Side Space Material. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 2(3), 114. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v2i3.13007.
Joffe, M. (2017). Causal theories , models and evidence in economics — some reflections from the natural sciences. Cogent Economics & Finance, IV(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2017.1280983.
Kurniawan, D A, Hoyi, R., & Sukarni, W. (2021). Description of Student Response on The Implementation of Cooperative Learning Models of Jigsaw and Role Playing on The Physics Learning. 17(June), 77–85. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi.v17i1.24315.
Kurniawan, Dwi Agus, & Kartina, L. (2021). Critical Thinking Analysis of 13-14 Years Old Students on Lens Refraction Material. 10(1), 149–157. https://doi.org/10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v10i1.7119.
Kwarikunda, D., Schiefele, U., Ssenyonga, J., & Muwonge, C. M. (2020). The Relationship between Motivation for, and Interest in, Learning Physics among Lower Secondary School Students in Uganda. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 24(3), 435–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2020.1841961.
Labouta, H. I., Kenny, N. A., Li, R., Anikovskiy, M., Reid, L., & Cramb, D. T. (2018). Learning science by doing science: an authentic science process-learning model in postsecondary education. International Journal of Science Education, 40(12), 1476–1492. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1484966.
Lee, E. G., Jang, G. W., Lee, K. H., & Kweon, D. C. (2020). Guidelines for radiation protection in dental radiographic examinations: a questionnaire-based summary. Radiation Effects and Defects in Solids. https://doi.org/10.1080/10420150.2020.1849215.
Luo, Z., Jingying, C., Guangshuai, W., & Mengyi, L. (2020). A three-dimensional model of student interest during learning using multimodal fusion with natural sensing technology. Interactive Learning Environments, 0(0), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1710852.
Mahayani, N. P. L., Astawa, I. W., & Suharta, I. G. P. (2021). Self-regulated Learning Model Affects Students’ Mathematical Conceptual Understanding and Self-confidence in terms of Cognitive Styles. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 5(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v5i1.30517.
Manini, N., Mistura, G., Paolicelli, G., Tosatti, E., & Vanossi, A. (2017). Current trends in the physics of nanoscale friction. Advances in Physics: X, 2(3), 569–590. https://doi.org/10.1080/23746149.2017.1330123.
Mutlu, A. (2020). Evaluation of students’ scientific process skills through reflective worksheets in the inquiry-based learning environments. Reflective Practice, 21(2), 271–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2020.1736999.
Nielsen, J. W., Nigg, D. W., & Norman, D. R. (2018). Extension of the advanced test reactor operating envelope via enhanced reactor physics validation techniques. Nuclear Technology, 201(3), 228–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2017.1356647.
Novajri, K., Maksum, H., Indrawan, E., & Irfan, D. (2021). Contribution of the Facilities Completeness and Learning Interests on Student Practical Capabilities in Broad-Based Network Technology Subject. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 5(1), 161. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v5i1.30333.
Nurzaelani, M. M., Kasman, R., & Achyanadia, S. (2018). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Integrasi Nasional Berbasis Mobile. JTP - Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 20(3), 264–279. https://doi.org/10.21009/jtp.v20i3.8685.
Pamungkas, A., Subali, B., & Lunuwih, S. (2017). Implementasi Model Pembelajaran IPA Berbasis Kearifan Lokal untuk Meningkatkan Kreativitas dan Hasil Belajar Siswa Implementation of Science Learning Model Based on Local Wisdom to Improve Creativity and Student Learning Outcomes. 3(2), 118–127.
Pratiwi, N., & Mustadi, A. (2021). Hots-Based Learning in 2013 Curriculum: Is it Suitable? JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 10(1), 128. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v10i1.22781.
Puspita, L. (2019). Pengembangan modul berbasis keterampilan proses sains sebagai bahan ajar dalam pembelajaran biologi Module development based on science process skills as teaching materials in biological learning. 5(1), 79–87.
Raffaghelli, J., Ghislandi, P., Sancassani, S., Canal, L., Micciolo, R., Balossi, B., Bozzi, M., Sieno, L. Di, Gondoni, P., Pini, A., Zani, M., Raffaghelli, J., Ghislandi, P., Sancassani, S., Canal, L., Micciolo, R., Balossi, B., Bozzi, M., Sieno, L. Di, & Genco, I. (2018). Integrating MOOCs in physics preliminary undergraduate education : beyond large size lectures. Educational Media International, 55(4), 301–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2018.1547544.
Ramadhani, H. S. (2017). Efektivitas Metode Pembelajaran Scl (Student Centered Learning) Dan Tcl (Teacher Centered Learning) Pada Motivasi Instrinsik & Ekstrinsik Mahasiswa Psikologi Untag Surabaya Angkatan Tahun 2014. Persona: Jurnal Psikologi Indonesia, 6(2), 66–74. http://jurnal.untag-sby.ac.id/index.php/persona/article/view/1302.
Rati, N. W., Kusmaryatni, N., & Rediani, N. (2017). Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek, Kreativitas dan Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa. JPI : Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 6(1), 60–71. https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JPI/article/view/9059.
Rienties, B., Lewis, T., Mcfarlane, R., Nguyen, Q., Toetenel, L., Rienties, B., Lewis, T., Mcfarlane, R., Nguyen, Q., & Toetenel, L. (2017). Analytics in online and offline language learning environments : the role of learning design to understand student online engagement. 8221(November). https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1401548.
Rochanawati, I., & Efi, A. (2020). The Relationship of Learning Entrepreneurship, Enterprise Motivation, And the Family Environment with Enterprise Interest in Students. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 4(4), 314. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v4i4.29739.
Rusmono, & Alghazali, M. I. (2019). Pengaruh Media Cerita Bergambar Dan Literasi Membaca Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Sekolah Dasar. JTP - Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 21(3), 269–282. https://doi.org/10.21009/jtp.v21i3.13386.
Shi, R., Li, S. J., Yu, L., Qian, H. J., & Lu, Z. Y. (2020). Physical insights into stress–strain process of polymers under tensile deformation via machine learning. Soft Materials, 18(2–3), 323–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/1539445X.2020.1741387.
Shin, M., & Bolkan, S. (2021). Intellectually stimulating students’ intrinsic motivation: the mediating influence of student engagement, self-efficacy, and student academic support. Communication Education, 70(2), 146–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2020.1828959.
Sökmen, Y. (2021). The role of self-efficacy in the relationship between the learning environment and student engagement. Educational Studies, 47(1), 19–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2019.1665986.
Stylinski, C. D., Peterman, K., Phillips, T., Linhart, J., & Becker-Klein, R. (2020). Assessing science inquiry skills of citizen science volunteers: a snapshot of the field. International Journal of Science Education, Part B: Communication and Public Engagement, 10(1), 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2020.1719288.
Sukmasari, V. P., & Rosana, D. (2017). Pengembangan penilaian proyek pembelajaran IPA berbasis discovery learning untuk mengukur keterampilan pemecahan masalah. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 3(1), 101-110. https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jipi/article/view/10468.
Sulistio, W., & Qohar, A. (2020). Development of Instructional Media “Game Math Comic Story” Based Android on Number. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 4(2), 109. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v4i2.22370.
Sumyadi, Y., Umasih, U., & Syukur, A. (2020). The Effect of Teacher Teaching Skills and Student Interest on History Learning Outcomes. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 4(3), 315–320. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v4i3.28349.
Swirski, H., Baram-Tsabari, A., & Yarden, A. (2018). Does interest have an expiration date? An analysis of students’ questions as resources for context-based learning. International Journal of Science Education, 40(10), 1136–1153. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1470348.
Tegeh, I. M., Parwata, I. G. L. A., & Ostaviani, B. G. (2020). The Observing Learning Activity Assisted by Concrete Media Improves Student’s Conceptual Knowledge. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 9(2), 182. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v9i2.25206.
Van Mieghem, A., Struyf, E., & Verschueren, K. (2020). The relevance of sources of support for teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs towards students with special educational needs. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 00(00), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2020.1829866.
Vansteensel, M. J., Kristo, G., Aarnoutse, E. J., & Ramsey, N. F. (2017). The brain-computer interface researcher’s questionnaire: from research to application. Brain-Computer Interfaces, 4(4), 236–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/2326263X.2017.1366237.
Wahyudi, W., & Lestari, I. (2019). Pengaruh Modul Praktikum Optika Berbasis Inkuiri Terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains dan Sikap Ilmiah Mahasiswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Keilmuan (JPFK), 5(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.25273/jpfk.v5i1.3317.
Widiawati, P. S., & Agustini, D. A. E. (2020). The Effect of Debate Technique towards Eleventh Grade Students’ Speaking Competency. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 4(3), 267. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v4i3.26989.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with the Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (JERE) agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)
