Is There a Difference in the Self Efficacy of Students with Academic and Non-Academic Achievements (Sports Field)?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/bisma.v6i3.53297Keywords:
Self-Efficacy, academic achievement, sport achievementAbstract
This research was conducted to analyze the differences in the level of self-efficacy of students with academic achievements and non-academic achievements majoring in MIPA and Social Sciences. The research method used is quantitative research using survey methods. The research subjects were taken by purposive sampling technique with a sample size using the Yamane formula of 50 students with academic achievements and 38 students with non-academic achievements. The instrument used in data collection is using a self-efficacy scale. Data analysis used comparative analysis with the Independent Sample T Test. The results of the study show that: 1) The self-efficacy of students with academic achievements is in the moderate category, 2) The self-efficacy of students with non-academic achievements is in the moderate category, and 3) The results of the Independent Sample T Test, the research hypothesis is rejected. So it can be concluded that there is no difference in the self-efficacy of students who achieve academically and non-academic achievers.
References
Alim, A. (2019). Hubungan Motivasi, Attitude, Anxiety Dan Self Efficacy Terhadap Prestasi Atlet Tenis Lapangan Level Junior Dan Senior. Medikora, 17(2), 83–90. https://doi.org/10.21831/medikora.v17i2.29179
Arikunto, S. (2002). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek Edisi Revisi V. Rineka Cipta.
Azwar, S. (2012). Penyusunan Skala Psikologi. Pustaka Pelajar.
Bandura, A. (1995). Self-efficacy in Changing Societies. Cambridge University Press.
Chairiyati, L. R. (2013). Hubungan Antara Self- Efficacy Akademik dan Konsep Diri Akademik dengan Prestasi Akademik. Humaniora, 4(2), 1125–1133.
Durović, D., Popov, S., Soki, J., Gruji, S., & Veljković, A. A. (2021). Rethinking the Role of Anxiety and Self-Efficacy in Collective Sports Achievements. Primenjena Psihologija, 14(1), 103–115. https://doi.org/10.19090/pp.2021.1.103-115
Ghufron, M. N., & S, R. R. (2014). Teori- Teori Psikologi. Ar-Ruzz Media.
Harapan, D. (2011). Analisis Hubungan Antara Efikasi-Diri Siswa dengan Hasil Belajar Kimianya. Jurusan Pendidikan Kimia UMTS, 42–53.
Hardianto, G., Erlamsyah, E., & Nurfahanah, N. (2016). Hubungan antara Self-Efficacy Akademik dengan Hasil Belajar Siswa. Konselor, 3(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.24036/02014312978-0-00
Heazlewood, I., & Burke, S. (2011). Self-efficacy and Its Relationship to Selected Sport Psychological Constructs in the Prediction of Performance in Ironman Triathlon. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise, 6(2), 328–350. https://doi.org/10.4100/jhse.2011.62.14
Indirwan, Suarni, W., & Priyatmo, D. (2021). Pentingnya Self-Efficacy terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika. Jurnal Sublimapsi, 2(1), 61–70. https://doi.org/10.36709/sublimapsi.v2i1.13055
Kurniawan, A. W., & Puspitaningtyas, Z. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Pandiva Buku.
Marjono. (2018). Rahasia Sembilan Kiat Sukses Siswa Berprestasi (S. Lestari (ed.)). LPPM Institut Agama Islam Ibrahimy Genteng Banyuwangi. https://play.google.com/books/reader?id=JZKnDwAAQBAJ&pg=GBS.PP4&hl=id
Mukti, B., & Tentama, F. (2019). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi efikasi diri akademik. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Magister Psikologi Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, 0(0), 341–347. http://seminar.uad.ac.id/index.php/snmpuad/article/view/3442
Nauvalia, C. (2021). Faktor eksternal yang mempengaruhi academic self-efficacy: Sebuah tinjauan literatur. Cognicia, 9(1), 36–39. https://doi.org/10.22219/cognicia.v9i1.14138
Olivier, E., Archambault, I., De Clercq, M., & Galand, B. (2019). Student Self-Efficacy, Classroom Engagement, and Academic Achievement: Comparing Three Theoretical Frameworks. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 48(2), 326–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-018-0952-0
Rosyid, M. Z., Mustajab, & Abdullah, A. R. (2014). Prestasi Belajar (H. Sa’diyah (ed.)). Literasi Nusantara.
Setiawan, M. A. (2018). Model Konseling Kelompok Teknik Problem Solving Teori dan Praktik untuk Meningkatkan Self Efficacy Akademik. Deepublish.
Setiawati, L., & Sudira, P. (2015). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Prestasi Belajar Praktik Kejuruan Siswa Smk Program Studi Keahlian Teknik Komputer Dan Informatika. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 5(3), 325. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v5i3.6487
Supardi. (2017). Statistik Penelitian Pendidikan Perhitungan, Penyajian, Penjelasan, Penafsiran, dan Penarikan Kesimpulan. Rajawali Press.
Susanti, L. (2019). Prestasi Belajar Akademik & Non Akademik (A. Hamzah (ed.)). Literasi Nusantara.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 M. Arli Rusandi, Lisa Khairani, Elni Yakub
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
BISMA the Journal of Counseling is an Open Access Journal. The authors who publish the manuscript in this journal agree to the following terms:
BISMA Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. This permits anyone to copy, redistribute, remix, transmit and adapt the work provided the original work and source is appropriately cited.
This means:
BISMA The Journal of Counseling is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
(1) Under the CC-BY license, authors retain ownership of the copyright for their article, but authors grant others permission to use the content of publications in BISMA Journal in whole or in part provided that the original work is properly cited. Users (redistributors) of BISMA Journal are required to cite the original source, including the author's names, BISMA Journal as the initial source of publication, year of publication, volume number, issue, and Digital Object Identifier (DOI); (2) The authors are the copyright owner of the article, and the author grants the BISMA Journal held the first publication right.
