THE EFFECTIVENESS OF INQUIRY BASED LEARNING FOR NATURAL SCIENCE LEARNING IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v1i1.10077Abstrak
This paper primarily emphasized on describing the use of inquiry in natural science learning at primary school. This study also exposed the validity of inquiry strategy in natural science learning to improve primary schools students’ comprehension. Further, this present study employed a library research sourced from reputable journal articles in relation to the issue. Assisted inquiry strategy with 5E model became the one investigated. The model covered five phases namely, engaging, exploring, explaining, elaborating, and evaluating. Empirically, the inquiry strategy in natural science learning had proven improving the quality of learning and the learning achievement, particularly in conceptual learningReferensi
Anderson, L.W. & Krathwohl, D.R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing. Abridged Edition. New York: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Ardhana, W. (2000). Reformasi Pembelajaran Menghadapi Abad Pengetahuan. Makalah. Disajikan dalam Seminar dan Diskusi Panel Nasional Teknologi Pembelajaran V. Prodi TEP Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Malang dan IPTPI Cabang Malang, tanggal 7 Oktober 2000.
Arends, R.I. (2011). Learning to Teach 9th. New York: McGraw Hill Companies
Ates, S. (2005). The effects of Learning Cycle on College Student’ Understandings of Different Aspect in Resistive DC Circuit. Elektronic Journal of Science Education, [online], 9(4) (http://wolfweb.unr.edu/homepage/crowther/ ejse/ates.pdf, diakses 21 Desember 2014
Buaraphan, K. (2011). Pre-service Physics Teachers’ Conceptions of Nature of Science. China Education Review, 8 (2), 137-148
Calik, M., Ayas, A. & Coll, R.K. (2007). Enhancing Pre-Service Elementary Teachers’ Conceptual Understanding of Solution Chemistry With Conceptual Change Text. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(2007), 1-28
Capps, D.K. & Crawford, B.A. (2013). Inquiry-based instruction and teaching about nature of science: are they happening? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(3), 497-526
Choi I., Lee, S.J., & Jung, J.W. (2008) Designing Multimedia Case-Based Instruction Accomodating student’s Diverse Learning Style. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 17 (1), 5-25
Cook, K. & Gayle B. (2014). Pre-service elementary teachers’ experience in a community of practice through a place-based inquiry. International Journal of Environmental & Science, 9 (1), 111-132
Dochy, F.J.R.C. (1996). Prior Knoledge and Learning. Dalam E.D. Corte & F. Weinert (Eds): International Encyclopedia of Development and Instructional Psycology. New York: Pergamon.
Jansen, C. & Merwe, P. (2015). Teaching Practice in the 21st Century: Emerging Trends, Challenges and Opportunities. Horizon Research Publishing. [online] melalui Error! Hyperlink reference not valid. =EJ1056080
Johnstone, A. H. (2000). Chemical education research: Where from here? University Chemistry Education, 4, 34-38
Joyce, B. & Weil, M. (2003). Models of Teaching 5th. New Delhi: Prentice HaII of India
Kim, H.R, Choi, S.Y., Lee, K.J. (2014). The effect of question-generating strategy for science inquiry instruction in elementary science class. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 33(4), 700-709
Kirna, I M. (2012). Conceptual chemistry understandings of beginning learners in interactive multimedia-based instruction. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 18(1), 88-97
Laksana, D.N L. (2012). The profile of misconception in science subject at elementary school by students of elementary school teacher education department Ganesha Education University UPP II Denpasar in academic year 2011/2012 (Unpublished thesis), Basic Education Graduate Program, University of Ganesha Education, Indonesia.
Laksana, D.N L. (2014). The profile of conception in science subject at elementary school by teacher of elementary school in Ngada Regency. Journal of Pendidikan Citra Bakti, 1 (1), 15-26.
Llewellyn, D. 2013. Teaching high school science through inquiry and argumentation, 2nd Edition. California: Corwin a SAGE Company.
Magee, P.A. & Ryan F. (2012). Collaborating to improve inquiry-based teaching in elementary science and mathematics method courses. Science Educational International, 23 (4), 353-365.
Minner, D.D., Levy, A.J., & Century, J. (2009). Inquiry-based science instruction—what is it and does it matter? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1-24
Niaz, M. (2005). How to facilitate students’ conceptual understanding of chemistry?: A history and philosophy of science perspective. Retrieved from http://old.iupac.org/publications/ cei/vol6/05Niaz.pdf
NRC—National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning, DC: National Academies Press.
Nuangchalerm, P. (2014). Inquiry-based learning in China: lesson learned for school science practices. Asian Sosial Science, 10 (13), 64-71
Prince, M. & Felder, R. (2007). The many faces of inductive teaching and learning. Journal of College Science Teaching, 36(5), 14-20.
Redhana, I W. (2009). Pengembangan Program Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Terbimbing Untuk meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa pada Mata Pelajaran Kimia SMA. Disertasi. Bandung: UPI.
Reigeluth, C.M. (1999). What is Instructional Design Theory and How is it Changing? Dalam C.M. Reigeluth (Ed.). Instructional Design Theory and Model, Vol. 2 (pp. 5-29). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Sadia, I Wayan. 1998. Reformasi Pendidikan Sains (sains) Menuju Masyarakat yang Literasi Sains dan Teknologi. Orasi Pengukuhan Guru Besar Tetap. Singaraja: STKIP Singaraja.
Spencer, T.L. & Tracy M.W. (2012). Creating a love for science for elementary students through inquiry-based learning. Journal of Virginia Science Education, 4 (2), 18-25
Turkmen, H. (2006). What Technology Plays Supporting Role in Learning Cycle Approach for Science Educational. TOJET, 5 (2), 1303-1321
Warpala, I.W.S. (2008). Pengaruh Pendekatan Pembelajaran dan Strategi Belajar Kooperatif yang Berbeda terhadap Pemahaman dan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis dalam Pembelajaran sains di SD. Desertasi. Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang.
Wiske, M.S. & Beatty, B.J. (2009). Fostering Understanding Outcome. Dalam C.M. Reigeluth, & A.A. Carr-Cheliman (Eds.), Instructional-Design Theories and Models: Building a Common Knowledge Base, Vol. 3 (pp. 195-197), New York: Routledge
Young, M.F., Nastasi, B.K., & Braunhardt, L. (1996). Implementating Jasper Immersion: A Case of conceptual change. Dalam B.G. Witson (Ed): Constructivist Learning Environment: Case Studies Instructional Design, (pp 121-133). Englewood Cliff, New Jersey: Educational Technology Publication, Inc.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Authors who publish with the Journal of Education Technology agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)
