Five-Tier Multiple-Choice Instrument for Assessing Students' Understanding of the Straight Motion
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/ijerr.v6i2.52366Keywords:
Five-Tier Multiple-Choice, Misconception, Straight MotionAbstract
The misconception in the concept of straight motion is a problem that often occurs in physics learning. An assessment instrument that specifically aims to assess conceptual understanding of the concept of straight motion is not widely available. Therefore, this research aims to develop a valid and practical five-tier multiple-choice instrument for assessing students’ understanding of the concept of straight motion. This research was development/design (DR) using the Plomp model. The model was validated by three experts. The data collection instruments were observation questionnaires, student concept tests, self-evaluation sheets, validation sheets, and practicality sheets. The results of the validity analysis showed that the instrument is in a very valid category in the aspects of presentation, content, construction/graphics, and language. Then the results of the practicality analysis show that the instrument is in the categories in terms of convenience, attractiveness, efficiency, and usefulness. Based on these results, the instrument fulfills the valid and practical category for assessing students’ understanding of the concept of straight motion and is expected to be an alternative reference to enhance the quality of physics learning and other fields of science.
References
Agustina, I., Astuti, D., Bhakti, Y. B., & Prasetya, R. (2021). Four Tier-Magnetic Diagnostic Test (4T-MDT): Instrumen Evaluasi Medan Magnet Untuk Mengidentifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa. JIPFRI (Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika Dan Riset Ilmiah), 5(2), 110–115. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30599/jipfri.v5i2.1205.
Alfiani, A. (2015). Analisis Profil Miskonsepsi dan Konsistensi Konsepsi Siswa SMA pada Topik Suhu dan Kalor. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fisika (E-Journal) SNF2015, IV, 29–32. https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.5.2.133-142.
Alwan, A. A. (2011). Misconception of heat and temperature among physics students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 12, 600–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.02.074.
Anam, R. S., Widodo, A., Sopandi, W., & Wu, H.-K. (2019). Öğrencilerin Bilimsel Kavram Yanılgılarını Belirlemek İçin Beş Katmanlı Bir Tanı Testi Geliştirilmesi: Isı Transferi Kavramlarına Bir Örnek. İlköğretim Online, 1014–1029. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2019.609690.
Apriyanti, N., Razak, R. A., Rahim, S. S. A., Shaharom, M. S. N., & Baharuldin, Z. (2020). Infographic instructional media as a solution and innovation in physics learning for senior high school students in Indonesia. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 10(10), 773–780. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2020.10.10.1457.
Capriconia, J., & Mufit, F. (2022). Analysis of Concept Understanding and Students’ Attitudes towards Learning Physics in Material of Straight Motion. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(3), 1453–1461. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i3.1381.
Dirman, H. M., Mufit, F., & Festiyed, F. (2022). Review and Comparison of Four-Tier Multiple Choice and Five-Tier Multiple Choice Diagnostic Tests to Identify Mastery of Physics Concepts. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i1.838.
Erwinsyah, H., Muhassin, M., & Asyhari, A. (2020). Pengembangan four-tier diagnostic test untuk mengetahui pemahaman konsep peserta didik pada materi gerak lurus. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Keilmuan (JPFK), 6(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.25273/jpfk.v6i1.5125.
Festiyed, Djamas, D., & Ramli, R. (2019). Learning model based on discovery learning equipped with interactive multimedia teaching materials assisted by games to improve critical thinking skills of high school students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1185(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1185/1/012054.
Fortuna, D., Chandra, E., & Gloria, R. Y. (2013). Pengembangan Tes Diagnostik Untuk Mengukur Miskonsepsi Siswa Pada Pokok Bahasan Sistem Regulasi Manusia Untuk Siswa SMA Kelas XI Semester II. Jurnal Scientiae Eduactia, 2(2), 1–16. https://repository.unja.ac.id/51471/.
Guswina, S., & Mufit, F. (2020). Desain Four-Tier Multiple Choice Test pada Materi Getaran Harmonis untuk Mengidentifikasi Pemahaman Konsep Siswa Kelas X SMA/MA. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika, 6(2), 183–192. https://doi.org/10.24036/jppf.v6i2.110873.
Jubaedah, D. S., Kaniawati, I., Suyana, I., Samsudin, A., & Suhendi, E. (2017). Pengembangan Tes Diagnostik Berformat Four-Tier untuk Mengidentifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa pada Topik Usaha dan Energi. SNF2017-RND-35-SNF2017-RND-40. https://doi.org/10.21009/03.snf2017.01.rnd.06.
Kaltakci-Gurel, D., Eryilmaz, A., & McDermott, L. C. (2017). Development and application of a four-tier test to assess pre-service physics teachers’ misconceptions about geometrical optics. Research in Science & Technological Education, 35(2), 238–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2017.1310094.
Kirbulut, Z. D., & Geban, O. (2014). Using Three-Tier Diagnostic Test To Assess Students’ Misconceptions Of States Of Matter. Eurasia Journal Of Mathematics, Science And Technology Education, 10(5), 509–521. https://doi.org/10.12973/Eurasia.2014.1128a.
Maharani, L., Rahayu, D. I., Amaliah, E., Rahayu, R., & Saregar, A. (2019). Diagnostic Test with Four-Tier in Physics Learning: Case of Misconception in Newton’s Law Material. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1155(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1155/1/012022.
Mufit, F; Asrizal, R. P. A. (2022). Cognitive Conflict-Based E-Book With Real Experiment Video Analysis Integration To Enhance Conceptual Understanding of Motion Kinematics. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 11(4), 626–639. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v11i4.39333.
Mufit, F., & Fauzan, A. (2019). Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Konflik Kognitif (PbKK) (Pertama). CV IRDH.
Mufit, F., Festiyed, Fauzan, A., & Lufri. (2023). The Effect of Cognitive Conflict-Based Learning (CCBL) Model on Remediation of Misconceptions. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 20(1), 26–49. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2023.003.
Mufit, F., & Syamsidar. (2022). Development of Four-Tier Multiple Choice Test Instrument to Identify Students ’ Concept Understanding of Newton ’ s Law Material. JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika), 7(2), 134–144. https://doi.org/10.26737/jipf.v7i2.2369.
Noriyatus, Fajriyyah, Frida, & Ermawati. (2020). The Validity and Reliability Of Five-Tier Conception Diagnostic Test For Kinetic Theory Of Gases. Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, 09(02), 117–125. https://doi.org/10.26740/ipf.v9n3.p459-465
Nurulwati, N., & Rahmadani, A. (2020). Perbandingan Hasil Diagnostik Miskonsepsi Menggunakan Threetier Dan Fourtier Diagnostic Test Pada Materi Gerak Lurus. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 7(2), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v7i2.14436.
Plomp, T., & Nieveen, N. (2013). Educational Design Research. Part B: Illustrative cases.
Raehan, R., Arizona, K., & Bahtiar, B. (2020). Penerapan Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Untuk Meningkatkan Penguasaan Konsep Dan Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif. Journal of Teaching and Learning Physics, 5(1), 35–40. https://doi.org/10.15575/jotalp.v5i1.5755.
Rahmah, C. M., Nasir, M., & Bahri, S. (2020). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Menggunakan Certainty Of Response Index (CRI) pada Materi Kinematika Gerak Lurus di MAN 4 Aceh Besar. Jurnal Phi; Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Terapan, 2018(2), 5–10. https://doi.org/10.22373/p-jpft.v2018i2.7457.
Retnawati, H. (2016). Analisis Kuantitatif Instrumen Penelitian. In Parama Publishing.
Rohmah, Z., & Handhika, J. (2018). Two-Tier Test Diagnostik sebagai identifikasi miskonsepsi tahap awal materi kinematika gerak lurus siswa Kelas X MIA MAN 1 Kota Madiun. In Quantum: Seminar Nasional Fisika, Dan Pendidikan Fisika, 25, 552–556. http://prosiding.unipma.ac.id/index.php/SNPF/article/view/730.
Rusilowati, A. (2015). Pengembangan Tes Diagnostik sebagai Alat Evaluasi Kesulitan Belajar Fisika. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fisika Dan Pendidikan Fisika (SNFPF), 6(1). https://jurnal.fkip.uns.ac.id/index.php/prosfis1/article/view/7684.
Saepuzaman, D., Utari, S., & Nugraha, M. G. (2019). Development of basic physics experiment based on science process skills (SPS) to improve conceptual understanding of the preservice physics teachers on Boyle’s law. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1280(5). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1280/5/052076.
Sholihat, F. N., Samsudin, A., & Nugraha, M. G. (2017). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi dan Penyebab Miskonsepsi Siswa Menggunakan Four-Tier Diagnostic Test Pada Sub-Materi Fluida Dinamik: Azas Kontinuitas. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 3(2), 175–180. https://doi.org/10.21009/1.03208.
Suparman. (2016). Meningkatkan Prestasi Belajar Pengetahuan Sosial Melalui Gabungan Metode Ceramah dengan Metode Belajar Aktif Model Pengajaran Autentik pada Siswa Sekolah Dasar pada Siswa Kelas IV SDN Beji IV Kec. Beji Kabupaten Pasuruan Tahun Pelajaran 2013/2014. Jurnal Ilmiah Edukasi & Sosial, 7(1), 98–104. https://doi.org/10.31004/jptam.v3i3.319.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 hidayatullah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Review (IJERR) agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)
