Instrumen Alat Ukur Pengetahuan Konseptual Siswa Kelas IV Sekolah Dasar

Authors

  • Ari Anggreni Putri Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
  • I Wayan Widiana
  • Kadek Suranata Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23887/jlls.v4i3.39098

Keywords:

student ability, assessment instrument, conceptual

Abstract

Masih banyak guru yang kesulitan dalam membuat instrument penilaian yang baik. Selain itu, soal-soal yang digunakan guru hanya untuk mengukur hasil belajar dan menilai pemahaman siswa saja daripada pada penguasaan pengetahuan konseptual. Tujuan penelitian ini yaitu untuk mengembangkan instrumen penilaian konseptual pada siswa sekolah dasar. Jenis penelitian ini yaitu R&D (Research and Development). Model yang digunakan untuk mengembangkan instrumen adalah model pengembangan Borg and Gall. Subjek penelitian ini yaitu ahli instrumen penilaian yang berjumlah 5 orang. Subjek uji coba yaitu siswa kelas IV SD yang berjumlah 95 siswa. Metode untuk mengumpulkan data pada penelitian ini yaitu observasi, wawancara, dan kuesioner. Observasi serta wawancara digunakan untuk mengetahui permasalahan yang ada. Instrumen yang digunakan untuk mengumpulkan data yaitu kuesioner. Teknik yang digunakan untuk menganalisis data yaitu analisis deskriptif kualitatif dan kuantitatif. Hasil penelitian yaitu Berdasarkan hasil uji validitas isi nilai yang didapatkan yaitu CVR 1,00 sehingga masuk kedalam katagori valid. Pengembangan instrumen ini menunjukkan tingkat instrumen  yang baik dilihat dari hasil validitas dan reliabilitas yang tinggi sebesar 0,80. Dapat disimpulkan bahwa instrument penilaian kemampuan konseptual pada siswa layak digunakan oleh guru. Implikasi penelitian ini yaitu Instrument pengetahuan konseptual dapat memberikan pemahaman yang lebih kepada siswa terhadap pengetahuan konseptual.

Author Biographies

Ari Anggreni Putri, Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar

I Wayan Widiana

PGSD

Kadek Suranata, Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

Bimbingan Konseling

References

Adjii, K. (2019). Instrumen penilaian kedisiplinan siswa sekolah menengah kejuruan. Assessment and Research on Education, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.33292/arisen.v1i1.19.

Ardhaoui, K., Lemos, M. S., & Silva, S. (2021). Effects of new teaching approaches on motivation and achievement in higher education applied chemistry courses: A case study in Tunisia. Education for Chemical Engineers, 36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2021.05.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2021.05.004

Arif, M. (2016). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Mapel Sains melalui Pendekatan Keterampilan Proses Sains SD/MI. Ta’allum: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.21274/taalum.2016.4.1.123-148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21274/taalum.2016.4.01.123-148

Asyhari, A. (2019). Pengembangan Instrumen Asesmen Literasi Sains Berbasis Nilai-Nilai Islam Dan Budaya Indonesia Dengan Pendekatan Kontekstual. Lentera Pendidikan : Jurnal Ilmu Tarbiyah Dan Keguruan, 22(1). http://journal.uin-alauddin.ac.id/index.php/lentera_pendidikan/article/view/6437.

Baidhowi. (2018). Instrumen Penilaian Sikap Sosial (Studi Penilaian Sikap Sosial pada mata pelajaran Fikih di Jurusan Tehnik dan Bisnis Sepeda Motor SMK Muhammadiyah 1 Patuk) Muhammad Rizal. Jurnal Edudeena, 2(1). https://jurnal.iainkediri.ac.id/index.php/edudeena/article/view/518. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30762/ed.v2i1.518

Candra, I., Sulistya, N., & Prasetyo, T. (2018). Pengembangan Instrumen Sikap Sosial Tematik Siswa SD Kelas IV. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 2(4), 455. https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v2i4.16167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v2i4.16167

Chan, S. W., & Ismail, Z. (2014). Developing Statistical Reasoning Assessment Instrument for High School Students in Descriptive Statistics. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.943. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.943

Chen, B., Wang, Y., Xiao, L., Xu, C., Shen, Y., & Qin, Q. (2021). Effects of mobile learning for nursing students in clinical education: A meta-analysis. Nurse Education, 97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104706. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104706

Cloonan, M. R., Cloonan, D. J., Schlitzkus, L. L., & Fingeret, A. L. (2020). Learners with Experience in Surgical Scrub Benefit from Additional Education with an Interactive E-Learning Module. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.08.521. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.08.521

Diah, & Riyanto. (2016). Problem-Based Learning Model In Biology Education Courses To Develop Inquiry Teaching Competency Of Preservice Teachers. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 35(1), 47–57. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v1i1.8364. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v1i1.8364

Edriati, S., Anggraini, V., & Siska, M. (2015). Efektivitas Model Jigsaw Disertai Penilaian Diskusi Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Matematis Mahasiswa. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v2i2.4833. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v2i2.4833

Fitri, Saparahayuningsih, & Agustriana. (2017). Perencanaan Pembelajaran Kurikulum 2013 Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini. Jurnal Ilmiah Potensia, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.33369/jip.2.1.1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33369/jip.2.1

Gaol, P. L., Khumaedi, M., & Masrukan, M. (2017). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Karakter Percaya Diri pada Mata Pelajaran Matematika Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation, 6(1). https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jere/article/view/16209.

Hidayat, W., & Andriani, A. (2020). Pelaksanaan Penilaian Autentik Guru Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini. Cakrawala Dini: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.17509/cd.v11i2.24922. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/cd.v11i2.24922

Hulukati, W., & Rahmi, M. (2020). Instrumen Evaluasi Karakter Mahasiswa Program Pendidikan Guru Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini. Jurnal Obsesi : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v4i2.468. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v4i2.468

Ilhami, R. S., & Rimantho, D. (2017). Penilaian Kinerja Karyawan dengan Metode AHP dan Rating Scale. Jurnal Optimasi Sistem Industri, 16(2), 150–157. https://doi.org/10.25077/josi.v16.n2.p150-157.2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25077/josi.v16.n2.p150-157.2017

Kaplan, D. E. (2018). Piagetian Theory in Online Teacher Education. Scientific Research Publishing, 9(6). https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2018.96061. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2018.96061

Kasiyan, & Sulistyo. (2020). Pengintegrasian Pendidikan Karakter Berbasis Budaya Lokal Dalam Pembelajaran Kriya Kayu Pada Siswa Tunagrahita. Jurnal Pendidikan Karakter, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.21831/jpk.v10i2.35032. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jpk.v10i2.35032

Kert, S. B., Erkoç, M. F., & Yeni, S. (2020). The effect of robotics on six graders’ academic achievement, computational thinking skills and conceptual knowledge levels. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100714. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100714

Khaerunnnisa, E., & Pamungkas, A. S. (2019). Pengembangan Instrumen Kecakapan Matematis Dalam Konteks Kearifan Lokal Budaya Banten Pada Materi Bangun Ruang Sisi Datar. Kreano Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v9i1.11210.

Liu, C., He, J., Ding, C., Fan, X., Hwang, G.-J., & Zhang, Y. (2021). Self-oriented learning perfectionism and English learning burnout among EFL learners using mobile applications: The mediating roles of English learning anxiety and grit. Learning and Individual Differences, 88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2021.102011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2021.102011

Lukum, A. (2015). Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran Ipa Smp Menggunakan Model Countenance Stake. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 19(1), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v19i1.4552. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v19i1.4552

Miller, A. (2020). Development through vocational education. The lived experiences of young people at a vocational education, training restaurant in Siem Reap, Cambodia. Heliyon, 6(12). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05765. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05765

Miranda, J., Navarrete, C., Noguez, J., Molina-Espinosa, J.-M., Ramírez-Montoya, M.-S., Navarro-Tuch, S. A., Close, & Bustamante-Bello, M.-R. (2021). The core components of education 4.0 in higher education: Three case studies in engineering education. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2021.107278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2021.107278

Monica, Gorghiu, Bîzoi, & Marra. (2011). a Modern Instrument Used in Teachers ’ Training Process. Procedia Computer Science, 3(1), 563–567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2010.12.09. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2010.12.093

Mutambara, D., & Bayaga, A. (2021). Determinants of mobile learning acceptance for STEM education in rural areas. Computers & Education, 160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104010

Novitasari, L., & Wardani, N. S. (2020). Pengembangan Instrumen Sikap Toleransi Dalam Pembelajaran Tematik Kelas 5 SD. Jurnal Penelitian Tindakan Kelas Dan Pengembangan Pembelajaran, 3(1). http://jurnal.um-tapsel.ac.id/index.php/ptk/article/view/1542. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v3i1.122

Pan, G., Shankararaman, V., Koh, K., & Gan, S. (2021). Students’ evaluation of teaching in the project-based learning programme: An instrument and a development process. The International Journal of Management Education, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100501. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100501

Phelps, A., Colburn, J., Hodges, M., & Hodges, M. (2021). A qualitative exploration of technology use among preservice physical education teachers in a secondary methods course. Teaching and Teacher Education, 105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103400. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103400

Pratiwi, P. H. (2017). Pengembangan Modul Mata Kuliah Penilaian Pembelajaran Sosiologi Berorientasi HOTS. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 36(2). https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v36i2.13123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v36i2.13123

Sailer, M., Stadler, M., Schultz-Pernice, F., Franke, U., & Schöffmann, C. (2021). Technology-related teaching skills and attitudes: Validation of a scenario-based self-assessment instrument for teachers. Computers in Human Behavior, 115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106625. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106625

Sari, K. M., & Setiawan, H. (2020). Kompetensi Pedagogik Guru dalam Melaksanakan Penilaian Pembelajaran Anak Usia Dini. Jurnal Obsesi : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v4i2.478. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v4i2.478

Segers, M., Martens, R., & Bossche, P. Van den. (2018). Understanding how a case-based assessment instrument influences student teachers’ learning approaches. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.02.022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.02.022

Serbin, K. S., Robayo, B. J. S., Truman, J. V., Watson, K. L., & Wawro, M. (2020). Characterizing quantum physics students’ conceptual and procedural knowledge of the characteristic equation. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2020.100777.

Serbin, K. S., Sánchez, B. J., Truman, J. V., & Watson, K. L. (2020). Characterizing quantum physics students’ conceptual and procedural knowledge of the characteristic equation. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2020.100777. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2020.100777

Solihah, A. N., Jubaedah, Y., & Rifa’i, M. S. S. (2020). Pengembangan Instrumen Pengukuran Perkembangan Sosial-Emosional Anak Berbasis Home-Based Childcare. Widyadari, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3517997.

Syafi’i, I. (2021). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Pada Perkembangan Fisik Motorik Anak Usia Dini Melalui Kegiatan Tari Kelompok B Di Tk Hasyim Asyari Surabaya. Islamic Edukids, 3(1). https://journal.uinmataram.ac.id/index.php/IEK/article/view/3444.

Taufik, A. (2019). Perspektif Tentang Perkembangan Sistem Pembelajaran Jarak Jauh Di Kabupaten Kutai Kartanegara Kalimantan Timur. Jurnal Pendidikan&Konseptual, 3(2), 88–98. http://doi.org/10.28926/riset_konseptual.v2i4.111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28926/riset_konseptual.v3i2.111

Tegeh, I. M., & Kirna, I. M. (2013). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Metode Penelitian Pendidikan dengan ADDIE Model. Jurnal Pendidikan, 11(1), 16.

Wang, Y., Muthu, B., & Sivaparthipan, C. B. (2021). Internet of things driven physical activity recognition system for physical education. Microprocessors and Microsystems, 81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpro.2020.103723. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpro.2020.103723

Wardani, I. G. A. K. (2012). Mengembangkan Profesionalisme Pendidik Guru (Kajian Konseptual Dan Operasional). Jurnal Pendidikan, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.33830/jp.v13i1.357.2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33830/jp.v13i1.357.2012

Wicaksono, T. P., Muhardjito, & Harsiati, T. (2016). Pengembangan penilaian sikap dengan teknik observasi , self assessment , dan peer assessment pada pembelajaran tematik kelas V SDN Arjowinangun 02 Malang. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 1(1), 45–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jp.v1i2.5214.

Yusup, F. (2018). Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas Instrumen Penelitian Kuantitatif. Jurnal Tarbiyah : Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 7(1), 17–23. https://doi.org/10.18592/tarbiyah.v7i1.2100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18592/tarbiyah.v7i1.2100

Zhao, Y., Llorente, A. M. P., & Gómez, M. C. S. (2021). Digital competence in higher education research: A systematic literature reviewNo Title. Computers & Education, 168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104212

Downloads

Published

2021-10-08

How to Cite

Putri, A. A., Widiana, I. W., & Suranata, K. (2021). Instrumen Alat Ukur Pengetahuan Konseptual Siswa Kelas IV Sekolah Dasar. Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 4(3), 281–288. https://doi.org/10.23887/jlls.v4i3.39098

Issue

Section

Articles